City Council Regular Meeting
Live stream not working in Chrome or Edge?
Troubleshooting steps
In your browser: open Menu (three dots) → Settings → System → turn off “Use graphics acceleration when available.” Then restart the browser.
Transcript
| Get started. Today is November 12th, 2025. The time is. | 00:00:00 | |
| 6 almost 6:00 PM Do we need to wait till 6:00? | 00:00:06 | |
| It's 5:59. We're going to wait one minute. | 00:00:10 | |
| I'm early, but thank you for being here. | 00:00:14 | |
| OK, now we're going to start. | 00:00:31 | |
| It is November 12th, 2025. The time is 6:00 PM and I'm going to call the. | 00:00:34 | |
| Vineyard City Council into session. We're going to start out with an invocation or an inspirational thought. And the Pledge of | 00:00:40 | |
| Allegiance. I'm going to ask. | 00:00:44 | |
| Councilmember Clausen if. | 00:00:48 | |
| On the spot. | 00:00:51 | |
| OK. | 00:00:53 | |
| Our Father in heaven, we're grateful that we can be here this this evening to. | 00:00:57 | |
| Discuss the the needs of the city and do the work of the city and. | 00:01:01 | |
| We ask that our minds might be clear that we can. | 00:01:06 | |
| Ask the right questions and get the right answers. And this we pray, the name of Jesus Christ. Amen. Amen. | 00:01:10 | |
| All the rise. | 00:01:17 | |
| I pledge allegiance to the flag. | 00:01:21 | |
| And to the Republic for which it stands. | 00:01:26 | |
| One nation under. | 00:01:29 | |
| Indivisible with. | 00:01:32 | |
| All right, we have. | 00:01:37 | |
| Matt Carter with us here today and he is going to talk to us about. | 00:01:38 | |
| The front runner deputy project. | 00:01:42 | |
| No, you are the front runner, deputy project manager for UTA. I was. | 00:01:45 | |
| Almost saying your title is what we're going to be talking about, but what we're going to be talking about is. | 00:01:49 | |
| The front runner double tracking. | 00:01:54 | |
| In, that's going along the Wasatch Front. | 00:01:56 | |
| Come on up. | 00:02:00 | |
| Hello. Thank you for having us today. Thank you so much for coming. | 00:02:07 | |
| My name is Matt Carter. I'm the Deputy Project Manager for the Front Runner 2X project. | 00:02:10 | |
| This is Janelle Robertson. Janelle Robertson, I'm the UTA project manager. | 00:02:15 | |
| We're going to. | 00:02:20 | |
| If they believe we have a presentation is that. | 00:02:21 | |
| Going to come up that we could share. | 00:02:25 | |
| Do you have it on a flash drive or something like that? We could. | 00:02:31 | |
| Get it loaded up. | 00:02:34 | |
| Let's see in the seam it looks like you step. He's probably I. | 00:02:36 | |
| Would guess getting that ready if he's. | 00:02:40 | |
| It's like he stepped out. | 00:02:42 | |
| Pictures up there. | 00:02:49 | |
| Nassim, do you have the power the PowerPoint loaded up? | 00:03:00 | |
| If you don't, we might. We may have it here. | 00:03:08 | |
| Yeah, it's right there. It's. | 00:03:12 | |
| Quick share on that. | 00:03:15 | |
| Cash, they're my friends. If you want to e-mail it to me that can take my tablet and. | 00:03:24 | |
| Big, but can they do it on my laptop? | 00:03:30 | |
| Like if you. | 00:03:34 | |
| So you could present it or you. | 00:03:40 | |
| I've never gotten quite sure. | 00:03:46 | |
| It's a 5050. | 00:03:52 | |
| Jump into the start and then. | 00:04:31 | |
| Yeah, I'll do 1 through 11. | 00:04:33 | |
| I'm not optimistic. | 00:04:47 | |
| Good music to play. | 00:05:12 | |
| While we're waiting. | 00:05:14 | |
| Jeopardy. | 00:05:16 | |
| Yeah. Thank you. | 00:05:27 | |
| Will that work? | 00:05:30 | |
| Yep. | 00:05:34 | |
| Right, I'm going to start the presentation with just some background information about the project and then Matt will go into. | 00:05:39 | |
| More detail about the design and and the work that's. | 00:05:46 | |
| Going on with that. | 00:05:50 | |
| Let's see. | 00:05:52 | |
| Oh, I see. It's a pattern. | 00:05:55 | |
| So the Front Runner 2X project is a joint project between UTA and UDOT. | 00:06:03 | |
| State funds. | 00:06:08 | |
| That are partially funding the project and so UDOT is leading the procurement and the project. | 00:06:09 | |
| Umm as it's moving forward with UTA as a partner. | 00:06:15 | |
| Brian Allen, who's the project manager, had another City Council meeting he had to be to. | 00:06:20 | |
| Tonight, so we're kind of just. | 00:06:24 | |
| Splitting up the rolls here so we have. | 00:06:26 | |
| You know somebody. | 00:06:29 | |
| Here but. | 00:06:30 | |
| Normally he would be here and present this information. | 00:06:31 | |
| Just some overall information about Frontrunner, our first. | 00:06:36 | |
| Trains in the north started running in 2008. | 00:06:42 | |
| Was from Salt Lake City to Ogden. | 00:06:45 | |
| And then we built track down to Provo, from Salt Lake City to Provo. | 00:06:47 | |
| And that service started in 2012. | 00:06:52 | |
| We have about. | 00:06:55 | |
| 48 million passengers. | 00:06:56 | |
| Since the project started. | 00:06:59 | |
| It's 83 miles. | 00:07:01 | |
| Most of the corridor is a single track system. | 00:07:03 | |
| In 2000. | 00:07:08 | |
| 24 We get about 14,500 riders a day. | 00:07:09 | |
| And there are 16 stations in the corridor. | 00:07:14 | |
| The Max speed on front runner is 79 miles an hour in the areas where. | 00:07:18 | |
| We have enough room to get up to that speed. | 00:07:24 | |
| So the purpose of the project as I mentioned with a 75% single track system. | 00:07:29 | |
| We need to. | 00:07:35 | |
| We can't provide very much service with that right now. We do 30 minute service in the peak hours and one hour service in the off | 00:07:38 | |
| peak hours. | 00:07:42 | |
| In order to provide more service. | 00:07:46 | |
| What we need to. | 00:07:49 | |
| Have more double tracking. | 00:07:50 | |
| The umm. | 00:07:52 | |
| Currently on the system about 90%. | 00:07:54 | |
| That's about 90% capacity in certain segments and the grant that we're going after for. | 00:07:57 | |
| With the Federal Transit Administration is to increase the capacity. | 00:08:04 | |
| Of the system. | 00:08:09 | |
| And the way that we're doing that is in. | 00:08:10 | |
| Increasing the amount of double tracking that we have. | 00:08:12 | |
| Benefits from the project is. | 00:08:17 | |
| Increasing the frequency. So the project would increase the frequency to 15 minutes in the peak and 30 minutes in the off peak. | 00:08:20 | |
| So significantly more service than we were able to provide now. | 00:08:27 | |
| Improve the reliability of our system. | 00:08:30 | |
| Right now, whenever one train is late with so much single track in the system, we get what we call cascading delays and it delays | 00:08:34 | |
| every train in the system. And so then it kind of. | 00:08:39 | |
| It causes a lot of problem for commuters so. | 00:08:44 | |
| It's going to significantly help our reliability in the system. | 00:08:46 | |
| Increasing the choice of travel in the Wasatch Front is very important. | 00:08:50 | |
| Reason to do the project. | 00:08:56 | |
| Overtime, I-15 is going to continue to get slower and slower, and it's getting harder and harder to. | 00:08:58 | |
| Increase it for that demand. | 00:09:05 | |
| Front runner is going to stay the same travel time, if not continue to get better as we continue to improve it. | 00:09:08 | |
| Better air quality with having less vehicle miles traveled. | 00:09:15 | |
| And with the increase in frequency, it really significantly is going to increase the ridership right now with, you know, you miss | 00:09:19 | |
| your train and you have to wait an hour for the next train. | 00:09:24 | |
| It doesn't make it a very attractive. | 00:09:29 | |
| Mode of transportation and so the frequency is really expected to increase the ridership as well. | 00:09:31 | |
| So this project has 11 double tracking sections, about 26 miles of additional double tracking. | 00:09:40 | |
| One new station in Bluffdale. | 00:09:47 | |
| At the point of the mountain development. | 00:09:49 | |
| One track retract. | 00:09:52 | |
| Alignment. | 00:09:54 | |
| Near our current maintenance facility. | 00:09:55 | |
| In order to run that additional service, we need 10 additional train sets. | 00:09:58 | |
| And we need a maintenance facility to maintain those. | 00:10:02 | |
| Additional trains. | 00:10:06 | |
| So this is a video of which I have no hope is going to do anything because. | 00:10:11 | |
| This is a PDF. | 00:10:17 | |
| But if you want to see the video, we have a really good video online. | 00:10:20 | |
| That kind of explains how the double tracking works and. | 00:10:25 | |
| And why we're doing the project and you can just go to the front runner to X. | 00:10:30 | |
| Project website and it's a really cool video and it explains how train operations work a little bit. | 00:10:37 | |
| And how the double tracking is going to improve the service? | 00:10:43 | |
| These are the areas where we're doing the double tracking. | 00:10:51 | |
| The dark blue. | 00:10:54 | |
| Areas are the areas where we have existing double track in the system. As you could see that's in very few locations. | 00:10:56 | |
| And mostly just at the station. So those are the only. | 00:11:02 | |
| Only places in the system where the trains can pass each other. | 00:11:06 | |
| The red areas are where. | 00:11:09 | |
| Extending those double tracking sections. | 00:11:12 | |
| There's a lot in New York, in Utah County, so. | 00:11:15 | |
| It should have a pretty good reliable. | 00:11:19 | |
| Service here. | 00:11:22 | |
| The purple box is where the new station will go. | 00:11:24 | |
| Overall timeline, We are in the phase of completing the environmental work. | 00:11:30 | |
| Finalizing the design and procuring the trains and looking toward a federal grant approval. | 00:11:36 | |
| Construction is expected to be from 2027 to 2029. | 00:11:43 | |
| With starting the service in 20-30. | 00:11:48 | |
| The environmental process that we've done so far has been overseen by the Federal Transit Administration. | 00:11:55 | |
| We have done a categorical exclusion which is a certain level of environmental documentation for each double tracking segment. | 00:12:00 | |
| So that they can be independent projects. | 00:12:10 | |
| And then there is a place. | 00:12:13 | |
| Planning and environmental linkage document that we had produced. | 00:12:15 | |
| Prior to that which? | 00:12:18 | |
| Is for the entire Frontrunner 2X project. | 00:12:19 | |
| Linking those projects together with the additional service. | 00:12:23 | |
| And then for the environmental review, these are the typical. | 00:12:30 | |
| Things that are reviewed in the environmental documentation and we have. | 00:12:33 | |
| Terry here. Who was the person who's been leading this? If we have any questions or anything about the environmental | 00:12:37 | |
| documentation. | 00:12:41 | |
| And then I'm going to let Matt talk about the details of the. | 00:12:48 | |
| Good design, sorry. | 00:12:52 | |
| OK. So the segment that? | 00:12:56 | |
| Involves Vineyard City. | 00:12:57 | |
| Is the north of Orem segment it starts. | 00:12:59 | |
| At the Vineyard station on the North End. | 00:13:03 | |
| And extends. | 00:13:05 | |
| There's double tracking around the Vineyard station will extend from where that double tracking ends at the South end of that | 00:13:07 | |
| station. | 00:13:11 | |
| Down to the Orem station where the double track. | 00:13:15 | |
| Begins again to go around the Orem station. It's about 1.7 miles long. | 00:13:18 | |
| Let's see, I gotta work. | 00:13:27 | |
| Yeah, yes, girl. | 00:13:29 | |
| We've tried to break up the strip map of the through the Vineyard area into three areas, but it's going to be kind of hard to see. | 00:13:36 | |
| This is the North End. | 00:13:44 | |
| It's by the school there. | 00:13:47 | |
| By the. | 00:13:50 | |
| Where the current turn out is that goes from double track to single track. | 00:13:51 | |
| The most interesting piece of this area is we are going to have double crossovers in this area, which allows the trains to go back | 00:13:57 | |
| and forth from one track to the other. | 00:14:02 | |
| Those will. | 00:14:08 | |
| Probably not be used very much. Generally speaking the trains will just use the straight through movements. | 00:14:09 | |
| On the track, but in the event that one of the tracks in the system. | 00:14:16 | |
| Gets blocked with a train that might be out of service or something going on in one of the tracks. It allows the. | 00:14:21 | |
| Allows them to detour to the other track to get around so that we're not. | 00:14:29 | |
| Limited to just a single track system in the whole area down here. | 00:14:32 | |
| As we get more and more double track areas that are fully connected, we'll have more of these double crossovers through those | 00:14:37 | |
| fully double tracked areas and since. | 00:14:41 | |
| With this project, we'll have double track from Provo. | 00:14:47 | |
| All the way to almost the Lehigh station. | 00:14:50 | |
| We need these double crossover areas so that we can. | 00:14:54 | |
| Get trains back and forth. | 00:14:58 | |
| The next. | 00:15:00 | |
| Areas kind of in that middle section. | 00:15:04 | |
| Of the vineyard area. | 00:15:06 | |
| It runs along the trail. | 00:15:08 | |
| The plan here is that we would be building a track to the. | 00:15:11 | |
| West of the current track. Between the current track and the trail. | 00:15:16 | |
| The plan would be I think I have a cross section in this. | 00:15:21 | |
| Which would show. | 00:15:25 | |
| A little bit more of what that cross section would look like. | 00:15:27 | |
| But generally speaking. | 00:15:30 | |
| The area that's between the trail and the current track is where the new train would go. We would build a wall. | 00:15:34 | |
| Directly adjacent to the eastern edge of the trail. | 00:15:40 | |
| The trail would remain in place. | 00:15:44 | |
| But the eastern side of the trail would be. | 00:15:47 | |
| Have a. | 00:15:52 | |
| Probably a short wall and that you'll see that in the. | 00:15:52 | |
| In the cross section. | 00:15:56 | |
| In this area, we begin to transition all of the tracks to the. | 00:16:00 | |
| East as we go South. | 00:16:06 | |
| We have a couple pinch point areas particularly. | 00:16:08 | |
| The Geneva Road bridge. | 00:16:12 | |
| When we go on to the Geneva Road bridge, our track is 10 feet from the. | 00:16:14 | |
| Southern abutment of that bridge and so we can't get a track. | 00:16:19 | |
| To the east side of our track through there. So we've got to push. | 00:16:23 | |
| Union Pacific over a track and build. | 00:16:28 | |
| Our new track between US and Union Pacific. | 00:16:31 | |
| So that transition starts kind of where those blue lines are. Those blue lines are the transition of the UP tracks pushing. | 00:16:38 | |
| A little bit to the east. | 00:16:45 | |
| Umm. | 00:16:49 | |
| This is kind of the southern end. | 00:16:52 | |
| Of the project through this area. | 00:16:55 | |
| We are building our track between our current track and Union Pacific. | 00:16:57 | |
| We do not affect Vineyard Rd. | 00:17:02 | |
| We do not affect those businesses between Vineyard Rd. and Geneva Rd. | 00:17:06 | |
| We build underneath Geneva Rd. between. | 00:17:10 | |
| The current up track in Union Pacific. | 00:17:14 | |
| And then we. | 00:17:16 | |
| Continue that through 400 S. | 00:17:18 | |
| Where we cross at 400 S. | 00:17:21 | |
| Essentially there'll be an additional track to the east, which is the new Union Pacific track that's been relocated and then our | 00:17:24 | |
| track will be will fit in between. | 00:17:28 | |
| The current set of tracks that cross across that. | 00:17:33 | |
| Intersection, so there won't be a track any closer to Geneva Rd. on 400. | 00:17:36 | |
| But there will be one on the on the east side. | 00:17:41 | |
| I think that's generally the highlights of. | 00:17:46 | |
| Work through. | 00:17:49 | |
| Vineyard. Here's the cross section. | 00:17:55 | |
| Of the area near the trail. | 00:17:57 | |
| The area. | 00:18:00 | |
| So this is our current track right here. | 00:18:03 | |
| So this would be the new track that we would build. It'll be built 15 feet off of the center. | 00:18:07 | |
| Of the existing track. | 00:18:12 | |
| This is the current trail right here. | 00:18:15 | |
| And so there would be a wall built right on the edge of that trail. | 00:18:18 | |
| To accommodate. | 00:18:22 | |
| The construction of that. | 00:18:24 | |
| New track. | 00:18:27 | |
| The wall height would be somewhere between zero and three or four feet, depending on where you are along that trail and how that | 00:18:28 | |
| trail goes kind of up and down in relation to the current track. | 00:18:33 | |
| The new track would be built at the same elevation as the. | 00:18:38 | |
| As the the new track would be built at the same elevation as the existing track. | 00:18:41 | |
| We have studied some noise impacts. Terry could answer questions. | 00:18:54 | |
| In regards to it basically. | 00:18:58 | |
| We have identified some. | 00:19:01 | |
| Minor impacts. | 00:19:04 | |
| To noise. | 00:19:05 | |
| Mainly at the North End of near those double crossovers. | 00:19:06 | |
| Umm, we are mitigating those by installing what's called a spring frog. | 00:19:11 | |
| Turn out at those turnouts that will build those double crossovers. | 00:19:19 | |
| Generally. | 00:19:23 | |
| A turn out the major piece of noise and vibration. | 00:19:25 | |
| Is the gap that the? | 00:19:30 | |
| The wheel of the train has to go across to cross where the where the rails are crossing. | 00:19:32 | |
| And in a spring frog. | 00:19:38 | |
| It keeps that gap closed so that it can run on continuous rail except for when it's making the divergent move diverging movement, | 00:19:41 | |
| so it wouldn't have a problem. | 00:19:46 | |
| Wouldn't wouldn't make as much noise when it's just running in its daily? | 00:19:51 | |
| Runs on the straight through track. | 00:19:55 | |
| So with that frog our. | 00:19:58 | |
| Our modeling and our analysis indicates that we've mitigated the. | 00:20:01 | |
| Minor impacts due to noise. | 00:20:06 | |
| We also looked at vibration. | 00:20:12 | |
| The vibration analysis didn't show that there was anything that exceeded thresholds to justify any mitigation. | 00:20:16 | |
| For vibration. | 00:20:22 | |
| But again, the spring frogs that we're installing will also help with any. | 00:20:25 | |
| With reducing the vibration. | 00:20:28 | |
| In the area. | 00:20:31 | |
| One of the things that is, I think, mentioned on the agenda is a cooperative agreement, a master agreement. | 00:20:35 | |
| I believe that this master agreement is mostly associated with. | 00:20:42 | |
| Utilities. | 00:20:46 | |
| This is something that will probably it's being worked on right now between staff and UTA project management. | 00:20:48 | |
| It just sets forth. | 00:20:56 | |
| How we'll work together to get things relocated. | 00:20:59 | |
| At Uta's expense, At Utah's expense to pay for any relocations that might need to take place. | 00:21:02 | |
| Or. | 00:21:08 | |
| Casings that might be need to be extended or things like that. | 00:21:10 | |
| That's the. | 00:21:14 | |
| The gist of that master agreement? | 00:21:14 | |
| The master agreement mainly just talks about. | 00:21:18 | |
| The how we would work together. | 00:21:21 | |
| Then there would be a specific supplemental agreement for each. | 00:21:23 | |
| Specific utility and how? | 00:21:25 | |
| That'll get utilized. | 00:21:28 | |
| Or how that will get relocated and paid for and costs and. | 00:21:30 | |
| Anything specific associated with that? | 00:21:33 | |
| Utility. | 00:21:37 | |
| As far as next steps on the project, we'll. | 00:21:43 | |
| Finish up all of our environmental. | 00:21:46 | |
| Plans and things we will finish our design Our design is set to. | 00:21:50 | |
| Go through. | 00:21:55 | |
| Probably most of next year. | 00:21:56 | |
| Before we're final. | 00:21:59 | |
| With our design. | 00:22:00 | |
| We have selected a contractor for the project, they're called Frontrunner Forward Partners. It's a joint venture between. | 00:22:02 | |
| Umm, Stacy and Whitbeck and. | 00:22:09 | |
| Ralph L Wadsworth. | 00:22:12 | |
| And as Janelle mentioned, construction. | 00:22:15 | |
| Could start as early as 2027, depends kind of a little bit on. | 00:22:17 | |
| How our contractor stages the different? | 00:22:22 | |
| Segments of work and where they'll go from there. | 00:22:25 | |
| I think that's it. If you are interested there's some. | 00:22:31 | |
| Our website, Our phone numbers. | 00:22:35 | |
| If you search. | 00:22:38 | |
| Front runner. | 00:22:39 | |
| FR2X. | 00:22:41 | |
| On YouTube, I think that video that we had in there pulls up pretty easy. | 00:22:43 | |
| It looks just like that. | 00:22:48 | |
| Front screen that was on. | 00:22:49 | |
| Slide but. | 00:22:51 | |
| It's pretty interesting video. It explains the. | 00:22:52 | |
| The need of why we need to have double track in order to have trains pass and get more trains out on the system so. | 00:22:55 | |
| Thank you for your time. Any questions that we can answer? | 00:23:02 | |
| We're happy to do so. | 00:23:06 | |
| OK, Council, do you have any questions? | 00:23:07 | |
| I do. | 00:23:11 | |
| I know with the train station there came requirements with housing. | 00:23:13 | |
| And anything with the double track. Is there any requirements on? | 00:23:17 | |
| Increasing density or beautification or with federal dollars sometimes comes strings attached is there. | 00:23:21 | |
| Any known string strings attached on this? | 00:23:27 | |
| Nothing that would be associated with the city. | 00:23:30 | |
| For any zoning requirements or anything like that, there are strings attached as far as on our side and increasing capacity and | 00:23:34 | |
| making sure that we are providing the service that we're saying that we're going to provide. | 00:23:39 | |
| In our grant application. | 00:23:46 | |
| So there are some things that we'll need to make sure that we. | 00:23:48 | |
| Meet when we make the commitments to get the grant, but nothing for the city. | 00:23:51 | |
| OK. | 00:23:57 | |
| Well, thank you so much for coming down. We appreciate it and for informing us in our community about it. | 00:23:58 | |
| And council, you'll have access to this. | 00:24:03 | |
| PowerPoint and then we will. | 00:24:06 | |
| Take that website that you gave us as well. | 00:24:09 | |
| Thank you. OK, Thanks. OK. | 00:24:12 | |
| All right, we'll go ahead and move on to our work session items. | 00:24:15 | |
| And we're going to start with 3.1, our rental license. | 00:24:19 | |
| By Maria Ortega Our Neighborhood Services Coordinator will be presenting this. | 00:24:23 | |
| Just let me know. | 00:24:59 | |
| Tom. | 00:25:22 | |
| OK, perfect. So. | 00:25:27 | |
| Over the past year. | 00:25:29 | |
| Be in cash have been working on a. | 00:25:31 | |
| Rental license program. | 00:25:34 | |
| There we go. | 00:25:40 | |
| And basically what this would do is it would require all rental dwellings within Vineyard to obtain a business license. | 00:25:44 | |
| That would be excluding any ad use as well as any. | 00:25:51 | |
| Rentals for immediate families. | 00:25:54 | |
| And then any of the apartment buildings. | 00:25:56 | |
| This would include a new application, a business license fee. | 00:26:00 | |
| Parking requirements and inspections. | 00:26:03 | |
| And then? | 00:26:06 | |
| The last point is just to let you know that the state law does authorize us to do this and there's many other cities in Utah that. | 00:26:07 | |
| Have this right now and that are there are some of them clear field Orem Provo. | 00:26:13 | |
| The purpose of this is really just to provide. | 00:26:20 | |
| Resources to control occupancy. That's been one of the biggest issues that I've had. | 00:26:23 | |
| While doing code enforcement and neighborhood services. | 00:26:27 | |
| As well as providing adequate living conditions and providing renters with resources. | 00:26:30 | |
| To know what? | 00:26:36 | |
| Their rights are. | 00:26:37 | |
| And then to ensure that landlords are providing. | 00:26:40 | |
| A good amount of parking spaces. | 00:26:42 | |
| It also helps with unpaid utility issues and it helps us collect information on who's in the home as well as landlords and the | 00:26:46 | |
| management companies. | 00:26:51 | |
| Here's just a timeline of what we have, kind of. | 00:26:57 | |
| In mind. | 00:27:01 | |
| We are currently doing a disproportionate fee study. | 00:27:02 | |
| And a licensed study than we plan on doing public outreach. | 00:27:05 | |
| One thing we want to kind of talk about is. | 00:27:09 | |
| The different forms we were planning on doing kind of online outreach as well as possibly some. | 00:27:12 | |
| Some public houses open homes. | 00:27:17 | |
| And then we would do. | 00:27:20 | |
| Council review at that time in March, as well as we have a communications plan on. | 00:27:22 | |
| Different things that we're going to do to. | 00:27:29 | |
| Put it out there in social media. | 00:27:32 | |
| As well as when it would begin in July of next year is the goal. | 00:27:33 | |
| There we go. | 00:27:39 | |
| And then that's just kind of some of the communication things again that we have. We have Flyers that will be sending out. | 00:27:40 | |
| Public meetings such as City Council. We want to add a page to our website and add it to the newsletter. Utility bills. | 00:27:46 | |
| As well as we'd create. | 00:27:52 | |
| Flyers and content that would be for landlords and tenants. | 00:27:54 | |
| In English and Spanish, because we do know that there is quite a bit of tenants that are mainly Spanish speakers. | 00:27:58 | |
| And then for this. | 00:28:07 | |
| The application that we have in mind would be just one application, even if. | 00:28:09 | |
| A landlord owns multiple homes. | 00:28:13 | |
| They would just list every home that they have on that main application. | 00:28:17 | |
| We would need valid contact information from them including e-mail, phone number. | 00:28:21 | |
| If the owner does not live within 20 miles of the rental dwelling. | 00:28:25 | |
| We would require them to have a property owner. | 00:28:29 | |
| And have that properties under information so that if there is. | 00:28:31 | |
| Any reason an issue at the property? | 00:28:35 | |
| We can reach out to the property management company instead. | 00:28:37 | |
| We need the number of individuals renting out the unit. | 00:28:41 | |
| The number of offset parking spaces that they are providing. | 00:28:44 | |
| As well as. | 00:28:47 | |
| An acknowledgment that they've. | 00:28:49 | |
| Spoken to the HOA and that they. | 00:28:50 | |
| Are in agreeance that they are renting out the unit. | 00:28:53 | |
| Inspections. | 00:28:58 | |
| We do plan on doing inspections on properties. | 00:28:59 | |
| We have two different options that we're looking at right now. One of them is a one year renewal where there would be an initial | 00:29:02 | |
| inspection. | 00:29:06 | |
| And then any further inspection would be based on complaints. | 00:29:09 | |
| And then a two year renewal. | 00:29:12 | |
| Where this would have an initial inspection. | 00:29:14 | |
| And then it would require a biannual inspection. This is closer to our Adu license that we currently have. | 00:29:16 | |
| And then? | 00:29:24 | |
| Yeah. And with most of these points, we do want to have this as a discussion maybe at the end. | 00:29:27 | |
| For that to see what that does to the county averages. | 00:30:02 | |
| And then just recently we have started working with Zion Public Finance to determine the fee that would be. | 00:30:04 | |
| Right for for Vineyard and so they essentially they just analyze how much staff time it takes to accept these applications, update | 00:30:10 | |
| the websites, do these inspections. | 00:30:14 | |
| And go on from there. You said Science Bank. | 00:30:20 | |
| Zion Zions Public Finance, Yeah. | 00:30:22 | |
| And then we just kind of brainstormed some questions that were outside of the scope of this and and just wanted to address those | 00:30:26 | |
| so. | 00:30:29 | |
| How will this be enforced just through our basic code enforcement process? | 00:30:33 | |
| So if we do get reports of a rental and they don't have a license, we'll use, you know, our code enforcement personnel to reach | 00:30:38 | |
| out to the property owners and get them to come into compliance, whether that's get a license or clear up if they're not a rental. | 00:30:43 | |
| The fee is going to be placed is the responsibility of the property owner. They are the ones that have to fill out the | 00:30:51 | |
| application, pay the fee. The the tenant cannot do that. | 00:30:54 | |
| All rental properties that do not have professional on site management will have to get this license. So this mostly excludes | 00:30:59 | |
| properties along Mill Rd. except for Edgewater townhomes. | 00:31:04 | |
| Just because they have that on site management, we just don't have issues with occupancy or maintenance issues, so. | 00:31:10 | |
