Development Review Committee
Live stream not working in Chrome or Edge?
Troubleshooting steps
In your browser: open Menu (three dots) → Settings → System → turn off “Use graphics acceleration when available.” Then restart the browser.
Bookmark list
Transcript
| Alright, so this is, uh, the development review committee, uh, November 7th, 2024 is currently 9:03 AM, uh, mountain time. | 00:00:05 | |
| Uh, so let's just do a quick, uh, roll call, uh. | 00:00:14 | |
| Uh, Alexa, so. | 00:00:17 | |
| Nothing would like to start. | 00:00:19 | |
| Umm, this is Madison Reed, planning technician. | 00:00:23 | |
| Brian Vodgery, parks and Rec director. | 00:00:28 | |
| The King endure for the worst Director, city engineer, the Arctic chair. | 00:00:30 | |
| Chris Johnson, billing official. | 00:00:34 | |
| Brandon Valley Fire Prevention. | 00:00:36 | |
| And then the two guys on the sidelines. | 00:00:38 | |
| Anthony Fletcher. | 00:00:43 | |
| Planner. | 00:00:45 | |
| Patrick James, assistant engineer. | 00:00:47 | |
| All right, I appreciate everyone for showing up. Uh, so umm. | 00:00:49 | |
| Moving forward on the 1st consent item approval of minutes. | 00:00:54 | |
| Uh, May 2nd, 2024 development review committee draft in minutes. Uh, so is there does, uh, anyone have any comments on this, uh, | 00:00:58 | |
| on the stand? | 00:01:02 | |
| Or whatever. | 00:01:08 | |
| Up here. Does anyone have any comments on this? | 00:01:09 | |
| No comment across the board. Uh, Anthony, is there any? | 00:01:11 | |
| Think of notes on those. | 00:01:15 | |
| What happened? | 00:01:17 | |
| If there's any changes from last time that we should know about, I didn't see anything. | 00:01:19 | |
| All right, so do we have a motion to, uh, approve the minute? | 00:01:23 | |
| I want a motion to approve the minute. | 00:01:27 | |
| All right. Uh, any denial? Is this all in favor? | 00:01:31 | |
| All right, all right, so we. | 00:01:35 | |
| So then that's have been proved. | 00:01:37 | |
| For April, uh, excuse me, May 7th, 2024. Uh, so we do have one business island, however, uh, the option is not here. I'll let | 00:01:39 | |
| Anthony, uh, read this discussion in terms of how we offer you to proceed. | 00:01:45 | |
| No, he's not he he was requested to be online. | 00:01:56 | |
| We're going to make that happen. | 00:02:02 | |
| So are you gonna be talking about how we proceed, uh, with this item with. | 00:02:05 | |
| Uh, with the without. | 00:02:10 | |
| I I want to. | 00:02:16 | |
| Just let you be aware of the fact that the applicants that we talk to us. | 00:02:19 | |
| Two months later. | 00:02:24 | |
| Uh, last night. | 00:02:25 | |
| And we're gonna, you know, get back to him in time. | 00:02:27 | |
| That's the one I can do remote. | 00:02:30 | |
| I mean, it's a request to extend by recording the process for another six months extension. I would, I mean, I think we have, uh, | 00:02:37 | |
| just myself, I think there's more people that have multiple questions that would. | 00:02:44 | |
| We, uh, want to ask in regards to why the expansion, because it's not, it's not a, uh, like a technical type item. This is not a. | 00:02:51 | |
| I mean, it's not technical any kind of nature and I don't think there's any kind of administration administrative type. | 00:02:59 | |
| Uh, you know, uh, items as well. It's more of a more of a request. | 00:03:04 | |
| Uh, foreign administrative action. So I would think that the Afghan. | 00:03:10 | |
| We want we we would need to ask, excuse me. | 00:03:14 | |
| In order to. | 00:03:16 | |
| They say why make the case and then if we have any questions and be able to answer those questions, I don't think that there. | 00:03:18 | |
| You know, moving forward over the approval or denial of it would, uh, be injustice for either parties. That's mine, that's mine. | 00:03:25 | |
| That's the, that's the way I view it right now, but. | 00:03:29 | |
| Uh, I'll let anyone else, uh, put in their opinion. | 00:03:34 | |
| I agree. | 00:03:39 | |
| OK, so we got one person with agreement, Brian. | 00:03:41 | |
| Yes. What do you think? I guess, Anthony, do you know the reasons why? | 00:03:45 | |
| I have, umm, some reason. | 00:03:49 | |
| I don't know if that's proper. Alright, I guess pop up bro, call me. I don't know how when it comes down to the. | 00:03:56 | |
| Uh, I can't answer in terms of how the. | 00:04:08 | |
| How? Yeah, like in terms of what's acceptable? Umm. | 00:04:11 | |
