Live stream not working in Chrome or Edge?

Bookmark list

Transcript

Event transcript
Alright, so this is, uh, the development review committee, uh, November 7th, 2024 is currently 9:03 AM, uh, mountain time. 00:00:05
Uh, so let's just do a quick, uh, roll call, uh. 00:00:14
Uh, Alexa, so. 00:00:17
Nothing would like to start. 00:00:19
Umm, this is Madison Reed, planning technician. 00:00:23
Brian Vodgery, parks and Rec director. 00:00:28
The King endure for the worst Director, city engineer, the Arctic chair. 00:00:30
Chris Johnson, billing official. 00:00:34
Brandon Valley Fire Prevention. 00:00:36
And then the two guys on the sidelines. 00:00:38
Anthony Fletcher. 00:00:43
Planner. 00:00:45
Patrick James, assistant engineer. 00:00:47
All right, I appreciate everyone for showing up. Uh, so umm. 00:00:49
Moving forward on the 1st consent item approval of minutes. 00:00:54
Uh, May 2nd, 2024 development review committee draft in minutes. Uh, so is there does, uh, anyone have any comments on this, uh, 00:00:58
on the stand? 00:01:02
Or whatever. 00:01:08
Up here. Does anyone have any comments on this? 00:01:09
No comment across the board. Uh, Anthony, is there any? 00:01:11
Think of notes on those. 00:01:15
What happened? 00:01:17
If there's any changes from last time that we should know about, I didn't see anything. 00:01:19
All right, so do we have a motion to, uh, approve the minute? 00:01:23
I want a motion to approve the minute. 00:01:27
All right. Uh, any denial? Is this all in favor? 00:01:31
All right, all right, so we. 00:01:35
So then that's have been proved. 00:01:37
For April, uh, excuse me, May 7th, 2024. Uh, so we do have one business island, however, uh, the option is not here. I'll let 00:01:39
Anthony, uh, read this discussion in terms of how we offer you to proceed. 00:01:45
No, he's not he he was requested to be online. 00:01:56
We're going to make that happen. 00:02:02
So are you gonna be talking about how we proceed, uh, with this item with. 00:02:05
Uh, with the without. 00:02:10
I I want to. 00:02:16
Just let you be aware of the fact that the applicants that we talk to us. 00:02:19
Two months later. 00:02:24
Uh, last night. 00:02:25
And we're gonna, you know, get back to him in time. 00:02:27
That's the one I can do remote. 00:02:30
I mean, it's a request to extend by recording the process for another six months extension. I would, I mean, I think we have, uh, 00:02:37
just myself, I think there's more people that have multiple questions that would. 00:02:44
We, uh, want to ask in regards to why the expansion, because it's not, it's not a, uh, like a technical type item. This is not a. 00:02:51
I mean, it's not technical any kind of nature and I don't think there's any kind of administration administrative type. 00:02:59
Uh, you know, uh, items as well. It's more of a more of a request. 00:03:04
Uh, foreign administrative action. So I would think that the Afghan. 00:03:10
We want we we would need to ask, excuse me. 00:03:14
In order to. 00:03:16
They say why make the case and then if we have any questions and be able to answer those questions, I don't think that there. 00:03:18
You know, moving forward over the approval or denial of it would, uh, be injustice for either parties. That's mine, that's mine. 00:03:25
That's the, that's the way I view it right now, but. 00:03:29
Uh, I'll let anyone else, uh, put in their opinion. 00:03:34
I agree. 00:03:39
OK, so we got one person with agreement, Brian. 00:03:41
Yes. What do you think? I guess, Anthony, do you know the reasons why? 00:03:45
I have, umm, some reason. 00:03:49
I don't know if that's proper. Alright, I guess pop up bro, call me. I don't know how when it comes down to the. 00:03:56
Uh, I can't answer in terms of how the. 00:04:08
How? Yeah, like in terms of what's acceptable? Umm. 00:04:11
Presence of an applicant would be. I mean I'm nothing has to be technically in person, but if you're not in person, you're not. 00:04:16
