Live stream not working in Chrome or Edge? Click Here
No Bookmarks Exist.
Welcome. Good morning. This is the Development Review Committee. December 1924 is 9. 00:00:38
02 AM. 00:00:46
And we were calling, calling the DRC in session. So to begin it off, I'll just do a quick roll call. We'll start off to my left 00:00:49
with a Miss Madison. 00:00:55
This is Madison Reed, the planning technician. 00:01:03
Eric Ellis, City Manager, Morgan Brand, Community Development director. I'm assuming the Republic of the worst director, City 00:01:06
engineer. 00:01:09
Chris Johnson, building official. 00:01:12
Brandon Valley Orem Fire Department. 00:01:14
Brian Vaudrey, parks and rec director. 00:01:16
Anthony Fletcher, a planner. I appreciate everyone coming today. So as we wrap up 2024, we're going to be gearing up for 2025 with 00:01:19
a, I guess with a bang and what that bang is said to be seen so far. But that being said, we do have some items on our agenda. The 00:01:27
first item. 00:01:35
The first set of items, excuse me, is consent items 2.12.22.3. 00:01:43
Approval of DRC minutes June 20th, 20, June 20th, July the 11th, July 25th respectively. 00:01:48
So I'll start off. Does anyone have any questions, comments about those minutes? 00:02:00
There's no comments or questions. Do I have a motion to approve? Motion to approve the consent agenda first? Is there a second, 00:02:08
Sir? 00:02:11
Second, I got a second. So now all in favor of approving the motions. 00:02:16
Hi, sweet. So we've. 00:02:22
Approve the minutes on the consent agenda. So we're going into our next item. The next item is business items, so 3.21 DRC bylaws, 00:02:26
discussion and approval. That being said, I believe it's Mr. Anthony Fletcher who's going to be taking the lead. 00:02:34
Go ahead, Sir. 00:02:45
Thank you very much here. 00:02:47
So in leading this discussion, I would want to ask a very quick question. Did you all have the chance to review the bylaws before 00:02:48
the meeting? 00:02:54
Or have you had the chance to ever review? Could you define before the meeting? 00:03:01
Pardon to define before the meeting is in, as we're talking right now. 00:03:05
So I think it would be a good idea, good if everyone's in agreement, if you just gave a quick summary of the bylaws for everyone's 00:03:09
everyone, everyone situational awareness and of course anyone who anyone in the public who may be listening to this currently or 00:03:14
in the future. Okay, thank you. 00:03:19
All right, so. 00:03:25
Chair, this is a draft bylaw that will, umm, eventually help keep us all in line during this meeting. And what I mean in line is. 00:03:27
To umm, uh. 00:03:39
Regulate the UMM. 00:03:41
Regulate and formalized the structure of DRC, its makeup, how we operate, what is required of us in terms of reviews and 00:03:44
approvals, as well as the powers that. 00:03:51
The DRC has. 00:03:59
As an institution or an establishment, so. 00:04:02
Instead of having to go through every single section of the. 00:04:07
Of the drafted. 00:04:12
Bylaws. 00:04:17
I would want to share my screen right now. 00:04:19
Yes, so I'd want to. 00:04:49
Go through the various sections briefly. We talk about the purpose being that the DRC will serve the purpose of a land use 00:04:53
authority for all final subdivision applications and technical review authority as well for all proposed developments and 00:05:01
development applications, including site plans for. 00:05:09
Compliance with applicable codes, ordinances, standards within the City of Vineyards. 00:05:18
This is the reason why. 00:05:25
Before every. 00:05:27
Proposed plan or site plan goes to Planning Commission. It comes here. We have you, you know, discuss issues on it, whether we are 00:05:30
all fine with it though you're not the approval body. 00:05:36
You make it safe to. 00:05:43
Us as planners that it's OK to go to Planning Commission for final approval. We bring in all the final plots. 00:05:46
Here and you are the final authority over that. So we want to make sure that things like that is all captured here and being the 00:05:55
final authority, you also have the authority to extend. 00:06:01
Application permits that have been expired for the final plat as well and it's all in the purpose. 00:06:09
The duties and authority. 00:06:18
Have been outlined here. 00:06:21
The membership. 00:06:24
Shall consist of seven. 00:06:26
Which um. 00:06:28
I have a list I have listed here. 00:06:30
I'll keep losing connection. 00:06:44
Which have been listed. 00:06:48
On here we have the Chair of the Planning Commission or their designee. 00:06:52
The city manager. 00:06:58
The fire Marshall or designee? The head. 00:07:02
Or designee of the building department. 00:07:06
Engineering department, Community development and parks and Recs. 00:07:09
Department as well. 00:07:15
So for the DRC leadership? 00:07:17
We have this document having the chair who will be elected every. 00:07:20
For every year a chair has to be elected. 00:07:28
To lead the affairs and facilitate meetings of the committee. 00:07:32
And that will be the same for a vice chair to assist the chair in its functions and. 00:07:40
Umm, operations. 00:07:48
I also have a section here that talks about the chair pro temp so. 00:07:54
I I got to know recently that it's pro tempore because it's Latin, so that would be updated as well. 00:08:01
In the absence of the chair and vice chair. 00:08:12
The chair can appoint some member on the committee to act as a chair while they're both away. 00:08:15
I have a section here as well. 00:08:27
For secretary. 00:08:30
And in here I said that the community development. 00:08:34
Director or. 00:08:38
May appoint a secretary. 00:08:41
Which is literally what Madison is doing right now, taking notes and umm. 00:08:45
Making sure that everything is organized before meetings. 00:08:52
We can decide to change that if the Chair of this committee wants to do any change to that right now. 00:08:56
This was written before we had medicine, so. 00:09:05
It could be changed. 00:09:08
We have our meetings set. 00:09:11
We have our regular meetings, special meetings, and a quorum because our membership is going to be 7 members. A quorum here is 4. 00:09:14
To have a meeting happen. 00:09:26
Decisions when it comes to voting shall be made by a majority of the vote of members present at a properly held meeting. 00:09:31
With the caveat that no action shall be approved with fewer than four votes. 00:09:41
Are included that the proxy voting is not permitted. 00:09:50
So if anyone is not able to make it in person. 00:09:55
Their votes may not count. They could still participate, but they cannot vote. Is that state code? 00:09:59
Um, I if if, if it's not, I'd recommend that we allow for remote meetings. Yeah, I don't wanna constrain us if. 00:10:05
If we're having an issue getting four and someone can call in. 00:10:13
OK. 00:10:18
Was it? Was it 3 last year and we changed it to four? 00:10:21
Has always been forward, yeah. 00:10:24
Because of the number. 00:10:28
Correction made. Thank you. 00:10:35
There's a section here that talks about amendments of the bylaws. 00:10:42
These bylaws may be amended by a majority vote as well of the DRC members present at a meeting. 00:10:47
Provided that proper notice of the proposed amendment has been given to the DRC members at least 72 hours prior to a meeting that 00:10:55
will require that voting for amending anything on the bylaws. 00:11:03
If there are no changes, we will approve this at the end of the discussion and then the bylaws will take effect immediately. I 00:11:13