| And then the the hardest part is probably that last question is how are we going to find the properties that don't proactively | 00:31:19 | |
| register because we definitely are going to do the best that we can to outreach to everybody in the city saying this is a | 00:31:23 | |
| requirement, you do need to get this license, but there will be some that. | 00:31:27 | |
| Just don't get a license. And so I've been talking with other cities throughout the state to figure out kind of what they've done. | 00:31:31 | |
| And a lot of them have just. | 00:31:37 | |
| Taking it through code enforcement that as they get complaints they just. | 00:31:38 | |
| Work it through the system. | 00:31:41 | |
| But we do have some tools such as the county partial data and utility counts. So on the county website, if we see that somebody | 00:31:43 | |
| owns multiple properties, we can assume they're not living it every single one of those houses. And so we can then reach out to | 00:31:48 | |
| them and let them know they need the license. And same thing with the utility accounts. We have a list of kind of existing rentals | 00:31:52 | |
| that we can utilize. | 00:31:57 | |
| And then like I said before the report concern tool. | 00:32:02 | |
| So that's all we have prepared. But like we said, this is a work session so we're in the middle of writing the language for this | 00:32:05 | |
| and would love feedback on what you like, what you don't like, and how we should proceed. | 00:32:10 | |
| Can I get some clarity on a few things? Yeah. | 00:32:14 | |
| I missed a portion of what you were. | 00:32:18 | |
| Speaking about when you said the. | 00:32:20 | |
| Properties that were included. | 00:32:22 | |
| And you also mentioned. | 00:32:24 | |
| How we have an Adu application? | 00:32:27 | |
| So this would not apply to the 80 correct? Just 880 user are treated separately under state law. | 00:32:29 | |
| And so we felt that it was proper to treat them under this. So essentially we'll have one portal where it'll be like you need to | 00:32:35 | |
| obtain a rental license. And from there you can say it's an accessory dwelling unit, as in I live on site and I'm renting out my | 00:32:39 | |
| basement or whatever it may be. | 00:32:43 | |
| Or there's the. | 00:32:47 | |
| I have a house in vineyards that I don't live at and I'm renting out the whole thing. | 00:32:49 | |
| OK. And then the second question that I had a. | 00:32:53 | |
| On this one I have a few more questions but. | 00:32:56 | |
| The housing that you mentioned along Mill Rd. having management already, does that pertain to all of our HOA's that have | 00:32:59 | |
| management? | 00:33:04 | |
| Oh, no, absolutely not. OK. So, so something like just excluding. Yeah. So like like the ones that are in like neighborhoods like. | 00:33:08 | |
| Tucker Rowe, the Locks, the preserve, Lakefront Town Center, they'll have H ways they don't have on site management and they're | 00:33:17 | |
| all individually owned units, meaning like in Lakefront for example, I think we have 700. | 00:33:22 | |
| Unique owners of the condos and townhomes there, meaning there could be up to 700 rentals there with different property managers | 00:33:28 | |
| and whatnot. Where the Vine, for example, we have one property manager on site at all times that we work with. So it was Vine, | 00:33:33 | |
| Concord and Alloy. | 00:33:38 | |
| Yeah, and. | 00:33:42 | |
| Mill Point and also the orchards that are just being built right now. | 00:33:44 | |
| Then you mentioned that the way that you would do enforcement, what is the rate of participation for other cities that are doing | 00:33:48 | |
| it such as Orem? I I believe Orem, when I reached out to them, they said they believe they have about 50% of their properties in | 00:33:52 | |
| compliance. | 00:33:56 | |
| OK, how do you? | 00:34:02 | |
| Are you done? | 00:34:04 | |
| Yeah, go ahead, Jake. | 00:34:05 | |
| How do you legally exclude certain sections like them and not like run into any issues legally? | 00:34:06 | |
| Like how do we exclude like the vine? | 00:34:14 | |
| So the count, yes, the Council can just say good question. | 00:34:16 | |
| We're going to have this fee for some so. | 00:34:19 | |
| One reason is a state law that does allow for these rental dwelling licenses requires that. | 00:34:23 | |
| An owner only has to get one license regardless of how many units they got. So we could include the vine. | 00:34:27 | |
| But in that case, we are and. And Jamie, correct me if I'm wrong, if you're brushed up on this, but. | 00:34:32 | |
| Essentially, the Vine would get one license for all of their units and I don't know if that would do any good for the city because | 00:34:38 | |
| we aren't necessarily having, we're not dealing with their parking issues. Most of those are dealt within the development | 00:34:42 | |
| themselves. | 00:34:46 | |
| But uh. | 00:34:51 | |
| The city can. I'm just. | 00:34:51 | |
| Legally we can say hey this. | 00:34:53 | |
| HOA yes, this HOA no. They will have to. | 00:34:56 | |
| Have a single license. | 00:34:59 | |
| But other welcome. | 00:35:01 | |
| It's one business. | 00:35:02 | |
| Even though they're renting multiple units. | 00:35:04 | |
| So what if somebody does own multiple houses? They would just have 1. You would just have one license. They they too would apply | 00:35:07 | |
| for a single license and then. | 00:35:10 | |
| But they they will list out all of their properties and we still could do inspections on all of those properties. I was gonna say | 00:35:14 | |
| like it needs to be equal under the. | 00:35:17 | |
| They and they would, they still would have the right to inspect and do other things on the property too. So Jamie, Jamie that that | 00:35:21 | |
| would be a change from how it's written right now. | 00:35:25 | |
| Like, yeah, well, we'll work on that language. You will need to make that change. I don't think you can exclude. | 00:35:30 | |
| A business from the license requirement or a landlord, so to speak, right? | 00:35:36 | |
| Everybody would be subject to it. We may need to work through. | 00:35:40 | |
| The provisions on inspection just to make sure that it is applied. | 00:35:44 | |
| And equitable way. | 00:35:49 | |
| So how we were doing is because the apartment complexes are paying for management. So they're they're they're kind of going to | 00:35:50 | |
| step above. I think that's fine. You could put an exclusion in the ordinance on that basis and then you. | 00:35:56 | |
| You would for bear inspections for those types of units. I think you still ought to require a license. | 00:36:02 | |
| At least a business license, yeah. | 00:36:09 | |
| Yeah, well, and the rental license? | 00:36:11 | |
| You you will run into other. | 00:36:13 | |
| Owners that own multiple properties do also have. | 00:36:16 | |
| Property management companies running them. | 00:36:19 | |
| Yeah. And that's why I think the language that I originally wrote like on site. | 00:36:22 | |
| Professional management meaning like. | 00:36:26 | |
| There was like for example, the Vine, you can go there and you can during business hours, you can go talk to their property | 00:36:28 | |
| management, you can talk to their maintenance people on site where your average mom and pop landlord don't necessarily have that | 00:36:32 | |
| service available. | 00:36:36 | |
| Are other cities using proactive enforcement where they're looking at parcels or are they? | 00:36:41 | |
| Relying on the 50% participation rates. | 00:36:48 | |
| I would say it's a mix. | 00:36:51 | |
| So, so Orem, for example, they did try at the very beginning they they looked at the county data. | 00:36:52 | |
| To look at, you know, duplicate records and whatnot and sent out. | 00:36:57 | |
| To those specific addresses or same thing with their utility accounts. | 00:37:00 | |
| But in the end, it is, it's, it's a big enforcement thing and and that's one of the reasons Maria recently went full time in our | 00:37:04 | |
| department was to help gear this up and then do these inspections and, and roll out this program. | 00:37:10 | |
| It just a little fact in in Vineyard. According to the last census, I believe it was about 56% of the the homes in Vineyard are | 00:37:16 | |
| all rentals. | 00:37:20 | |
| That includes everything, not just, you know, your high density, that's single family homes, all that 56% and. | 00:37:25 | |
| Without having any kind of data or any kind of contact with. | 00:37:31 | |
| A majority of the residents of Vineyard, it's really hard for us to do any kind of code enforcement or anything like that. | 00:37:34 | |
| When we don't have that information. | 00:37:39 | |
| That's a good question. I mean a good comment. | 00:37:41 | |
| My question is. | 00:37:44 | |
| According to the state law, we've had to deal with long term rental. | 00:37:45 | |
| Issues for occupation and it's very difficult to. | 00:37:49 | |
| Manage those especially because you're not going to notice them by parcel type. Sometimes it's two floors being rented out and | 00:37:54 | |
| those come in. | 00:37:57 | |
| Will it? | 00:38:02 | |
| Exist. | 00:38:02 | |
| The same way. I mean, we're not going to have. | 00:38:04 | |
| Proactive code enforcement on that it'll it'll exist the same way it This just makes it easier to enforce the the biggest thing | 00:38:05 | |
| with. | 00:38:09 | |
| Occupancy is that it's really hard right now how we have it in the code. | 00:38:12 | |
| To enforce because we have nothing that. | 00:38:17 | |
| Allows us to have permission to do inspections. | 00:38:19 | |
| We have to ask the homeowner and if the homeowner doesn't want to because they know that they're out of compliance. | 00:38:23 | |
| They can say no, and at that point it becomes. | 00:38:28 | |
| Either I have enough evidence to. | 00:38:31 | |
| Get a subpoena. | 00:38:33 | |
| Or. | 00:38:34 | |
| I have to just go based off of word of mouth. | 00:38:35 | |
| And just say, OK, well. | 00:38:37 | |
| They're saying they have 4:00. I'm going to agree they have 4:00 because I have no proof of it. | 00:38:39 | |
| Even though we might have. | 00:38:43 | |
| Tools that are letting us know if we have no concrete evidence. That's the hard part. | 00:38:45 | |
| Versus this if we have you know? | 00:38:48 | |
| Multiple people saying, hey, we've seen that there's eight people living in this home. | 00:38:51 | |
| I could say, look, you have a license. | 00:38:55 | |
| You've agreed to the terms of this license, so now we can do an inspection. | 00:38:57 | |
| And that way we could verify that you either are in compliance or you're out of compliance. | 00:39:02 | |
| OK. So anybody that has taken the time to participate in the activity and has agreed to this type of enforcement is going to? | 00:39:06 | |
| Allow you to do this and our thought is that we're going to allow 50% of the people that like to. | 00:39:14 | |
| Participate, we'll say. | 00:39:21 | |
| To basically kind of change the way things are going because they have a desire to follow the law. | 00:39:23 | |
| Yeah. And and really a lot of it is also is just. | 00:39:28 | |
| As uh. | 00:39:31 | |
| The city gets older and as the city grows. | 00:39:32 | |
| What a lot of these cities are trying to prevent as well is. | 00:39:34 | |
| Homes that aren't being maintained, and that's a big part of it as well. | 00:39:38 | |
| Is that you're ensuring that these people who are renting these homes have livable conditions at the property owner is taking care | 00:39:42 | |
| of it, they're not letting it get. | 00:39:45 | |
| You know, mold either not letting pestle in there, they're not letting it just. | 00:39:49 | |
| Dilapidate. | 00:39:53 | |
| And that's also a big thing that we're wanting to avoid now. | 00:39:54 | |
| Versus later when it does start getting, you know, an issue, especially with like Orem and probably when I've talked to them, | 00:39:58 | |
| that's their biggest thing. | 00:40:01 | |
| Is that a lot of the time is an occupancy, a lot of the time is just their livable conditions aren't there, aren't being met. | 00:40:05 | |
| And that's something that some most the times attendants aren't aware of that they can reach out to the city and say hey. | 00:40:11 | |
| My home. | 00:40:17 | |
| Is. | 00:40:18 | |
| Having water leaks. I'm having mold. | 00:40:18 | |
| What am I supposed to do? | 00:40:21 | |
| And they're unaware that they can reach out to us. So the goal is to try to. | 00:40:22 | |
| Inform everybody of their rights. | 00:40:25 | |
| I have a question you mentioned. | 00:40:28 | |
| Parking requirements. | 00:40:31 | |
| Was that specifically for? | 00:40:33 | |
| Did you take it up? | 00:40:36 | |
| There was a parking slide in here but I think this might be an old presentation, like it's not my latest save. | 00:40:37 | |
| So explain what are what your rights or abilities will be with parking requirements. | 00:40:43 | |
| Yeah. So how we have the parking? | 00:40:48 | |
| Right now, for example, if somebody who's renting gets towed, they're gonna call the city and they're gonna say hey. | 00:40:50 | |
| I live here. | 00:40:55 | |
| And I was towed and this was unfair and we. | 00:40:56 | |
| Be like sorry like you were parked illegally. Have you talked to your landlord? | 00:40:59 | |
| And the landlord right now has really no responsibility to provide that parking for the the tenants. | 00:41:03 | |
| You know, they, there's nothing the city can do to force them to do that. So, so the, and we're still working on the language for | 00:41:08 | |
| the parking to make sure it's compliant with, with state code on this. But essentially we're saying that. | 00:41:13 | |
| You have to be able to every on-site parking space. | 00:41:18 | |
| That you have has to be available for the tenants. We'll see some instances where somebody will. | 00:41:21 | |
| Rent out a house, but they won't let their tenants park in the garage. So now their tenants are parking on the street or in the | 00:41:25 | |
| driveway. So now we're saying if you have parking spaces on site, they need to be available to the tenants to use. | 00:41:30 | |
| We are also requesting put in the the language that. | 00:41:36 | |
| Every occupant who has a vehicle must have an off site parking space essentially. | 00:41:40 | |
| So it does require that if I'm a landlord and I have a condo, say in the lakefront community where you're parking in the driveway, | 00:41:45 | |
| in the garage and then you have a parking pass. | 00:41:49 | |
| You can then rent up to three people. | 00:41:53 | |
| Because that's the parking you're providing and you're no longer putting that burden on the the city or or other communities, | 00:41:54 | |
| other neighborhoods to provide for those those landlords. | 00:41:59 | |
| So for like a house. | 00:42:03 | |
| Let's just say house and. | 00:42:06 | |
| If they have four people living there, would you would this program? | 00:42:09 | |
| Actually allow I guess. | 00:42:14 | |
| Could we be allowed to require them to utilize the garage on the driveway for those four people or would? | 00:42:17 | |
| Since it's a public Rd. Yeah, because we don't have a parking permit, we couldn't say you have. | 00:42:22 | |
| To park on site, we have to say. | 00:42:26 | |
| Provide the parking available so that's something we could check when we do our inspection and say we look at the garage and the | 00:42:27 | |
| garage is jam packed as a storaging or whatever. | 00:42:31 | |
| We can say we are not. | 00:42:36 | |
| Permitting this or we're not going to pass this inspection because you are not providing the adequate parking for this, this need | 00:42:37 | |
| or this use. | 00:42:40 | |
| All right. That's a good question, Marty, because. | 00:42:44 | |
| Otherwise it might conflict with ad use even though we're viewing them separately. | 00:42:47 | |
| The state law is kind of the right. Yeah. No, we don't do parking. I like that this is separate from Adus, because you're right. | 00:42:51 | |
| Yeah, the. | 00:42:55 | |
| We can't require the additional parking spot for you, right? Right. We just have to require 4 spots and that's it. But it might | 00:42:59 | |
| conflict even either way. So yeah, even if we are doing. | 00:43:03 | |
| OK. | 00:43:08 | |
| My question is about the 50%. | 00:43:11 | |
| Don't choose to. | 00:43:14 | |
| Get a license. | 00:43:15 | |
| Because my guess is. | 00:43:18 | |
| That house in La Chaminade that's got eight guys living in it. | 00:43:20 | |
| With seven cars. | 00:43:25 | |
| Or 9 cars. | 00:43:28 | |
| That their landlord is. | 00:43:32 | |
| Going to choose not to do that and. | 00:43:34 | |
| I mean, Marty and I are probably talking about the same house. | 00:43:35 | |
| But. | 00:43:41 | |
| That landlords. | 00:43:42 | |
| You know, just brush you off and say now I don't need that. | 00:43:44 | |
| Like so in that case we do have enforcement mechanisms within this code as well as I. | 00:43:47 | |
| I'm sure we could also look at enforcing our doing business without a license violations as well. So we do have some ways that we | 00:43:51 | |
| could. | 00:43:54 | |
| Essentially get them to come into compliance as we get those reports because essentially the other 50% that aren't necessarily | 00:43:57 | |
| complying with the code. | 00:44:00 | |
| Hopefully they're. | 00:44:03 | |
| Just being good landlords and they're. | 00:44:04 | |
| Tenants aren't causing a problem in the neighborhood. | 00:44:06 | |
| For the second week, catch wind of a rental. | 00:44:08 | |
| Causing a problem, we can go straight to the landlord. | 00:44:11 | |
| Say, hey, we know you're operating this rental, you need to get a license. This is a new and you know what, we'll have some grace | 00:44:14 | |
| is this is a new program we're rolling out, but you know, we're going to say you need to obtain a license. Here's how you're going | 00:44:18 | |
| to do that You have. | 00:44:22 | |
| X amount of days to come into compliance. If not, you're going to face a daily fee of X amount. | 00:44:26 | |
| What are the improvements that allow you to do that enforcement? | 00:44:30 | |
| What are the improvements? | 00:44:34 | |
| Yeah, in this code. What is this code offer separately from what we do now that's suddenly going to allow us to have? | 00:44:35 | |
| So just right now we don't require a rental to or a landlord to have a business license. | 00:44:42 | |
| But now we will. | 00:44:47 | |
| So we're essentially now saying you are now essentially doing business in the city of Vineyard without a license. | 00:44:48 | |
| OK, I have a. | 00:44:52 | |
| I have an example. | 00:44:54 | |
| There is a house right now that has a lot of people living in it, but they're actually running a car dealership. | 00:44:55 | |
| We hopefully took a care of that. | 00:45:01 | |
| I need to take care of that. That one is actually dealt with as of now because I was going to say it's been reported. People want, | 00:45:03 | |
| yeah, I got a report of it and it was taken care of within the time frame that it needed to be. So they were actually very quick | 00:45:08 | |
| to comply. | 00:45:12 | |
| OK. Yeah, OK. | 00:45:17 | |
| Doesn't matter anymore. No, you're good. I dealt with that one. | 00:45:18 | |
| I'm guessing. Any other questions? I'm guessing this doesn't change anything with Airbnbs. | 00:45:23 | |
| No, so as of now Airbnbs are not permitted um. | 00:45:27 | |
| And that is based on complaint basis as well. I have been handling those as they've come in when they don't have a license. How | 00:45:30 | |
| are you solving that just? | 00:45:34 | |
| Because our code does. | 00:45:38 | |
| Explicitly state that they don't are not permitted, so we can still enforce it on that end. | 00:45:39 | |
| Well, just to clarify, Sorry, sorry, Maria. Maria. | 00:45:44 | |
| Pretty much right? | 00:45:47 | |
| Short term rentals are allowed under a special project. So if you develop a commercial project in a commercial district that is | 00:45:49 | |
| developed for short term rentals, kind of it's kind of like a hotel use. | 00:45:55 | |
| But developed for that, we do have a code provision that allows that just. There's also a plethora of state codes that. | 00:46:00 | |
| Kind of. | 00:46:07 | |
| Bind cities hands for how they're able to do enforcement. | 00:46:08 | |
| Yeah, there's an interest on torture rentals. Yeah, there was an update to the code this last legislative season that has made it | 00:46:12 | |
| easier. | 00:46:15 | |
| And so there are there were a couple of problem Airbnbs that have been dealt with since that. | 00:46:19 | |
| Has passed. | 00:46:24 | |
| OK, I know that we have a few that have been grandfathered in. I guess I'm wondering how many? | 00:46:25 | |
| As of now, I have a list of three. | 00:46:30 | |
| All right, Sophie. | 00:46:33 | |
| A couple more, but they've been sold, so that does not roll over to the new owners. | 00:46:35 | |
| Awesome. Any other questions from the Council at this time? | 00:46:40 | |
| If you have any other thoughts, please send them to Maria and Cash as they work through this to bring it back to yeah, We'd love | 00:46:43 | |
| to hear anybody's feedback on this. | 00:46:46 | |
| As we move forward with it. | 00:46:50 | |
| I just want to say well done. | 00:46:51 | |
| Thanks, Sir. You've been great at helping encourage us to get this moving, so I appreciate that. Yeah, well, a year ago, right, we | 00:46:52 | |
| had a parking meeting and that was one of the main concerns. | 00:46:57 | |
| Was. | 00:47:02 | |
| Over occupancy. So sure that that's for sure the one thing I do get on a. | 00:47:03 | |
| Like a day-to-day basis is just, hey, there's so many people in this home. And so that was definitely something I was looking into | 00:47:07 | |
| anyways, just because it it is an issue that we have to deal with at some point. Yeah, it makes sense for our community. So thank | 00:47:12 | |
| you. Yeah. Yeah. Well done. Definitely. Thank you. | 00:47:17 | |
| Thank you. | 00:47:22 | |
| All right, Eric, you are going to be discussing the fuel card policy and agreement. | 00:47:24 | |
| Yeah. Thank you. | 00:47:30 | |
| OK, so the Vineyard city? | 00:47:33 | |
| Fuel card policy is. | 00:47:35 | |
| One deliverable from the audit that we've been working through. | 00:47:37 | |
| To have a written. | 00:47:41 | |
| Policy on this that increases accountability. It makes it easier for us to track. | 00:47:43 | |
| Fuel usage. | 00:47:48 | |
| And it also reduces any risk of. | 00:47:50 | |
| Fraud, waste or abuse. | 00:47:52 | |
| So kind of in summary and you have these before you that you can review, but. | 00:47:54 | |
| The fuel fuel cars will be issued to specific vehicles. | 00:47:59 | |
| The fuel card pins may be used. | 00:48:03 | |
| Only for purchasing fuel for city vehicles and equipment. | 00:48:06 | |
| Employees will enter accurate odometer readings, which again helps with tracking of this. | 00:48:09 | |
| And vehicle identification information when prompted at the time of purchase. | 00:48:15 | |
| The purchase of fuel or items for personal vehicles or non city purposes is prohibited. | 00:48:23 | |
| As is splitting transactions to. | 00:48:29 | |
| Bypass purchase limits. | 00:48:32 | |
| As is misrepresentation of mileage, vehicle number. | 00:48:34 | |
| Or other information. | 00:48:38 | |
| From a monitoring standpoint, the fuel card activity shall be regularly reviewed to ensure comple. | 00:48:40 | |
| Clients on this policy. | 00:48:46 | |
| And it will be the supervisors who are responsible for monitoring card usage and ensuring that employees under their supervision | 00:48:48 | |
| comply with the policy. | 00:48:53 | |
| That's kind of a summary of that. | 00:48:57 | |
| Did you have anything to add, Brett? | 00:49:00 | |
| Excuse me? | 00:49:04 | |
| Nothing to add, I do have questions but I'll hold off. | 00:49:04 | |
| That Nope. It is now time for questions. | 00:49:07 | |
| The the question I had and I this is as much so that we get an answer on record for everybody in case they're reviewing this. | 00:49:10 | |
| The way the proposal reads. | 00:49:21 | |
| If cards are issued to a vehicle and then you have a PIN and then there's. | 00:49:25 | |
| Language about turning in cards and things like that. | 00:49:30 | |
| Can you explain the relationship between? | 00:49:33 | |
| The. | 00:49:37 | |
| Card the vehicle and the person. | 00:49:38 | |
| There's two, I guess you would. | 00:49:42 | |
| Say there's two different types of relationships. | 00:49:44 | |
| There are. | 00:49:46 | |
| Vehicles that are assigned to individuals and so those ones would have. | 00:49:47 | |
| Single pin for that driver. | 00:49:51 | |
| And that driver is expected to always use that same card for that same vehicle. | 00:49:54 | |
| Then there are shared vehicles in the city. | 00:49:59 | |
| And with the shared vehicles? | 00:50:02 | |
| The card will stay with the vehicle. | 00:50:05 | |
| And anyone that's using that card will have to again use the same protocol so they enter the odometer. | 00:50:07 | |
| And and that way over time you can kind of track. | 00:50:14 | |
| The mileage used with the. | 00:50:18 | |
| With the fuel used and from an audit standpoint, that's what they're kind of looking for is. | 00:50:20 | |
| Is. | 00:50:26 | |
| Variations. Kind of. | 00:50:27 | |
| That extend beyond the expected for that amount of mileage. | 00:50:28 | |
| And that vehicle, so that's that's how those two different types would work. And Christy has a thought too. | 00:50:33 | |
| Just the pins for each employee will be different. So that's how we will know which employee put gas in that vehicle. That was | 00:50:39 | |
| going to be my next question, so. | 00:50:44 | |
| Excellent. | 00:50:50 | |
| Any other questions? | 00:50:53 | |
| No, I'd just say well done like. | 00:50:58 | |
| Without this information, you're not able to track and understand or even investigate. And now with this ability, you'll be able | 00:51:00 | |
| to. | 00:51:03 | |
| Ascertain where issues are or arise if they come in. So good job, Brett. | 00:51:07 | |
| Team and everyone. So yeah. | 00:51:12 | |
| Thank you, Eric and Christy. | 00:51:13 | |
| We'll move on to our transportation utility fee. | 00:51:16 | |
| And we have a few people coming up. | 00:51:21 | |
| Cody and Hales. | 00:51:24 | |
| Cody Dieter with EFG Consulting and Hales Engineering is here. Naseem is anybody from our team? | 00:51:27 | |
| Working on this as well. | 00:51:33 | |
| I just want to make sure I. | 00:51:35 | |
| State everybody's name who's presenting. | 00:51:36 | |
| Just those two that you mentioned. | 00:51:51 | |
| OK, mostly just me. I think so. OK. | 00:51:52 | |
| While this is coming up, I just want to express appreciation to staff. | 00:51:57 | |
| For their assistance with this project, they've been professional and very helpful. | 00:52:01 | |
| As we've gone through this. | 00:52:07 | |
| You've got a great staff. | 00:52:10 | |
| So you should be. | 00:52:11 | |
| Grateful for their work. | 00:52:13 | |
| Thank you. | 00:52:14 | |
| All right, do I just push the thing? Is that what I do? | 00:52:22 | |
| There we go. OK, I got it. | 00:52:28 | |
| I think so. | 00:52:31 | |
| It was scared of you, so just take a second. | 00:52:35 | |
| All right, so the first thing to share about the transportation utility fee is. | 00:52:39 | |
| The statute currently does not exist. This explicitly allows the city to charge a transportation utility fee. In 2016, I assisted | 00:52:43 | |
| Pleasant Grove City. | 00:52:48 | |
| With the implement implementation of their transportation utility fee, the first in the state. | 00:52:53 | |
| It was taken to the Supreme Court. So this ruling. | 00:52:58 | |
| Now provides. | 00:53:02 | |
| The only legal pathway currently. | 00:53:03 | |
| For a city to charge a transportation utility fee, there was a proposed legislation last year that did not pass. | 00:53:06 | |
| And it's likely that that will come back in the future and it will follow, we think if it follows the statute that was proposed | 00:53:13 | |
| last year, it'll be similar to this. | 00:53:18 | |
| So So what the the reason you have the authority to? | 00:53:23 | |
| Levy a transportation utility fee or charge a transportation utility fee is under 10884 just the. | 00:53:26 | |
| The general welfare of the city and your ability to. | 00:53:34 | |
| Promote the things that are involved with running a city. | 00:53:38 | |
| Specifically. | 00:53:42 | |
| This ruling said you need to have a clear link between the demand for service. | 00:53:43 | |
| That you're providing and what you charge. | 00:53:49 | |
| So it's a very reasonable and sensible. | 00:53:51 | |
| Link that needs to be created. The second is that you need to have a utility fee fund which you already have. | 00:53:56 | |
| So that all of those expenses fall into this fund, It's easy to track. | 00:54:02 | |
| For those residents of your city. | 00:54:07 | |
| So we have followed that. | 00:54:09 | |
| Methodology. | 00:54:11 | |
| I had a quick question. Go ahead. | 00:54:13 | |
| Just to make sure I understood you properly. | 00:54:15 | |