Of them or anything like that, how would how would that work? 00:04:22
A phone call, I'm not sure if that would, if that's acceptable to you, I mean. 00:04:25
Uh, and, and, uh, we care that we need to carry on highly PRC, but the time you want to be kind of, uh, look towards you guys to 00:04:29
determine. 00:04:33
If it's within our limits or not, just seeing. Has there been a precedent in the past with, umm, other meetings where people have 00:04:37
been online? 00:04:41
Versus and find out the accounts, I mean, we've had online every time people, uh, come in online like this, for example, 00:04:46
yesterday's Planning Commission meeting. 00:04:50
We had a planner. 00:04:54
Who presented, uh, items online? I would think that we did this. If we would do for our staff, we would do it for Atkins as well. 00:04:56
But I mean, phone call like that, umm, if he's online, great. I mean, I know that if, if he if those phone calls accessible. 00:05:04
I'm not going to say no, but then again, I'm not. I can't cut the line of what's acceptable and not acceptable in terms of. 00:05:12
So I I would say legalities of the of the public of a public meeting. 00:05:18
OK, OK. 00:05:31
I mean, and this is, I'm asking the group again, I mean, if we're not going to accept like a phone call and to allow the applicant 00:05:41
to be present and so forth, just to wait, uh, I would rather wait. But if you would like to. 00:05:46
Share the reasons but and then but we don't vote. 00:05:52
We all make a decision then maybe based on what you share with us, we may or may not have additional questions where the applicant 00:05:55
can at least provide to the applicants. 00:05:59
And the napkin can at least come. 00:06:04
Next time we present, we we bring a few things. 00:06:06
The questions that we have now would at least have been answered. So just people are advantageous to all of us. Is everyone fine 00:06:09
with that? 00:06:13
Just make it more of a work session. 00:06:17
10 Business 5. 00:06:19
All right, so I can resist it, but, uh, so that we have to do official, uh. 00:06:21
Uh, customer says that time and move it to work session. 00:06:24
OK, so I mean again if it's. 00:06:29
I don't like that. I I don't wanna be the one who makes the call in terms of what's legally acceptable and present. Umm, but I 00:06:32
don't want to. 00:06:35
Uh, do something that would, uh. 00:06:39
Void, uh, this person's, uh, void decision that would have to be done on that. 00:06:41
Umm, alright, with that being said, do we have a motion? 00:06:47
Uh, postpone the business item 3.1 whole way sales plus 1B request for a six month class recording extension, uh to umm, as you 00:06:51
have to say the date of our next year or three or just the future of the year. 00:06:57
Uh, I was just a feature you are saying? 00:07:05
I'll motion to postpone. 00:07:07
OK, we have a second. 00:07:09
All right. And then all in favor. 00:07:12
All right, all right, all right. How does that sound? But, uh, now. 00:07:14
But that being said, we have a work session, no arms on our work session. However, I, I think, uh, I believe, uh, Anthony may 00:07:17
have, uh, something we'd like to ask about so. 00:07:21
Let's have it to a work session. Uh, I have to leave the work session. 00:07:25
That would like to have a discussion on. 00:07:28
Umm, or do we just make a committee report? 00:07:31
I mean, if you don't have work session out here, can we officially talk about? 00:07:34
You know application. 00:07:39
OK, so let's just say umm. 00:07:42
This is making a get the work session. Let's just make this a, uh, staff report. 00:07:45
Uh, that's why we're not buying ourselves in a legal window of, uh, having worse questions that without, uh, properly posted 00:07:50
notice, yeah. 00:07:54
And then since we have no work session, we're moving on to staff Commission committee reports. I believe Anthony has staff reports 00:07:57
to provide us. 00:08:01
Uh, go ahead, Sir. 00:08:05
Thank you very much. 00:08:07