mean we will make that date here based on the approval to make the bylaws take effect by the 1st of January next year. So we start 00:11:21
the new year with a new leaf and hopefully. 00:11:30
Just follow through as it should. 00:11:40
Thank you. 00:11:44
I appreciate the. 00:11:48
A good summary on this. 00:11:51
So I can start off with that I do have some. 00:11:55
Comments about the bylaws and. 00:11:58
Most of them are not I was saying none. I would feel that none of them substantial comments that would change the the context of 00:12:03
what the bylaws is to represent so. 00:12:08
Now I can go and down the page on that and then after, of course, I'll open it up to anyone else who would like to interject. And 00:12:14
of course, any items that I kind of talk about is meant to be a kind of a open discussion for any of the other members on there. 00:12:23
So please feel free to interject. How interject? So the first one I have is. 00:12:32
The on Section 2 duties. 00:12:41
Subsection 2 and when it says engage in technical plan reviews and revise on all plans submitted to proposed development within 00:12:44
the Vineyard, I would like to kind of clarify the word technical. 00:12:51
So because there is another technique, there is a technical plans review process. 00:12:59
That's done outside the DRC. So the technical review, the technical review. 00:13:03
Process which is the more in depth. 00:13:10
Engineering plans reviews such as you know, looking at the size of a looking a size of a meter. 00:13:14
Or you know, or like the height of concrete curves along the roadside. I just want to make sure that we kind of clarify that the 00:13:24
intent of the DRC is not to do that type of level of technical review, but more maybe a different type of review. 00:13:33
I guess leave that open to the discussion for the members. I'm not sure what other words we would want to use as technical. 00:13:44
We could probably. 00:13:51
Either take the technical out or just make it a preliminary technical review where you're just having a quick look at the plan to 00:13:53
make sure it has some basics in there. And as we have done in the past, anytime we bring plans or site plans to DRC, what I've 00:14:01
seen happen is we have solid comments either from building or engineering reminding us to remind. 00:14:10
The applicants that this is what lies ahead of you. You need to make sure these things are in place. 00:14:19
Before you get to the real technical review, so. 00:14:26
I I suggest we either take out the technical or just include preliminary technical review. Yeah, OK. So some feedback up here is 00:14:29
probably just be easier to remove the word technical so we all put ourselves into. 00:14:36
Ourselves into a position where an applicant may misconstrue that as something else? Sure. 00:14:43
So everyone good. OK, so the other item I have. 00:14:50
I'm sorry, yeah, my eyes have to adjust. So Section 2 do these. 00:14:55
#5 Subsection 5. Submit a quarterly report to the City Council summarizing. 00:15:00
It says activities, accomplishments and challenges of the DRC. 00:15:06
I would like to think that we, US members on the RC work, collaborate well together. We never face any challenges. 00:15:09
Of course that's, you know, that's always our hope. But maybe change that to say. 00:15:17
Submit a quarterly report to the City Council summarizing the summarizing activities of the DRC meetings to include. 00:15:24
To include. 00:15:34
Points such as approvals, comments, accomplishments and and challenges. So this way we're not every single when we submit 00:15:38
quarterly report, if we don't submit a challenge, it's mainly because we don't, you know, we work well together and we don't have 00:15:44
any. 00:15:50
So as an example. 00:15:57
Cool article for membership. 00:16:04
Section 1. 00:16:09
Composition the last. 00:16:11
The last sentence. 00:16:14
I would put down the census since it was discussed about the seven, about seven members serving on the land use. 00:16:17
Alright, so I would I would I asked for it to be revised. 00:16:32
I have to say that the. 00:16:40
The membership of. 00:16:42
The composition of the membership. There we go. 00:16:46
Is based. 00:16:53
Or will be based on expertise or. 00:16:56
Excuse me is based on expertise. 00:17:00
So we're moving towards ethical. 00:17:03
Or experience and development. 00:17:06
Aligned with Wienerit's general plan. 00:17:11
So again, we're moving the word technical. 00:17:17
And then changing expertise, excuse me, changing the word or in between expertise experience to. 00:17:22
Change the word and. 00:17:29
Between expertise and experience to the word or. 00:17:31
Changing and the last. 00:17:34
Words after the word development to say aligned with vineyards general plan. 00:17:40
So. 00:17:47
And well, I'll give you my these notes too. 00:17:50
The subsequent words. 00:17:55
Yes. 00:17:57
As subsequent words you mean. 00:18:01
And safe and sound community building. 00:18:03
I was I was going to have those replaced. 00:18:07
So I'll read it the way, yeah, I'll read the way that it was written. I have written out. 00:18:12
OK. 00:18:19
So the composition of the membership is based on expertise or experience and development aligned with Vineyards General plan. 00:18:20
And just for the record, that's the last sentence of that paragraph. 00:18:38
Thanks. Thank you. 00:18:44
Thank you. 00:18:46
I don't have too many more so. 00:18:49
Arco 5. 00:18:54
On meetings, this is more of a question than. 00:18:56
In the change it says the first paragraph. 00:19:01
On the third line. 00:19:05
That says meetings may be recorded and made available on the. 00:19:09
On the Vineyard City website, the word May is there. Is there a requirement for public records for these meetings? So. 00:19:15
So I. 00:19:25
I checked with Pam and she did say that we can record audio, which is a requirement, but it's not, it's not requirement. It's not, 00:19:27
it's not a big requirement for we just do it, but it's not a requirement. Okay, that's not, that's fine. I just wanted to make 00:19:33
sure. I think she had mentioned that some of the others if they're not making a decision. 00:19:40
Then they don't record them. So if they're just having like a work session on something, then they're not recorded meetings. OK, 00:19:47
sweet, I appreciate that. Section 4 under voting. I guess for clarification, do we want to put on the 1st sentence? The decision 00:19:54
shall be made by majority vote of the members. Do we want to insert or designee or do we feel that we since we defined a member 00:20:01
can be a designee if if we defined. 00:20:08
Members, then I don't think that we need to clarify it again. 00:20:16
And if I cannot jump in for a second on this. 00:20:20
Section 3. 00:20:23
Describes what a quorum is. 00:20:25
And so the subsequent Section 4 and section and Article 6. 00:20:27
Can probably skip that description, so the second line in Section 4. 00:20:32
From width all the way to votes. Probably can just be deleted, otherwise it kind of adds confusion. 00:20:38
Because it really just needs to be a majority. 00:20:46
If I understand that, and likewise Article 6, these bylaws may be amended by a majority vote. Just get rid of the IE 4 votes. 00:20:48
Because again, it could be technically voted with three if there's just 4 here. 00:20:58
So if we just delete that, then we just stick with. 00:21:05
A majority of the quorum. 00:21:07
Is that is that how is that with the state code? That's what we have described above. So quorum is for at least four members of 00:21:09