| Presence of an applicant would be. I mean I'm nothing has to be technically in person, but if you're not in person, you're not. | 00:04:16 | |
| Of them or anything like that, how would how would that work? | 00:04:22 | |
| A phone call, I'm not sure if that would, if that's acceptable to you, I mean. | 00:04:25 | |
| Uh, and, and, uh, we care that we need to carry on highly PRC, but the time you want to be kind of, uh, look towards you guys to | 00:04:29 | |
| determine. | 00:04:33 | |
| If it's within our limits or not, just seeing. Has there been a precedent in the past with, umm, other meetings where people have | 00:04:37 | |
| been online? | 00:04:41 | |
| Versus and find out the accounts, I mean, we've had online every time people, uh, come in online like this, for example, | 00:04:46 | |
| yesterday's Planning Commission meeting. | 00:04:50 | |
| We had a planner. | 00:04:54 | |
| Who presented, uh, items online? I would think that we did this. If we would do for our staff, we would do it for Atkins as well. | 00:04:56 | |
| But I mean, phone call like that, umm, if he's online, great. I mean, I know that if, if he if those phone calls accessible. | 00:05:04 | |
| I'm not going to say no, but then again, I'm not. I can't cut the line of what's acceptable and not acceptable in terms of. | 00:05:12 | |
| So I I would say legalities of the of the public of a public meeting. | 00:05:18 | |
| OK, OK. | 00:05:31 | |
| I mean, and this is, I'm asking the group again, I mean, if we're not going to accept like a phone call and to allow the applicant | 00:05:41 | |
| to be present and so forth, just to wait, uh, I would rather wait. But if you would like to. | 00:05:46 | |
| Share the reasons but and then but we don't vote. | 00:05:52 | |
| We all make a decision then maybe based on what you share with us, we may or may not have additional questions where the applicant | 00:05:55 | |
| can at least provide to the applicants. | 00:05:59 | |
| And the napkin can at least come. | 00:06:04 | |
| Next time we present, we we bring a few things. | 00:06:06 | |
| The questions that we have now would at least have been answered. So just people are advantageous to all of us. Is everyone fine | 00:06:09 | |
| with that? | 00:06:13 | |
| Just make it more of a work session. | 00:06:17 | |
| 10 Business 5. | 00:06:19 | |
| All right, so I can resist it, but, uh, so that we have to do official, uh. | 00:06:21 | |
| Uh, customer says that time and move it to work session. | 00:06:24 | |
| OK, so I mean again if it's. | 00:06:29 | |
| I don't like that. I I don't wanna be the one who makes the call in terms of what's legally acceptable and present. Umm, but I | 00:06:32 | |
| don't want to. | 00:06:35 | |
| Uh, do something that would, uh. | 00:06:39 | |
| Void, uh, this person's, uh, void decision that would have to be done on that. | 00:06:41 | |
| Umm, alright, with that being said, do we have a motion? | 00:06:47 | |
| Uh, postpone the business item 3.1 whole way sales plus 1B request for a six month class recording extension, uh to umm, as you | 00:06:51 | |
| have to say the date of our next year or three or just the future of the year. | 00:06:57 | |
| Uh, I was just a feature you are saying? | 00:07:05 | |
| I'll motion to postpone. | 00:07:07 | |
| OK, we have a second. | 00:07:09 | |
| All right. And then all in favor. | 00:07:12 | |
| All right, all right, all right. How does that sound? But, uh, now. | 00:07:14 | |
| But that being said, we have a work session, no arms on our work session. However, I, I think, uh, I believe, uh, Anthony may | 00:07:17 | |
| have, uh, something we'd like to ask about so. | 00:07:21 | |
| Let's have it to a work session. Uh, I have to leave the work session. | 00:07:25 | |
| That would like to have a discussion on. | 00:07:28 | |
| Umm, or do we just make a committee report? | 00:07:31 | |
| I mean, if you don't have work session out here, can we officially talk about? | 00:07:34 | |
| You know application. | 00:07:39 | |
| OK, so let's just say umm. | 00:07:42 | |
| This is making a get the work session. Let's just make this a, uh, staff report. | 00:07:45 | |
| Uh, that's why we're not buying ourselves in a legal window of, uh, having worse questions that without, uh, properly posted | 00:07:50 | |
| notice, yeah. | 00:07:54 | |
| And then since we have no work session, we're moving on to staff Commission committee reports. I believe Anthony has staff reports | 00:07:57 | |
| to provide us. | 00:08:01 | |
| Uh, go ahead, Sir. | 00:08:05 | |
| Thank you very much. | 00:08:07 | |