| You said. | 00:54:18 | |
| Legislation has come forward and it did not pass, but it might come back this legislative session. And your what you said was. | 00:54:19 | |
| But you still feel like what you're presenting before us. | 00:54:27 | |
| Will meet those changes, yes. | 00:54:30 | |
| So it won't. | 00:54:32 | |
| Suddenly come back because. | 00:54:34 | |
| We had this. | 00:54:35 | |
| Be and then we paused it. | 00:54:37 | |
| And that's why we have some of this and now we would be resuming it because we waited for the Supreme Court ruling to go through. | 00:54:39 | |
| That's correct. Yes. All right. So we're following that legislation, even if it didn't pass, we're following the same guidelines | 00:54:43 | |
| that are provided therein and they. | 00:54:48 | |
| Really, there's a little bit of nuance here, Mayor at the. | 00:54:53 | |
| Pleasant Grove City was. | 00:54:56 | |
| I'll say the bleeding edge. | 00:54:58 | |
| Of. | 00:54:59 | |
| Implementing this. | 00:55:00 | |
| Where they implemented it, it was challenged. As he mentioned, it went to the Supreme Court. | 00:55:01 | |
| Supreme Court decided. | 00:55:06 | |
| The question before the Supreme Court was. | 00:55:08 | |
| Is there transportation utility fee, a fee or a tax and there's a different process for? | 00:55:11 | |
| Implementing. | 00:55:15 | |
| Each thing and for transportation taxes there are specific sections and state code that limit. | 00:55:16 | |
| Who can and under what circumstance they can implement those taxes? | 00:55:22 | |
| The Supreme Court. | 00:55:26 | |
| Said it's a fee, not a tax. | 00:55:28 | |
| And then remanded it back down to the District Court for. | 00:55:30 | |
| Pleasant Grove City to implement. | 00:55:34 | |
| The fee. | 00:55:36 | |
| And basically wait and see is that going to be challenged? | 00:55:37 | |
| My understanding, and you'll probably have better information than I do on this, is that Pleasant Grove has now done that. | 00:55:41 | |
| And. | 00:55:47 | |
| That. | 00:55:48 | |
| They don't believe it has been challenged, and my understanding with the legislature is they're basically in the holding pattern | 00:55:49 | |
| to see how that shakes out. | 00:55:52 | |
| And then? | 00:55:56 | |
| What they'll try to do is implement legislation that will mirror. | 00:55:57 | |
| What Pleasant Grove City and what other cities are doing. | 00:56:02 | |
| To implement this so that that is kind of where we're at right now. | 00:56:05 | |
| Is trying. | 00:56:09 | |
| Replicate what Pleasant Grove City has done. | 00:56:10 | |
| And have that in place and our expectation. I think my understanding of what the Legislature said fits pretty well with how you | 00:56:13 | |
| described it. | 00:56:17 | |
| OK. Thank you. You're welcome. | 00:56:22 | |
| This slide is a. | 00:56:25 | |
| Helpful exhibit. | 00:56:27 | |
| To talk about. | 00:56:29 | |
| That good roads cost less. | 00:56:31 | |
| So the concept is you do receive money. | 00:56:33 | |
| Right now from your general fund and from Class C Rd. funds and the sales tax. | 00:56:35 | |
| But it is not currently sufficient. | 00:56:42 | |
| To invest in your roadway so you can see that this. | 00:56:44 | |
| Line here that starts off with $1,000,000 road and it goes down overtime the value of that road. Meaning if you got to year 10 you | 00:56:48 | |
| would need to inject 300,000. | 00:56:54 | |
| To get it back to where it was before and it has a very steep slope. So good roads cost less. If if we come in and and inject, you | 00:56:59 | |
| know, 50,000 every five years in a good pavement management system, that is significantly cheaper than waiting for it to go all | 00:57:06 | |
| the way down to a complete rebuild in year 20 to 25 and people are happier. | 00:57:12 | |
| They don't have potholes in front of their house in year 10 or forward. | 00:57:20 | |
| So that's just a good context about YFE is being considered by you and many other cities in the state right now. | 00:57:25 | |
| Here's an overview of the methodology that we utilized. | 00:57:32 | |
| So we first looked at all of your operating costs. | 00:57:36 | |
| That go into the street department. | 00:57:38 | |
| And extrapolate those forward for you know 1015 year period, we looked at all the capital projects so. | 00:57:40 | |
| Josh with Hell's Engineering recently completed a master plan, transportation master plan that looks at all of your roadways, the | 00:57:47 | |
| capacity, what's going to be needed over the next 10 or 15 years, including what's needed for. | 00:57:53 | |
| Annual pavement management. | 00:58:00 | |
| That's just generally needed across the city. | 00:58:02 | |
| We then looked at the need for debt, if that would be needed to fund some of these. | 00:58:05 | |
| These larger projects that have. | 00:58:09 | |
| You know, 20 year lifespan and covering those rather than saving money. | 00:58:12 | |
| To fund those up front. | 00:58:17 | |
| Then applied financial metrics like how much money should you have in the rainy day fund in case there's a major emergency that | 00:58:20 | |
| occurs? And also if you know when should debt be considered and how should that be looked at? | 00:58:26 | |
| Then ultimately that landed with a revenue requirement. What is the annual revenue needed every year to ensure that you can | 00:58:32 | |
| implement this system? | 00:58:36 | |
| And then the final piece is then how do you go about collecting that revenue from users of your system in a fair and equitable | 00:58:40 | |
| way? | 00:58:44 | |
| So let's talk about a few of those things. We have developed a financial forecast. | 00:58:48 | |
| And I could put the spreadsheet up there, I can provide it to you. | 00:58:54 | |
| It has a tendency to put people to sleep, so this picture hopefully is more intuitive than a spreadsheet. | 00:58:57 | |
| So this is a look at the expenditures. | 00:59:04 | |
| Both historically for the last two years and what we project. | 00:59:06 | |
| For the next. | 00:59:09 | |
| 10 years. | 00:59:10 | |
| As you can see the green on the top. | 00:59:11 | |
| Is your capital projects. | 00:59:14 | |
| It's a meaningful amount of money. | 00:59:16 | |
| That includes both new. | 00:59:18 | |
| Development and. | 00:59:19 | |
| Primarily. | 00:59:21 | |
| Pavement Management. | 00:59:21 | |
| The orange is another large piece on the bottom that is personnel. | 00:59:23 | |
| And then the blue. | 00:59:28 | |
| Piece in the middle. | 00:59:31 | |
| Would be. | 00:59:32 | |
| Using debt to pay for. | 00:59:33 | |
| Large projects here. | 00:59:36 | |
| That assumption is that. | 00:59:38 | |
| That debt would be issued. | 00:59:41 | |
| Secured by this transportation utility fee, it would not be a general obligation bond. | 00:59:43 | |
| Excise tax or sales tax bond? It would be solely. | 00:59:48 | |
| Dependent upon the utility fee itself. | 00:59:52 | |
| So that would be. | 00:59:55 | |
| Something that would be a proactive way to help. | 00:59:57 | |
| Pay for those costs over the life of those assets by those who are being charged the fee upfront. | 00:59:59 | |
| Here's another look at the capital projects. It's approximately $41 million. | 01:00:07 | |
| Over the next 10 years. | 01:00:13 | |
| The projects are listed there. | 01:00:16 | |
| On the right, so the biggest is 28 million. | 01:00:18 | |
| Almost 29 million of. | 01:00:21 | |
| Of costs for pavement preservation. | 01:00:23 | |
| And that is, you know, the annual amount that you're implementing. | 01:00:26 | |
| We've also included the streetlights in this, so it's both a transportation and a streetlight fee. | 01:00:30 | |
| So it would be updating your annual streetlight maintenance and then these. | 01:00:36 | |
| Other projects. | 01:00:40 | |
| You know 7-8 projects there are. | 01:00:42 | |
| New capital projects that will be needed to be funded. | 01:00:45 | |
| If you have any questions about any of those capital projects, I am not the person to ask, but Josh is here and it seems here as | 01:00:48 | |
| well to answer any of those questions that you might have. | 01:00:52 | |
| So I'll pause in case you have questions about any of those. | 01:00:57 | |
| Capital projects. | 01:01:00 | |
| Looking at your revenue structure. | 01:01:06 | |
| The dark green at the bottom. | 01:01:08 | |
| Is classy Rd. funds? | 01:01:11 | |
| As you know, those come from. | 01:01:13 | |
| The state gas tax. | 01:01:14 | |
| That you pay at the pump. | 01:01:17 | |
| The lighter green is the transportation tax, which is a portion of the sales tax. | 01:01:19 | |
| We are considering implementing an impact fee. | 01:01:24 | |
| And with. | 01:01:27 | |
| Meaningful growth you have in the community that does have a large impact. | 01:01:28 | |
| But as I mean it's obvious here the. | 01:01:33 | |
| The rate revenue from. | 01:01:35 | |
| This fee would be. | 01:01:37 | |
| By and large, the largest portion of. | 01:01:38 | |
| Of the revenue stream. | 01:01:41 | |
| That we would be considering. | 01:01:43 | |
| And just a note here that. | 01:01:46 | |
| That we still have obligations. | 01:01:47 | |
| To use those funds both. | 01:01:49 | |
| The fee funds and the classy Rd. funds and others. | 01:01:52 | |
| There's specific restrictions on how those funds would be used, so we're assuming that all those would be used. | 01:01:55 | |
| Appropriately. | 01:02:00 | |
| A couple of financial metrics to look at cash reserves. | 01:02:04 | |
| It's important to. | 01:02:07 | |
| Have a healthy fund balance. This will be an enterprise fund, meaning it needs to be self supporting. | 01:02:09 | |
| So having a healthy cash balance is important. | 01:02:14 | |
| The industry standard for cash balance is one year's worth of operating expenditures. | 01:02:18 | |
| That's the same for your water and sewer utilities. That's probably how your rates were developed there. | 01:02:23 | |
| So this shows that throughout that period you generally are above or below. | 01:02:28 | |
| You know, here in 2033 you have a large capital project. As we get to that point, we may choose to. | 01:02:32 | |
| To issue data if it helps with this issue but. | 01:02:38 | |
| That far out? | 01:02:41 | |
| It's not a huge problem to have a little bit below. | 01:02:42 | |
| So it shows that this projection that we're meeting a healthy cash reserve overtime. | 01:02:46 | |
| This slide. | 01:02:52 | |
| Coverage. | 01:02:53 | |
| What it means Debt service coverage. | 01:02:54 | |
| And what that means is when you issue debt. | 01:02:57 | |
| Lenders want to know or investors want to know that you have. | 01:03:00 | |
| Healthy fund that covers operations first. | 01:03:03 | |
| So this would be called a debt service coverage ratio, a net debt service pledge, meaning after you fund all of your operation and | 01:03:08 | |
| maintenance and then you pay debt. | 01:03:13 | |
| This blue line would mean you'd have a dollar and a quarter worth of. | 01:03:18 | |
| Of revenue leftover to pay for every dollar worth of debt. | 01:03:22 | |
| And you can see the orange line, you have a very healthy. | 01:03:26 | |
| Coverage ratio, meaning you have the ability, if you chose to do so, to issue more debt in the future. | 01:03:31 | |
| To help pay for these projects moving forward. | 01:03:37 | |
| It's a very healthy. | 01:03:39 | |
| Metric. | 01:03:40 | |
| There's a lot going on here on this slide, but this represents. | 01:03:42 | |
| Though both the growth rate. | 01:03:45 | |
| In your community. | 01:03:47 | |
| Measured on the right. | 01:03:48 | |
| And. | 01:03:50 | |
| The. | 01:03:51 | |
| Likely or the. | 01:03:52 | |
| The projected annual increase in rates measured on the right as well in these two orange lines. | 01:03:54 | |
| So this orange line shows. | 01:04:00 | |
| The annual rate increase would be around 3%. | 01:04:02 | |
| And this. | 01:04:06 | |
| Lighter orange shows that you're growing at about 9%, which isn't a surprise to you have a very. | 01:04:08 | |
| Quick growing community. | 01:04:14 | |
| The line that you care most about is what is the rate? | 01:04:16 | |
| Per month. | 01:04:19 | |
| Per equivalent residential unit. So for a resident or for. | 01:04:20 | |
| An equivalent residential unit. | 01:04:24 | |
| We're starting off at $5. | 01:04:26 | |
| Moving up to around 7:00 and then by year 3. | 01:04:29 | |
| $9 and then growing at 3% thereafter. | 01:04:33 | |
| So looking at that more granularly so you can see it, it's this $5 number right here. | 01:04:37 | |
| Would be the cost. | 01:04:42 | |
| Dwelling Unit. | 01:04:44 | |
| So let's just talk a little bit here on this rate structure. | 01:04:47 | |
| We it's titled adjusted for axle. | 01:04:51 | |
| So the equitable way to determine how you should allocate this fee is by. | 01:04:55 | |
| Both. How many trips? | 01:05:00 | |
| Each type of. | 01:05:02 | |
| Zone generates. | 01:05:04 | |
| So a residential unit is the base. | 01:05:07 | |
| They have about what is it 7 or 8? | 01:05:09 | |
| Trips. | 01:05:11 | |
| 7 or 8 trips per day. | 01:05:12 | |
| So that's like the. | 01:05:14 | |
| You know, just one trip. | 01:05:16 | |
| That how does that equate to if you have an office or retail or commercial or industrial? | 01:05:17 | |
| They have an equivalent adjustment. | 01:05:22 | |
| But we're also adjusting for the fact that. | 01:05:25 | |
| One small car is not the same as a semi truck. | 01:05:28 | |
| So they have very different impacts on your Rd. system. | 01:05:32 | |
| So the structure that we're suggesting to you is weighted by both trips and by axle weight. | 01:05:35 | |
| So if we look at this column here. | 01:05:41 | |
| The. | 01:05:44 | |
| By type. | 01:05:45 | |
| What we're suggesting to you is an office. | 01:05:47 | |
| 1000 square feet of office. | 01:05:50 | |
| Has four times the impact. | 01:05:52 | |
| That one residential unit has. | 01:05:55 | |
| And retail and commercial has seven. | 01:05:57 | |
| Almost 8 times. | 01:05:59 | |
| The impact an industrial has almost. | 01:06:00 | |
| 9 1/2 times the impact of one residential unit. Those are all per 1000 square feet. | 01:06:03 | |
| So we're suggesting that you should. | 01:06:09 | |
| Weight more heavily the fee. | 01:06:12 | |
| Because their impact is more. | 01:06:14 | |
| Than a standard residential unit. | 01:06:18 | |
| So the outcome here is if we have $5 is the residential rate. | 01:06:21 | |
| Per unit. | 01:06:26 | |
| The office would be $36. | 01:06:27 | |
| Per 1000 square feet. | 01:06:30 | |
| Retail commercial 70 and $0.50 per thousand. | 01:06:32 | |
| And industrial $91.75 per thousand. | 01:06:36 | |
| Is this a month? | 01:06:39 | |
| Per month. | 01:06:41 | |
| To the to the owner of the home. | 01:06:45 | |
| So yeah, to the owner of the home, it would be $5. | 01:06:47 | |
| Per month put on their utility fee. | 01:06:51 | |
| Put on their utility be. | 01:06:53 | |
| Garbage. | 01:06:54 | |
| Water. Sewer. | 01:06:55 | |
| Transportation utility fee. | 01:06:56 | |
| That's right. | 01:06:58 | |
| And so then a. | 01:07:04 | |
| An office that's 2000 square feet of office would have. | 01:07:07 | |
| $72 and. | 01:07:10 | |
| $0.04. | 01:07:11 | |
| Yes, per month, every month. That's correct. | 01:07:12 | |
| And for illustration purposes, these are. This is the amount of. | 01:07:18 | |
| Square footage that you have. | 01:07:21 | |
| In each of those types. | 01:07:23 | |
| In your community right now. | 01:07:26 | |
| So you have. | 01:07:27 | |
| 278. | 01:07:29 | |
| 1000 square feet of office. | 01:07:31 | |
| That's commercial and that's industrial. | 01:07:33 | |
| We're also suggesting a specific. | 01:07:39 | |
| Unique fee. | 01:07:41 | |
| For just those businesses along 1750 N. | 01:07:42 | |
| That road is in need of reconstruction. | 01:07:46 | |
| So for a five year period there would be an additional. | 01:07:49 | |
| $7.55. | 01:07:53 | |
| Added to. | 01:07:56 | |
| Their rate in that area specifically. | 01:07:57 | |
| So that they could recoup that over a five year period. | 01:08:02 | |
| Again, just a sample size. | 01:08:07 | |
| Like you're you're talking about. | 01:08:09 | |
| Councilman Clawson here's If it was 5000 square feet, this would what the fee would be per month. | 01:08:11 | |
| For each of those users. | 01:08:16 | |
| In terms of comparables these it's kind of small, but you can see there. | 01:08:23 | |
| There are other communities that provide. | 01:08:26 | |
| Charge this fee the most. | 01:08:29 | |
| Comparable right now would be the city of South Salt Lake that's just recently adopted. | 01:08:31 | |
| Their fee? | 01:08:35 | |
| Using Axel 8. | 01:08:37 | |
| Same structure. | 01:08:38 | |
| They have chosen not to implement the residential fee. They will cover that through a general fund subsidy. | 01:08:40 | |
| Because of the. | 01:08:45 | |
| Council council's choice to do that. | 01:08:47 | |
| Pleasant Grove you can see here. | 01:08:50 | |
| This is a similar fee structure. You know they based on trips, not on axle load. | 01:08:52 | |
| Same with provoke. | 01:08:57 | |
| Kaysville and South Ogden. South Ogden has. | 01:08:59 | |
| An enormous list. I think they have like. | 01:09:02 | |
| 15 or 20 different categories. | 01:09:06 | |
| So you can. | 01:09:08 | |
| It's much more detailed. | 01:09:09 | |
| So you're generally in line with how those others work. There are other communities on this slide that are less detailed. They | 01:09:11 | |
| just charge a fee, a flat fee. | 01:09:15 | |
| So. | 01:09:19 | |
| Highland, Mapleton. Pleasant. | 01:09:20 | |
| View South Weber. | 01:09:21 | |
| Fruit Heights, Farmington. They're just a very. | 01:09:24 | |
| Simple flat fee. These have been in place for a while. | 01:09:26 | |
| So that's what I have to share today. I'm happy to answer any questions that you might have. | 01:09:28 | |
| Great counsel, do you have any questions right now? If not, you can. | 01:09:35 | |
| Schedule a meeting or. | 01:09:39 | |
| Have a sit down. | 01:09:40 | |
| Send an e-mail. | 01:09:42 | |
| When is this being considered to be brought back to vote on? | 01:09:45 | |
| I believe it's the 10th, is that right? | 01:09:48 | |
| Yeah, of December 10th. | 01:09:50 | |
| Yeah. | 01:09:51 | |
| Any other questions? | 01:09:55 | |
| Thank you. I do I. | 01:09:59 | |
| I think it would be interesting to see some different models where the residential side is less. | 01:10:02 | |
| And what that what kind of impact that might have on? | 01:10:07 | |
| Businesses if. | 01:10:11 | |
| So less than $5 changed some of those numbers. | 01:10:13 | |
| OK. So I want to say the number that's been on our fee schedule, you know I'm looking over across there to. | 01:10:16 | |
| Make sure I get right. It's 3:50. | 01:10:23 | |
| Is what was on the. | 01:10:25 | |
| The the the the old one. | 01:10:26 | |
| Was 350, it was 350 and we just haven't been collecting it five years ago. And so this this number is kind of the inflation | 01:10:28 | |
| adjusted version of that. | 01:10:32 | |
| Sorry, but I would be curious what it would look like if. | 01:10:38 | |
| For example, we just left it at the 3:50 in. | 01:10:42 | |
| Then change some of those ratios. | 01:10:45 | |
| If we're allowed to do that. | 01:10:48 | |
| I can't. I don't understand why we wouldn't be allowed to do it, but we can do anything. | 01:10:51 | |
| As long as it's fair, every long as everyone is treated fairly. | 01:10:55 | |
| Within their category. | 01:10:57 | |
| Yeah, I'm very concerned about this. | 01:11:03 | |
| Because a year ago I talked about the failure of the RDA to bring in businesses to be able to. | 01:11:05 | |
| Bring a tax structure. | 01:11:11 | |
| Strong enough? | 01:11:14 | |
| To be able to fund the city. | 01:11:15 | |
| And this actually proves this, that we don't have a tax base here. | 01:11:17 | |
| And this is finding another way to be able to. | 01:11:22 | |
| To provide for our roads. | 01:11:24 | |
| And I think having an open conversation, not attacking anyone. | 01:11:26 | |
| But just being an open, honest. | 01:11:30 | |
| Conversation of. | 01:11:32 | |
| We are 15. | 01:11:33 | |
| Or 2006. | 01:11:35 | |
| 19 years into the RDA. | 01:11:38 | |
| And big businesses haven't come. | 01:11:40 | |
| In and that's scary. | 01:11:42 | |
| Because. | 01:11:45 | |
| You have to turn to structures and I remember when Pleasant Grove. | 01:11:47 | |
| Put this in and it was extremely controversial. | 01:11:52 | |
| And anyone hearing this today? | 01:11:55 | |
| Going January or December 10th is going to go. | 01:11:57 | |
| Wow, that's a That's a huge. | 01:12:00 | |
| You know, tax, it's a fee. | 01:12:02 | |
| So it's not a tax. | 01:12:05 | |
| And I remember the fight. | 01:12:07 | |
| Fighting over. | 01:12:08 | |
| Taxes and fees and. | 01:12:09 | |
| And all of that. But thanks for the presentation. It's helpful. | 01:12:11 | |
| You have to fund. | 01:12:16 | |
| A government. | 01:12:18 | |
| Right, but it just tells us how. | 01:12:19 | |
| Essential. | 01:12:21 | |
| The success and failure of our RDA is. | 01:12:23 | |
| Well, I don't know. | 01:12:29 | |
| Where there's so many cities that charge this, I don't know that you can say that specifically for the RDA. The RDA is in. | 01:12:30 | |
| Progress. | 01:12:36 | |
| And will be happening for the next. | 01:12:38 | |
| 25 to 50 years. | 01:12:40 | |
| So 25 years from now, maybe. | 01:12:42 | |
| But it's it's going to take time. | 01:12:44 | |
| I don't have, I don't have a problem with the residential. I mean I spent an extra $4.00 for an extra garbage can, so. | 01:12:47 | |
| So that one doesn't. | 01:12:53 | |
| Bother me but the industrial seems so high. | 01:12:55 | |
| Right. So it's like. | 01:12:58 | |
| As a business owner. | 01:13:00 | |
| You know, I'm thinking of the little businesses in the yard. | 01:13:02 | |
| You know that it? | 01:13:05 | |
| Feels like. | 01:13:06 | |
| A big expense. | 01:13:07 | |
| You know, but I could be wrong. | 01:13:09 | |
| Well, So what I wonder is if. | 01:13:11 | |
| Is if you could. | 01:13:13 | |
| Somehow. | 01:13:15 | |
| If if the businesses could show that they're creating a certain amount of. | 01:13:16 | |
| Tax benefit. | 01:13:20 | |
| To the city, if that. | 01:13:22 | |
| If they could get a credit. | 01:13:23 | |
| I don't know just well, I mean, I look at because I'm a business owner like we have a FedEx warehouse and vineyard. | 01:13:26 | |
| And the wear and tear they put on the roads. | 01:13:32 | |
| Versus. | 01:13:35 | |
| What I put on the roads. So I mean, I see. | 01:13:37 | |
| But not every. | 01:13:39 | |
| Business and. | 01:13:40 | |
| And Vineyard. | 01:13:42 | |
| Not every industrial business has the same type of traffic as the FedEx warehouse, but. | 01:13:44 | |
| I definitely see the value in this structure. | 01:13:48 | |
| I think that tying it to the RDA. | 01:13:52 | |
| Is kind of just like a. | 01:13:56 | |
| We can analyze it and criticize it and dig into it all day long, but I think what you have to decide is. | 01:13:58 | |
| How are you going to move in the future to pay for your roads? | 01:14:05 | |
| So that's a, that's a good question. I wonder is there anything? | 01:14:09 | |
| Because when we talk about businesses coming in. | 01:14:14 | |
| And the rate of businesses and the RDA has been providing the backbone infrastructure and roads. | 01:14:16 | |
| And we're really lucky. | 01:14:22 | |
| To have that. | 01:14:23 | |
| We've increased our businesses by like 50% over the last few years. | 01:14:25 | |
| But to. | 01:14:30 | |
| Point we do have to offset that, so if there was. | 01:14:31 | |
| Do in your comparables. | 01:14:36 | |
| Do are we looking at the economic? | 01:14:39 | |
| Balance between. | 01:14:41 | |
| The different cities and how much they're paying and how big of a. | 01:14:43 | |
| Economic base they have. | 01:14:47 | |
| Have have we been able to do that? I don't even know if that's something that you examine when looking at Rd. base and stuff. But | 01:14:49 | |
| maybe together as a team we can take your study and then we can do those comparables ourselves and then as your take away, I | 01:14:54 | |
| guess. | 01:14:58 | |
| For what the Council is asking for. | 01:15:03 | |
| Its models going back to our 350. | 01:15:05 | |
| Is that something that we can look into and say, what does that look like? I mean, I think I saw Farmington was 350. Maybe we can | 01:15:08 | |
| just compare those two. | 01:15:12 | |
| So here's the first one where they have a detailed schedule. | 01:15:18 | |
| So just look at that and then let me know when you want to look at the other. | 01:15:21 | |
| Yeah, and then council, maybe what we could do is. | 01:15:27 | |
| Take the time to sit down and meet with these guys and you can look at the different comparables. You can look at the ones that | 01:15:30 | |
| are subsidizing. | 01:15:34 | |
| You can look at the ones that have a lower model, like I think it was Farmington, and then maybe between our team and your team we | 01:15:38 | |
| can look at. | 01:15:42 | |
| What the business? | 01:15:46 | |
| You know what their business base is there and what they're providing and then how they're offsetting it with. | 01:15:48 | |
| Transportation fees. I do like how Pleasant Grove has a Tier 1 and Tier 2 commercial that would be interesting to. | 01:15:53 | |
| See how that could be reflected in ours. | 01:16:00 | |
| 'Cause I mean. | 01:16:03 | |
| No, nothing against FedEx, but I definitely feel like they should be paying more than. | 01:16:06 | |
| A different warehouse if I could ask them and that that would be something good to look at because we have industrial your your | 01:16:11 | |
| trucks are a lot heavier you're, you know like there's. | 01:16:15 | |
| Just the weight of the vehicles is going to have a much bigger impact, so there might be some. | 01:16:20 | |
| Usefulness in looking at. | 01:16:25 | |
| OK, so I feel like everybody has their tasks. | 01:16:28 | |
| Council, you're going to go sit down and look at these comparables that already came through. We're going to look at the business | 01:16:31 | |
| base of all these comparables and then you guys are going to model the Farmington 350 kind of lower thing. | 01:16:35 | |
| OK awesome, this is so helpful. | 01:16:41 | |
| Any something to add, Eric? Just one quick clarification based on. | 01:16:43 | |
| Question and. | 01:16:47 | |
| It kind of teetered on two different categories. | 01:16:48 | |
| Home based businesses will be treated as residential. | 01:16:51 | |
| There won't be an added fee because you have a. | 01:16:54 | |
| Whatever the home based business is. So it'll be $5 for those. | 01:16:57 | |
| It's only when it goes to actual commercial that you'll see that adjustment to. | 01:17:01 | |
| Commercial categories. | 01:17:06 | |
| OK, awesome. | 01:17:09 | |
| Thank you, Council. | 01:17:11 | |
| All right, Jamie, this brings us to 3.4. This is the Vineyard Municipal Code amendment for Title 2. | 01:17:14 | |
| Administration and Jamie's going to present. | 01:17:21 | |
| Some of these changes. | 01:17:25 | |
| Thank you, Mayor. | 01:18:06 | |
| I have just a few slides to introduce this. | 01:18:08 | |
| As you all know. | 01:18:11 | |
| Last November. | 01:18:14 | |
| Citizens elected or voted to. | 01:18:15 | |
| Move from A5 to A6 member council form of government. | 01:18:18 | |
| The election this fall reflected that, and so elected to the Council were. | 01:18:22 | |
| Enough council members to form. | 01:18:26 | |
| 6 member. | 01:18:28 | |
| Council form of government. | 01:18:29 | |
| What that means is 5 council members and a non voting mayor. | 01:18:31 | |
| On most issues. | 01:18:35 | |
| With this change. | 01:18:37 | |
| The city has to update its municipal code to reflect that. | 01:18:38 | |
| Change. There are a few simple changes that will. | 01:18:42 | |
| Need to be made. | 01:18:46 | |
| Again. | 01:18:47 | |
| The the ordinance that's been. | 01:18:48 | |
| Presented. What we've attempted to do is clarify how that authority administratively and executively and among the Council. | 01:18:50 | |
| Will function under the new form of. | 01:18:59 | |
| Government. | 01:19:01 | |
| The Council, of course, has statutory authority to establish policy and legislation in the city. | 01:19:01 | |
| The mayor provides leadership and representation. | 01:19:08 | |
| For the city and the city manager. | 01:19:13 | |
| Handles the administration side, the daily operations side. | 01:19:16 | |
| Of city government. | 01:19:20 | |
| The state code references 103B306 that relates to 6 member council form of government and again to restate a little bit. | 01:19:22 | |
| The council's legislative body returns all those powers. The mayor's the chief executive. | 01:19:30 | |
| And then perform certain statutory functions and then the council by ordinance. | 01:19:36 | |
| Is allowed to delegate executive or administrative duties to a city manager. | 01:19:41 | |
| And they, you know. | 01:19:45 | |
| Maintain flexibility overtime to remove or reinstate those duties as needed. | 01:19:46 | |
| The. | 01:19:51 | |
| These are the mayor's statutory powers, and they're reflected in. | 01:19:52 | |