the DRC members equates to a quorum and so a majority of four is 3. Do we need to clarify for something to be approved like in 00:21:16
Planning Commission you have to have. 00:21:23
The majority have to approve it, so if you have three in attendance then you have to have three vote in favor of an item. If 3. 00:21:30
Affirmative votes. 00:21:40
And so even if you just have 4, everyone has to vote in favor. 00:21:46
No. 00:21:49
The majority is just representative of those present and as long as you have a quorum presence so that. 00:21:51
If a quorum is 4, you need a minimum of three votes to approve something. If the quorum is five, you need to still need a majority 00:21:59
is 3. 00:22:03
So it's whatever. We're not going to run into an issue. It's the number of people that are present that do represent the quorum 00:22:10
now it's the majority of that. Yeah, OK. 00:22:15
And that's where the descriptions kind of get confusing. 00:22:21
Yeah. And that's the actually thanks Eric, because that that addressed my other comments as well. So sweet. I appreciate that. 00:22:26
Ask a quick question. 00:22:33
Is there a spot where it talks about if it's two and two? 00:22:36
OK. That's not the majority, is it? 00:22:41
It would be denied. 00:22:46
We could clarify that. You think that would help? 00:22:49
The individual really would just be. 00:22:53
It would be an unfortunate scenario because we don't. The only reason that's going to happen is because we don't have. 00:22:57
The full group here. 00:23:04
And so in that situation. 00:23:05
We've opened the door by by allowing for an electronic vote so we could call someone. 00:23:09
Or we could have them come back to the next meeting when the full group is here and they won't have that opportunity to split the 00:23:15
vote. 00:23:19
That's a good point because we did have that happen at Planning Commission months. 00:23:24
Yeah, several years ago we only have 4 show up and as a 2:00 to 2:00. 00:23:27
So would you want to have a note in here? 00:23:32
But you could. Or you could table it. It could come back. 00:23:37
Would you want this to be in the bylaws or would just it's implied? 00:23:42
Yeah, it's implied. So I. 00:23:47
Thank you. We're good. 00:23:50
Does anyone else have any comments or they would like to? 00:23:53
By the bylaws. 00:23:58
Sweet. So, um. 00:24:00
Thing without we can make A and there's no other comments. Questions. Anthony, I have a quick comment here about the secretary. Do 00:24:03
we still want to maintain it as it is or change it because this was written before we had a plan in tech? 00:24:11
So in here we did say that the title. Are you worried about the title? Sex Secretary? Yeah. Or what function? What's the. 00:24:19
Industry standard that other cities use secretary if other cities are I mean that's just like the the name of the position in the 00:24:33
DRC and I'm OK with the way it's written like you know, may or may not be ADRC member. 00:24:41
I don't want to force it to be like the planning tech, but that's just whoever it could be me, whoever sits in that position Is is 00:24:52
the secretary of fruit for that meeting. Yeah, that's how it is in other cities. I just thought, I'm sorry. So do you want to have 00:24:58
it where it may be like, for example. 00:25:04
Now Madison does, she does an awesome job and she gets permitted to, you know. 00:25:11
The assistance engineer or maybe say engineer and then where each meeting we may choose to vote on a new secretary to maybe take 00:25:18
minutes so it doesn't fall on one particular person all the time we could So right now it's. 00:25:25
Let me find that spot again. It's Section 4 and second page, third page, page three. Yes, Sir. Top page three. Yeah, yeah. Because 00:25:34
I mean, that would also cuz again, we may choose to. I mean, fortunately you could add the flexibility in there. 00:25:41
Yeah. I mean it provides that or DRC may appoint a secretary may. 00:25:52
Or may not be a DRC member. The Secretary shall be responsible for maintaining accurate records of all the meetings and managing 00:25:57
official correspondence. So I mean, typically the default is that it would be the whoever is in the planning tech position. 00:26:05
But it doesn't mean it need to be. So if that position is vacant, then either the community development director could appoint 00:26:13
someone else, it would be from the community development department, or the DRC could do a one off. So I think it provides enough 00:26:20
flexibility. I just want to make sure. Thanks, that's good. 00:26:27
That's right. Or anyone else. Anthony, do you have any other comments? 00:26:35
No, please. OK. So that being said that there's no other questions on there. 00:26:40
No, so I guess seeking a motion to approve the DRC bylaws as it was presented. And again, Morgan said that he felt that we should 00:26:44
probably go through the changes one more time. Well, I, I think we, we, we, we clarified pretty good and we haven't written down 00:26:53
to So I have it all here. Am I going to make a motion? OK, I'm good with it. OK, yeah. Motion to approve the DRC bylaws with the. 00:27:02
Amendments as noted in the record. 00:27:12
Do we have a second? 00:27:14
Second sweet is this a? 00:27:17
This is a. 00:27:22
Go where? Each one we have to go separately or you'd have to vote each one. And I'd also want you to state on the day it takes 00:27:23
effect because that's the last thing we wanted to take effect. Okay, with that being said. 00:27:30
Can we just remotion with that for the date to take effect and to do new motion with the effective date? So just it would be an 00:27:38
amendment to my motion that the effective date would be today? 00:27:45
That works. 00:27:54
Good. I like that too. All right, so do I have a second to the amendment? 00:27:55
I 2nd Amendment. 00:28:01
Second Amendment, Well, it would be Chris would. 00:28:03
Yeah. So he would accept it since he was the original second. Appreciate that. Thank you very much, Morgan. OK, so with that, this 00:28:08
is a roll call vote. So let's go left to right. So Eric, Sir with you. Hi. 00:28:14
I myself, Nassim I. 00:28:21
Aye. 00:28:24
Aye, aye. 00:28:25
Thank you. 00:28:29
Good job. If if that was in fact A roll call vote, we should probably state. 00:28:31
Either you should state names and then they say I or we state our names. Don't say I. All right, so you did the first 3. So you 00:28:37
probably want to call out Chris. All right, So, Chris. So we got the first 3. So Chris, your vote. All right, Brandon, Sir. Hi. 00:28:43
And then Brian. Aye. All right. Sweet. OK, so that's official. 00:28:50
All right, so that passes. So appreciate your help Anthony on that one. So the next item is 3.22 thousand 25 calendar. So will you 00:28:58
be leaving that discussion too? 00:29:04
Yeah, so. 00:29:16
As as regularly scheduled or as we've had, a whole of 2024 is going to be the same format for the whole of 2025, where we have the 00:29:18
1st and 3rd Thursdays of every month we'll have a DRC and we will be able to also schedule special sessions if. 00:29:27
There's a need to, based on the request of the Commission, I mean the chair or vice chair or the membership. 00:29:39
So we will. 00:29:47
Be sending out the. 00:29:50
The full calendar, which is you know, going to have all the exact dates to the rest of the members and it will be published as 00:29:53
well. 00:29:57
So that's all we have for the. 00:30:02
For the calendar. 00:30:06
Of 2025. 00:30:08
In the 1st and 3rd, just as it was the 1st and 3rd Thursdays of each month and at the same time 9 AM, 9:00 AM. Special sessions 00:30:14