| Appreciate you going through the faster you will. | 00:08:08 | |
| Enough that that's for our aluminum. | 00:08:12 | |
| So I want to share my screen. | 00:08:17 | |
| Tested, pushed on the same day. | 00:08:21 | |
| Once again proposal. | 00:08:23 | |
| So Apple invested in negative. | 00:08:26 | |
| Was open to. | 00:08:28 | |
| Have an extension for this. | 00:08:31 | |
| Uh, class. | 00:08:33 | |
| Which was approved umm, last year in October. | 00:08:34 | |
| So the. | 00:08:39 | |
| The code requires that after a year if they still want to keep an approval. | 00:08:41 | |
| Seven they would have to apply for. | 00:08:47 | |
| A six month extension and they can do that twice. | 00:08:51 | |
| To make it a fortune year. | 00:08:55 | |
| Uh, of maintaining, you know, approved flight. | 00:08:57 | |
| So in the quarter? | 00:09:01 | |
| When is the application reached out? | 00:09:02 | |
| They shared that the. | 00:09:05 | |
| The relative deal that we had to sell these lots and making them. | 00:09:08 | |
| You know, biggest application fell through. | 00:09:13 | |
| So you have held on to, you know, the record. | 00:09:16 | |
| Until. | 00:09:20 | |
| Is that to help hold on the recording until they find a new buyer for the lot? | 00:09:21 | |
| And he did mention to me. | 00:09:25 | |
| And UH-2 meetings that we had that. | 00:09:29 | |
| They have a new buyer and they're working on due diligence right now. | 00:09:32 | |
| And paperwork, so they're hoping to have this recorded in three months. | 00:09:37 | |
| So having the six month extension is going to be a good one for them. | 00:09:42 | |
| While they work through the sale process. | 00:09:46 | |
| But in the meantime, that's the main reason why. | 00:09:49 | |
| They have not re recorded it and I request them for this extension. | 00:09:53 | |
| So, and that's the the other asking for extension, uh, uh. | 00:09:59 | |
| Uh, due to the sales. | 00:10:05 | |
| Yes, transaction, yes, they're they're asking just to make sure that the transaction happens before I mean. | 00:10:08 | |
| I guess my other question comes down to, I mean, if they record this, uh. | 00:10:16 | |
| I mean. | 00:10:20 | |
| In terms of, umm, kind of like making a decision based on priorities between, uh, between, uh, actions, between 2:00 private | 00:10:21 | |
| parties. | 00:10:25 | |
| I mean, and that's the way I look at it. | 00:10:28 | |
| But, uh, we combine the box or combine, combine that lot, uh, and in essence, umm, I mean. | 00:10:30 | |
| The applicant said that they had interested party, uh, to do it and that's why they were doing it. But I don't think we could find | 00:10:38 | |
| a lot. | 00:10:41 | |
| Just because. | 00:10:45 | |
| Of a person who wants to purchase it. | 00:10:47 | |
| But because the developer themselves was requesting it, uh, requesting a combination and our code allow those. | 00:10:49 | |
| I would say that I would rather find a reason other than. | 00:10:56 | |
| A delayed financial transaction in terms of why not, uh, to, uh, record the class. | 00:11:00 | |
| Uh, in terms of the options, uh, and then in my opinion is. | 00:11:07 | |
| What happens between 2:00 private parties is not in our control and I don't want to make our decisions based on on that. | 00:11:12 | |
| Definitely umm or not? | 00:11:16 | |
| Personally, but as a, as a, as a doctor, if, uh, because the applicant can easily just go ahead and report it. | 00:11:20 | |
| And. | 00:11:27 | |
| What, what what happens between? | 00:11:28 | |
| The two private parties is what happens to two private parties whether they sell to that person or they sell. | 00:11:31 | |
| Like 5 days later. | 00:11:37 | |
| Six months later, 810 months later, everything that I I would like to. | 00:11:38 | |
| I would like to, uh, have them bring forward a different, uh, reasoning as to. | 00:11:43 | |
| Uh, any other comments? | 00:11:48 | |
| Thank you customers. Are we required requiring a bond for the frequent? | 00:11:52 | |
| For this. | 00:11:58 | |
| Umm. | 00:12:01 | |
| We we are not requiring that because it's part of the. | 00:12:03 | |
| Umm, the auto wave field development. | 00:12:08 | |
| Yep, in general improvement. | 00:12:15 | |
| To be swept or not? | 00:12:17 | |
| I've not been. | 00:12:18 | |
| So. | 00:12:20 | |
| Yes. | 00:12:22 | |
| So. | 00:12:23 | |
| For the plant only, it has not been required until so when we're working through the review process. | 00:12:24 | |