| The proposed ordinance. | 01:19:56 | |
| The policy goals of the proposed ordinance are to protect the mayor's leadership and ceremonial roles. | 01:19:59 | |
| Maintain the current delegation of day-to-day operations to a professional city manager so the code doesn't. | 01:20:05 | |
| Upset anything that's occurring right now, but carries out forward to the new form of government. | 01:20:12 | |
| Ensures that the city manager is accountable to the council as a body, not to individual members of the council. | 01:20:18 | |
| And then maintains the rules applicable to transparency efficiency. | 01:20:24 | |
| And good governance. | 01:20:28 | |
| There are. | 01:20:30 | |
| Some proposed code updates that include four different sections in Title 2, Chapter 4. | 01:20:31 | |
| They relate to the mayor's duty. | 01:20:38 | |
| The delegation of executive and administrative duties among the. | 01:20:40 | |
| City manager and the mayor. | 01:20:44 | |
| The definition of the city manager and the city manager's role. | 01:20:47 | |
| And how the city manager functions visa via the mayor and the City Council. | 01:20:52 | |
| And then sections on administrative route. | 01:20:56 | |
| Relations among in between. | 01:20:59 | |
| The Council. | 01:21:02 | |
| And the mayor. And the city manager. | 01:21:03 | |
| There also is a section that we needed to make a few adjustments to to make sure the two code sections interrelate and these are | 01:21:05 | |
| the. | 01:21:08 | |
| Provisions in 2.08 point 010. | 01:21:12 | |
| That established the office of the city manager. How the city manager is appointed. | 01:21:16 | |
| What the bonding, salary, term removal process, those kinds of things are? | 01:21:20 | |
| And then making sure that if there are any conflicts between the two sections which which section controls. | 01:21:25 | |
| I won't belabor the points, this is just a summary of. | 01:21:33 | |
| What's in the document? But again, the goal was to clarify rather than change. | 01:21:36 | |
| The existing practice make sure the code is aligned with. | 01:21:41 | |
| The state. | 01:21:44 | |
| Code sections that relate to A6 member framework. | 01:21:46 | |
| Strengthen the partnership between elected leadership and professional administration and allow Vineyard to continue. | 01:21:50 | |
| Operating as it has. | 01:21:56 | |
| So. | 01:21:58 | |
| In terms of next steps, this is being presented tonight for discussion and feedback from the Council. | 01:21:59 | |
| In a work session at the next meeting, it will be brought forward with the formal ordinance for adoption. | 01:22:04 | |
| We need to make sure it's adopted before the end of the year so that when the new. | 01:22:11 | |
| Council is seated in. The new mayor is sworn in. | 01:22:15 | |
| That this will be in place. | 01:22:18 | |
| For them to function under that structure. | 01:22:20 | |
| All right. Any questions or comments from the City Council? | 01:22:23 | |
| With the vote, the new council can adjust. | 01:22:32 | |
| Things as necessary, right to their liking. | 01:22:35 | |
| There are certain statutory. | 01:22:38 | |
| Duties and obligations that of course they can't change, but they have flexibility to. | 01:22:40 | |
| Change order. Assign the delegation of. | 01:22:45 | |
| What things the mayor does, what things the city manager does. | 01:22:48 | |
| Yeah, on the administrative. | 01:22:51 | |
| Side of that and we have the full thing to now yeah you have the. | 01:22:54 | |
| Text. It's in the packet. | 01:22:57 | |
| And you're welcome to look at that if you have things that you would like. | 01:22:59 | |
| To discuss or talk through or change between now and the next meeting. | 01:23:03 | |
| Ping me and we can. | 01:23:07 | |
| And work on that. | 01:23:09 | |
| OK. Any other questions or comments? | 01:23:11 | |
| Thank you so much. I would just say inviting all citizens and to do a social media post about. | 01:23:14 | |
| The ordinances and changes and post the. | 01:23:20 | |
| The uh. | 01:23:23 | |
| The detailed stuff online so that they can give us feedback before the next meeting because it is a big. | 01:23:24 | |
| It's a happy thing, you know, that we all worked on on the change of government and. | 01:23:29 | |
| Getting feedback before the next meeting would be cool. | 01:23:34 | |
| OK. | 01:23:36 | |
| Eric is on that. | 01:23:39 | |
| 3.5 is going to be continued. | 01:23:41 | |
| Do we need a motion to continue this item or can I? | 01:23:44 | |
| Assign it to a different agenda. | 01:23:47 | |
| Do we need to make a motion? No. You. | 01:23:54 | |
| You don't need to make a motion. You can simply continue it. I think the reason for the continuance is it's notice for a hearing | 01:23:56 | |
| before the Planning Commission and OK. | 01:24:00 | |
| My recommendation is to allow the Planning Commission. | 01:24:04 | |
| For the hearing and for them to. | 01:24:07 | |
| Fulfill their. | 01:24:09 | |
| Obligations. | 01:24:11 | |
| Before it come to the Council for decision. OK, perfect. Thank you so much. | 01:24:12 | |
| Brian, I believe you are up with 3.6 for the mountain bike park location. | 01:24:16 | |
| Discussion. | 01:24:22 | |
| Real quick. | 01:24:24 | |
| Why the why the push of all the way fields just not ready. Oh that is the one we were just talking about with the notice of the | 01:24:25 | |
| hearing that went to the Planning Commission and so we're gonna have it go to the Planning Commission and then it'll go to the | 01:24:30 | |
| council. OK the amendments at the request of the developer, but the. | 01:24:35 | |
| The development agreement contains administrative and legislative. | 01:24:41 | |
| I think aspects, so it requires a public hearing and it's I just think the preferred way to do it is. | 01:24:45 | |
| Allow the hearing to occur at the Planning Commission where it really needs to before. | 01:24:51 | |
| It comes to the council. If it comes to the council first, then they're. | 01:24:55 | |
| Or questions of. | 01:24:58 | |
| You know, did we predetermine what would occur? | 01:24:59 | |
| In that hearing and how the Planning Commission would make its recommendation. | 01:25:01 | |
| Any other questions on that one? | 01:25:07 | |
| OK. Go ahead, Brian. | 01:25:10 | |
| OK, Good evening, Brian Vaudrey, Vineyard Parks and Rec Director. | 01:25:12 | |
| I wanted to show you the central corridor plan, just briefly. | 01:25:16 | |
| To propose potential amendment. | 01:25:21 | |
| Of the location of the dirt pump track. | 01:25:24 | |
| So on the. | 01:25:27 | |
| Senator Corridor plan has. | 01:25:28 | |
| The Dirt Pump track across the street from Gammon Park. | 01:25:30 | |
| I'm proposing that we move it. | 01:25:36 | |
| To the City Hall. | 01:25:39 | |
| Location. | 01:25:40 | |
| For three reasons in particular. | 01:25:43 | |
| The first reason it would be. | 01:25:45 | |
| Super close to parking. | 01:25:48 | |
| Whereas over here. | 01:25:50 | |
| You have to cross a street. | 01:25:51 | |
| That is a busy center St. | 01:25:54 | |
| This would also. | 01:25:58 | |
| Be already Vineyard city owned land. | 01:26:00 | |
| Whereas this current portion is not. | 01:26:04 | |
| And then at the City Hall, it would also allow us to have a stronger application for. | 01:26:07 | |
| Our skate park. | 01:26:14 | |
| Grant. | 01:26:16 | |
| Application that we'll be putting out in January. | 01:26:17 | |
| And so I just wanted to. | 01:26:21 | |
| See if. | 01:26:25 | |
| There's any concerns with us? | 01:26:26 | |
| Pursuing that potential option. | 01:26:29 | |
| Who owns the wind property that was out? | 01:26:31 | |
| Oh yeah, sorry, let me show you the. | 01:26:34 | |
| Picture. | 01:26:36 | |
| I don't know what you call that. OK, so essentially this is what is being. | 01:26:37 | |
| Proposed. | 01:26:41 | |
| The green area is where the. | 01:26:42 | |
| Potential skate park would go. | 01:26:45 | |
| The red area. | 01:26:48 | |
| Would be a potential asphalt or modular pump track. | 01:26:49 | |
| And then the yellow area would. | 01:26:54 | |
| Be the potential area for the. | 01:26:57 | |
| Dirt pump track and potential jump lines and skill area. | 01:26:59 | |
| OK. Because we had this discussion with the central corridor plan, I think it would be really helpful to send out a message to | 01:27:04 | |
| that area that had it before and let them know that due to the additional parking that would be required for that area, this is | 01:27:11 | |
| the new location. So that when this comes back or that change occurs that the. | 01:27:17 | |
| They can make comment. | 01:27:23 | |
| Great. | 01:27:25 | |
| Mayor, if I can just add one thing too, and I don't know if you touched on this or not, but. | 01:27:27 | |
| Yes. So you did mention like Center St. being really busy, but having a bathroom and so like having so the kids don't have to run | 01:27:31 | |
| across a busy Rd. just to use a bathroom and then come back across again. So yeah, that would be really good to add. | 01:27:37 | |
| OK. | 01:27:44 | |
| How in terms of space, how does this? | 01:27:47 | |
| Space in terms of size. | 01:27:50 | |
| Compare with the. | 01:27:52 | |
| The current central quarter plan. | 01:27:54 | |
| This is much bigger. | 01:27:57 | |
| So, um. | 01:27:59 | |
| I guess as far as size wise. | 01:28:02 | |
| I'm sorry, I don't know the number completely off the top of my head. I could measure it in like a minute and get back to you. | 01:28:05 | |
| OK. But it's, but this is, yeah, this is much bigger. | 01:28:11 | |
| OK. So I would also expect that. | 01:28:15 | |
| Bigger means more expensive. | 01:28:17 | |
| We may not have those numbers. | 01:28:21 | |
| Yes. So in terms of a grant application, we're now talking about trying to get something. | 01:28:23 | |
| More. | 01:28:28 | |
| Yes, so. | 01:28:29 | |
| With the central corridor, planet just had this little smaller area. | 01:28:31 | |
| The initial plan was to actually have it go up further. | 01:28:35 | |
| Just pending the neighbors approval. | 01:28:40 | |
| Of being fine with that. So essentially if we did that option, neighbors were fine with it, it'd be about the same size there as | 01:28:42 | |
| it would be. | 01:28:46 | |
| Coming here to the City Hall. | 01:28:49 | |
| OK, Do you mind if we? | 01:28:53 | |
| Go through a few of your items. | 01:28:56 | |
| There's no other questions on this one. | 01:28:58 | |
| For comments. | 01:29:02 | |
| How did flagship? | 01:29:09 | |
| Like we had the pump track park and that used to be. | 01:29:12 | |
| Delineated wetlands. How is it not anymore? | 01:29:15 | |
| On the side where the contract was. | 01:29:18 | |
| I see value. | 01:29:22 | |
| Now partial. | 01:29:24 | |
| Sorry, so no seem to know about the works director. | 01:29:25 | |
| In regards to the what answers hasn't officially been dealing with excuse me on that. So we we went through environmental wetlands | 01:29:28 | |
| study on that and we were able to determine where the what they call the merchant wetlands vegetation is in each of the areas so | 01:29:36 | |
| and the area behind Grove Park. | 01:29:43 | |
| We've identified the areas there. | 01:29:51 | |
| And also what they call the fish hook area, which is right to kind of. | 01:29:53 | |
| South of Gammon Park and Bio City Hall. | 01:29:57 | |
| The two areas there. | 01:30:00 | |
| And then based on the. | 01:30:03 | |
| Within survey that we had conducted. | 01:30:05 | |
| And the report that we have ready for the United States Army Corps of Engineers. | 01:30:08 | |
| That. | 01:30:13 | |
| Our consultants has. | 01:30:14 | |
| Made a. | 01:30:16 | |
| Determination that the. | 01:30:18 | |
| Area. That's the fish hook area. | 01:30:19 | |
| The the vegetation there is. | 01:30:23 | |
| Considered non jurisdictional. | 01:30:25 | |
| Would be considered non jurisdictional. | 01:30:27 | |
| Based on federal laws. | 01:30:29 | |
| Yeah, the current fellow. | 01:30:32 | |
| Federal laws. | 01:30:34 | |
| On that, since it doesn't touch but it doesn't navigate, does not navigate navigable what type of bodies of water and such. | 01:30:36 | |
| And we will. We actually have a. | 01:30:42 | |
| Excuse me application array to submit to the core engineers now that. | 01:30:49 | |
| The federal government should be open pretty soon. | 01:30:52 | |
| We'll be able to move forward on that and then the area on Grove. | 01:30:54 | |
| Park we have. We're going to be scheduling a sit down meeting with the Corps of Engineers to discuss. | 01:30:58 | |
| The some prior impacts. | 01:31:05 | |
| That was done on that area. | 01:31:08 | |
| For the wetlands and have a discussion with them to. | 01:31:11 | |
| Have a discussion with them to determine whether or not that would be considered, though that area would still have to be | 01:31:16 | |
| mitigated or not. | 01:31:19 | |
| And if and then apply for. | 01:31:22 | |
| The parameter release of jurisdictional wetlands from the core engineers. | 01:31:25 | |
| On that 1. So it's a process. | 01:31:30 | |
| It's a process to go through. | 01:31:32 | |
| The area behind Gamut Park. | 01:31:35 | |
| All right, Excuse me. Grove Park. | 01:31:37 | |
| Probably a longer process than the area. That's the fish oak area. | 01:31:39 | |
| That would be a smoother, faster process and which also makes why the relocation makes more sense. | 01:31:43 | |
| Because it's a, you know it's. | 01:31:49 | |
| Something that could be. | 01:31:51 | |
| In the more foreseeable future. | 01:31:53 | |
| Does that answer your question? | 01:31:56 | |
| Yeah. I mean, I was a kid when those were contracts were. | 01:31:58 | |
| Negotiated, but I know the. | 01:32:02 | |
| Lynn Holdaway, Robin Hold, Robbins. | 01:32:04 | |
| You know there's 5 or 6 different families that are there. | 01:32:08 | |
| That turned over those properties. | 01:32:12 | |
| Knowing or thinking that being told by the state and city that those would be. | 01:32:14 | |
| Non developable or usable wetlands. | 01:32:19 | |
| And then? | 01:32:23 | |
| When the developer was done with them, it's my understanding that they were turned over to the city, right? That's how we became | 01:32:24 | |
| the area. The area. Grove Park has not yet been turned over the city. That's part of the process to ensure that no, not talking | 01:32:29 | |
| about Grove Park. I'm talking about. | 01:32:33 | |
| The wetlands. | 01:32:38 | |
| He's talking. I think you guys are saying the same thing, Jake. He's saying it's the. | 01:32:39 | |
| Open space behind Grove Park so it's the area as a point of order for this particular item. I think it would be great if you guys | 01:32:44 | |
| if you guys want to look at the contracts for the Army Corps and talk about the wetlands and the delineation of that space or | 01:32:49 | |
| have. | 01:32:55 | |
| Kind of further conversation about the skate parks. | 01:33:01 | |
| The skate park, I think that. | 01:33:04 | |
| You guys could do that, maybe offline, I will say that delineation. | 01:33:05 | |
| If I'm echoing what you're saying happens with the Army Corps. | 01:33:11 | |
| And they determine whether something is uplands or. | 01:33:14 | |
| Wetlands. | 01:33:17 | |
| Correct. And then if there's mitigation that's done. | 01:33:18 | |
| Wetlands. Never. | 01:33:22 | |
| Are reduced, they are only replaced. | 01:33:23 | |
| And so I think. | 01:33:26 | |
| You could go and look at those agreements. | 01:33:28 | |
| To see so if he wanted to say where did those wetlands go or how if they were mitigated? | 01:33:30 | |
| Where did they go? | 01:33:35 | |
| And how were they replaced? I bet you could do that. And if you want to say how were they delineated, you could look back through | 01:33:36 | |
| the time frame. But for purposes of tonight, we're going to stay on this topic. | 01:33:41 | |
| And we are going to move on to another item, but I just want to make sure it's on the record. | 01:33:47 | |
| That entire foshark South of Gamma Park, up and around we as a city went. | 01:33:52 | |
| And met with the Army Corps of Engineer to ensure that those are no longer wetlands. | 01:33:57 | |
| We have not. I didn't say that we have. We have an application. We have an application, We have an application to submit to the | 01:34:02 | |
| core of engineers and. | 01:34:05 | |
| Again, now that the federal government should be opened, we should be able to proceed with that. | 01:34:10 | |
| Thank you. And that also means that if the Army Corps comes back and says, yeah, this is all wetlands, then those plans. | 01:34:14 | |
| Kind of go away cuz they're white ones. Not necessarily there's areas where we would have they would identify what areas are | 01:34:21 | |
| considered what lands and then of course we have buffer areas so we would ensure that we're still protecting what would be | 01:34:26 | |
| considered what lands and. | 01:34:30 | |
| The current plans that Brian has put together. | 01:34:35 | |
| Does does it does that as well, so. | 01:34:38 | |
| Technically he's. | 01:34:41 | |
| He's playing a safe route. | 01:34:42 | |
| And making sure that regardless what the determination is. | 01:34:45 | |
| That there. | 01:34:48 | |
| He's he's not having to redo his process. | 01:34:49 | |
| Awesome. | 01:34:52 | |
| All right, Brian, can you stay here for a second so we can? | 01:34:53 | |
| Close out a few. | 01:34:57 | |
| Few of your items. | 01:34:58 | |
| You had some appointments that you wanted. | 01:35:00 | |
| To discuss. | 01:35:02 | |
| Yes. So on the Arch Commission. | 01:35:03 | |
| We have Jerem Sidwell, who is our current Arch Commission Chair. | 01:35:06 | |
| And then Elizabeth Shelley, who is a former arch Commission chair. | 01:35:11 | |
| And just proposed to. | 01:35:17 | |
| Have them serve a second term. | 01:35:19 | |
| We just are in need of staggering. | 01:35:22 | |
| Are members of Arch. They are all. | 01:35:25 | |
| Like on the same. | 01:35:29 | |
| Time frame so. | 01:35:30 | |
| Hold that thought, just for one second. | 01:35:32 | |
| Cash and Morgan, would you mind just because we're on the appointments, if you could just introduce Neil Peterson and Doug. | 01:35:35 | |
| Rodnick. | 01:35:41 | |
| To I'm going to do them all at the same time. Yeah, no problem. And unfortunately Anthony's out for for a little bit, so I think | 01:35:43 | |
| he had those appointments. There's Doug Radnich. | 01:35:47 | |
| And. | 01:35:53 | |
| I'm not I'm. | 01:35:54 | |
| I I'm not familiar with it, I didn't manage the process for Miss Neil. | 01:35:55 | |
| What's the name of that? Yeah, Neil Peterson, Neil Peterson and Neil Peterson. He served on a few of our committees and task | 01:36:00 | |
| forces already. But if you if you guys don't have anything about that tonight, I can wait until December 10th for that. | 01:36:06 | |
| Because I'd like them introduced. | 01:36:13 | |
| I thought they were. | 01:36:16 | |
| Yeah, we didn't know. So would you like them to? So if it's next meeting, would you like them at the at the meeting then? | 01:36:17 | |
| You guys can introduce the process of how you guys or talk to them and interview them next time. Awesome. Sorry Anthony is not | 01:36:23 | |
| here but happy he's with his family. | 01:36:29 | |
| All right, can I get a motion from the council to approve a? | 01:36:34 | |
| Jeremiah said well and Liz Shelley to serve a second term. | 01:36:39 | |
| So moved. | 01:36:43 | |
| Thank you, Marty. Can I get a second? | 01:36:44 | |
| 2nd. | 01:36:47 | |
| Second by Brett. All in favor. | 01:36:47 | |
| Aye, aye. | 01:36:49 | |
| Any opposed? | 01:36:50 | |
| All right. | 01:36:52 | |
| Stay here still. | 01:36:54 | |
| 7.37.4 and 7.10 of the consent items, you said there were things on them that needed to be discussed that were not actually added. | 01:36:56 | |
| Before the Council saw them and they were for discussion tonight. | 01:37:05 | |
| I'm going to pull those off of the consent agenda and allow you to discuss them really quick. | 01:37:09 | |
| Great. Thank you. | 01:37:14 | |
| So the first one is regarding this 7.1. | 01:37:15 | |
| Zero option. | 01:37:21 | |
| This is pertaining to the Arch grant. | 01:37:22 | |
| Policy and procedure update. | 01:37:25 | |
| There's just a minor language change that is just shown up here in yellow. | 01:37:28 | |
| So just instead of it saying. | 01:37:34 | |
| In agreement, it specifies. | 01:37:36 | |
| A written agreement and this is 710 guys. | 01:37:38 | |
| 7.10. | 01:37:41 | |
| Correct. OK. | 01:37:42 | |
| OK. That's the only change with that one. | 01:37:45 | |
| This next one is for. | 01:37:51 | |
| The. | 01:37:53 | |
| Did anybody have any questions on 7.10? | 01:37:54 | |
| With that. | 01:37:57 | |
| Change. | 01:37:58 | |
| OK, go to the next one. | 01:38:01 | |
| Oh, go ahead. | 01:38:03 | |
| I guess I would act like. | 01:38:05 | |
| How long term are these changes? Because I know there's an appetite to look into and. | 01:38:07 | |
| Adjust Arch Commission. | 01:38:11 | |
| It's like, what? What are we agreeing to? That would be extremely long term tonight. | 01:38:14 | |
| So as far as the code, well, and you always have the ability to change it. Yeah, OK. | 01:38:18 | |
| So if you if you go through it, this is just a technical change. The short answer on this one is it. | 01:38:24 | |
| But just in order the arch committee. | 01:38:29 | |
| Issues grants and so this relates to. | 01:38:31 | |
| The grants, they can issue, the criteria they would apply, right, How we would memorialize the agreement with the grant recipient. | 01:38:34 | |
| And then certain kinds of things that are eligible and ineligible. | 01:38:41 | |
| Have received those grants. | 01:38:45 | |
| Yeah, that's good. | 01:38:47 | |
| OK, next one. | 01:38:49 | |
| OK with the pavilion and field reservation? | 01:38:50 | |
| Code. I'm sorry, I don't remember what number specifically that was, If that was 77.33. OK, thank you. | 01:38:54 | |
| So in yellow are just a few. | 01:39:02 | |
| Updates that occurred since. | 01:39:05 | |
| The packet was published. | 01:39:08 | |
| So it's really just a lot of. | 01:39:10 | |
| Just language changes I guess. | 01:39:14 | |
| Let's see. So like for example 1 was. | 01:39:18 | |
| Identifying what long term basis means for. | 01:39:22 | |
| Reservation. | 01:39:26 | |
| So we just. | 01:39:28 | |
| Change that to be. | 01:39:29 | |
| Exceeding 24 hours. | 01:39:31 | |
| And then just a few changes regarding the fees and refunds. | 01:39:36 | |
| Umm. | 01:39:41 | |
| You're welcome to read through that. | 01:39:44 | |
| One of which was the commercial use of parks. Just ensuring that if there's. | 01:39:53 | |
| Businesses wanting to use parks. | 01:39:59 | |
| Profit or business purposes? | 01:40:02 | |
| We just ensure that we have. | 01:40:05 | |
| A process in place for that to get insurance documents and a contract written up and. | 01:40:07 | |
| A fee paid. | 01:40:12 | |
| And that's to remove liability from the city. | 01:40:16 | |
| So and then the bottom half is just pertaining to. | 01:40:20 | |
| Than field reservations. So these changes are essentially the same as the top half. | 01:40:24 | |
| That was just pertaining to pavilion reservations. Any questions on 7.3? | 01:40:29 | |
| Any further clarity needed on it? | 01:40:33 | |
| OK, 7.4. | 01:40:36 | |
| OK. The last one is pertaining to concessions. | 01:40:38 | |
| Would it help you, Brian, if I talked through this change or did you want to? | 01:40:46 | |
| Take it on. Yeah, there's an addition to the concessions code that. | 01:40:50 | |
| Was. | 01:40:53 | |
| Requested in part by code enforcement, in part by the concessionaire, and then. | 01:40:55 | |
| In part by Pam, as she's dealt with some election questions this last election cycle. What ended up occurring? We have a | 01:41:00 | |
| concessionaire that pays. | 01:41:05 | |
| To operate space in the park and they sell. | 01:41:09 | |
| Ice cream, sodas, candies, those kinds of things. And we had. | 01:41:13 | |
| Some. | 01:41:17 | |
| People during the campaign season that were. | 01:41:18 | |
| Providing free treats and snacks that were of the same variety sold by the concessionaire. And so the concessionaire complained to | 01:41:21 | |
| the city saying. | 01:41:25 | |
| I'm paying to rent the space. These are the things I'm selling and folks are coming and giving it away for free. | 01:41:29 | |
| We didn't feel it appropriate to enforce or to make a change in the ordinance mid election cycle. | 01:41:35 | |
| It just becomes too difficult where you have. | 01:41:41 | |
| Competing campaigns and you want to be fair to all sides. | 01:41:44 | |
| But we did want to make a change. | 01:41:47 | |
| Going forward, so that that's known by everybody. | 01:41:50 | |
| And the reason for the change again is we have a concessionaire and a revenue stream to the city that comes from it. | 01:41:53 | |
| Pays to operate a business in that space. | 01:42:01 | |
| In that space and we didn't want to allow. | 01:42:03 | |
| Behavior in the parks that would. | 01:42:06 | |
| Compete with. | 01:42:08 | |
| That right to operate the business in that same area. | 01:42:10 | |
| All right. | 01:42:14 | |
| If there are no. | 01:42:15 | |
| Questions on that that? | 01:42:16 | |
| Felt really clear. Why don't we go ahead and approve 7.37.4? | 01:42:18 | |
| 7.5 which goes with it in seven point. | 01:42:23 | |
| Is that is that approving those or moving them because there was additional change? | 01:42:31 | |
| Nope, they're they're already. | 01:42:35 | |
| Moved, so I pulled them. | 01:42:37 | |
| So we just need to approve them. | 01:42:39 | |
| So I just want a clarification. | 01:42:41 | |
| On the concessions, are you saying that? | 01:42:43 | |
| Because I guess I'm not. | 01:42:47 | |
| It's not reading easy for me. Are you saying that people are not allowed to hand out free items if. | 01:42:48 | |
| At all or free items that are sold by those vendors. | 01:42:54 | |
| The way our process works with the concessionaire is they get a menu approved by the city. | 01:42:58 | |
| Of the things that they. | 01:43:03 | |
| Can sell and if somebody were to come to the park and. | 01:43:05 | |
| Either give away or try to sell. | 01:43:09 | |
| The same items that the concessionaire sells. | 01:43:12 | |
| Then we'd be able to. | 01:43:14 | |
| Remove them or stop them from selling that item. | 01:43:16 | |
| At the park. | 01:43:19 | |
| And if we? | 01:43:24 | |
| Don't pass this. | 01:43:24 | |
| If because when you talk about selling other items. | 01:43:26 | |
| I mean, you already have to have a permit to sell at the park. | 01:43:29 | |
| So if we didn't pass this, you could already. | 01:43:33 | |
| If someone's selling it, you could already stop them, correct? Correct. | 01:43:35 | |
| But now you're just basically saying you can't give it away for free. | 01:43:38 | |
| Which feels UN American the same items. | 01:43:45 | |
| You can give away something else. | 01:43:48 | |
| No, I I get it. | 01:43:50 | |
| I think it's because one is paying a fee to do it and then we're allowing somebody else to come in and we're not charging them a | 01:43:51 | |
| fee. | 01:43:54 | |
| Yeah, there there are times that. | 01:43:59 | |
| Cities make decisions that feel a little bit more like a private landlord than they do. | 01:44:01 | |
| A government entity. | 01:44:08 | |
| And one is when you make the choice to. | 01:44:09 | |
| Lease some of your park space to a business and give that business certain. | 01:44:12 | |
| Exclusive rights to operate in that space, and that's really what this is about. | 01:44:18 | |
| You could pivot and not. | 01:44:23 | |
| Rent that space and. | 01:44:25 | |
| Not run it in that way. | 01:44:27 | |
| If you. | 01:44:29 | |
| Didn't want to receive that revenue stream. | 01:44:29 | |
| But I. | 01:44:32 | |
| Think you're going to have a hard time holding on to the business if you allow competing behaviors? | 01:44:32 | |
| That erode their bottom line. | 01:44:37 | |
| Well, and it's not very common that someone's going to be handing out free stuff. | 01:44:39 | |
| Yeah, it seems very few and far between. | 01:44:45 | |
| I'm with Marty on that one. | 01:44:50 | |
| OK. | 01:44:52 | |
| I'm comfortable with that. I'll make a motion. | 01:44:56 | |
| To approve. | 01:44:59 | |
| 7.1. | 01:45:02 | |
| 7.3.37.4 and 7.10. | 01:45:03 | |
| And seven point. | 01:45:08 | |
| 5 and 7.5. | 01:45:08 | |
| You have a first by Marty. Can I get a second? | 01:45:11 | |
| Second Second by Sarah. | 01:45:13 | |
| I'm going to do this by roll call Jake. | 01:45:16 | |
| No, Brett. | 01:45:18 | |
| Aye, aye, Marty. Hi, Sarah. | 01:45:21 | |
| Aye, all right. | 01:45:25 | |
| Thank you. | 01:45:27 | |
| I think the. | 01:45:28 | |
| Took care of all of your items. Yes, yes. OK. | 01:45:29 | |
| Can I get a raise of hand of who would like to speak in public comment? | 01:45:33 | |
| For things that are not currently on the Agenda 123. | 01:45:38 | |
| Anybody else? | 01:45:42 | |
| All right, Tony, can you put? | 01:45:44 | |
| Minutes on the clock for each. Please come state your name at the podium and share with us. | 01:45:46 | |
| Your comments. | 01:45:52 | |