when needed and special sessions when needed. Okay, so is there any comments from that from the members there, Brian? Do you have 00:30:20
a comments Brian then? 00:30:26
I have no comments. Anyone. 00:30:34
All right, so we're all good without us. We'll do a motion to approve the 2025 calendar on this, a motion to approve the 20. 00:30:37
I motion to approve the 2025 calendar. All right, Do I have a second? Second. All right, so roll call vote again. I'll start with 00:30:52
Brian this time around. So Brian. Hi, Brandon. Hi, Chris, Nassim. Aye, Morgan hi and Eric hi. Sweet. So that passes. 00:31:00
And then the last one is going to be my favorites. It's going to be item 3.3, election chair and vice chair for 2025. 00:31:09
So I think again, we've had good set, good go with the 2024, especially with the DRC, haven't taken on a different role. 00:31:17
And. 00:31:28
Excuse me, haven't taken on a different role in line to state standards and of course had a very, I think it's provided a great 00:31:30
opportunity to have that have that communication with applicants as well as the public as well. And definitely enjoyed the enjoyed 00:31:36
this. 00:31:43
So with that. 00:31:50
I'll let Anthony kind of take that, but if you want to, you know, set the stage before we go to building. 00:31:54
It's an election year. 00:32:05
And we're excited about elections. So just as we did have stated in our approved bylaws, which takes effect from now. 00:32:07
We are required to have a new chair and vice chair elected. 00:32:18
By the end of this year to serve for the year 2025. 00:32:24
And at this moment, you have the chance to give your chair a second goal. 00:32:28
And vice chair, second goal, or take them out of office and have another one. 00:32:35
For 2025. So at this moment, I will turn it over to the chair to be able to allow for some nominations and you are as well free to 00:32:43
nominate yourself at this moment if you still feel like you want to continue the good work you've done. We appreciate it. You can. 00:32:53
So at the moment we'll just allow everyone to make a nomination. 00:33:05
And from that point, we would make a vote and the majority would take it. 00:33:10
All right, so I'll start off with the, you know, do I do my do I do on my speech right now to, you know, for my to make to get 00:33:18
everyone to want to, you know. 00:33:22
It's only gonna be take about 1520 minutes. No problem. I prepare some slides for the two so. 00:33:28
Definitely, I appreciate the kind words that you said about, you know, my good work this year, so I do appreciate that. 00:33:35
So all that. So I think with yeah, definitely on 2025 and I know with two consecutive terms that that, that, that sounds very 00:33:42
tempting on that. And you know that I think that's kind of where I think stopped. I think with that being said, we're gonna put up 00:33:49
for nominations on this. I think, and I'm not gonna be bashful to make the first nomination on on this because I do think that 00:33:57
the, you know, a lot of good work has been done and I think that that good work should should continue into 2025. 00:34:04
So I will nominate the Brian Baudry. 00:34:12
As a chair. 00:34:14
And then who is? 00:34:17
And I agree with the nomination. I think Brian is phenomenal, does a good job. I've seen him. He took the parks and rec department 00:34:20
from One man Show. 00:34:24
To you are the show now for the city. 00:34:29
Are we missing someone on the on the DRC today? 00:34:35
Who are missing? We're missing the Planning Commission chair or designee. 00:34:39
OK, maybe we don't make that. I mean nothing to say we're for missing someone. If it was like Pam, it was like Pam. 00:34:44
All right. So Vice Chair, I would nominate Chris Johnson. 00:34:52
I think Chris is phenomenal. I've seen him do so much. He's a great leader and I think he could step in if Brian Brian was out. 00:34:58
Yeah, I look up to business team. I look up to Chris Johnson definitely for that's a good advice. Sure. So that's a good one. And 00:35:06
so Eric, do you have any nominations there that you would like to present? No, I would actually just like to present a second. 00:35:12
On both of those nominations for chair and Vice chair, OK, so we got this first one is just for chair. OK, so the first one is 00:35:19
this chair. So OK, So sorry Chris, we won't speak highly of you until. 00:35:26
A few more minutes. 00:35:33
So I'll speak highly of Chris, I think. I think wearing a hat, consider that a crown. Yeah, you don't have to separate. So we're 00:35:35
going to roll this into one motion. 00:35:39
All right. Thank you. 00:35:44
So I heard Brian Bald. 00:35:46
Doing a second nomination for Vice Chair, is that correct for Chair and chair? 00:35:49
So go ahead, I will do whatever. So I think I heard that as Brian is accepting a nomination for chair. 00:35:56
And supporting the nomination for Vice Chair for Chris. 00:36:04
All right, You're welcome. 00:36:10
Yes. All right, Brandon. 00:36:12
Do you have any? 00:36:15
I support the decision for the chair and Vice chair. All right. And Chris, do you have any? 00:36:17
Yeah, I would. I would nominate Brian for a chair and Morgan for Vice Chair. OK, so we have, I do have a competition for Vice 00:36:23
Chair. 00:36:27
So with that being said, let's take it so since we have a majority for Vice Chair for Chris, so we have. 00:36:32
So we have 5 nominations. 00:36:42
6 nominations for Brian Baldry for Chair, and then five nominations for Chris Johnson for Vice Chair and one nomination for Morgan 00:36:45
for Vice Chair. I think we'll see if someone wants to go ahead and take a motion, make a motion for. 00:36:52
Or is do we want to have speeches? 00:37:01
Chair speeches are allowed. Speeches are allowed. So Brian, do you have a speech that you would like to give or I have no speech? 00:37:05
All right. And Chris Johnson, do you have a speech that you like to give? 00:37:10
Just that it's not just me, it's all good, so. 00:37:16
Yeah, I appreciate that. So I think that that's good. That's good words of wisdom for a potential vice chair. So it is a team 00:37:22
effort out here. So I'll take it. I'll take a motion for chair and vice chair if someone would like to present the motion. 00:37:29
Yeah, motion to appoint Brian Baudry as Chair of the DRC and Chris Johnson as Vice Chair of the DRC 2025 for the calendar year 00:37:37
2025. 00:37:44
So I got first, I got motion for Brian Vaudrey as chair and Chris Johnson is vice chair for the 2025 calendar year. Do I have a 00:37:51
second? I'll second that. All right, I got a second motion by Mr. Eric Ellis. So that being said, let's do roll call. Let's go 00:37:59
roll call. Mr. Eric, Sir Aye and Morgan, Sir aye. And Chris and Brandon and. 00:38:07
Last but not least, Mr. Potential Future 2025 chair Brian. 00:38:16
Unanimous vote for this, so we appreciate everyone's work. 00:38:23
So. 00:38:26
All right. Well, that being said, we've completed our business items. Is there any work sessions? 00:38:28
All right, we don't have any work sessions and we'll just and unless anyone here has staff commissioner committee reports. 00:38:34
I don't believe so. All right. That being said, let's get moved towards adjournment. So I adjourn this meeting as my final action 00:38:42
as Chair of the DRC to the year 2024. 00:38:48
Thank you. 00:38:57
Link
Start video at
Social
Embed
* you need to log in to manage your favorites
My Favorites List
You haven't added any favorites yet. Click the "Add Favorite" button on any media page, and they'll show up here.