| Uh, we came to an understanding because this was way before the new one year whole thing started like even before DRC. | 00:12:31 | |
| Became the approval body, but the discussion back then was. | 00:12:39 | |
| Umm, just to be able to have. | 00:12:44 | |
| Umm, a part of this lot. | 00:12:47 | |
| Sold to a private party. | 00:12:49 | |
| At a time to make them able to use the last 6167. | 00:12:52 | |
| As an additional, you know, uh. | 00:12:58 | |
| Play parts or something for a house right South of it which is in Sleepy Ridge. So that was the main intent for this whole 1B. | 00:13:01 | |
| Plot to how it started. | 00:13:11 | |
| Uh, the improvement. | 00:13:14 | |
| Was not being required at the time because there were a lot of you know. | 00:13:16 | |
| Discussions in the air about. | 00:13:21 | |
| How things are going to go with those lots in general, knowing that 167. | 00:13:23 | |
| Was going to lit literally front. | 00:13:29 | |
| South, which is much closer to the, you know, the the new owner that they wanted to have. | 00:13:32 | |
| And I wanted to buy this. | 00:13:38 | |
| Umm in answering your question. | 00:13:40 | |
| It was going to be the next step for them to be able to get building permit. | 00:13:43 | |
| As well. Just go through LDP. | 00:13:48 | |
| Where all of those things are going to be possibly, uh, required? | 00:13:51 | |
| Before they can even. | 00:13:55 | |
| Submit for building permit on any of the lots. | 00:13:57 | |
| So that's the long answer for. | 00:14:00 | |
| And no, it wasn't required at the time. | 00:14:04 | |
| I have a comment. Is there anything specifically in the city ordinance or code or whatever that's umm. | 00:14:08 | |
| You know regulates the six months extension that are discriminating factors for allowing the six monthly. | 00:14:15 | |
| Extension. | 00:14:23 | |
| That makes sense what I'm asking. | 00:14:26 | |
| Because, because I understand you correctly, you're you're asking if there's anything in the code that prohibits. | 00:14:28 | |
| Uh, approval of the six months? | 00:14:35 | |
| Umm, it's on the judgment. I think it's nothing in the call, but I can pull it up. What what we have in the code is they're | 00:14:38 | |
| allowed to do that. | 00:14:42 | |
| Umm, based on the judgment of the DRC. | 00:14:47 | |
| There isn't. There isn't an outline of. | 00:14:50 | |
| Umm, if they don't meet a certain criteria because it's already been approved anyway, so it's just an extension for them to have | 00:14:53 | |
| more time. | 00:14:57 | |
| For the recommendation, So the answer is no, OK, is there and the kind of, uh, piggybacking off these questions anything because | 00:15:01 | |
| that, that is like, you know, uh, kind of conditions as to reasons as to why and then take some extension would be allowed. | 00:15:07 | |
| Right now, so for instance there's like XYZ 123. | 00:15:14 | |
| You don't have to find out now out now you can find. I mean, I think if you send a, it's uh, I think before the next DRC, you send | 00:15:19 | |
| a, uh, e-mail to the group. | 00:15:23 | |
| Just giving us some background in terms of extensions because like I said, uh. | 00:15:28 | |
| Or like a, a brand new, uh, kind of brand pointed out. We just wanna make sure that our decision is being made based on, uh, code | 00:15:34 | |
| allowances and not what they're allowed to do, what they're not allowed to do. | 00:15:39 | |
| You know, and stare it out, you know, like, I understand the reason. I just wanna make sure that's our re uh, you know, our | 00:15:45 | |
| decision is based on. | 00:15:49 | |
| Something more just. | 00:15:53 | |
| Uh, you know. | 00:15:54 | |
| And personal I, I was, I was personal. | 00:15:56 | |
| You know that because it allows us to make decisions based on personal requests and nothing else, and that'll be good. | 00:16:00 | |
| Alright, bye. You're ready, Sir. | 00:16:06 | |
| No. | 00:16:07 | |
| Uh, hi, there I was. Bye. | 00:16:09 | |
| Is that anything? That's everything I can do. Thank you so much. You're welcome. I appreciate. I appreciate your flexibility. | 00:16:11 | |
| Uh, so umm, is there any other staff Commission committee report? | 00:16:17 | |
| Nothing from planning uh uh, fabric. Anything from engineering. | 00:16:22 | |
| No, that's great. All right, Well, if that's the case, that, uh, through the motion to adjourn. | 00:16:27 | |
| I want. I want to. Nope, I. | 00:16:33 | |
| Uh, listen to your journey. Let's go. | 00:16:34 | |
| I'll be back. | 00:16:36 | |
| Thank you. | 00:16:39 |