Appreciate you going through the faster you will. 00:08:08
Enough that that's for our aluminum. 00:08:12
So I want to share my screen. 00:08:17
Tested, pushed on the same day. 00:08:21
Once again proposal. 00:08:23
So Apple invested in negative. 00:08:26
Was open to. 00:08:28
Have an extension for this. 00:08:31
Uh, class. 00:08:33
Which was approved umm, last year in October. 00:08:34
So the. 00:08:39
The code requires that after a year if they still want to keep an approval. 00:08:41
Seven they would have to apply for. 00:08:47
A six month extension and they can do that twice. 00:08:51
To make it a fortune year. 00:08:55
Uh, of maintaining, you know, approved flight. 00:08:57
So in the quarter? 00:09:01
When is the application reached out? 00:09:02
They shared that the. 00:09:05
The relative deal that we had to sell these lots and making them. 00:09:08
You know, biggest application fell through. 00:09:13
So you have held on to, you know, the record. 00:09:16
Until. 00:09:20
Is that to help hold on the recording until they find a new buyer for the lot? 00:09:21
And he did mention to me. 00:09:25
And UH-2 meetings that we had that. 00:09:29
They have a new buyer and they're working on due diligence right now. 00:09:32
And paperwork, so they're hoping to have this recorded in three months. 00:09:37
So having the six month extension is going to be a good one for them. 00:09:42
While they work through the sale process. 00:09:46
But in the meantime, that's the main reason why. 00:09:49
They have not re recorded it and I request them for this extension. 00:09:53
So, and that's the the other asking for extension, uh, uh. 00:09:59
Uh, due to the sales. 00:10:05
Yes, transaction, yes, they're they're asking just to make sure that the transaction happens before I mean. 00:10:08
I guess my other question comes down to, I mean, if they record this, uh. 00:10:16
I mean. 00:10:20
In terms of, umm, kind of like making a decision based on priorities between, uh, between, uh, actions, between 2:00 private 00:10:21
parties. 00:10:25
I mean, and that's the way I look at it. 00:10:28
But, uh, we combine the box or combine, combine that lot, uh, and in essence, umm, I mean. 00:10:30
The applicant said that they had interested party, uh, to do it and that's why they were doing it. But I don't think we could find 00:10:38
a lot. 00:10:41
Just because. 00:10:45
Of a person who wants to purchase it. 00:10:47
But because the developer themselves was requesting it, uh, requesting a combination and our code allow those. 00:10:49
I would say that I would rather find a reason other than. 00:10:56
A delayed financial transaction in terms of why not, uh, to, uh, record the class. 00:11:00
Uh, in terms of the options, uh, and then in my opinion is. 00:11:07
What happens between 2:00 private parties is not in our control and I don't want to make our decisions based on on that. 00:11:12
Definitely umm or not? 00:11:16
Personally, but as a, as a, as a doctor, if, uh, because the applicant can easily just go ahead and report it. 00:11:20
And. 00:11:27
What, what what happens between? 00:11:28
The two private parties is what happens to two private parties whether they sell to that person or they sell. 00:11:31
Like 5 days later. 00:11:37
Six months later, 810 months later, everything that I I would like to. 00:11:38
I would like to, uh, have them bring forward a different, uh, reasoning as to. 00:11:43
Uh, any other comments? 00:11:48
Thank you customers. Are we required requiring a bond for the frequent? 00:11:52
For this. 00:11:58
Umm. 00:12:01
We we are not requiring that because it's part of the. 00:12:03
Umm, the auto wave field development. 00:12:08
Yep, in general improvement. 00:12:15
To be swept or not? 00:12:17
I've not been. 00:12:18
So. 00:12:20
Yes. 00:12:22
So. 00:12:23
For the plant only, it has not been required until so when we're working through the review process. 00:12:24
Uh, we came to an understanding because this was way before the new one year whole thing started like even before DRC. 00:12:31