Welcome. Good morning. This is the Development Review Committee. December 1924 is 9. 00:00:38
02 AM. 00:00:46
And we were calling, calling the DRC in session. So to begin it off, I'll just do a quick roll call. We'll start off to my left 00:00:49
with a Miss Madison. 00:00:55
This is Madison Reed, the planning technician. 00:01:03
Eric Ellis, City Manager, Morgan Brand, Community Development director. I'm assuming the Republic of the worst director, City 00:01:06
engineer. 00:01:09
Chris Johnson, building official. 00:01:12
Brandon Valley Orem Fire Department. 00:01:14
Brian Vaudrey, parks and rec director. 00:01:16
Anthony Fletcher, a planner. I appreciate everyone coming today. So as we wrap up 2024, we're going to be gearing up for 2025 with 00:01:19
a, I guess with a bang and what that bang is said to be seen so far. But that being said, we do have some items on our agenda. The 00:01:27
first item. 00:01:35
The first set of items, excuse me, is consent items 2.12.22.3. 00:01:43
Approval of DRC minutes June 20th, 20, June 20th, July the 11th, July 25th respectively. 00:01:48
So I'll start off. Does anyone have any questions, comments about those minutes? 00:02:00
There's no comments or questions. Do I have a motion to approve? Motion to approve the consent agenda first? Is there a second, 00:02:08
Sir? 00:02:11
Second, I got a second. So now all in favor of approving the motions. 00:02:16
Hi, sweet. So we've. 00:02:22
Approve the minutes on the consent agenda. So we're going into our next item. The next item is business items, so 3.21 DRC bylaws, 00:02:26
discussion and approval. That being said, I believe it's Mr. Anthony Fletcher who's going to be taking the lead. 00:02:34
Go ahead, Sir. 00:02:45
Thank you very much here. 00:02:47
So in leading this discussion, I would want to ask a very quick question. Did you all have the chance to review the bylaws before 00:02:48
the meeting? 00:02:54
Or have you had the chance to ever review? Could you define before the meeting? 00:03:01
Pardon to define before the meeting is in, as we're talking right now. 00:03:05
So I think it would be a good idea, good if everyone's in agreement, if you just gave a quick summary of the bylaws for everyone's 00:03:09
everyone, everyone situational awareness and of course anyone who anyone in the public who may be listening to this currently or 00:03:14
in the future. Okay, thank you. 00:03:19
All right, so. 00:03:25
Chair, this is a draft bylaw that will, umm, eventually help keep us all in line during this meeting. And what I mean in line is. 00:03:27
To umm, uh. 00:03:39
Regulate the UMM. 00:03:41
Regulate and formalized the structure of DRC, its makeup, how we operate, what is required of us in terms of reviews and 00:03:44
approvals, as well as the powers that. 00:03:51
The DRC has. 00:03:59
As an institution or an establishment, so. 00:04:02
Instead of having to go through every single section of the. 00:04:07
Of the drafted. 00:04:12
Bylaws. 00:04:17
I would want to share my screen right now. 00:04:19
Yes, so I'd want to. 00:04:49
Go through the various sections briefly. We talk about the purpose being that the DRC will serve the purpose of a land use 00:04:53
authority for all final subdivision applications and technical review authority as well for all proposed developments and 00:05:01
development applications, including site plans for. 00:05:09
Compliance with applicable codes, ordinances, standards within the City of Vineyards. 00:05:18
This is the reason why. 00:05:25
Before every. 00:05:27
Proposed plan or site plan goes to Planning Commission. It comes here. We have you, you know, discuss issues on it, whether we are 00:05:30
all fine with it though you're not the approval body. 00:05:36
You make it safe to. 00:05:43
Us as planners that it's OK to go to Planning Commission for final approval. We bring in all the final plots. 00:05:46
Here and you are the final authority over that. So we want to make sure that things like that is all captured here and being the 00:05:55
final authority, you also have the authority to extend. 00:06:01
Application permits that have been expired for the final plat as well and it's all in the purpose. 00:06:09
The duties and authority. 00:06:18
Have been outlined here. 00:06:21
The membership. 00:06:24
Shall consist of seven. 00:06:26
Which um. 00:06:28
I have a list I have listed here. 00:06:30
I'll keep losing connection. 00:06:44
Which have been listed. 00:06:48
On here we have the Chair of the Planning Commission or their designee. 00:06:52
The city manager. 00:06:58
The fire Marshall or designee? The head. 00:07:02
Or designee of the building department. 00:07:06
Engineering department, Community development and parks and Recs. 00:07:09
Department as well. 00:07:15
So for the DRC leadership? 00:07:17
We have this document having the chair who will be elected every. 00:07:20
For every year a chair has to be elected. 00:07:28
To lead the affairs and facilitate meetings of the committee. 00:07:32
And that will be the same for a vice chair to assist the chair in its functions and. 00:07:40
Umm, operations. 00:07:48
I also have a section here that talks about the chair pro temp so. 00:07:54
I I got to know recently that it's pro tempore because it's Latin, so that would be updated as well. 00:08:01
In the absence of the chair and vice chair. 00:08:12
The chair can appoint some member on the committee to act as a chair while they're both away. 00:08:15
I have a section here as well. 00:08:27
For secretary. 00:08:30
And in here I said that the community development. 00:08:34
Director or. 00:08:38
May appoint a secretary. 00:08:41
Which is literally what Madison is doing right now, taking notes and umm. 00:08:45
Making sure that everything is organized before meetings. 00:08:52
We can decide to change that if the Chair of this committee wants to do any change to that right now. 00:08:56
This was written before we had medicine, so. 00:09:05
It could be changed. 00:09:08
We have our meetings set. 00:09:11
We have our regular meetings, special meetings, and a quorum because our membership is going to be 7 members. A quorum here is 4. 00:09:14
To have a meeting happen. 00:09:26
Decisions when it comes to voting shall be made by a majority of the vote of members present at a properly held meeting. 00:09:31
With the caveat that no action shall be approved with fewer than four votes. 00:09:41
Are included that the proxy voting is not permitted. 00:09:50
So if anyone is not able to make it in person. 00:09:55
Their votes may not count. They could still participate, but they cannot vote. Is that state code? 00:09:59
Um, I if if, if it's not, I'd recommend that we allow for remote meetings. Yeah, I don't wanna constrain us if. 00:10:05
If we're having an issue getting four and someone can call in. 00:10:13
OK. 00:10:18
Was it? Was it 3 last year and we changed it to four? 00:10:21
Has always been forward, yeah. 00:10:24
Because of the number. 00:10:28
Correction made. Thank you. 00:10:35
There's a section here that talks about amendments of the bylaws. 00:10:42
These bylaws may be amended by a majority vote as well of the DRC members present at a meeting. 00:10:47
Provided that proper notice of the proposed amendment has been given to the DRC members at least 72 hours prior to a meeting that 00:10:55
will require that voting for amending anything on the bylaws. 00:11:03
If there are no changes, we will approve this at the end of the discussion and then the bylaws will take effect immediately. I 00:11:13