| Yep. | 01:45:59 | |
| Good evening Daria Evans, Vineyard resident. | 01:46:04 | |
| Thank you for this opportunity to speak tonight. | 01:46:08 | |
| I'd like to thank the city for honoring Don Overson. | 01:46:12 | |
| For his dedicated service to Vineyard City and residents. | 01:46:16 | |
| I enjoyed the dedicatory ceremony and seeing the inside of the water tank that was very. | 01:46:20 | |
| Cool. Very interesting. | 01:46:25 | |
| And I'm just wondering when the tank will be operational. | 01:46:27 | |
| I also would like to thank Nassim for his answering my many water questions. I had some more and he answered them this last week. | 01:46:32 | |
| So thank you Nasim. | 01:46:36 | |
| Now I have my questions. | 01:46:42 | |
| I am wondering when the crosswalks will be completed on Main Street. | 01:46:44 | |
| And also Vineyard Loop Rd. | 01:46:48 | |
| I have a question about. | 01:46:52 | |
| Is if there is an ordinance restricting overnight parking on public streets from November to March? | 01:46:54 | |
| And if so, what will happen with those vehicles on the Vineyard Loop Rd. | 01:47:01 | |
| Will the roads still be plowed? | 01:47:06 | |
| And then I have one question. | 01:47:09 | |
| Or concern. | 01:47:11 | |
| Regarding item 6.3 on the work session. | 01:47:13 | |
| Nassim said that the Army Corps of Engineers has not released that designation of wetlands. | 01:47:20 | |
| At this property here. | 01:47:27 | |
| At Planning Commission. | 01:47:29 | |
| It was said that the survey study was done in June. | 01:47:31 | |
| And I believe that the City Council should not move ahead. | 01:47:34 | |
| Until the Corps of Engineers gives the approval. | 01:47:39 | |
| Thank you very much. | 01:47:42 | |
| Tim Blackburn, Vineyard resident. | 01:47:58 | |
| I thought it was going to be discussed tonight 3.5. | 01:48:01 | |
| A little bit, but since it wasn't. | 01:48:03 | |
| I'll take just a moment and. | 01:48:05 | |
| Talk about a concern we have. I'm speaking on behalf of the Vineyard Heritage Foundation. | 01:48:06 | |
| And a couple of years ago, the mayor. | 01:48:12 | |
| And I and half dozen other people went with the developers through that area. We walked through all the. | 01:48:15 | |
| Thorny areas of of that of the property up near. | 01:48:21 | |
| The eastern portion of that plat of ground, right behind the Pioneer home. | 01:48:26 | |
| Where there are still. | 01:48:31 | |
| And there's an old barn and there's silos and all that kind of thing. And I had understood that maybe the developer was going to | 01:48:34 | |
| reverse the order in which they were going to have the city take. | 01:48:39 | |
| Ownership or. | 01:48:44 | |
| In interest in that property. | 01:48:46 | |
| And I just want to remind the city that at that time a couple of years ago. | 01:48:48 | |
| In talking with gold barrel and and other. | 01:48:54 | |
| Interested people that was going to become a Heritage Park. | 01:48:56 | |
| Of some kind. | 01:49:00 | |
| We were going to take the silos and and redo some of them. We were going to. | 01:49:02 | |
| Take the old barn and. | 01:49:07 | |
| Maybe redo it. We were going to turn some of it into a venue where we could use them for weddings and other events in the city. | 01:49:09 | |
| And I'm just hopeful that as that sequence of turning that ownership over to the city or. | 01:49:16 | |
| Or who's going to be developing? | 01:49:22 | |
| That it isn't just bulldozed down. | 01:49:24 | |
| So that it can be developed. | 01:49:27 | |
| That we truly do retain that parcel of land. | 01:49:28 | |
| Into some kind of heritage celebration, because there aren't many of those locations in Vineyard left. | 01:49:32 | |
| And right now we have that prize in our hands, so let's not destroy it. | 01:49:39 | |
| Let's keep it. | 01:49:44 | |
| Let's build upon it and turn it into something that we can all be proud of. | 01:49:45 | |
| Thank you so much. | 01:49:49 | |
| Thanks, Tim. | 01:49:50 | |
| Crystal, did you have something? | 01:49:52 | |
| Do you mind if I speak to that first? | 01:49:54 | |
| No, we're gonna finish for school. I think you are last. | 01:49:56 | |
| Well, I just wanted to say that I. | 01:50:03 | |
| The voter base that elected the new. | 01:50:06 | |
| Mayor and council are not happy about the What is it? | 01:50:08 | |
| I think you're 10 cent items 7.7. | 01:50:13 | |
| And 7.8. | 01:50:17 | |
| And I hope that you will do the ethical thing and not try to jam through. | 01:50:19 | |
| Any of your agendas? | 01:50:23 | |
| OK, Thank you. As we close, I'm going to turn a few things. I'm. | 01:50:26 | |
| We're going to answer a few questions. | 01:50:31 | |
| I'm going to close. | 01:50:33 | |
| Comment. | 01:50:35 | |
| Really quick, I believe the water tank completion is going to is pegged to be. | 01:50:37 | |
| Entirely completed in the next month. | 01:50:42 | |
| Is that right, Nasim? OK. | 01:50:44 | |
| Vineyard Loop Rd. Crosswalks. | 01:50:46 | |
| I can't speak to the timeline on that. | 01:50:49 | |
| Did you want to come to a microphone? | 01:50:52 | |
| Thanks, Chris. | 01:50:55 | |
| OK. Thanks for being here. | 01:50:59 | |
| We're going to excuse Marty. She has streets and stormwater. | 01:51:01 | |
| So you may have noticed now we're doing the the cross, the crossings for the Refuge Islands and some of the other. | 01:51:09 | |
| Pedestrian crossings. | 01:51:15 | |
| As soon as those crossings are done. | 01:51:17 | |
| The the ADA Paths report today. | 01:51:19 | |
| They'll start on the islands here soon. | 01:51:22 | |
| As soon as those islands are done. | 01:51:24 | |
| The strippers will be in here to kind of. | 01:51:26 | |
| Red delineate some of those lanes there around those islands. | 01:51:29 | |
| And they'll also hit the crosswalks before then. | 01:51:34 | |
| If it's a concern. | 01:51:36 | |
| That we want to get them out here sooner. | 01:51:38 | |
| I'm happy to have them come out and do that. | 01:51:40 | |
| We were just hoping to kind of get them all here, for one. | 01:51:44 | |
| Big striping event so. | 01:51:47 | |
| OK. Thank you. | 01:51:49 | |
| We can. | 01:51:52 | |
| Have you guys work on that and find out the best opportunity for us? Marty, did you have something to add? Yeah, I wanted to know. | 01:51:53 | |
| There was an addition on the crosswalks. | 01:52:00 | |
| We added another crosswalk on. | 01:52:02 | |
| Oh, now I'm going to free. Is it Vineyard loop Rd. and. | 01:52:06 | |
| 170 N. | 01:52:11 | |
| It's right by the Willows. | 01:52:12 | |
| Clubhouse, I think it's worth noting. | 01:52:14 | |
| That it was. | 01:52:17 | |
| A really cool. | 01:52:20 | |
| Conversation where flagship. | 01:52:21 | |
| Offered to pay for the whole project. | 01:52:23 | |
| Up to was it 18,000 or 15,000? | 01:52:26 | |
| So I think that that's. | 01:52:30 | |
| Really exciting for those communities that cross. | 01:52:31 | |
| Over to that clubhouse all summer long. Yeah. Thank you so much, Marty, for negotiating that and putting that through. | 01:52:34 | |
| I really appreciate it. Thank you. Thank you. We'll look forward. Maybe you guys can put a timeline together and we can. | 01:52:40 | |
| Kind of post it and. | 01:52:44 | |
| Recap it next. I mean I would anticipate within the next 30 days the project is going to be complete. | 01:52:46 | |
| So it would be within the next 30 days. That's wonderful. Thank you. | 01:52:50 | |
| Daria, we do have a winter ordinance that talks about parking on those roads and what it usually entails is when it snows, they | 01:52:56 | |
| move and then when they come back when it's. | 01:53:01 | |
| Cleared, the cars can return to where they are allowed to park. | 01:53:06 | |
| We could have that sent to you and we could post it. Generally we post it every time winter starts coming, so on social media. So | 01:53:10 | |
| you'll see that come up, but we can get it too earlier. | 01:53:15 | |
| Let's see as far as Tim Tim, that park remains. | 01:53:21 | |
| I don't believe that was going to change on timeline. | 01:53:25 | |
| Those agreements are still there. Go ahead Morgan, you can add to it. I don't know what they're requesting. So so they their, | 01:53:28 | |
| their request now is. | 01:53:32 | |
| To essentially flip the parks. | 01:53:36 | |
| So instead of doing. | 01:53:39 | |
| The lakeside park. | 01:53:41 | |
| 1st. | 01:53:43 | |
| They they want to do that they what we call the gateway or the. | 01:53:45 | |
| The wet. | 01:53:48 | |
| The East park first. | 01:53:50 | |
| Which is the heritage, yeah. And so and. | 01:53:51 | |
| They're they're required to install baseline improvements. And so this is something we talked with the council a few years ago. | 01:53:55 | |
| And so it would, it would be up to the City Council. | 01:53:59 | |
| So those would be costs above what the what what the developers required to put in. They're required to put in baseline | 01:54:03 | |
| improvements, which would be essentially grasp playground equipment. | 01:54:08 | |
| Restrooms. | 01:54:15 | |
| So they're supposed to put in a minimum kind of those minimum requirements and then if the city wants anything in addition. | 01:54:17 | |
| We would do that and so. | 01:54:22 | |
| That's one of those things that the city would like to budget to get, like to see if. | 01:54:24 | |
| From a engineering structural assessment standpoint. | 01:54:29 | |
| If they'll silos are good if you want to keep someone I mean that that'd be worthy of like a design charrette to. | 01:54:33 | |
| To to to kick that back up, because if. | 01:54:40 | |
| If the approval occurs as. | 01:54:43 | |
| The applicant is requesting it would push that park at the front more of the front end and that does cut down some of the timeline | 01:54:46 | |
| that we'd be able to to look at because. | 01:54:51 | |
| So because right now it's towards the end and so it provides us a lot of time. | 01:54:56 | |
| We move it up. | 01:55:00 | |
| Then we need to make some decisions quickly. It's going to be fairly expensive to. So we just got anticipate that so it looks | 01:55:01 | |
| like. | 01:55:04 | |
| The timeline switches it closer. | 01:55:08 | |
| And then? | 01:55:11 | |
| Obviously comes into a budget conversation. | 01:55:12 | |
| Yeah. So that will come forward in the future. | 01:55:14 | |
| And then? | 01:55:17 | |
| Crystal, I'm glad that you mentioned 7.8. | 01:55:18 | |
| 7:00 I'm going to confirm those numbers as I say them out loud. | 01:55:21 | |
| Yep, 7.7 and 7.8. | 01:55:26 | |
| We were able to have some conversations with our. | 01:55:28 | |
| Newly elected officials. | 01:55:32 | |
| And they talked about. | 01:55:34 | |
| Potentially bringing forward some ideas to see if those work. | 01:55:35 | |
| I recommended to the council that we allow them to bring those forward and talk in the next couple of weeks and show what we've | 01:55:39 | |
| got and so my recommendation is that we move. | 01:55:44 | |
| Those to our December 10th meeting to see. | 01:55:48 | |
| How we can come together on that? But thank you for your comment. | 01:55:51 | |
| Yep, there's there's always different opportunities. | 01:55:55 | |
| So hopefully we can come together as a, as a. | 01:55:59 | |
| As group. | 01:56:01 | |
| All right, with that in mind. | 01:56:02 | |
| Let's Oh, yeah, I'm sorry, Jake, you had something to add to the. | 01:56:05 | |
| The park. I'm glad that Tim came tonight. A lot of people don't know. | 01:56:08 | |
| The original name of Sleepy Ridge. | 01:56:12 | |
| Is brought to us by. | 01:56:16 | |
| The Timpanogos people. | 01:56:18 | |
| The Sleepy Ridge is along. | 01:56:21 | |
| It goes all the way throughout Vineyard, right? | 01:56:23 | |
| Don't want to get emotional but. | 01:56:26 | |
| Before The Pioneers got here. | 01:56:29 | |
| We didn't have Deer Creek, we didn't have Strawberry and we didn't have Jordanelle. | 01:56:33 | |
| And so every spring. | 01:56:38 | |
| The entire. | 01:56:43 | |
| Valley. | 01:56:44 | |
| In about a three or four week period would flood. | 01:56:45 | |
| And Vineyard would be a point of order. | 01:56:49 | |
| Talking about history. | 01:56:53 | |
| I know. | 01:56:54 | |
| But you can. | 01:56:55 | |
| Talk about that. | 01:56:56 | |
| Another time. | 01:56:57 | |
| We're talking about what Tim just said. | 01:56:59 | |
| Talking about it, I think that's awesome. | 01:57:01 | |
| And I think that should happen. Absolutely. OK, Jake, do you have a point? Yeah, Yeah, I have a point to this. | 01:57:04 | |
| Because of that. | 01:57:10 | |
| The specific location of where the indigenous people. | 01:57:12 | |
| And the early holdaway families. | 01:57:16 | |
| Met for a truce was on the sleepy Ridge right on right where the. | 01:57:18 | |
| Leroy Family. | 01:57:23 | |
| Farm is. | 01:57:24 | |
| 3. | 01:57:26 | |
| Profits of the LDS church and 9 apostles lived in that location and so I love that Tim is concerned about the history there. | 01:57:27 | |
| And about that Heritage Park because it's not only the Mormon settlers, but also the indigenous of the Timpanogos tribe. | 01:57:37 | |
| Of what? Of what happened and occurred at that location. So I just want to make sure that. | 01:57:46 | |
| Tim, I will go. | 01:57:51 | |
| I've spoken with the mayor elect and the council and I know I'm going to be playing a major role. | 01:57:52 | |
| In that history, and I'll go and meet with them before. | 01:57:57 | |
| Next meeting, I know the next council will be the one that. | 01:58:01 | |
| Is financing and thinking and. | 01:58:04 | |
| Building that through so I just want to make sure. | 01:58:06 | |
| I understand the history. | 01:58:08 | |
| And the importance of it. | 01:58:12 | |
| Go ahead, Sarah. | 01:58:15 | |
| So. | 01:58:16 | |
| As far as? | 01:58:18 | |
| 7.7. | 01:58:19 | |
| And the social media outrage? | 01:58:22 | |
| I just wanted to point out. | 01:58:25 | |
| To all of. | 01:58:27 | |
| The people who are opposing it. | 01:58:28 | |
| That I have a budget request from Sullivan Love a year and a half ago. | 01:58:31 | |
| Requesting a new vac truck. | 01:58:35 | |
| What is a TV van? | 01:58:37 | |
| The TV vans are used for. | 01:58:42 | |
| Sending a video camera into those lines prior to using the back truck. So you send the video camera in. | 01:58:45 | |
| You inspect the line with that. | 01:58:52 | |
| From the surface. | 01:58:55 | |
| You determine where the problems are. | 01:58:56 | |
| And then you put your vac truck in and take care of it. | 01:58:58 | |
| OK. So did we purchase that? | 01:59:01 | |
| OK, so he has a request to purchase a new vac truck. | 01:59:04 | |
| And a TV van. And that was a year and a half ago. | 01:59:07 | |
| And we have since put money aside in the budget to be able to do that. Is that correct? | 01:59:10 | |
| So for the last year and a half. | 01:59:15 | |
| We've been setting aside money to be able to afford that. | 01:59:17 | |
| So so when you get information. | 01:59:20 | |
| Online and you say that we're going to spend $700,000. That's incorrect. | 01:59:23 | |
| The amount here on fiscal impact shows 643. | 01:59:28 | |
| 643,000 with A170150 to 170. | 01:59:31 | |
| $1000 credit for the existing. | 01:59:37 | |
| Equipment that would be turned back in. | 01:59:40 | |
| So the actual amount was. | 01:59:42 | |
| Closer to what was it for? | 01:59:44 | |
| 475. | 01:59:47 | |
| So I think it's really important that we get our facts straight, especially if we're spreading them. | 01:59:48 | |
| Through the community. | 01:59:53 | |
| To make sure that Sullivan was the one that asked for this a year and a half ago. | 01:59:54 | |
| And the city supported that and put the money aside. | 01:59:58 | |
| And so. | 02:00:01 | |
| So when we spread information, let's sure that make sure that we have all our facts correct. Sarah you. | 02:00:02 | |
| Sullivan started with. | 02:00:08 | |
| Telling me that he was the one that requested it. | 02:00:09 | |
| Due to COVID funds. | 02:00:12 | |
| There were massive amount of buildings that. | 02:00:13 | |
| Bought vac trucks. | 02:00:15 | |
| The hourly rate to rent one. | 02:00:17 | |
| And the availability has changed dramatically in the last year and a half, so for him to come forward. | 02:00:19 | |
| And adjust his assessment. | 02:00:25 | |
| Is awesome. | 02:00:27 | |
| So we knew that he didn't, he didn't not share that with us because we are discussing 700,000, okay, he was off 100,000. | 02:00:29 | |
| No, the actual amounts more like 475. That's a big difference. | 02:00:37 | |
| Because we are discussing. | 02:00:42 | |
| 7.7. | 02:00:45 | |
| I know I recommended it to be continued for further discussion, but maybe we could just come and talk about some of the facts. | 02:00:47 | |
| Of the truck. | 02:00:56 | |
| It seems like you guys want to review them. | 02:01:00 | |
| I would just recognize the mayor and say thank you for working with Zach and and. | 02:01:03 | |
| Having a conversation, you know he. | 02:01:07 | |
| Obviously is the executive. He'll have an approach. He works with VAC trucks. | 02:01:10 | |
| All the time like I spent an hour learning. I don't even know. | 02:01:14 | |
| A lot about vac trucks, but about the rental of how much and and the availability of them and then also being on with. | 02:01:18 | |
| TTSD today. | 02:01:24 | |
| For like an hour and understanding that contract, it was like. | 02:01:26 | |
| Wow yeah, this is a no brainer so. | 02:01:28 | |
| I just appreciate the conversation and delaying it a couple of weeks. | 02:01:32 | |
| Yeah, OK. | 02:01:36 | |
| Thank you. | 02:01:38 | |
| For your comments. | 02:01:39 | |
| Did we want to talk about it now? Does the Council want to continue it? | 02:01:42 | |
| OK, how about we continue it? | 02:01:46 | |
| We sit down and then next time we can bring these discussions forward and we can talk about the contract with TSSD. | 02:01:48 | |
| We can talk about. | 02:01:56 | |
| The ability or. | 02:01:57 | |
| Discussion about what it costs to rent it. | 02:01:59 | |
| We can talk about our usage and our service agreements. | 02:02:02 | |
| OK, so I'm going to ask that we just put. | 02:02:05 | |
| Put 7.7 and 7.8 and we continue those. | 02:02:07 | |
| Hold for a second while I. | 02:02:12 | |
| Just say, can we approve? | 02:02:14 | |
| 7.1. | 02:02:16 | |
| 7.2. | 02:02:18 | |
| Seven point. | 02:02:20 | |
| Six and seven point. | 02:02:21 | |
| 9 and 7.11. | 02:02:24 | |
| And then we'll continue 7.7 and 7.8. | 02:02:27 | |
| I'd like to pull off 7.6. | 02:02:32 | |
| 7.6 Can we can we go ahead and talk about 7.6? | 02:02:34 | |
| Yeah. All right. | 02:02:41 | |
| Right, go ahead and start the the the the question I had and this is again, as much I know, I know we've I've already had a | 02:02:42 | |
| conversation about this, but I want to make sure everybody. | 02:02:47 | |
| Hears it. | 02:02:53 | |
| In the work session on. | 02:02:55 | |
| On that. | 02:02:59 | |
| I had asked for an evaluation of a breakpoint for Council approval. | 02:03:03 | |
| In. | 02:03:07 | |
| I'm going to point Eric. | 02:03:10 | |
| If you could walk us through the the research and evaluation that you did. | 02:03:14 | |
| And the because when I was reviewing the updated policy that's coming in here. | 02:03:19 | |
| That particular piece wasn't in there, and it was. | 02:03:24 | |
| A bit frustrating. | 02:03:26 | |
| But then we had a conversation and I want to make sure everybody hears. | 02:03:29 | |
| The research that staff have done. | 02:03:33 | |
| And why that one particular piece wasn't in there? | 02:03:36 | |
| From my recollection, there was there was 2 requests. 1 was that we would adjust the international travel that gets approved by | 02:03:42 | |
| the City Council to be scrutinized. | 02:03:46 | |
| And the other was that we looked at. | 02:03:50 | |
| Thresholds that we could utilize. | 02:03:52 | |
| On a dollar. | 02:03:55 | |
| Level rather than just. | 02:03:57 | |
| Where the location was. | 02:03:59 | |
| And so we. | 02:04:01 | |
| Did add one that was for outside Utah County that cost more than $4000. | 02:04:02 | |
| When we looked around Utah cities, there was no other Utah cities that use a dollar threshold. | 02:04:07 | |
| We did a nationwide search. | 02:04:13 | |
| And there was a couple cities in Texas that did have a dollar amount. | 02:04:15 | |
| So we utilized one of those. | 02:04:18 | |
| The $4000 one. | 02:04:22 | |
| Any travel that would that would go above that. | 02:04:25 | |
| Certainly merits. | 02:04:28 | |
| Getting additional scrutiny? | 02:04:29 | |
| And so we've added a. | 02:04:31 | |
| A requirement for that to be. | 02:04:33 | |
| I would just let. | 02:04:36 | |
| Council know that. | 02:04:37 | |
| That looking over the last couple of years, the travel. | 02:04:38 | |
| Has not been over that $4000 amount. | 02:04:43 | |
| And so anything that would go above that would definitely be something that raises a flag and needs to be looked over and | 02:04:47 | |
| carefully considered. | 02:04:51 | |
| In addition to just the budgeting of those in the 1st place at the beginning of the year. | 02:04:56 | |
| OK. Thank you. | 02:05:00 | |
| Any other comments or? | 02:05:02 | |
| Is there, you mentioned that nothing in the last couple of years has gone up that high? | 02:05:03 | |
| Do we know what the highest thing was? What was that? | 02:05:09 | |
| Dollar amount, I think the highest dollar amount was actually for City Council to attend. | 02:05:13 | |
| Our Saint George. | 02:05:20 | |
| Event and that I think the total. | 02:05:22 | |
| Total dollar amount on that was about 2800. | 02:05:24 | |
| OK. | 02:05:28 | |
| OK. Well, thank you. | 02:05:31 | |
| With that, does everybody feel comfortable approving everything and continuing everything, remaining and continuing 7.7 and 7.8? | 02:05:34 | |
| I second. | 02:05:43 | |
| Or do I make a motion? Yeah, Jake, we'll get a motion for you to do that. And I'm just going to name the numbers really quick, | 02:05:44 | |
| 7.17.27.6. | 02:05:48 | |
| 7.9 and 7. | 02:05:52 | |
| .11 to be to be approved and 7.7 and 7.8 to be continued. I make that motion. | 02:05:54 | |
| OK, can I get a second Second. | 02:06:01 | |
| Thank you. | 02:06:03 | |
| Brett for a second. | 02:06:05 | |
| And I'll do it by roll call, Jake. | 02:06:07 | |
| I Marty's excused. | 02:06:11 | |
| Hi, excellent. | 02:06:13 | |
| OK. Eric, you had a report. | 02:06:15 | |
| Did you get 7.11? | 02:06:18 | |
| That's on the next page I did. I called it 7.11. | 02:06:20 | |
| Sorry. | 02:06:24 | |
| I missed that. OK, yeah, just a just a quick we've, we've got a nice report for the council to review. | 02:06:24 | |
| Be sure to take a look at that, there's tons of cool information about what's happened over the last month. | 02:06:30 | |
| But just a couple highlights. | 02:06:35 | |
| From recreation, there were 591 registrants to the youth. | 02:06:38 | |
| Junior Jazz Basketball League. | 02:06:41 | |
| Huge, huge numbers. It's fun to see that many kids coming out for those. | 02:06:44 | |
| We hosted our buapalooza. | 02:06:47 | |
| Event this year. | 02:06:50 | |
| Just before Halloween. | 02:06:51 | |
| And had. | 02:06:53 | |
| Approximately 4000 attendees, which was huge, an increase over the years in the past. | 02:06:54 | |
| Also coordinated. | 02:07:01 | |
| With the Rojas farms. | 02:07:03 | |
| To offer pumpkins to the community on the. | 02:07:05 | |
| On the one day. | 02:07:08 | |
| And those were incredibly popular. | 02:07:10 | |
| I know that we saw pumpkins going all over the city. | 02:07:12 | |
| The their teams installed two dog stations along the trail. | 02:07:17 | |
| Near the train tracks. | 02:07:22 | |
| I bring that up as a point of. | 02:07:24 | |
| Of. | 02:07:26 | |
| Note because I know that there's oftentimes concerns about about. | 02:07:27 | |
| Not having those available and therefore. | 02:07:31 | |
| Having issues with. | 02:07:34 | |
| With dog feces found along those trails. So that's a big deal. | 02:07:35 | |
| Also. | 02:07:40 | |
| 2 memorial bench and plaques were installed. | 02:07:41 | |
| Just wanted to point out because this has come up. | 02:07:45 | |
| On social media. | 02:07:47 | |
| Those are fully funded through donations. | 02:07:48 | |
| The benches. | 02:07:53 | |
| Yes. Why were they on the budget then? | 02:07:54 | |
| Any expenses that come through the city? | 02:07:57 | |
| Have to go through our budget even if. | 02:08:00 | |
| We have to track the revenue and then we have to track the expenses. | 02:08:02 | |
| And so it shows up in our budget. | 02:08:06 | |
| But it is not something that the city is is expending its own dollars. It's just expending the could you call that out on the | 02:08:08 | |
| budget next time? Absolutely delineated. | 02:08:12 | |
| Yeah, yeah. | 02:08:16 | |
| Why were they still? | 02:08:18 | |
| $12,000 though. | 02:08:19 | |
| They were not $12,000 Twelve. | 02:08:20 | |
| Maybe in the ballpark of. | 02:08:22 | |
| 6000 total for. | 02:08:24 | |
| For how many for six benches? | 02:08:26 | |
| So 1000 bucks each. | 02:08:28 | |
| And usually when they go through the budget, they go through kind of our grants and expenses and then it shows what is coming in | 02:08:30 | |
| and what's going on. | 02:08:33 | |
| But we can be a little more clear about that next year. Yeah, that's great. | 02:08:38 | |
| Also wanted to point out we have a whole page of. | 02:08:41 | |
| Master plan updates. | 02:08:44 | |
| That includes. | 02:08:46 | |
| Mill Rd. Wayfinding station area plan. | 02:08:48 | |
| Vineyard center rental program Bluffs at Vineyard so lots of different master plans. | 02:08:51 | |
| And we try to keep you up to speed on what those are with an update each month. | 02:08:57 | |
| Let's see. | 02:09:03 | |
| I think there was one other. | 02:09:04 | |
| On our occupancy from the building, on our building report, our total units occupied in Vineyard are now at 58130. | 02:09:07 | |
| Which puts our estimated population at 22,742. | 02:09:15 | |
| From this last month we had the. | 02:09:22 | |
| Three single family dwellings were approved. | 02:09:25 | |
| 19 townhomes and three commercial units. | 02:09:28 | |
| And that's it. | 02:09:32 | |
| Awesome. Thank you so much. | 02:09:35 | |
| We're going to go ahead and do our public hearing. | 02:09:37 | |
| This is an update to the Vineyard City Development Standards and Design Specifications or. | 02:09:39 | |
| Ordinance 2025-15 can. | 02:09:44 | |
| Can I get a motion to go into a public hearing? | 02:09:47 | |
| So moved. Thank you, Brett. Can I get a second? | 02:09:50 | |
| 2nd Thank you, Sarah. | 02:09:53 | |
| We are now in a public hearing. | 02:09:55 | |
| And then? | 02:09:58 | |
| Chris Thompson, I believe our consultant. | 02:10:00 | |
| Is going to be this discussion for us. Thanks so much for being here. | 02:10:03 | |
| Yeah. Thank you. | 02:10:07 | |
| I think I need this. | 02:10:09 | |
| I don't think this will take a long time. | 02:10:18 | |
| But. | 02:10:21 | |
| Let's see. | 02:10:23 | |
| I just push the button as soon as. | 02:10:28 | |
| To run. | 02:10:58 | |
| Do I press the button on here? | 02:11:04 | |
| If you take it out and then put it back in. | 02:11:06 | |
| OK, that's what I've noticed. I have to do it twice. | 02:11:08 | |
| OK. | 02:11:13 | |
| And then it comes. | 02:11:15 | |
| Sorry that. | 02:11:17 | |
| Something came up right here so. | 02:11:22 | |
| You click it first. | 02:11:27 | |
| Didn't do that. | 02:11:32 | |
| There we go. All right, great. | 02:11:34 | |
| Sorry about that. | 02:11:36 | |
| Recently. | 02:11:46 | |
| We've been able to work with engineering staff to revise the construction and development standards. | 02:11:48 | |
| This is how your neighborhoods. | 02:11:53 | |
| Are constructed. | 02:11:55 | |
| From the curb and gutter to the sidewalks to the utilities under the ground. | 02:11:57 | |
| And. | 02:12:02 | |
| A lot of, really. | 02:12:03 | |
| Change it. Good changes that I think will help. | 02:12:06 | |
| The development community, the contractors, the inspectors, and. | 02:12:08 | |
| The engineering reviewers. | 02:12:12 | |
| One of the things. | 02:12:15 | |
| That happened at the beginning of 2025. Is a new version of the. | 02:12:17 | |
| American Poet Works Association, Utah Chapter Standards came out. | 02:12:22 | |
| These are. | 02:12:26 | |
| Are kind of like the Uniform building code, but for building. | 02:12:27 | |
| The roads and the utilities. | 02:12:31 | |
| And. | 02:12:33 | |
| There's a state committee. | 02:12:34 | |
| That meets on on. | 02:12:36 | |
| On these standards and they update them every year. | 02:12:38 | |
| And the latest update was in 2025 actually. | 02:12:41 | |
| Scene is on this committee. | 02:12:46 | |
| The state committee that. | 02:12:49 | |
| That of Daisy standards. | 02:12:50 | |
| And he's been a long standing member of the committee anyway, these standards. | 02:12:52 | |
| Have a lot of detail. | 02:12:57 | |
| That is. | 02:12:59 | |
| Up to date on like. | 02:13:00 | |
| The road base that you build underneath the asphalt. The asphalt. | 02:13:01 | |
| How it's comprised and and and concrete, the standards for concrete, it stays up with all of those so that the cities don't have | 02:13:05 | |