Became the approval body, but the discussion back then was. 00:12:39
Umm, just to be able to have. 00:12:44
Umm, a part of this lot. 00:12:47
Sold to a private party. 00:12:49
At a time to make them able to use the last 6167. 00:12:52
As an additional, you know, uh. 00:12:58
Play parts or something for a house right South of it which is in Sleepy Ridge. So that was the main intent for this whole 1B. 00:13:01
Plot to how it started. 00:13:11
Uh, the improvement. 00:13:14
Was not being required at the time because there were a lot of you know. 00:13:16
Discussions in the air about. 00:13:21
How things are going to go with those lots in general, knowing that 167. 00:13:23
Was going to lit literally front. 00:13:29
South, which is much closer to the, you know, the the new owner that they wanted to have. 00:13:32
And I wanted to buy this. 00:13:38
Umm in answering your question. 00:13:40
It was going to be the next step for them to be able to get building permit. 00:13:43
As well. Just go through LDP. 00:13:48
Where all of those things are going to be possibly, uh, required? 00:13:51
Before they can even. 00:13:55
Submit for building permit on any of the lots. 00:13:57
So that's the long answer for. 00:14:00
And no, it wasn't required at the time. 00:14:04
I have a comment. Is there anything specifically in the city ordinance or code or whatever that's umm. 00:14:08
You know regulates the six months extension that are discriminating factors for allowing the six monthly. 00:14:15
Extension. 00:14:23
That makes sense what I'm asking. 00:14:26
Because, because I understand you correctly, you're you're asking if there's anything in the code that prohibits. 00:14:28
Uh, approval of the six months? 00:14:35
Umm, it's on the judgment. I think it's nothing in the call, but I can pull it up. What what we have in the code is they're 00:14:38
allowed to do that. 00:14:42
Umm, based on the judgment of the DRC. 00:14:47
There isn't. There isn't an outline of. 00:14:50
Umm, if they don't meet a certain criteria because it's already been approved anyway, so it's just an extension for them to have 00:14:53
more time. 00:14:57
For the recommendation, So the answer is no, OK, is there and the kind of, uh, piggybacking off these questions anything because 00:15:01
that, that is like, you know, uh, kind of conditions as to reasons as to why and then take some extension would be allowed. 00:15:07
Right now, so for instance there's like XYZ 123. 00:15:14
You don't have to find out now out now you can find. I mean, I think if you send a, it's uh, I think before the next DRC, you send 00:15:19
a, uh, e-mail to the group. 00:15:23
Just giving us some background in terms of extensions because like I said, uh. 00:15:28
Or like a, a brand new, uh, kind of brand pointed out. We just wanna make sure that our decision is being made based on, uh, code 00:15:34
allowances and not what they're allowed to do, what they're not allowed to do. 00:15:39
You know, and stare it out, you know, like, I understand the reason. I just wanna make sure that's our re uh, you know, our 00:15:45
decision is based on. 00:15:49
Something more just. 00:15:53
Uh, you know. 00:15:54
And personal I, I was, I was personal. 00:15:56
You know that because it allows us to make decisions based on personal requests and nothing else, and that'll be good. 00:16:00
Alright, bye. You're ready, Sir. 00:16:06
No. 00:16:07
Uh, hi, there I was. Bye. 00:16:09
Is that anything? That's everything I can do. Thank you so much. You're welcome. I appreciate. I appreciate your flexibility. 00:16:11
Uh, so umm, is there any other staff Commission committee report? 00:16:17
Nothing from planning uh uh, fabric. Anything from engineering. 00:16:22
No, that's great. All right, Well, if that's the case, that, uh, through the motion to adjourn. 00:16:27
I want. I want to. Nope, I. 00:16:33
Uh, listen to your journey. Let's go. 00:16:34
I'll be back. 00:16:36
Thank you. 00:16:39