mean we will make that date here based on the approval to make the bylaws take effect by the 1st of January next year. So we start 00:11:21
the new year with a new leaf and hopefully. 00:11:30
Just follow through as it should. 00:11:40
Thank you. 00:11:44
I appreciate the. 00:11:48
A good summary on this. 00:11:51
So I can start off with that I do have some. 00:11:55
Comments about the bylaws and. 00:11:58
Most of them are not I was saying none. I would feel that none of them substantial comments that would change the the context of 00:12:03
what the bylaws is to represent so. 00:12:08
Now I can go and down the page on that and then after, of course, I'll open it up to anyone else who would like to interject. And 00:12:14
of course, any items that I kind of talk about is meant to be a kind of a open discussion for any of the other members on there. 00:12:23
So please feel free to interject. How interject? So the first one I have is. 00:12:32
The on Section 2 duties. 00:12:41
Subsection 2 and when it says engage in technical plan reviews and revise on all plans submitted to proposed development within 00:12:44
the Vineyard, I would like to kind of clarify the word technical. 00:12:51
So because there is another technique, there is a technical plans review process. 00:12:59
That's done outside the DRC. So the technical review, the technical review. 00:13:03
Process which is the more in depth. 00:13:10
Engineering plans reviews such as you know, looking at the size of a looking a size of a meter. 00:13:14
Or you know, or like the height of concrete curves along the roadside. I just want to make sure that we kind of clarify that the 00:13:24
intent of the DRC is not to do that type of level of technical review, but more maybe a different type of review. 00:13:33
I guess leave that open to the discussion for the members. I'm not sure what other words we would want to use as technical. 00:13:44
We could probably. 00:13:51
Either take the technical out or just make it a preliminary technical review where you're just having a quick look at the plan to 00:13:53
make sure it has some basics in there. And as we have done in the past, anytime we bring plans or site plans to DRC, what I've 00:14:01
seen happen is we have solid comments either from building or engineering reminding us to remind. 00:14:10
The applicants that this is what lies ahead of you. You need to make sure these things are in place. 00:14:19
Before you get to the real technical review, so. 00:14:26
I I suggest we either take out the technical or just include preliminary technical review. Yeah, OK. So some feedback up here is 00:14:29
probably just be easier to remove the word technical so we all put ourselves into. 00:14:36
Ourselves into a position where an applicant may misconstrue that as something else? Sure. 00:14:43
So everyone good. OK, so the other item I have. 00:14:50
I'm sorry, yeah, my eyes have to adjust. So Section 2 do these. 00:14:55
#5 Subsection 5. Submit a quarterly report to the City Council summarizing. 00:15:00
It says activities, accomplishments and challenges of the DRC. 00:15:06
I would like to think that we, US members on the RC work, collaborate well together. We never face any challenges. 00:15:09
Of course that's, you know, that's always our hope. But maybe change that to say. 00:15:17
Submit a quarterly report to the City Council summarizing the summarizing activities of the DRC meetings to include. 00:15:24
To include. 00:15:34
Points such as approvals, comments, accomplishments and and challenges. So this way we're not every single when we submit 00:15:38
quarterly report, if we don't submit a challenge, it's mainly because we don't, you know, we work well together and we don't have 00:15:44
any. 00:15:50
So as an example. 00:15:57
Cool article for membership. 00:16:04
Section 1. 00:16:09
Composition the last. 00:16:11
The last sentence. 00:16:14
I would put down the census since it was discussed about the seven, about seven members serving on the land use. 00:16:17
Alright, so I would I would I asked for it to be revised. 00:16:32
I have to say that the. 00:16:40
The membership of. 00:16:42
The composition of the membership. There we go. 00:16:46
Is based. 00:16:53
Or will be based on expertise or. 00:16:56
Excuse me is based on expertise. 00:17:00
So we're moving towards ethical. 00:17:03
Or experience and development. 00:17:06
Aligned with Wienerit's general plan. 00:17:11
So again, we're moving the word technical. 00:17:17
And then changing expertise, excuse me, changing the word or in between expertise experience to. 00:17:22
Change the word and. 00:17:29
Between expertise and experience to the word or. 00:17:31
Changing and the last. 00:17:34
Words after the word development to say aligned with vineyards general plan. 00:17:40
So. 00:17:47
And well, I'll give you my these notes too. 00:17:50
The subsequent words. 00:17:55
Yes. 00:17:57
As subsequent words you mean. 00:18:01
And safe and sound community building. 00:18:03
I was I was going to have those replaced. 00:18:07
So I'll read it the way, yeah, I'll read the way that it was written. I have written out. 00:18:12
OK. 00:18:19
So the composition of the membership is based on expertise or experience and development aligned with Vineyards General plan. 00:18:20
And just for the record, that's the last sentence of that paragraph. 00:18:38
Thanks. Thank you. 00:18:44
Thank you. 00:18:46
I don't have too many more so. 00:18:49
Arco 5. 00:18:54
On meetings, this is more of a question than. 00:18:56
In the change it says the first paragraph. 00:19:01
On the third line. 00:19:05
That says meetings may be recorded and made available on the. 00:19:09
On the Vineyard City website, the word May is there. Is there a requirement for public records for these meetings? So. 00:19:15
So I. 00:19:25
I checked with Pam and she did say that we can record audio, which is a requirement, but it's not, it's not requirement. It's not, 00:19:27
it's not a big requirement for we just do it, but it's not a requirement. Okay, that's not, that's fine. I just wanted to make 00:19:33
sure. I think she had mentioned that some of the others if they're not making a decision. 00:19:40
Then they don't record them. So if they're just having like a work session on something, then they're not recorded meetings. OK, 00:19:47
sweet, I appreciate that. Section 4 under voting. I guess for clarification, do we want to put on the 1st sentence? The decision 00:19:54
shall be made by majority vote of the members. Do we want to insert or designee or do we feel that we since we defined a member 00:20:01
can be a designee if if we defined. 00:20:08
Members, then I don't think that we need to clarify it again. 00:20:16
And if I cannot jump in for a second on this. 00:20:20
Section 3. 00:20:23
Describes what a quorum is. 00:20:25
And so the subsequent Section 4 and section and Article 6. 00:20:27
Can probably skip that description, so the second line in Section 4. 00:20:32
From width all the way to votes. Probably can just be deleted, otherwise it kind of adds confusion. 00:20:38
Because it really just needs to be a majority. 00:20:46
If I understand that, and likewise Article 6, these bylaws may be amended by a majority vote. Just get rid of the IE 4 votes. 00:20:48
Because again, it could be technically voted with three if there's just 4 here. 00:20:58
So if we just delete that, then we just stick with. 00:21:05
A majority of the quorum. 00:21:07
Is that is that how is that with the state code? That's what we have described above. So quorum is for at least four members of 00:21:09