| to. | 02:13:09 | |
| And so. | 02:13:13 | |
| A lot of this. | 02:13:15 | |
| Update to the Vineyard Standards where? | 02:13:17 | |
| Was to adopt. | 02:13:19 | |
| The APWA specifications and then take out. | 02:13:21 | |
| Standards like. | 02:13:25 | |
| Road base? How many? | 02:13:26 | |
| You know what the graduation for your Rd. base is and and how the asphalt should be made-up to take that out so that. | 02:13:28 | |
| That you just referred to a more up-to-date standard. | 02:13:34 | |
| And the APWA specs? | 02:13:38 | |
| Anyway, that's. | 02:13:40 | |
| That's one change. | 02:13:41 | |
| The second change which? | 02:13:43 | |
| I really. | 02:13:46 | |
| Feel like is going to help. | 02:13:48 | |
| The inspectors, the. | 02:13:49 | |
| The design engineers the. | 02:13:51 | |
| The contractors is. | 02:13:53 | |
| Is kind of organizing. | 02:13:56 | |
| The standards in a way that. | 02:13:58 | |
| That if you have. | 02:14:00 | |
| A sanitary sewer or a drinking water. | 02:14:01 | |
| A standards question you can go right there and get. | 02:14:05 | |
| Get all of the answers and. | 02:14:07 | |
| And and so. | 02:14:09 | |
| Just reorganizing all the standards so that if you're a design engineer. | 02:14:12 | |
| The design requirements are in one. | 02:14:17 | |
| Section or if you're an inspector, the inspection. | 02:14:19 | |
| Requirements are on one section as well. | 02:14:23 | |
| And so this was. | 02:14:25 | |
| A pretty good change. | 02:14:27 | |
| I felt like for. | 02:14:29 | |
| The people who use these standards all the time. | 02:14:30 | |
| This is kind of. | 02:14:34 | |
| An example of. | 02:14:35 | |
| Of the previous. | 02:14:37 | |
| Standards and. | 02:14:38 | |
| To kind of see how. | 02:14:40 | |
| We took all of this and organized it into. | 02:14:42 | |
| Into a way that you you could. | 02:14:45 | |
| Just go to one place. | 02:14:47 | |
| Get all the information on on that item. | 02:14:48 | |
| The other thing is, is vineyards have been. | 02:14:52 | |
| Working on a new transportation master plan. | 02:14:55 | |
| Which has made some some great. | 02:14:57 | |
| New plans for the city's transportation system and and with that. | 02:15:02 | |
| Some different. | 02:15:07 | |
| Street cross sections. | 02:15:08 | |
| Were proposed. | 02:15:09 | |
| These were implemented into the standards so that. | 02:15:10 | |
| You now had. | 02:15:14 | |
| Your standard drawings for a street cross section match. | 02:15:15 | |
| The the master plan. | 02:15:17 | |
| And then the last kind of major. | 02:15:19 | |
| Change that I think helps is. | 02:15:22 | |
| A lot of the municip. | 02:15:24 | |
| Code is. | 02:15:25 | |
| Held in a program called Muni Code. | 02:15:28 | |
| It allows you to very quickly get to. | 02:15:31 | |
| To different codes and and standards and. | 02:15:33 | |
| Ordinances and. | 02:15:39 | |
| So, uh. | 02:15:41 | |
| The last part of this once. | 02:15:42 | |
| Once it's approved, is. | 02:15:43 | |
| These construction standards will be put into muni code. | 02:15:45 | |
| So that that. | 02:15:48 | |
| Accessibility will be there for the contractors and engineers. | 02:15:49 | |
| As well. | 02:15:53 | |
| Any questions about all that before we? | 02:15:56 | |
| Maybe. | 02:15:59 | |
| Really high level changes that were proposed. | 02:16:00 | |
| Doesn't look like it. | 02:16:05 | |
| OK. All right. | 02:16:06 | |
| Kind of just took kind of. | 02:16:08 | |
| The more impactful. | 02:16:10 | |
| We call them significant. | 02:16:12 | |
| Revisions and thought we could hit those really quickly and then we'll be done. | 02:16:14 | |
| The first one is. | 02:16:18 | |
| A lot of times. | 02:16:20 | |
| When a contractor. | 02:16:21 | |
| Comes and tears up the roads and and replaces the water line or. | 02:16:23 | |
| Or does some sort of work? | 02:16:27 | |
| The engineering office gets some complaints of, well, my driveway was cracked or my sidewalk or what have you. | 02:16:30 | |
| And. | 02:16:37 | |
| You go out there as an engineer and and. | 02:16:39 | |
| The contractors saying, well, that was already there and. | 02:16:42 | |
| That homeowners saying well, it wasn't. | 02:16:44 | |
| And and so one one of the additions to the standards is that a contractor is up to the contractor to take a video footage of the | 02:16:47 | |
| area before starting work. | 02:16:52 | |
| And and if that's neglected and and that's what will be used to to solve those type of disputes. If that's not there, then. | 02:16:57 | |
| The disputes will be decided on the homeowners side, if that makes sense. So that's if the contractor wants to be able to. | 02:17:06 | |
| Claim something is already. | 02:17:15 | |
| Was already done. They have to provide that video. | 02:17:17 | |
| The next one is. | 02:17:21 | |
| Is. | 02:17:22 | |
| There is a situation. | 02:17:24 | |
| With UDOT where all the UDOT roads and there's quite a few. | 02:17:26 | |
| UDOT roads in in in Vineyard. | 02:17:28 | |
| They use a 30 inch curb and gutter. | 02:17:32 | |
| But the Citi had 24 inch curb and gutter and so. | 02:17:35 | |
| You're always kind of. | 02:17:38 | |
| If you're a contractor and you're slipping. | 02:17:40 | |
| The curb and go use these machines that just kind of lay it. | 02:17:44 | |
| They call it slip lining anyway as they slip the curb and gutter. | 02:17:48 | |
| In and then all of a sudden you go around a corner and you now have a 24 inch. | 02:17:52 | |
| Gutter There's a lot of costs in reset up of the equipment and and. | 02:17:57 | |
| That's that's fine. | 02:18:02 | |
| Except for. | 02:18:03 | |
| The 30 inch curb and gutter is much better. | 02:18:04 | |
| It holds. | 02:18:07 | |
| More of the water in during a storm and and a lot of times the edge of the road gets eroded and that's where you have a lot of St. | 02:18:08 | |
| Problems because the water actually overflows the 24 inch curb gutter and and it erodes the water. There's two things that. | 02:18:17 | |
| That hurt roads, and that's the sun. | 02:18:24 | |
| And water. | 02:18:27 | |
| And so if you have. | 02:18:28 | |
| A little bit wider. | 02:18:30 | |
| Kirby gutter temperature. | 02:18:31 | |
| If you have a little bit wider curb and gutter, it holds that water in and it protects the road. | 02:18:33 | |
| From that water. | 02:18:37 | |
| The other thing? | 02:18:39 | |
| About that is. | 02:18:41 | |
| The cost of curbing gutter, a lot of it is in that big machine. | 02:18:43 | |
| That slips it in. | 02:18:47 | |
| And so. | 02:18:48 | |
| When you add 6 inches onto it, the only real additional cost is for a little bit more concrete. | 02:18:50 | |
| And. | 02:18:56 | |
| And. | 02:18:57 | |
| When you have concrete. | 02:18:58 | |
| It doesn't really require much maintenance except for if it settles OK. | 02:19:00 | |
| Whereas asphalt. | 02:19:04 | |
| As a 20 year lifespan and you're. | 02:19:06 | |
| You're always doing maintenance to the asphalt, so. | 02:19:08 | |
| Taking out a foot of Rd. | 02:19:11 | |
| You would think isn't a big deal, but it is a big deal. | 02:19:12 | |
| Because the cost to construct the asphalt. | 02:19:15 | |
| And to maintain it is very linear. | 02:19:19 | |
| You add 1 foot and it adds exactly. | 02:19:21 | |
| That percent of the road. | 02:19:24 | |
| In in cost of maintenance and and construction so. | 02:19:26 | |
| There's a lot of reasons why a 30 inch. | 02:19:30 | |
| Kernel gutter. | 02:19:32 | |
| Makes sense and and so this adds. | 02:19:33 | |
| It basically makes the city standard for current gutter. | 02:19:36 | |
| Match the the UDOT standard. | 02:19:39 | |
| But unless of course you already have a road with 24 inch and then it would stay the same. | 02:19:43 | |
| You just match. | 02:19:47 | |
| Grandfather did. | 02:19:48 | |
| Yeah. | 02:19:50 | |
| Yeah, OK. | 02:19:50 | |
| The next one is railroad crossings. | 02:19:53 | |
| UDOT and the railroad and Utah. | 02:19:56 | |
| Have really come into. | 02:20:00 | |
| A much higher level of regulation railroad crossings, especially in regards to having a driveway. | 02:20:05 | |
| Or another Rd. close by. | 02:20:10 | |
| Because of the hazard of it and and diagnostic. | 02:20:12 | |
| Type. | 02:20:15 | |
| Events are triggered once. | 02:20:17 | |
| You get within 200 feet of of a railroad crossing, and so this creates a standard that says you just can't have a street | 02:20:19 | |
| intersection. | 02:20:23 | |
| Within. | 02:20:28 | |
| 200 feet of railroad crossing. | 02:20:29 | |
| And and if you want. | 02:20:31 | |
| A driveway. | 02:20:33 | |
| Then the developer would have to pay for that diagnostic. | 02:20:34 | |
| That's required. | 02:20:37 | |
| There any questions on what I've said so far? | 02:20:39 | |
| Yeah, I have. I have a question on the. | 02:20:43 | |
| You can't have an intersection by the. | 02:20:47 | |
| Railroad crossing. Can you explain that one a little bit more? | 02:20:49 | |
| OK, so. | 02:20:52 | |
| St. Intersections. | 02:20:54 | |
| Yeah, explain that one. | 02:20:55 | |
| Code approaches a railroad crossing. | 02:20:58 | |
| There there's there's some hazard. | 02:21:03 | |
| In umm. | 02:21:05 | |
| Blocking. | 02:21:08 | |
| The access across that railroad and so. | 02:21:11 | |
| What what happens is a lot of times. | 02:21:14 | |
| I'm sorry. | 02:21:17 | |
| I think I understand the right of review and the hazard. | 02:21:18 | |
| I don't think I understand when you say no St. intersections. What do? | 02:21:22 | |
| What are we defining as St. intersections? | 02:21:27 | |
| Around our railroad. | 02:21:30 | |
| So if you measured from the. | 02:21:31 | |
| From the railroad. | 02:21:34 | |
| Out 250 feet down the. | 02:21:36 | |
| The road You couldn't have a new proposal. | 02:21:38 | |
| St. come in to to. | 02:21:41 | |
| To that street, so. | 02:21:43 | |
| This is railroad crossing. Here's the road. | 02:21:45 | |
| You'd have to measure 250 feet before you could propose a new road. | 02:21:47 | |
| To connect to this. | 02:21:50 | |
| This street that crosses the railroad. | 02:21:52 | |
| Does that make more sense? | 02:21:54 | |
| Yeah, it does make more sense. | 02:21:56 | |
| I'm just wondering if I like that one or not. | 02:21:58 | |
| All right, continue. | 02:22:01 | |
| Come back to that one. | 02:22:03 | |
| That's mostly a safety situation. | 02:22:04 | |
| That UDOT, UTA, Union Pacific, all of the. | 02:22:08 | |
| The railroad folks, Sorry. | 02:22:11 | |
| Saying, yeah, it's you got to keep those 250 feet or more away. | 02:22:13 | |
| When so? | 02:22:17 | |
| This just eliminates. | 02:22:19 | |
| Review. All right. | 02:22:20 | |
| Go to the next one. I'm gonna think about that. | 02:22:22 | |
| OK, OK, great. | 02:22:23 | |
| 11. | 02:22:27 | |
| Issue that you have a lot in development is if a field is is is going to be developed and has a road along. | 02:22:29 | |
| The edge of the field. | 02:22:35 | |
| A lot of cities don't require. | 02:22:38 | |
| The full Rd. | 02:22:40 | |
| To be built. | 02:22:42 | |
| In between the two fields. | 02:22:43 | |
| But they do require enough of the road so that you can get two way traffic and and get that but. | 02:22:46 | |
| It doesn't seem fair to. | 02:22:52 | |
| Require all the right away. | 02:22:53 | |
| On the one property owner. | 02:22:55 | |
| And all of the improvements and then the property owner across the street. | 02:22:57 | |
| Basically. | 02:23:01 | |
| Can develop all their property and doesn't have all that road to put in, so it's very common. | 02:23:02 | |
| Across Utah to. | 02:23:09 | |
| To make them build half the road plus 10 feet and plus a little buffer. | 02:23:10 | |
| Okay. And and vineyards the same ways have been the same way. | 02:23:14 | |
| But there's a problem that occurs when you get. | 02:23:18 | |
| To an intersection. | 02:23:21 | |
| And. | 02:23:23 | |
| Not just in that case, but. | 02:23:25 | |
| Sometimes a development will phase. | 02:23:27 | |
| They'll build 1 section. | 02:23:30 | |
| One phase of their development 1st and then the next phase, and then the next phase. | 02:23:31 | |
| And and sometimes. | 02:23:35 | |
| When they get to those. | 02:23:37 | |
| Phase lines. There's an intersection there, and. | 02:23:38 | |
| And uh. | 02:23:41 | |
| They'll try to build. | 02:23:43 | |
| Kind of half plus 10 feet of an intersection, it just doesn't work very well. And so there's require that you have to build out. | 02:23:45 | |
| The full intersection. | 02:23:52 | |
| With each phase of the development. | 02:23:53 | |
| OK, I'm going to go back to the last one. | 02:23:56 | |
| All right. | 02:23:59 | |
| A few scenarios. | 02:24:02 | |
| Is a new intersection. | 02:24:03 | |
| An at grade or. | 02:24:05 | |
| Is that also an overpass? | 02:24:07 | |
| No, it just be out crazy, OK and. | 02:24:09 | |
| Is. | 02:24:12 | |
| A new intersection. | 02:24:13 | |
| Where we're trying to get. | 02:24:16 | |
| We'll say 1200 N. | 02:24:19 | |
| Goes in before the spur line is removed due to one of our agreements. | 02:24:22 | |
| Normally it would just require flaggers, but in this code it would mean. | 02:24:29 | |
| We can have no new intersection. | 02:24:34 | |
| No or assessment would be required. | 02:24:37 | |
| Are those different? | 02:24:39 | |
| Yeah. | 02:24:42 | |
| So if you had a situation where a spur was coming out. | 02:24:44 | |
| The city engineer has. | 02:24:50 | |
| The opportunity in your in your code. | 02:24:52 | |
| To to make exception for that. | 02:24:55 | |
| Call get the diagnostics. | 02:24:57 | |
| Where you bring out UDOT, you bring out the railroad and you do the diagnostic and you review it. | 02:24:59 | |
| But it would. | 02:25:05 | |
| It would take an exception to the rule. | 02:25:07 | |
| Rather than just be allowed by the rule. | 02:25:09 | |
| Hmm. So we already have the right of review from the railroad. We already have it from you dot. | 02:25:12 | |
| But why would we create another hurdle for us to put roads and I and I get safety? I'm just thinking as a city that's bifurcated | 02:25:19 | |
| by rail. | 02:25:23 | |
| In a city that's locked in by rail. | 02:25:27 | |
| Our entire goal as a city. | 02:25:30 | |
| Has been to overcome this hurdle and create every access point availability. | 02:25:32 | |
| I mean. | 02:25:37 | |
| Right now we're so. | 02:25:38 | |
| Traffic jammed along 800 N. | 02:25:40 | |
| That any opportunity we have to open any cross section. | 02:25:43 | |
| Is what we're going to do and so. | 02:25:47 | |
| I don't know why as a city we would say. | 02:25:49 | |
| Hey, this is going to be the exception to the rule when. | 02:25:52 | |
| Our rule? | 02:25:55 | |
| In our city right now is. | 02:25:56 | |
| Cross it. | 02:25:58 | |
| You know, I mean we want to remove it. | 02:25:59 | |
| And we want to build over it, of course, for safety because we care, but we also need to get out of here. | 02:26:01 | |
| There's huge cost. There's a simple solution to that. You can just add the words. | 02:26:07 | |
| Unless otherwise authorized by the. | 02:26:12 | |
| City engineer or the post director or someone? | 02:26:15 | |
| And and and and then you still have the teeth. | 02:26:18 | |
| Of. | 02:26:21 | |
| If a developer wants to come and put one where you don't even want it. | 02:26:22 | |
| You can still prevent it if you OK, so you could organize it. | 02:26:25 | |
| That would be a pretty easy. | 02:26:29 | |
| Addition to that and I. | 02:26:31 | |
| I don't know. I'll defer to staff if they. | 02:26:33 | |
| But but. | 02:26:36 | |
| It seems like. | 02:26:39 | |
| You don't want to be caught up in a lot of diet. | 02:26:41 | |
| Diagnostic. | 02:26:43 | |
| Because another thing for me is I'm thinking I like that because it's something where you don't want to Rd. but then you think | 02:26:46 | |
| there's additional cost to getting inspections, making it harder for businesses. Sorry, I'm troublemaker. Yeah. Patrick James, | 02:26:50 | |
| assistant city engineer. | 02:26:54 | |
| I believe we already added that language unless other other. | 02:26:58 | |
| Otherwise approved by the City engineer. | 02:27:03 | |
| But I feel like there's a little bit of confusion still. So I don't think that this doesn't necessarily eliminate the possibility | 02:27:06 | |
| of a crossing. | 02:27:10 | |
| It's just it's another St. intersecting. | 02:27:14 | |
| That road that's crossing the railroad within 250 feet? | 02:27:18 | |
| Maybe. | 02:27:22 | |
| I don't know. I'm thinking there's a little bit of confusion. So you're saying that? | 02:27:23 | |
| In Mayer's example where 1200 N we have. | 02:27:28 | |
| The intention hopefully to get 1200 N to push through to Geneva Rd. | 02:27:31 | |
| As long as it's just pushing through to Geneva Rd. | 02:27:36 | |
| That would be your. | 02:27:39 | |
| Otherwise approved. | 02:27:40 | |
| You just wouldn't want to shortly thereafter at a Rd. | 02:27:42 | |
| Within 250 feet, yeah, 1200 N and the existing spur line paralleling it. | 02:27:45 | |
| Yeah. So it just keeps that distance away, so as people. | 02:27:52 | |
| So, for example, as people back up to that intersection, they're not crossing into that. | 02:27:56 | |
| Railroad, uh. | 02:28:02 | |
| Aligned. | 02:28:03 | |
| Does that make more sense? | 02:28:05 | |
| OK. And like we can't? | 02:28:07 | |
| 'Cause this problem that I'm seeing that that makes sense. | 02:28:10 | |
| OK. Thanks. Thanks, Patrick. | 02:28:13 | |
| OK, so the next one. | 02:28:16 | |
| Is. | 02:28:19 | |
| Building and pavements not allowed over landfilled. | 02:28:20 | |
| Areas. | 02:28:24 | |
| This this is a big problem. | 02:28:26 | |
| Problem where? | 02:28:29 | |
| Where you have filled. | 02:28:31 | |
| Brought in a lot of times it'll settle. | 02:28:33 | |
| A lot of times, a lot of things in there that. | 02:28:36 | |
| That maybe are contaminants or. | 02:28:38 | |
| One city. | 02:28:41 | |
| How did development go over a landfilled area and and everything went great. They followed all the. | 02:28:43 | |
| All the reports, all the. | 02:28:48 | |
| The requirements that. | 02:28:50 | |
| That the environmental documents, the geotech. | 02:28:51 | |
| Documents and. | 02:28:54 | |
| Things had it, but then the gas company came in and. | 02:28:55 | |
| Dug their trenches in it. | 02:28:57 | |
| Unearthed a lot of garbage and things. | 02:28:59 | |
| And. | 02:29:02 | |
| Ended up being in a huge. | 02:29:03 | |
| Battle over that. | 02:29:05 | |
| And had to move. | 02:29:06 | |
| All the development. | 02:29:08 | |
| Off of it just because of public opinion and so. | 02:29:09 | |
| This helps you. | 02:29:12 | |
| To avoid that it. | 02:29:13 | |
| Even if. | 02:29:17 | |
| If you come in, you get all these reports saying we'll do it. | 02:29:19 | |
| This way there's there's a lot of. | 02:29:22 | |
| Of. | 02:29:24 | |
| Public angst about building over landfill type areas and so this just. | 02:29:27 | |
| Added a. | 02:29:32 | |
| Requirement that buildings and payments. | 02:29:34 | |
| Can't be built over that type of. | 02:29:36 | |
| Of the situation. So we do have a containment. | 02:29:38 | |
| Facility in our area that. | 02:29:43 | |
| The city has always planned to allow for pavement over that facility in some way. | 02:29:45 | |
| This would stop that ability for pavement to be put on there. | 02:29:52 | |
| Yes it would. | 02:29:57 | |
| You left this in. | 02:29:58 | |
| I mean I. | 02:30:00 | |
| I understand buildings. | 02:30:02 | |
| White pavement. | 02:30:04 | |
| Especially with just impacted material. Is landfill different? | 02:30:07 | |
| Well, they measure the settlement. | 02:30:11 | |
| Yeah, then it becomes completely unusable. But if you allow some kind of. | 02:30:12 | |
| Surface. | 02:30:19 | |
| I mean from everything that I've. | 02:30:21 | |
| Learned about it, it feels like. | 02:30:24 | |
| That was the one thing that they could allow to go in. | 02:30:25 | |
| That space. | 02:30:28 | |
| Yeah, from what I've seen personally as an engineer, I've seen pavements over this. | 02:30:30 | |
| Type of material and and they don't hold up very well. | 02:30:35 | |
| And so they after. | 02:30:39 | |
| Not very much time. | 02:30:42 | |
| Then they crack. But. | 02:30:43 | |
| This definitely is is a political decision. I mean, if you. | 02:30:45 | |
| I want to remove pavements. | 02:30:50 | |
| That's easy to do, but. | 02:30:52 | |
| It's mostly. | 02:30:54 | |
| To say, look, if you're going to build. | 02:30:56 | |
| A parking lot or a building you don't want it to settle. | 02:31:00 | |
| You want. | 02:31:04 | |
| Preferred foundation, but it'd be easy to. | 02:31:05 | |
| That payments requirement out if you want. | 02:31:08 | |
| No, I just want to learn more about it because we've had so many engineers and people come and talk to us about it. And so it's so | 02:31:12 | |
| interesting to see it come forward, especially because the scene sits on that. | 02:31:17 | |
| Committee with you. | 02:31:22 | |
| So interesting. | 02:31:23 | |
| I 100% back that. | 02:31:26 | |
| I would trust you with that because you've had so much settling in Vineyard. | 02:31:28 | |
| With so many developments and we should have. | 02:31:34 | |
| Had that standard a long time ago. | 02:31:37 | |
| I've seen in situations where you want to do. | 02:31:39 | |
| Like a park or something which is a good. | 02:31:43 | |
| Actually a good way to handle that type of material is is where you do put the parking lot you. | 02:31:45 | |
| You excavate it out and. | 02:31:51 | |
| And then build it back up. | 02:31:53 | |
| But. | 02:31:55 | |
| That's this is your code. | 02:31:58 | |
| So you can do it however you want. | 02:32:00 | |
| OK. | 02:32:02 | |
| Glass is. | 02:32:07 | |
| Fire hydrants. | 02:32:09 | |
| One problem that fire department. | 02:32:12 | |
| Quite often have is. | 02:32:13 | |
| Is they come out. | 02:32:15 | |
| To a fire. They're in a hurry. | 02:32:17 | |
| And if they don't see that hydrant write off. | 02:32:18 | |
| And they have to hunt for it then. Then that's a problem. | 02:32:22 | |
| And and so. | 02:32:25 | |
| In response to this, a lot of cities are putting what's called an apron around the hydrants. | 02:32:27 | |
| Some concrete and. | 02:32:34 | |
| 2 feet in each direction and. | 02:32:35 | |
| It's really hard to plant a Bush in concrete and so. | 02:32:37 | |
| That does a good job at. | 02:32:40 | |
| It looks. | 02:32:42 | |
| Nice. | 02:32:43 | |
| And clean. | 02:32:45 | |
| And it just keeps. | 02:32:47 | |
| Keeps those hydrants. | 02:32:48 | |
| Open from having people. | 02:32:51 | |
| Put fences or. | 02:32:53 | |
| Or trees or whatever in front of them. | 02:32:55 | |
| So. | 02:32:58 | |
| Any questions about that? | 02:33:00 | |
| You don't care about the next one. | 02:33:05 | |
| I don't know if anyone does but. | 02:33:07 | |
| There's a new meter. | 02:33:09 | |
| Box assembly. | 02:33:10 | |
| Design and then. | 02:33:12 | |
| The state requires A sewer clean out at the back of the sidewalk now. | 02:33:14 | |
| And this is really nice for residents as they. | 02:33:19 | |
| Have problems with their sewer lines. They can have a clean out there and one at the house and so. | 02:33:22 | |
| That's one and then? | 02:33:26 | |
| There's now a parking lot. | 02:33:28 | |
| Drawing in the standards so. | 02:33:30 | |
| An engineer and architect can pull that out and. | 02:33:34 | |
| And quickly design a parking lot. | 02:33:36 | |
| Know the dimensions of all the. | 02:33:38 | |
| Lanes and and stalls. | 02:33:40 | |
| And then finally. | 02:33:43 | |
| Vineyard had a survey monument standard. I don't know those. | 02:33:46 | |
| Followed a lot. | 02:33:50 | |
| But Utah County. | 02:33:52 | |
| Has the county surveyor. | 02:33:54 | |
| And and the county surveyors. | 02:33:56 | |
| Response is. | 02:33:59 | |
| Is. | 02:34:01 | |
| Don't put them in. | 02:34:01 | |
| They're not going to maintain them if they do get put in. | 02:34:03 | |
| And, and the, the county with GPS is able, has been able to survey all the section corners, all the section quarter corners and, | 02:34:06 | |
| and different things. And that's all they need. They don't need monuments anymore. So that's just kind of an old. | 02:34:12 | |
| Throwback in the standards. | 02:34:18 | |
| Any more questions? | 02:34:21 | |
| Are there more slides? | 02:34:23 | |
| No, I mean there there are, but. | 02:34:25 | |
| You don't want to see them. OK, well, I want to invite the public. The public Have any questions? | 02:34:27 | |
| Not at this time. | 02:34:35 | |
| OK. I'm going to call for a motion to go out of a public hearing if you are done presenting. | 02:34:36 | |
| Yeah. | 02:34:41 | |
| OK I have a first by Sarah. Can I get a second? | 02:34:44 | |
| Thank you, Brett. All in favor. | 02:34:47 | |
| Aye. | 02:34:49 | |
| Aye, aye. | 02:34:49 | |
| All right, Council, do you have questions? | 02:34:51 | |
| Or comments. | 02:34:54 | |
| I'm not going to pretend to be an expert in any of this stuff. I mean, that's why you're here. | 02:34:57 | |
| But. | 02:35:02 | |
| In their review that I that I've done I. | 02:35:03 | |
| It is super thorough. Everything that I've seen is. | 02:35:06 | |
| In line with what we would expect and even some of the comments, I was able to go search. | 02:35:11 | |
| Just in the during the presentation and. | 02:35:15 | |
| Like that language about the? | 02:35:18 | |
| Railroad crossing it it it is in there. | 02:35:19 | |
| So yeah. | 02:35:23 | |
| Good job. | 02:35:24 | |
| I'm pretty happy. I like and I like all of the stuff that's in there. | 02:35:25 | |
| I would also back that like these standards are brought forth because of hundreds of problems. | 02:35:31 | |
| That have happened over many years. | 02:35:38 | |
| And getting the brightest of minds that are involved in that, like the compaction. | 02:35:40 | |
| And saying what should that standard be for longevity so the problems in the future don't come? | 02:35:45 | |
| And I'm grateful that an organization like that exists as a trade and there's no way I would ever question it. | 02:35:51 | |
| So yeah. | 02:35:58 | |
| 100% vote and I I wouldn't recommend. | 02:35:59 | |
| Altering it at all? | 02:36:03 | |
| Sarah, do you have anything? | 02:36:05 | |
| I actually. | 02:36:08 | |
| Disagree a little bit, because. | 02:36:10 | |
| If the land is. | 02:36:11 | |
| Not usable. | 02:36:14 | |
| To be able to lay asphalt on it and. | 02:36:15 | |
| Repair it every five years to make it usable. | 02:36:17 | |
| That seems like a better use of. | 02:36:20 | |
| Available land. | 02:36:23 | |
| Yeah, I I wonder if we do want to. | 02:36:25 | |
| Pass it tonight if we could. | 02:36:28 | |
| I kind of want to come back to that. I want to go research it a little bit more. | 02:36:32 | |
| So if let's say you walk down that road and the developer builds a Rd. | 02:36:36 | |
| That is over a. | 02:36:41 | |
| Landfill. | 02:36:43 | |
| It would be upon the city. | 02:36:44 | |
| To pay or to fix? | 02:36:46 | |
| That particular problem and by having a standard in that's high. | 02:36:48 | |
| You're risking or taking the liability and saying. | 02:36:53 | |
| We already know based off of hundreds of hours of research that compacted land might be good and they try to do it, but at the end | 02:36:56 | |
| of the day. | 02:36:59 | |
| Whatever given reason. | 02:37:03 | |
| Compacted naturally over thousands of years is more stable and so if we give a variance on that. | 02:37:05 | |
| Then you don't know. | 02:37:12 | |
| I mean, I can't tell you how many hundreds of. | 02:37:15 | |
| Parcels around Vineyard have settled. | 02:37:17 | |
| After the fact of them saying well. | 02:37:21 | |
| They compacted it to a level and they tried and they did their best and they did all the standards but. | 02:37:24 | |
| It ended up just not. | 02:37:29 | |
| Just earth moves. | 02:37:31 | |
| So yeah, no, and I'm 100% with you like I avoiding any of that liability going through all those studies. I I think I'm just | 02:37:33 | |
| saying. | 02:37:37 | |
| I would like to go and research it and study it more and understand it a little bit better before I. | 02:37:42 | |
| Yeah, if I could make a little point of clarification too. So I. | 02:37:48 | |
| I kind of understood it a lot. Like Cal, Jake just said, it's kind of a liability issue, right? | 02:37:53 | |
| But I also understand that there's there's areas in the city like the Camus that we have planned on developing. So we added | 02:37:59 | |
| language to that section that. | 02:38:04 | |
| That basically said that it can still be developed on as long as it goes through all the. | 02:38:09 | |
| State. Federal. Local. | 02:38:14 | |
| Environmental regulations and and all those all those things. So it just kind of adds. So there's a caveat inside of are you | 02:38:16 | |
| saying the camo? | 02:38:20 | |
| We plan on developing the Cambo. Is that what you said? Yeah, that's that's that's what we're talking about here is the. | 02:38:24 | |
| If I'm if I'm correct that that the Camus the only the only use for the Camus is if you put. | 02:38:30 | |