the DRC members equates to a quorum and so a majority of four is 3. Do we need to clarify for something to be approved like in 00:21:16
Planning Commission you have to have. 00:21:23
The majority have to approve it, so if you have three in attendance then you have to have three vote in favor of an item. If 3. 00:21:30
Affirmative votes. 00:21:40
And so even if you just have 4, everyone has to vote in favor. 00:21:46
No. 00:21:49
The majority is just representative of those present and as long as you have a quorum presence so that. 00:21:51
If a quorum is 4, you need a minimum of three votes to approve something. If the quorum is five, you need to still need a majority 00:21:59
is 3. 00:22:03
So it's whatever. We're not going to run into an issue. It's the number of people that are present that do represent the quorum 00:22:10
now it's the majority of that. Yeah, OK. 00:22:15
And that's where the descriptions kind of get confusing. 00:22:21
Yeah. And that's the actually thanks Eric, because that that addressed my other comments as well. So sweet. I appreciate that. 00:22:26
Ask a quick question. 00:22:33
Is there a spot where it talks about if it's two and two? 00:22:36
OK. That's not the majority, is it? 00:22:41
It would be denied. 00:22:46
We could clarify that. You think that would help? 00:22:49
The individual really would just be. 00:22:53
It would be an unfortunate scenario because we don't. The only reason that's going to happen is because we don't have. 00:22:57
The full group here. 00:23:04
And so in that situation. 00:23:05
We've opened the door by by allowing for an electronic vote so we could call someone. 00:23:09
Or we could have them come back to the next meeting when the full group is here and they won't have that opportunity to split the 00:23:15
vote. 00:23:19
That's a good point because we did have that happen at Planning Commission months. 00:23:24
Yeah, several years ago we only have 4 show up and as a 2:00 to 2:00. 00:23:27
So would you want to have a note in here? 00:23:32
But you could. Or you could table it. It could come back. 00:23:37
Would you want this to be in the bylaws or would just it's implied? 00:23:42
Yeah, it's implied. So I. 00:23:47
Thank you. We're good. 00:23:50
Does anyone else have any comments or they would like to? 00:23:53
By the bylaws. 00:23:58
Sweet. So, um. 00:24:00
Thing without we can make A and there's no other comments. Questions. Anthony, I have a quick comment here about the secretary. Do 00:24:03
we still want to maintain it as it is or change it because this was written before we had a plan in tech? 00:24:11
So in here we did say that the title. Are you worried about the title? Sex Secretary? Yeah. Or what function? What's the. 00:24:19
Industry standard that other cities use secretary if other cities are I mean that's just like the the name of the position in the 00:24:33
DRC and I'm OK with the way it's written like you know, may or may not be ADRC member. 00:24:41
I don't want to force it to be like the planning tech, but that's just whoever it could be me, whoever sits in that position Is is 00:24:52
the secretary of fruit for that meeting. Yeah, that's how it is in other cities. I just thought, I'm sorry. So do you want to have 00:24:58
it where it may be like, for example. 00:25:04
Now Madison does, she does an awesome job and she gets permitted to, you know. 00:25:11
The assistance engineer or maybe say engineer and then where each meeting we may choose to vote on a new secretary to maybe take 00:25:18
minutes so it doesn't fall on one particular person all the time we could So right now it's. 00:25:25
Let me find that spot again. It's Section 4 and second page, third page, page three. Yes, Sir. Top page three. Yeah, yeah. Because 00:25:34
I mean, that would also cuz again, we may choose to. I mean, fortunately you could add the flexibility in there. 00:25:41
Yeah. I mean it provides that or DRC may appoint a secretary may. 00:25:52
Or may not be a DRC member. The Secretary shall be responsible for maintaining accurate records of all the meetings and managing 00:25:57
official correspondence. So I mean, typically the default is that it would be the whoever is in the planning tech position. 00:26:05
But it doesn't mean it need to be. So if that position is vacant, then either the community development director could appoint 00:26:13
someone else, it would be from the community development department, or the DRC could do a one off. So I think it provides enough 00:26:20
flexibility. I just want to make sure. Thanks, that's good. 00:26:27
That's right. Or anyone else. Anthony, do you have any other comments? 00:26:35
No, please. OK. So that being said that there's no other questions on there. 00:26:40
No, so I guess seeking a motion to approve the DRC bylaws as it was presented. And again, Morgan said that he felt that we should 00:26:44
probably go through the changes one more time. Well, I, I think we, we, we, we clarified pretty good and we haven't written down 00:26:53
to So I have it all here. Am I going to make a motion? OK, I'm good with it. OK, yeah. Motion to approve the DRC bylaws with the. 00:27:02
Amendments as noted in the record. 00:27:12
Do we have a second? 00:27:14
Second sweet is this a? 00:27:17
This is a. 00:27:22
Go where? Each one we have to go separately or you'd have to vote each one. And I'd also want you to state on the day it takes 00:27:23
effect because that's the last thing we wanted to take effect. Okay, with that being said. 00:27:30
Can we just remotion with that for the date to take effect and to do new motion with the effective date? So just it would be an 00:27:38
amendment to my motion that the effective date would be today? 00:27:45
That works. 00:27:54
Good. I like that too. All right, so do I have a second to the amendment? 00:27:55
I 2nd Amendment. 00:28:01
Second Amendment, Well, it would be Chris would. 00:28:03
Yeah. So he would accept it since he was the original second. Appreciate that. Thank you very much, Morgan. OK, so with that, this 00:28:08
is a roll call vote. So let's go left to right. So Eric, Sir with you. Hi. 00:28:14
I myself, Nassim I. 00:28:21
Aye. 00:28:24
Aye, aye. 00:28:25
Thank you. 00:28:29
Good job. If if that was in fact A roll call vote, we should probably state. 00:28:31
Either you should state names and then they say I or we state our names. Don't say I. All right, so you did the first 3. So you 00:28:37
probably want to call out Chris. All right, So, Chris. So we got the first 3. So Chris, your vote. All right, Brandon, Sir. Hi. 00:28:43
And then Brian. Aye. All right. Sweet. OK, so that's official. 00:28:50
All right, so that passes. So appreciate your help Anthony on that one. So the next item is 3.22 thousand 25 calendar. So will you 00:28:58
be leaving that discussion too? 00:29:04
Yeah, so. 00:29:16
As as regularly scheduled or as we've had, a whole of 2024 is going to be the same format for the whole of 2025, where we have the 00:29:18
1st and 3rd Thursdays of every month we'll have a DRC and we will be able to also schedule special sessions if. 00:29:27
There's a need to, based on the request of the Commission, I mean the chair or vice chair or the membership. 00:29:39
So we will. 00:29:47
Be sending out the. 00:29:50
The full calendar, which is you know, going to have all the exact dates to the rest of the members and it will be published as 00:29:53
well. 00:29:57
So that's all we have for the. 00:30:02
For the calendar. 00:30:06
Of 2025. 00:30:08
In the 1st and 3rd, just as it was the 1st and 3rd Thursdays of each month and at the same time 9 AM, 9:00 AM. Special sessions 00:30:14
when needed and special sessions when needed. Okay, so is there any comments from that from the members there, Brian? Do you have 00:30:20
a comments Brian then? 00:30:26
I have no comments. Anyone. 00:30:34
All right, so we're all good without us. We'll do a motion to approve the 2025 calendar on this, a motion to approve the 20. 00:30:37
I motion to approve the 2025 calendar. All right, Do I have a second? Second. All right, so roll call vote again. I'll start with 00:30:52
Brian this time around. So Brian. Hi, Brandon. Hi, Chris, Nassim. Aye, Morgan hi and Eric hi. Sweet. So that passes. 00:31:00
And then the last one is going to be my favorites. It's going to be item 3.3, election chair and vice chair for 2025. 00:31:09
So I think again, we've had good set, good go with the 2024, especially with the DRC, haven't taken on a different role. 00:31:17
And. 00:31:28
Excuse me, haven't taken on a different role in line to state standards and of course had a very, I think it's provided a great 00:31:30
opportunity to have that have that communication with applicants as well as the public as well. And definitely enjoyed the enjoyed 00:31:36
this. 00:31:43
So with that. 00:31:50
I'll let Anthony kind of take that, but if you want to, you know, set the stage before we go to building. 00:31:54
It's an election year. 00:32:05
And we're excited about elections. So just as we did have stated in our approved bylaws, which takes effect from now. 00:32:07
We are required to have a new chair and vice chair elected. 00:32:18
By the end of this year to serve for the year 2025. 00:32:24
And at this moment, you have the chance to give your chair a second goal. 00:32:28
And vice chair, second goal, or take them out of office and have another one. 00:32:35
For 2025. So at this moment, I will turn it over to the chair to be able to allow for some nominations and you are as well free to 00:32:43
nominate yourself at this moment if you still feel like you want to continue the good work you've done. We appreciate it. You can. 00:32:53
So at the moment we'll just allow everyone to make a nomination. 00:33:05
And from that point, we would make a vote and the majority would take it. 00:33:10
All right, so I'll start off with the, you know, do I do my do I do on my speech right now to, you know, for my to make to get 00:33:18
everyone to want to, you know. 00:33:22
It's only gonna be take about 1520 minutes. No problem. I prepare some slides for the two so. 00:33:28
Definitely, I appreciate the kind words that you said about, you know, my good work this year, so I do appreciate that. 00:33:35
So all that. So I think with yeah, definitely on 2025 and I know with two consecutive terms that that, that, that sounds very 00:33:42
tempting on that. And you know that I think that's kind of where I think stopped. I think with that being said, we're gonna put up 00:33:49
for nominations on this. I think, and I'm not gonna be bashful to make the first nomination on on this because I do think that 00:33:57
the, you know, a lot of good work has been done and I think that that good work should should continue into 2025. 00:34:04
So I will nominate the Brian Baudry. 00:34:12
As a chair. 00:34:14
And then who is? 00:34:17
And I agree with the nomination. I think Brian is phenomenal, does a good job. I've seen him. He took the parks and rec department 00:34:20
from One man Show. 00:34:24
To you are the show now for the city. 00:34:29
Are we missing someone on the on the DRC today? 00:34:35
Who are missing? We're missing the Planning Commission chair or designee. 00:34:39
OK, maybe we don't make that. I mean nothing to say we're for missing someone. If it was like Pam, it was like Pam. 00:34:44
All right. So Vice Chair, I would nominate Chris Johnson. 00:34:52
I think Chris is phenomenal. I've seen him do so much. He's a great leader and I think he could step in if Brian Brian was out. 00:34:58
Yeah, I look up to business team. I look up to Chris Johnson definitely for that's a good advice. Sure. So that's a good one. And 00:35:06
so Eric, do you have any nominations there that you would like to present? No, I would actually just like to present a second. 00:35:12
On both of those nominations for chair and Vice chair, OK, so we got this first one is just for chair. OK, so the first one is 00:35:19
this chair. So OK, So sorry Chris, we won't speak highly of you until. 00:35:26
A few more minutes. 00:35:33
So I'll speak highly of Chris, I think. I think wearing a hat, consider that a crown. Yeah, you don't have to separate. So we're 00:35:35
going to roll this into one motion. 00:35:39
All right. Thank you. 00:35:44
So I heard Brian Bald. 00:35:46
Doing a second nomination for Vice Chair, is that correct for Chair and chair? 00:35:49
So go ahead, I will do whatever. So I think I heard that as Brian is accepting a nomination for chair. 00:35:56
And supporting the nomination for Vice Chair for Chris. 00:36:04
All right, You're welcome. 00:36:10
Yes. All right, Brandon. 00:36:12
Do you have any? 00:36:15
I support the decision for the chair and Vice chair. All right. And Chris, do you have any? 00:36:17
Yeah, I would. I would nominate Brian for a chair and Morgan for Vice Chair. OK, so we have, I do have a competition for Vice 00:36:23
Chair. 00:36:27
So with that being said, let's take it so since we have a majority for Vice Chair for Chris, so we have. 00:36:32
So we have 5 nominations. 00:36:42
6 nominations for Brian Baldry for Chair, and then five nominations for Chris Johnson for Vice Chair and one nomination for Morgan 00:36:45
for Vice Chair. I think we'll see if someone wants to go ahead and take a motion, make a motion for. 00:36:52
Or is do we want to have speeches? 00:37:01
Chair speeches are allowed. Speeches are allowed. So Brian, do you have a speech that you would like to give or I have no speech? 00:37:05
All right. And Chris Johnson, do you have a speech that you like to give? 00:37:10
Just that it's not just me, it's all good, so. 00:37:16
Yeah, I appreciate that. So I think that that's good. That's good words of wisdom for a potential vice chair. So it is a team 00:37:22
effort out here. So I'll take it. I'll take a motion for chair and vice chair if someone would like to present the motion. 00:37:29
Yeah, motion to appoint Brian Baudry as Chair of the DRC and Chris Johnson as Vice Chair of the DRC 2025 for the calendar year 00:37:37
2025. 00:37:44
So I got first, I got motion for Brian Vaudrey as chair and Chris Johnson is vice chair for the 2025 calendar year. Do I have a 00:37:51
second? I'll second that. All right, I got a second motion by Mr. Eric Ellis. So that being said, let's do roll call. Let's go 00:37:59
roll call. Mr. Eric, Sir Aye and Morgan, Sir aye. And Chris and Brandon and. 00:38:07
Last but not least, Mr. Potential Future 2025 chair Brian. 00:38:16
Unanimous vote for this, so we appreciate everyone's work. 00:38:23
So. 00:38:26
All right. Well, that being said, we've completed our business items. Is there any work sessions? 00:38:28
All right, we don't have any work sessions and we'll just and unless anyone here has staff commissioner committee reports. 00:38:34
I don't believe so. All right. That being said, let's get moved towards adjournment. So I adjourn this meeting as my final action 00:38:42
as Chair of the DRC to the year 2024. 00:38:48
Thank you. 00:38:57
scroll up