| Some kind of payment on top? | 02:38:37 | |
| You can't have and you. | 02:38:39 | |
| In the code. | 02:38:41 | |
| Which I must have missed, you're saying? | 02:38:42 | |
| There is an availability for that if it goes through all the right processes. Yeah, as long as it goes through all the all the | 02:38:45 | |
| environmental, federal, state and local regulations and processes, then the city engineer or public works director. | 02:38:52 | |
| Maybe I have it. | 02:39:01 | |
| In print. | 02:39:04 | |
| Find this section for you. | 02:39:06 | |
| I think if those two. | 02:39:13 | |
| Things are there that say. | 02:39:15 | |
| As far as leaving rail and the caveat for developing those areas, because it's such a large swath of land and as long as it goes | 02:39:22 | |
| through all the processes to avoid liability. | 02:39:27 | |
| That was my main concern and like I said, I'm 100% with Jake wanting to avoid any liability and any problems like that, but if | 02:39:33 | |
| there is something inside of it that says hey. | 02:39:38 | |
| If. | 02:39:42 | |
| This works out and it looks right, and there's that option. | 02:39:43 | |
| That makes more sense to, I think. | 02:39:47 | |
| If if the. | 02:39:49 | |
| And this may be a question for your city attorney, but you could probably. | 02:39:50 | |
| A vote to approve it. | 02:39:55 | |
| Based on that. | 02:39:57 | |
| Being in the actual ordinance. | 02:40:00 | |
| And then? | 02:40:04 | |
| If it's already there, then it doesn't have to be changed. If it's not, it can be added. | 02:40:06 | |
| Patrick, is there urgency to adopt this today and not at the next Council meeting? | 02:40:10 | |
| Not, not a huge urgency. I mean, we, we have just been in this process for a long time. Our, our current standards and | 02:40:17 | |
| specifications are quite old, you know, dating back to. | 02:40:22 | |
| 20/16/2007 I think, where the Council has taken up. | 02:40:28 | |
| This. | 02:40:32 | |
| Ordinance. | 02:40:34 | |
| If you did have an application that came in in the next month, you could still. | 02:40:35 | |
| Weight and apply. | 02:40:39 | |
| These standards once we have them on the table, because they're on the table already. | 02:40:42 | |
| There's enough concern in this. | 02:40:47 | |
| That I. | 02:40:50 | |
| I think it would be worth the wait. | 02:40:51 | |
| I I think, yeah. | 02:40:53 | |
| Councilmember Holdaway's point is worth looking at because. | 02:40:56 | |
| We don't want the city to be left holding the. | 02:40:59 | |
| The bag, so to speak, if. | 02:41:02 | |
| A developer constructs. | 02:41:05 | |
| On top of compacted soil. | 02:41:06 | |
| And then you have settling in the city's responsible for the maintenance or upkeep of that. | 02:41:09 | |
| Because you'll have more than your routine maintenance, You're going to have to go back in, bring in fill, recompact with soil, | 02:41:15 | |
| deal with whatever utilities are underneath. | 02:41:18 | |
| I wonder if there's a way to allow. | 02:41:23 | |
| If you then have the other problem of are there certain? | 02:41:27 | |
| Properties within the city that would be undevelopable or unusable. | 02:41:30 | |
| If you didn't allow for. | 02:41:35 | |
| Paving. | 02:41:38 | |
| Over compacted soils and I think what we need to figure out is. | 02:41:39 | |
| If you allow for that type of thing, what are the circumstances where you allow it? That gets at what Patrick's talking about. | 02:41:43 | |
| But the other thing I'd like to look at is. | 02:41:50 | |
| Do you allow it only with? | 02:41:52 | |
| Some kind of protection being provided by the developer to the city, right maybe a bond, maybe an insurance product right let's | 02:41:55 | |
| figure out what that is and pair it so that if that use is allowed and we're. | 02:42:02 | |
| Permitting it based on information put forward by the developer that the developer backs it with either a warranty or some kind | 02:42:08 | |
| of. | 02:42:12 | |
| Product that the city can call on to protect itself OK yeah this is an assume I'm sorry. I was I stopped I had stopped out earlier | 02:42:16 | |
| I just had to do some of the other items. But in essence I. | 02:42:22 | |
| We're talking about pairing pavements on top of. | 02:42:29 | |
| The Karen Center, OK, those things, I mean. | 02:42:32 | |
| In essence, we can insist on in essence, what's called a performance based design. | 02:42:35 | |
| I mean in a sense like. | 02:42:42 | |
| The I mean, I'm an engineer. | 02:42:44 | |
| Yeah, I pretend to be once every once in a while, but I'm an engineer and. | 02:42:48 | |
| The the age-old we built it based on the safe standards or redesigned based on the save standards. It doesn't hold much water. | 02:42:52 | |
| On that I say that as an as because I act as an expert engineer witness. | 02:43:01 | |
| On several matters and cases. | 02:43:07 | |
| Were just because. | 02:43:09 | |
| An engineer designed to the certain standards and so forth. If it doesn't come to if it doesn't perform the way that is intended | 02:43:12 | |
| to perform. | 02:43:15 | |
| The engineer of record, the contractor and primarily the engineer records still holds liability to ensure that the performance of | 02:43:18 | |
| that. | 02:43:23 | |
| Was to. | 02:43:27 | |
| Meet the requirements of the intended purposes and they can't hide behind well, I just followed so and so standards. Therefore I'm | 02:43:28 | |
| I'm not liable. I say this having. | 02:43:34 | |
| Recently. | 02:43:41 | |
| Like 20 foot rockery failures where they followed a certain city's standard to the T but it failed within and like it failed | 02:43:45 | |
| within like less than 10 years. | 02:43:49 | |
| On that. | 02:43:54 | |
| And then of course, like building collapses and so forth. | 02:43:55 | |
| So again. | 02:43:59 | |
| On something like this I would say that the. | 02:44:01 | |
| Kind of a based on Jamie's point, I mean there is a bond, there's warranties on there, but even past that there is. | 02:44:03 | |
| I'll say that there is liability. | 02:44:08 | |
| The engineers by themselves. | 02:44:11 | |
| Do have a? | 02:44:14 | |
| Liability that they're that they had to, they have to abide to. | 02:44:15 | |
| Yeah, I like all of that. I think that's fine. So the recommendation is to continue it to the next meeting then? Yeah, that would | 02:44:18 | |
| be my recommendation. And then let's work language into the. | 02:44:23 | |
| I've into the ordinance that will protect the city. | 02:44:28 | |
| OK, I found this section in wording if you're curious to hear it now, Sure. | 02:44:31 | |
| So it's 1.08.09 specialized engineering. | 02:44:35 | |
| So, landfill construction debris or garbage. Any work around and related to landfills or areas with buried debris, waste or | 02:44:39 | |
| garbage will require phase one environmental report with recommendations for additional study. | 02:44:45 | |
| No buildings, paved parking lots, paved roads, curb, gutter, sidewalks or allowed. | 02:44:51 | |
| Are allowed. | 02:44:56 | |
| To be located over landfills, construction debris or garbage unless otherwise approved by the appropriate federal, state, and or | 02:44:57 | |
| city agency having jurisdiction. | 02:45:01 | |
| OK, that's great. | 02:45:06 | |
| So it looks like if anybody makes an application, we can already. | 02:45:07 | |
| Work within these. | 02:45:11 | |
| The processes that you've outlined before us, this was really thorough and helpful. Thank you so much. | 02:45:12 | |
| And I just need a motion to continue it to the next. | 02:45:18 | |
| Are we, are we expecting a development to come? | 02:45:22 | |
| Is under this. | 02:45:26 | |
| I don't think so. | 02:45:27 | |
| I think before the end of the year. | 02:45:28 | |
| To us, is there somebody that's like, well, it would apply to? | 02:45:30 | |
| Lot or parcel that pulls a building permit, right? | 02:45:35 | |
| What would be expected so? | 02:45:39 | |
| Maybe, but I don't know that we have. | 02:45:41 | |
| Large application pending or are we expecting the orchards before the end of the year? | 02:45:44 | |
| Not a new phase, no. | 02:45:50 | |
| Yeah, there's always, there's always continuing developments coming up. | 02:45:53 | |
| But the developers have been really good to work with us on on getting what we. | 02:45:57 | |
| What we want anyway. | 02:46:02 | |
| These these standards just kind of. | 02:46:03 | |
| Protect us so that. | 02:46:06 | |
| If we if we make an ask, we, we say this, this is in our standards, right? They they cannot dispute it. | 02:46:08 | |
| But yeah, there's no immediate development reason why we wouldn't just. | 02:46:15 | |
| Approve this and then come back and make the small changes that you're talking about because I think there's so much protection. | 02:46:18 | |
| You could do that as well. Let's just do that because there's so much protection in what he's talking about. | 02:46:24 | |
| That we could just carve out what we. | 02:46:29 | |
| Don't like? | 02:46:31 | |
| Like what you're saying? | 02:46:33 | |
| I do want to add that it's kind of our goal. | 02:46:35 | |
| Letting standards go several years without an update is not. | 02:46:39 | |
| Good practice generally. So as I read through, I was actually concerned about the liability of like so many of these things. If | 02:46:43 | |
| you let's get this in this fact, if you want to go that direction, that makes sense. | 02:46:48 | |
| What I would recommend so that you don't have to re notice a public hearing. | 02:46:53 | |
| Is that you continue not just the ordinance but also the hearing? | 02:46:58 | |
| To the next meeting and then. | 02:47:03 | |
| That way you can adopt what you have now but not have to re notice things. | 02:47:07 | |
| So how would the motion look? Let me I guess look at Naseem or should we just re notice it for the next meeting also? | 02:47:11 | |
| So we'll adopt tonight. | 02:47:19 | |
| Let me restate it. I didn't say that very clearly. | 02:47:21 | |
| To adopt an ordinance with development standards, you have to go through the land use notice and comment, right? So it goes not | 02:47:24 | |
| just the council, but to. | 02:47:29 | |
| Your Planning Commission. | 02:47:34 | |
| You have already done that, so you've. | 02:47:35 | |
| And you've held part of the public hearing today. | 02:47:39 | |
| I don't want to. | 02:47:41 | |
| Have to redo all of the. | 02:47:42 | |
| Procedure before. | 02:47:44 | |
| You make an additional change in your next meeting. | 02:47:46 | |
| So I think what you. | 02:47:50 | |
| Probably. | 02:47:53 | |
| I'm going to think out loud on this and I. | 02:47:54 | |
| Hope I'm not wrong. | 02:47:56 | |
| On it but. | 02:47:57 | |
| If you wish to adopt it today, I think you probably have to rehear it before it comes to you at your next meeting. | 02:48:00 | |
| If you wish to continue it. | 02:48:07 | |
| To your next meeting then. | 02:48:09 | |
| I don't think you have to redo the hearing because you've done that. You would just continue. | 02:48:11 | |
| And make the decision at a later point in time. There's not a perfect answer. | 02:48:16 | |
| With that procedural wrinkle. | 02:48:21 | |
| What do you guys feel comfortable with this is you guys have in the next week or two like the the things that you want changed? | 02:48:25 | |
| Like Mayor, do you? | 02:48:32 | |
| Just the compaction of dirt thing. | 02:48:35 | |
| It's that small thing. | 02:48:37 | |
| Yeah, I I mean. | 02:48:40 | |
| If you guys want to adopt it because you feel comfortable with it, I think that hits. | 02:48:41 | |
| My thing, I think you could put additional protections in for liability like Jamie was saying. | 02:48:46 | |
| Which is why you'd want to re notice it and put more things in. | 02:48:51 | |
| There is AI mean the ordinance and. | 02:48:55 | |
| I hope I'm right about this, but some of them bad levels could maybe may be may able to be addressed at the DRC level because | 02:48:58 | |
| there's a part of the ordinance that allows. | 02:49:03 | |
| For. | 02:49:08 | |
| Areas, emissions and other. | 02:49:09 | |
| Updates to meet certain statutes statutory standards to be done at the DRC, but the question the same is whether the city could | 02:49:12 | |
| apply an additional. | 02:49:16 | |
| Bond or insurance requirement for that kind of development, so I don't. | 02:49:21 | |
| I think you're right as it relates to. | 02:49:25 | |
| The engineer standing behind their work. But what that doesn't give you is a financial resource the city can turn to. | 02:49:28 | |
| If what's constructed fails. | 02:49:35 | |
| And so I. | 02:49:38 | |
| I'd like the idea of if you have. | 02:49:39 | |
| A requirement related to construction to design is that the language you used? | 02:49:43 | |
| That you would pair it with. | 02:49:48 | |
| Something that would make the city whole. | 02:49:50 | |
| If it failed within a certain period of time. | 02:49:53 | |
| On most construction you're going to have a one year warranty and maybe on. | 02:49:56 | |
| Pavement over compacted soils, you extend that. | 02:50:00 | |
| A period of time based on what's built. | 02:50:04 | |
| I am not an engineer and so I don't want to speculate as to what that would be or what it might look like. | 02:50:07 | |
| And I think we also have to look at the state law restrictions on how long you can hold those things and under what circumstances, | 02:50:14 | |
| because there are there are more moving parts and. | 02:50:18 | |
| Yeah, the structural failures I've been part of have been usually 7-8 years old. | 02:50:25 | |
| And on that portion of it, but yeah, you're right. | 02:50:30 | |
| So I don't know that I have a preference whether the city adopts. | 02:50:34 | |
| Whether the Council adopts us today or at its next meeting, just know that. | 02:50:37 | |
| If you adopt it today, we probably have to re notice it. This is what I think the new part through that process, this is what I'm | 02:50:42 | |
| thinking. If no changes really come except for additional burden on removing liability from the city, let's continue it and put it | 02:50:47 | |
| on like our consent agenda. If we add it something additional and if we don't, we'll have it on our consent agenda and we'll just | 02:50:52 | |
| pass it as it. | 02:50:57 | |
| Was resembled tonight. | 02:51:02 | |
| You know. | 02:51:03 | |
| Because to anybody's point, that says. | 02:51:04 | |
| Something could happen where somebody makes an application, not that there is an application. | 02:51:07 | |
| Jamie already said because we have these underway. | 02:51:11 | |
| You can use these standards as a guide for what we're doing so. | 02:51:15 | |
| Can I get a motion to continue it to the next meeting? | 02:51:19 | |
| I'd be happy to do so, but I comment I wanted to make first. I think there is language in there about. | 02:51:22 | |
| Bonding and accepting in. | 02:51:28 | |
| Extended warranty. | 02:51:31 | |
| I'm not sure if they're in. | 02:51:32 | |
| This exact context or not, but I'm pretty sure I saw that in there. | 02:51:33 | |
| There is a bonding section in the specifications so. | 02:51:37 | |
| Our process that whenever there's a permit comes through, we we diagnose basically what what we would need it for a bond. | 02:51:41 | |
| Based on the cost of construction or or what would happen and we. | 02:51:48 | |
| We implement or we ask for a bond. | 02:51:51 | |
| For each permit, it's kind of a permit by permit basis. OK. Would you mind continuing it? | 02:51:54 | |
| OK, so move to continue it. | 02:51:59 | |
| All right, can I get a second? | 02:52:01 | |
| Second, thanks Sarah, all in favor. | 02:52:03 | |
| Aye. | 02:52:05 | |
| All right, that brings us to the close of our meeting. | 02:52:06 | |
| Have a great night. | 02:52:08 |
* use Ctrl+F (Cmd+F on Mac) to search in document
Loading...
* use Ctrl+F (Cmd+F on Mac) to search in document
Loading...
Transcript
| Get started. Today is November 12th, 2025. The time is. | 00:00:00 | |
| 6 almost 6:00 PM Do we need to wait till 6:00? | 00:00:06 | |
| It's 5:59. We're going to wait one minute. | 00:00:10 | |
| I'm early, but thank you for being here. | 00:00:14 | |
| OK, now we're going to start. | 00:00:31 | |
| It is November 12th, 2025. The time is 6:00 PM and I'm going to call the. | 00:00:34 | |
| Vineyard City Council into session. We're going to start out with an invocation or an inspirational thought. And the Pledge of | 00:00:40 | |
| Allegiance. I'm going to ask. | 00:00:44 | |
| Councilmember Clausen if. | 00:00:48 | |
| On the spot. | 00:00:51 | |
| OK. | 00:00:53 | |
| Our Father in heaven, we're grateful that we can be here this this evening to. | 00:00:57 | |
| Discuss the the needs of the city and do the work of the city and. | 00:01:01 | |
| We ask that our minds might be clear that we can. | 00:01:06 | |
| Ask the right questions and get the right answers. And this we pray, the name of Jesus Christ. Amen. Amen. | 00:01:10 | |
| All the rise. | 00:01:17 | |
| I pledge allegiance to the flag. | 00:01:21 | |
| And to the Republic for which it stands. | 00:01:26 | |
| One nation under. | 00:01:29 | |
| Indivisible with. | 00:01:32 | |
| All right, we have. | 00:01:37 | |
| Matt Carter with us here today and he is going to talk to us about. | 00:01:38 | |
| The front runner deputy project. | 00:01:42 | |
| No, you are the front runner, deputy project manager for UTA. I was. | 00:01:45 | |
| Almost saying your title is what we're going to be talking about, but what we're going to be talking about is. | 00:01:49 | |
| The front runner double tracking. | 00:01:54 | |
| In, that's going along the Wasatch Front. | 00:01:56 | |
| Come on up. | 00:02:00 | |
| Hello. Thank you for having us today. Thank you so much for coming. | 00:02:07 | |
| My name is Matt Carter. I'm the Deputy Project Manager for the Front Runner 2X project. | 00:02:10 | |
| This is Janelle Robertson. Janelle Robertson, I'm the UTA project manager. | 00:02:15 | |
| We're going to. | 00:02:20 | |
| If they believe we have a presentation is that. | 00:02:21 | |
| Going to come up that we could share. | 00:02:25 | |
| Do you have it on a flash drive or something like that? We could. | 00:02:31 | |
| Get it loaded up. | 00:02:34 | |
| Let's see in the seam it looks like you step. He's probably I. | 00:02:36 | |
| Would guess getting that ready if he's. | 00:02:40 | |
| It's like he stepped out. | 00:02:42 | |
| Pictures up there. | 00:02:49 | |
| Nassim, do you have the power the PowerPoint loaded up? | 00:03:00 | |
| If you don't, we might. We may have it here. | 00:03:08 | |
| Yeah, it's right there. It's. | 00:03:12 | |
| Quick share on that. | 00:03:15 | |
| Cash, they're my friends. If you want to e-mail it to me that can take my tablet and. | 00:03:24 | |
| Big, but can they do it on my laptop? | 00:03:30 | |
| Like if you. | 00:03:34 | |
| So you could present it or you. | 00:03:40 | |
| I've never gotten quite sure. | 00:03:46 | |
| It's a 5050. | 00:03:52 | |
| Jump into the start and then. | 00:04:31 | |
| Yeah, I'll do 1 through 11. | 00:04:33 | |
| I'm not optimistic. | 00:04:47 | |
| Good music to play. | 00:05:12 | |
| While we're waiting. | 00:05:14 | |
| Jeopardy. | 00:05:16 | |
| Yeah. Thank you. | 00:05:27 | |
| Will that work? | 00:05:30 | |
| Yep. | 00:05:34 | |
| Right, I'm going to start the presentation with just some background information about the project and then Matt will go into. | 00:05:39 | |
| More detail about the design and and the work that's. | 00:05:46 | |
| Going on with that. | 00:05:50 | |
| Let's see. | 00:05:52 | |
| Oh, I see. It's a pattern. | 00:05:55 | |
| So the Front Runner 2X project is a joint project between UTA and UDOT. | 00:06:03 | |
| State funds. | 00:06:08 | |
| That are partially funding the project and so UDOT is leading the procurement and the project. | 00:06:09 | |
| Umm as it's moving forward with UTA as a partner. | 00:06:15 | |
| Brian Allen, who's the project manager, had another City Council meeting he had to be to. | 00:06:20 | |
| Tonight, so we're kind of just. | 00:06:24 | |
| Splitting up the rolls here so we have. | 00:06:26 | |
| You know somebody. | 00:06:29 | |
| Here but. | 00:06:30 | |
| Normally he would be here and present this information. | 00:06:31 | |
| Just some overall information about Frontrunner, our first. | 00:06:36 | |
| Trains in the north started running in 2008. | 00:06:42 | |
| Was from Salt Lake City to Ogden. | 00:06:45 | |
| And then we built track down to Provo, from Salt Lake City to Provo. | 00:06:47 | |
| And that service started in 2012. | 00:06:52 | |
| We have about. | 00:06:55 | |
| 48 million passengers. | 00:06:56 | |
| Since the project started. | 00:06:59 | |
| It's 83 miles. | 00:07:01 | |
| Most of the corridor is a single track system. | 00:07:03 | |
| In 2000. | 00:07:08 | |
| 24 We get about 14,500 riders a day. | 00:07:09 | |
| And there are 16 stations in the corridor. | 00:07:14 | |
| The Max speed on front runner is 79 miles an hour in the areas where. | 00:07:18 | |
| We have enough room to get up to that speed. | 00:07:24 | |
| So the purpose of the project as I mentioned with a 75% single track system. | 00:07:29 | |
| We need to. | 00:07:35 | |
| We can't provide very much service with that right now. We do 30 minute service in the peak hours and one hour service in the off | 00:07:38 | |
| peak hours. | 00:07:42 | |
| In order to provide more service. | 00:07:46 | |
| What we need to. | 00:07:49 | |
| Have more double tracking. | 00:07:50 | |
| The umm. | 00:07:52 | |
| Currently on the system about 90%. | 00:07:54 | |
| That's about 90% capacity in certain segments and the grant that we're going after for. | 00:07:57 | |
| With the Federal Transit Administration is to increase the capacity. | 00:08:04 | |
| Of the system. | 00:08:09 | |
| And the way that we're doing that is in. | 00:08:10 | |
| Increasing the amount of double tracking that we have. | 00:08:12 | |
| Benefits from the project is. | 00:08:17 | |
| Increasing the frequency. So the project would increase the frequency to 15 minutes in the peak and 30 minutes in the off peak. | 00:08:20 | |
| So significantly more service than we were able to provide now. | 00:08:27 | |
| Improve the reliability of our system. | 00:08:30 | |
| Right now, whenever one train is late with so much single track in the system, we get what we call cascading delays and it delays | 00:08:34 | |
| every train in the system. And so then it kind of. | 00:08:39 | |
| It causes a lot of problem for commuters so. | 00:08:44 | |
| It's going to significantly help our reliability in the system. | 00:08:46 | |
| Increasing the choice of travel in the Wasatch Front is very important. | 00:08:50 | |
| Reason to do the project. | 00:08:56 | |
| Overtime, I-15 is going to continue to get slower and slower, and it's getting harder and harder to. | 00:08:58 | |
| Increase it for that demand. | 00:09:05 | |
| Front runner is going to stay the same travel time, if not continue to get better as we continue to improve it. | 00:09:08 | |
| Better air quality with having less vehicle miles traveled. | 00:09:15 | |
| And with the increase in frequency, it really significantly is going to increase the ridership right now with, you know, you miss | 00:09:19 | |
| your train and you have to wait an hour for the next train. | 00:09:24 | |
| It doesn't make it a very attractive. | 00:09:29 | |
| Mode of transportation and so the frequency is really expected to increase the ridership as well. | 00:09:31 | |
| So this project has 11 double tracking sections, about 26 miles of additional double tracking. | 00:09:40 | |
| One new station in Bluffdale. | 00:09:47 | |
| At the point of the mountain development. | 00:09:49 | |
| One track retract. | 00:09:52 | |
| Alignment. | 00:09:54 | |
| Near our current maintenance facility. | 00:09:55 | |
| In order to run that additional service, we need 10 additional train sets. | 00:09:58 | |
| And we need a maintenance facility to maintain those. | 00:10:02 | |
| Additional trains. | 00:10:06 | |
| So this is a video of which I have no hope is going to do anything because. | 00:10:11 | |
| This is a PDF. | 00:10:17 | |
| But if you want to see the video, we have a really good video online. | 00:10:20 | |
| That kind of explains how the double tracking works and. | 00:10:25 | |
| And why we're doing the project and you can just go to the front runner to X. | 00:10:30 | |
| Project website and it's a really cool video and it explains how train operations work a little bit. | 00:10:37 | |
| And how the double tracking is going to improve the service? | 00:10:43 | |
| These are the areas where we're doing the double tracking. | 00:10:51 | |
| The dark blue. | 00:10:54 | |
| Areas are the areas where we have existing double track in the system. As you could see that's in very few locations. | 00:10:56 | |
| And mostly just at the station. So those are the only. | 00:11:02 | |
| Only places in the system where the trains can pass each other. | 00:11:06 | |
| The red areas are where. | 00:11:09 | |
| Extending those double tracking sections. | 00:11:12 | |
| There's a lot in New York, in Utah County, so. | 00:11:15 | |
| It should have a pretty good reliable. | 00:11:19 | |
| Service here. | 00:11:22 | |
| The purple box is where the new station will go. | 00:11:24 | |
| Overall timeline, We are in the phase of completing the environmental work. | 00:11:30 | |
| Finalizing the design and procuring the trains and looking toward a federal grant approval. | 00:11:36 | |
| Construction is expected to be from 2027 to 2029. | 00:11:43 | |
| With starting the service in 20-30. | 00:11:48 | |
| The environmental process that we've done so far has been overseen by the Federal Transit Administration. | 00:11:55 | |
| We have done a categorical exclusion which is a certain level of environmental documentation for each double tracking segment. | 00:12:00 | |
| So that they can be independent projects. | 00:12:10 | |
| And then there is a place. | 00:12:13 | |
| Planning and environmental linkage document that we had produced. | 00:12:15 | |
| Prior to that which? | 00:12:18 | |
| Is for the entire Frontrunner 2X project. | 00:12:19 | |
| Linking those projects together with the additional service. | 00:12:23 | |
| And then for the environmental review, these are the typical. | 00:12:30 | |
| Things that are reviewed in the environmental documentation and we have. | 00:12:33 | |
| Terry here. Who was the person who's been leading this? If we have any questions or anything about the environmental | 00:12:37 | |
| documentation. | 00:12:41 | |
| And then I'm going to let Matt talk about the details of the. | 00:12:48 | |
| Good design, sorry. | 00:12:52 | |
| OK. So the segment that? | 00:12:56 | |
| Involves Vineyard City. | 00:12:57 | |
| Is the north of Orem segment it starts. | 00:12:59 | |
| At the Vineyard station on the North End. | 00:13:03 | |
| And extends. | 00:13:05 | |
| There's double tracking around the Vineyard station will extend from where that double tracking ends at the South end of that | 00:13:07 | |
| station. | 00:13:11 | |
| Down to the Orem station where the double track. | 00:13:15 | |
| Begins again to go around the Orem station. It's about 1.7 miles long. | 00:13:18 | |
| Let's see, I gotta work. | 00:13:27 | |
| Yeah, yes, girl. | 00:13:29 | |
| We've tried to break up the strip map of the through the Vineyard area into three areas, but it's going to be kind of hard to see. | 00:13:36 | |
| This is the North End. | 00:13:44 | |
| It's by the school there. | 00:13:47 | |
| By the. | 00:13:50 | |
| Where the current turn out is that goes from double track to single track. | 00:13:51 | |
| The most interesting piece of this area is we are going to have double crossovers in this area, which allows the trains to go back | 00:13:57 | |
| and forth from one track to the other. | 00:14:02 | |
| Those will. | 00:14:08 | |
| Probably not be used very much. Generally speaking the trains will just use the straight through movements. | 00:14:09 | |
| On the track, but in the event that one of the tracks in the system. | 00:14:16 | |
| Gets blocked with a train that might be out of service or something going on in one of the tracks. It allows the. | 00:14:21 | |
| Allows them to detour to the other track to get around so that we're not. | 00:14:29 | |
| Limited to just a single track system in the whole area down here. | 00:14:32 | |
| As we get more and more double track areas that are fully connected, we'll have more of these double crossovers through those | 00:14:37 | |
| fully double tracked areas and since. | 00:14:41 | |
| With this project, we'll have double track from Provo. | 00:14:47 | |
| All the way to almost the Lehigh station. | 00:14:50 | |
| We need these double crossover areas so that we can. | 00:14:54 | |
| Get trains back and forth. | 00:14:58 | |
| The next. | 00:15:00 | |
| Areas kind of in that middle section. | 00:15:04 | |
| Of the vineyard area. | 00:15:06 | |
| It runs along the trail. | 00:15:08 | |
| The plan here is that we would be building a track to the. | 00:15:11 | |
| West of the current track. Between the current track and the trail. | 00:15:16 | |
| The plan would be I think I have a cross section in this. | 00:15:21 | |
| Which would show. | 00:15:25 | |
| A little bit more of what that cross section would look like. | 00:15:27 | |
| But generally speaking. | 00:15:30 | |
| The area that's between the trail and the current track is where the new train would go. We would build a wall. | 00:15:34 | |
| Directly adjacent to the eastern edge of the trail. | 00:15:40 | |
| The trail would remain in place. | 00:15:44 | |
| But the eastern side of the trail would be. | 00:15:47 | |
| Have a. | 00:15:52 | |
| Probably a short wall and that you'll see that in the. | 00:15:52 | |
| In the cross section. | 00:15:56 | |
| In this area, we begin to transition all of the tracks to the. | 00:16:00 | |
| East as we go South. | 00:16:06 | |
| We have a couple pinch point areas particularly. | 00:16:08 | |
| The Geneva Road bridge. | 00:16:12 | |
| When we go on to the Geneva Road bridge, our track is 10 feet from the. | 00:16:14 | |
| Southern abutment of that bridge and so we can't get a track. | 00:16:19 | |
| To the east side of our track through there. So we've got to push. | 00:16:23 | |
| Union Pacific over a track and build. | 00:16:28 | |
| Our new track between US and Union Pacific. | 00:16:31 | |
| So that transition starts kind of where those blue lines are. Those blue lines are the transition of the UP tracks pushing. | 00:16:38 | |
| A little bit to the east. | 00:16:45 | |
| Umm. | 00:16:49 | |
| This is kind of the southern end. | 00:16:52 | |
| Of the project through this area. | 00:16:55 | |
| We are building our track between our current track and Union Pacific. | 00:16:57 | |
| We do not affect Vineyard Rd. | 00:17:02 | |
| We do not affect those businesses between Vineyard Rd. and Geneva Rd. | 00:17:06 | |
| We build underneath Geneva Rd. between. | 00:17:10 | |
| The current up track in Union Pacific. | 00:17:14 | |
| And then we. | 00:17:16 | |
| Continue that through 400 S. | 00:17:18 | |
| Where we cross at 400 S. | 00:17:21 | |
| Essentially there'll be an additional track to the east, which is the new Union Pacific track that's been relocated and then our | 00:17:24 | |
| track will be will fit in between. | 00:17:28 | |
| The current set of tracks that cross across that. | 00:17:33 | |
| Intersection, so there won't be a track any closer to Geneva Rd. on 400. | 00:17:36 | |
| But there will be one on the on the east side. | 00:17:41 | |
| I think that's generally the highlights of. | 00:17:46 | |
| Work through. | 00:17:49 | |
| Vineyard. Here's the cross section. | 00:17:55 | |
| Of the area near the trail. | 00:17:57 | |
| The area. | 00:18:00 | |
| So this is our current track right here. | 00:18:03 | |
| So this would be the new track that we would build. It'll be built 15 feet off of the center. | 00:18:07 | |
| Of the existing track. | 00:18:12 | |
| This is the current trail right here. | 00:18:15 | |
| And so there would be a wall built right on the edge of that trail. | 00:18:18 | |
| To accommodate. | 00:18:22 | |
| The construction of that. | 00:18:24 | |
| New track. | 00:18:27 | |
| The wall height would be somewhere between zero and three or four feet, depending on where you are along that trail and how that | 00:18:28 | |
| trail goes kind of up and down in relation to the current track. | 00:18:33 | |
| The new track would be built at the same elevation as the. | 00:18:38 | |
| As the the new track would be built at the same elevation as the existing track. | 00:18:41 | |
| We have studied some noise impacts. Terry could answer questions. | 00:18:54 | |
| In regards to it basically. | 00:18:58 | |
| We have identified some. | 00:19:01 | |
| Minor impacts. | 00:19:04 | |
| To noise. | 00:19:05 | |
| Mainly at the North End of near those double crossovers. | 00:19:06 | |
| Umm, we are mitigating those by installing what's called a spring frog. | 00:19:11 | |
| Turn out at those turnouts that will build those double crossovers. | 00:19:19 | |
| Generally. | 00:19:23 | |
| A turn out the major piece of noise and vibration. | 00:19:25 | |
| Is the gap that the? | 00:19:30 | |
| The wheel of the train has to go across to cross where the where the rails are crossing. | 00:19:32 | |
| And in a spring frog. | 00:19:38 | |
| It keeps that gap closed so that it can run on continuous rail except for when it's making the divergent move diverging movement, | 00:19:41 | |
| so it wouldn't have a problem. | 00:19:46 | |
| Wouldn't wouldn't make as much noise when it's just running in its daily? | 00:19:51 | |
| Runs on the straight through track. | 00:19:55 | |
| So with that frog our. | 00:19:58 | |
| Our modeling and our analysis indicates that we've mitigated the. | 00:20:01 | |
| Minor impacts due to noise. | 00:20:06 | |
| We also looked at vibration. | 00:20:12 | |
| The vibration analysis didn't show that there was anything that exceeded thresholds to justify any mitigation. | 00:20:16 | |
| For vibration. | 00:20:22 | |
| But again, the spring frogs that we're installing will also help with any. | 00:20:25 | |
| With reducing the vibration. | 00:20:28 | |
| In the area. | 00:20:31 | |
| One of the things that is, I think, mentioned on the agenda is a cooperative agreement, a master agreement. | 00:20:35 | |
| I believe that this master agreement is mostly associated with. | 00:20:42 | |
| Utilities. | 00:20:46 | |
| This is something that will probably it's being worked on right now between staff and UTA project management. | 00:20:48 | |
| It just sets forth. | 00:20:56 | |
| How we'll work together to get things relocated. | 00:20:59 | |
| At Uta's expense, At Utah's expense to pay for any relocations that might need to take place. | 00:21:02 | |
| Or. | 00:21:08 | |
| Casings that might be need to be extended or things like that. | 00:21:10 | |
| That's the. | 00:21:14 | |
| The gist of that master agreement? | 00:21:14 | |
| The master agreement mainly just talks about. | 00:21:18 | |
| The how we would work together. | 00:21:21 | |
| Then there would be a specific supplemental agreement for each. | 00:21:23 | |
| Specific utility and how? | 00:21:25 | |
| That'll get utilized. | 00:21:28 | |
| Or how that will get relocated and paid for and costs and. | 00:21:30 | |
| Anything specific associated with that? | 00:21:33 | |
| Utility. | 00:21:37 | |
| As far as next steps on the project, we'll. | 00:21:43 | |
| Finish up all of our environmental. | 00:21:46 | |
| Plans and things we will finish our design Our design is set to. | 00:21:50 | |
| Go through. | 00:21:55 | |
| Probably most of next year. | 00:21:56 | |
| Before we're final. | 00:21:59 | |
| With our design. | 00:22:00 | |
| We have selected a contractor for the project, they're called Frontrunner Forward Partners. It's a joint venture between. | 00:22:02 | |
| Umm, Stacy and Whitbeck and. | 00:22:09 | |
| Ralph L Wadsworth. | 00:22:12 | |
| And as Janelle mentioned, construction. | 00:22:15 | |
| Could start as early as 2027, depends kind of a little bit on. | 00:22:17 | |
| How our contractor stages the different? | 00:22:22 | |
| Segments of work and where they'll go from there. | 00:22:25 | |
| I think that's it. If you are interested there's some. | 00:22:31 | |
| Our website, Our phone numbers. | 00:22:35 | |
| If you search. | 00:22:38 | |
| Front runner. | 00:22:39 | |
| FR2X. | 00:22:41 | |
| On YouTube, I think that video that we had in there pulls up pretty easy. | 00:22:43 | |
| It looks just like that. | 00:22:48 | |
| Front screen that was on. | 00:22:49 | |
| Slide but. | 00:22:51 | |
| It's pretty interesting video. It explains the. | 00:22:52 | |
| The need of why we need to have double track in order to have trains pass and get more trains out on the system so. | 00:22:55 | |
| Thank you for your time. Any questions that we can answer? | 00:23:02 | |
| We're happy to do so. | 00:23:06 | |
| OK, Council, do you have any questions? | 00:23:07 | |
| I do. | 00:23:11 | |
| I know with the train station there came requirements with housing. | 00:23:13 | |
| And anything with the double track. Is there any requirements on? | 00:23:17 | |
| Increasing density or beautification or with federal dollars sometimes comes strings attached is there. | 00:23:21 | |
| Any known string strings attached on this? | 00:23:27 | |
| Nothing that would be associated with the city. | 00:23:30 | |
| For any zoning requirements or anything like that, there are strings attached as far as on our side and increasing capacity and | 00:23:34 | |
| making sure that we are providing the service that we're saying that we're going to provide. | 00:23:39 | |
| In our grant application. | 00:23:46 | |
| So there are some things that we'll need to make sure that we. | 00:23:48 | |
| Meet when we make the commitments to get the grant, but nothing for the city. | 00:23:51 | |
| OK. | 00:23:57 | |
| Well, thank you so much for coming down. We appreciate it and for informing us in our community about it. | 00:23:58 | |
| And council, you'll have access to this. | 00:24:03 | |
| PowerPoint and then we will. | 00:24:06 | |
| Take that website that you gave us as well. | 00:24:09 | |
| Thank you. OK, Thanks. OK. | 00:24:12 | |
| All right, we'll go ahead and move on to our work session items. | 00:24:15 | |
| And we're going to start with 3.1, our rental license. | 00:24:19 | |
| By Maria Ortega Our Neighborhood Services Coordinator will be presenting this. | 00:24:23 | |
| Just let me know. | 00:24:59 | |
| Tom. | 00:25:22 | |
| OK, perfect. So. | 00:25:27 | |
| Over the past year. | 00:25:29 | |
| Be in cash have been working on a. | 00:25:31 | |
| Rental license program. | 00:25:34 | |
| There we go. | 00:25:40 | |
| And basically what this would do is it would require all rental dwellings within Vineyard to obtain a business license. | 00:25:44 | |
| That would be excluding any ad use as well as any. | 00:25:51 | |
| Rentals for immediate families. | 00:25:54 | |
| And then any of the apartment buildings. | 00:25:56 | |
| This would include a new application, a business license fee. | 00:26:00 | |
| Parking requirements and inspections. | 00:26:03 | |
| And then? | 00:26:06 | |
| The last point is just to let you know that the state law does authorize us to do this and there's many other cities in Utah that. | 00:26:07 | |
| Have this right now and that are there are some of them clear field Orem Provo. | 00:26:13 | |
| The purpose of this is really just to provide. | 00:26:20 | |
| Resources to control occupancy. That's been one of the biggest issues that I've had. | 00:26:23 | |
| While doing code enforcement and neighborhood services. | 00:26:27 | |
| As well as providing adequate living conditions and providing renters with resources. | 00:26:30 | |
| To know what? | 00:26:36 | |
| Their rights are. | 00:26:37 | |
| And then to ensure that landlords are providing. | 00:26:40 | |
| A good amount of parking spaces. | 00:26:42 | |
| It also helps with unpaid utility issues and it helps us collect information on who's in the home as well as landlords and the | 00:26:46 | |
| management companies. | 00:26:51 | |
| Here's just a timeline of what we have, kind of. | 00:26:57 | |
| In mind. | 00:27:01 | |
| We are currently doing a disproportionate fee study. | 00:27:02 | |
| And a licensed study than we plan on doing public outreach. | 00:27:05 | |
| One thing we want to kind of talk about is. | 00:27:09 | |
| The different forms we were planning on doing kind of online outreach as well as possibly some. | 00:27:12 | |
| Some public houses open homes. | 00:27:17 | |
| And then we would do. | 00:27:20 | |
| Council review at that time in March, as well as we have a communications plan on. | 00:27:22 | |
| Different things that we're going to do to. | 00:27:29 | |
| Put it out there in social media. | 00:27:32 | |
| As well as when it would begin in July of next year is the goal. | 00:27:33 | |
| There we go. | 00:27:39 | |
| And then that's just kind of some of the communication things again that we have. We have Flyers that will be sending out. | 00:27:40 | |
| Public meetings such as City Council. We want to add a page to our website and add it to the newsletter. Utility bills. | 00:27:46 | |
| As well as we'd create. | 00:27:52 | |
| Flyers and content that would be for landlords and tenants. | 00:27:54 | |
| In English and Spanish, because we do know that there is quite a bit of tenants that are mainly Spanish speakers. | 00:27:58 | |
| And then for this. | 00:28:07 | |
| The application that we have in mind would be just one application, even if. | 00:28:09 | |
| A landlord owns multiple homes. | 00:28:13 | |
| They would just list every home that they have on that main application. | 00:28:17 | |
| We would need valid contact information from them including e-mail, phone number. | 00:28:21 | |
| If the owner does not live within 20 miles of the rental dwelling. | 00:28:25 | |
| We would require them to have a property owner. | 00:28:29 | |
| And have that properties under information so that if there is. | 00:28:31 | |
| Any reason an issue at the property? | 00:28:35 | |
| We can reach out to the property management company instead. | 00:28:37 | |
| We need the number of individuals renting out the unit. | 00:28:41 | |
| The number of offset parking spaces that they are providing. | 00:28:44 | |
| As well as. | 00:28:47 | |
| An acknowledgment that they've. | 00:28:49 | |
| Spoken to the HOA and that they. | 00:28:50 | |
| Are in agreeance that they are renting out the unit. | 00:28:53 | |
| Inspections. | 00:28:58 | |
| We do plan on doing inspections on properties. | 00:28:59 | |
| We have two different options that we're looking at right now. One of them is a one year renewal where there would be an initial | 00:29:02 | |
| inspection. | 00:29:06 | |
| And then any further inspection would be based on complaints. | 00:29:09 | |
| And then a two year renewal. | 00:29:12 | |
| Where this would have an initial inspection. | 00:29:14 | |
| And then it would require a biannual inspection. This is closer to our Adu license that we currently have. | 00:29:16 | |
| And then? | 00:29:24 | |
| Yeah. And with most of these points, we do want to have this as a discussion maybe at the end. | 00:29:27 | |
| For that to see what that does to the county averages. | 00:30:02 | |
| And then just recently we have started working with Zion Public Finance to determine the fee that would be. | 00:30:04 | |
| Right for for Vineyard and so they essentially they just analyze how much staff time it takes to accept these applications, update | 00:30:10 | |
| the websites, do these inspections. | 00:30:14 | |
| And go on from there. You said Science Bank. | 00:30:20 | |
| Zion Zions Public Finance, Yeah. | 00:30:22 | |
| And then we just kind of brainstormed some questions that were outside of the scope of this and and just wanted to address those | 00:30:26 | |
| so. | 00:30:29 | |
| How will this be enforced just through our basic code enforcement process? | 00:30:33 | |
| So if we do get reports of a rental and they don't have a license, we'll use, you know, our code enforcement personnel to reach | 00:30:38 | |
| out to the property owners and get them to come into compliance, whether that's get a license or clear up if they're not a rental. | 00:30:43 | |
| The fee is going to be placed is the responsibility of the property owner. They are the ones that have to fill out the | 00:30:51 | |
| application, pay the fee. The the tenant cannot do that. | 00:30:54 | |
| All rental properties that do not have professional on site management will have to get this license. So this mostly excludes | 00:30:59 | |
| properties along Mill Rd. except for Edgewater townhomes. | 00:31:04 | |
| Just because they have that on site management, we just don't have issues with occupancy or maintenance issues, so. | 00:31:10 | |
| And then the the hardest part is probably that last question is how are we going to find the properties that don't proactively | 00:31:19 | |
| register because we definitely are going to do the best that we can to outreach to everybody in the city saying this is a | 00:31:23 | |
| requirement, you do need to get this license, but there will be some that. | 00:31:27 | |
| Just don't get a license. And so I've been talking with other cities throughout the state to figure out kind of what they've done. | 00:31:31 | |
| And a lot of them have just. | 00:31:37 | |
| Taking it through code enforcement that as they get complaints they just. | 00:31:38 | |
| Work it through the system. | 00:31:41 | |
| But we do have some tools such as the county partial data and utility counts. So on the county website, if we see that somebody | 00:31:43 | |
| owns multiple properties, we can assume they're not living it every single one of those houses. And so we can then reach out to | 00:31:48 | |
| them and let them know they need the license. And same thing with the utility accounts. We have a list of kind of existing rentals | 00:31:52 | |
| that we can utilize. | 00:31:57 | |
| And then like I said before the report concern tool. | 00:32:02 | |
| So that's all we have prepared. But like we said, this is a work session so we're in the middle of writing the language for this | 00:32:05 | |
| and would love feedback on what you like, what you don't like, and how we should proceed. | 00:32:10 | |
| Can I get some clarity on a few things? Yeah. | 00:32:14 | |
| I missed a portion of what you were. | 00:32:18 | |
| Speaking about when you said the. | 00:32:20 | |
| Properties that were included. | 00:32:22 | |
| And you also mentioned. | 00:32:24 | |
| How we have an Adu application? | 00:32:27 | |
| So this would not apply to the 80 correct? Just 880 user are treated separately under state law. | 00:32:29 | |
| And so we felt that it was proper to treat them under this. So essentially we'll have one portal where it'll be like you need to | 00:32:35 | |
| obtain a rental license. And from there you can say it's an accessory dwelling unit, as in I live on site and I'm renting out my | 00:32:39 | |
| basement or whatever it may be. | 00:32:43 | |
| Or there's the. | 00:32:47 | |
| I have a house in vineyards that I don't live at and I'm renting out the whole thing. | 00:32:49 | |
| OK. And then the second question that I had a. | 00:32:53 | |
| On this one I have a few more questions but. | 00:32:56 | |
| The housing that you mentioned along Mill Rd. having management already, does that pertain to all of our HOA's that have | 00:32:59 | |
| management? | 00:33:04 | |
| Oh, no, absolutely not. OK. So, so something like just excluding. Yeah. So like like the ones that are in like neighborhoods like. | 00:33:08 | |
| Tucker Rowe, the Locks, the preserve, Lakefront Town Center, they'll have H ways they don't have on site management and they're | 00:33:17 | |
| all individually owned units, meaning like in Lakefront for example, I think we have 700. | 00:33:22 | |
| Unique owners of the condos and townhomes there, meaning there could be up to 700 rentals there with different property managers | 00:33:28 | |
| and whatnot. Where the Vine, for example, we have one property manager on site at all times that we work with. So it was Vine, | 00:33:33 | |
| Concord and Alloy. | 00:33:38 | |
| Yeah, and. | 00:33:42 | |
| Mill Point and also the orchards that are just being built right now. | 00:33:44 | |
| Then you mentioned that the way that you would do enforcement, what is the rate of participation for other cities that are doing | 00:33:48 | |
| it such as Orem? I I believe Orem, when I reached out to them, they said they believe they have about 50% of their properties in | 00:33:52 | |
| compliance. | 00:33:56 | |
| OK, how do you? | 00:34:02 | |
| Are you done? | 00:34:04 | |
| Yeah, go ahead, Jake. | 00:34:05 | |
| How do you legally exclude certain sections like them and not like run into any issues legally? | 00:34:06 | |
| Like how do we exclude like the vine? | 00:34:14 | |
| So the count, yes, the Council can just say good question. | 00:34:16 | |
| We're going to have this fee for some so. | 00:34:19 | |
| One reason is a state law that does allow for these rental dwelling licenses requires that. | 00:34:23 | |
| An owner only has to get one license regardless of how many units they got. So we could include the vine. | 00:34:27 | |
| But in that case, we are and. And Jamie, correct me if I'm wrong, if you're brushed up on this, but. | 00:34:32 | |
| Essentially, the Vine would get one license for all of their units and I don't know if that would do any good for the city because | 00:34:38 | |
| we aren't necessarily having, we're not dealing with their parking issues. Most of those are dealt within the development | 00:34:42 | |
| themselves. | 00:34:46 | |
| But uh. | 00:34:51 | |
| The city can. I'm just. | 00:34:51 | |
| Legally we can say hey this. | 00:34:53 | |
| HOA yes, this HOA no. They will have to. | 00:34:56 | |
| Have a single license. | 00:34:59 | |
| But other welcome. | 00:35:01 | |
| It's one business. | 00:35:02 | |
| Even though they're renting multiple units. | 00:35:04 | |
| So what if somebody does own multiple houses? They would just have 1. You would just have one license. They they too would apply | 00:35:07 | |
| for a single license and then. | 00:35:10 | |
| But they they will list out all of their properties and we still could do inspections on all of those properties. I was gonna say | 00:35:14 | |
| like it needs to be equal under the. | 00:35:17 | |
| They and they would, they still would have the right to inspect and do other things on the property too. So Jamie, Jamie that that | 00:35:21 | |
| would be a change from how it's written right now. | 00:35:25 | |
| Like, yeah, well, we'll work on that language. You will need to make that change. I don't think you can exclude. | 00:35:30 | |
| A business from the license requirement or a landlord, so to speak, right? | 00:35:36 | |
| Everybody would be subject to it. We may need to work through. | 00:35:40 | |
| The provisions on inspection just to make sure that it is applied. | 00:35:44 | |
| And equitable way. | 00:35:49 | |
| So how we were doing is because the apartment complexes are paying for management. So they're they're they're kind of going to | 00:35:50 | |
| step above. I think that's fine. You could put an exclusion in the ordinance on that basis and then you. | 00:35:56 | |
| You would for bear inspections for those types of units. I think you still ought to require a license. | 00:36:02 | |
| At least a business license, yeah. | 00:36:09 | |
| Yeah, well, and the rental license? | 00:36:11 | |
| You you will run into other. | 00:36:13 | |
| Owners that own multiple properties do also have. | 00:36:16 | |
| Property management companies running them. | 00:36:19 | |
| Yeah. And that's why I think the language that I originally wrote like on site. | 00:36:22 | |
| Professional management meaning like. | 00:36:26 | |
| There was like for example, the Vine, you can go there and you can during business hours, you can go talk to their property | 00:36:28 | |
| management, you can talk to their maintenance people on site where your average mom and pop landlord don't necessarily have that | 00:36:32 | |
| service available. | 00:36:36 | |
| Are other cities using proactive enforcement where they're looking at parcels or are they? | 00:36:41 | |
| Relying on the 50% participation rates. | 00:36:48 | |
| I would say it's a mix. | 00:36:51 | |
| So, so Orem, for example, they did try at the very beginning they they looked at the county data. | 00:36:52 | |
| To look at, you know, duplicate records and whatnot and sent out. | 00:36:57 | |
| To those specific addresses or same thing with their utility accounts. | 00:37:00 | |
| But in the end, it is, it's, it's a big enforcement thing and and that's one of the reasons Maria recently went full time in our | 00:37:04 | |
| department was to help gear this up and then do these inspections and, and roll out this program. | 00:37:10 | |
| It just a little fact in in Vineyard. According to the last census, I believe it was about 56% of the the homes in Vineyard are | 00:37:16 | |
| all rentals. | 00:37:20 | |
| That includes everything, not just, you know, your high density, that's single family homes, all that 56% and. | 00:37:25 | |
| Without having any kind of data or any kind of contact with. | 00:37:31 | |
| A majority of the residents of Vineyard, it's really hard for us to do any kind of code enforcement or anything like that. | 00:37:34 | |
| When we don't have that information. | 00:37:39 | |
| That's a good question. I mean a good comment. | 00:37:41 | |
| My question is. | 00:37:44 | |
| According to the state law, we've had to deal with long term rental. | 00:37:45 | |
| Issues for occupation and it's very difficult to. | 00:37:49 | |
| Manage those especially because you're not going to notice them by parcel type. Sometimes it's two floors being rented out and | 00:37:54 | |
| those come in. | 00:37:57 | |
| Will it? | 00:38:02 | |
| Exist. | 00:38:02 | |
| The same way. I mean, we're not going to have. | 00:38:04 | |
| Proactive code enforcement on that it'll it'll exist the same way it This just makes it easier to enforce the the biggest thing | 00:38:05 | |
| with. | 00:38:09 | |
| Occupancy is that it's really hard right now how we have it in the code. | 00:38:12 | |
| To enforce because we have nothing that. | 00:38:17 | |
| Allows us to have permission to do inspections. | 00:38:19 | |
| We have to ask the homeowner and if the homeowner doesn't want to because they know that they're out of compliance. | 00:38:23 | |
| They can say no, and at that point it becomes. | 00:38:28 | |
| Either I have enough evidence to. | 00:38:31 | |
| Get a subpoena. | 00:38:33 | |
| Or. | 00:38:34 | |
| I have to just go based off of word of mouth. | 00:38:35 | |
| And just say, OK, well. | 00:38:37 | |
| They're saying they have 4:00. I'm going to agree they have 4:00 because I have no proof of it. | 00:38:39 | |
| Even though we might have. | 00:38:43 | |
| Tools that are letting us know if we have no concrete evidence. That's the hard part. | 00:38:45 | |
| Versus this if we have you know? | 00:38:48 | |
| Multiple people saying, hey, we've seen that there's eight people living in this home. | 00:38:51 | |
| I could say, look, you have a license. | 00:38:55 | |
| You've agreed to the terms of this license, so now we can do an inspection. | 00:38:57 | |
| And that way we could verify that you either are in compliance or you're out of compliance. | 00:39:02 | |
| OK. So anybody that has taken the time to participate in the activity and has agreed to this type of enforcement is going to? | 00:39:06 | |
| Allow you to do this and our thought is that we're going to allow 50% of the people that like to. | 00:39:14 | |
| Participate, we'll say. | 00:39:21 | |
| To basically kind of change the way things are going because they have a desire to follow the law. | 00:39:23 | |
| Yeah. And and really a lot of it is also is just. | 00:39:28 | |
| As uh. | 00:39:31 | |
| The city gets older and as the city grows. | 00:39:32 | |
| What a lot of these cities are trying to prevent as well is. | 00:39:34 | |
| Homes that aren't being maintained, and that's a big part of it as well. | 00:39:38 | |
| Is that you're ensuring that these people who are renting these homes have livable conditions at the property owner is taking care | 00:39:42 | |
| of it, they're not letting it get. | 00:39:45 | |
| You know, mold either not letting pestle in there, they're not letting it just. | 00:39:49 | |
| Dilapidate. | 00:39:53 | |
| And that's also a big thing that we're wanting to avoid now. | 00:39:54 | |
| Versus later when it does start getting, you know, an issue, especially with like Orem and probably when I've talked to them, | 00:39:58 | |
| that's their biggest thing. | 00:40:01 | |
| Is that a lot of the time is an occupancy, a lot of the time is just their livable conditions aren't there, aren't being met. | 00:40:05 | |
| And that's something that some most the times attendants aren't aware of that they can reach out to the city and say hey. | 00:40:11 | |
| My home. | 00:40:17 | |
| Is. | 00:40:18 | |
| Having water leaks. I'm having mold. | 00:40:18 | |
| What am I supposed to do? | 00:40:21 | |
| And they're unaware that they can reach out to us. So the goal is to try to. | 00:40:22 | |
| Inform everybody of their rights. | 00:40:25 | |
| I have a question you mentioned. | 00:40:28 | |
| Parking requirements. | 00:40:31 | |
| Was that specifically for? | 00:40:33 | |
| Did you take it up? | 00:40:36 | |
| There was a parking slide in here but I think this might be an old presentation, like it's not my latest save. | 00:40:37 | |
| So explain what are what your rights or abilities will be with parking requirements. | 00:40:43 | |
| Yeah. So how we have the parking? | 00:40:48 | |
| Right now, for example, if somebody who's renting gets towed, they're gonna call the city and they're gonna say hey. | 00:40:50 | |
| I live here. | 00:40:55 | |
| And I was towed and this was unfair and we. | 00:40:56 | |
| Be like sorry like you were parked illegally. Have you talked to your landlord? | 00:40:59 | |
| And the landlord right now has really no responsibility to provide that parking for the the tenants. | 00:41:03 | |
| You know, they, there's nothing the city can do to force them to do that. So, so the, and we're still working on the language for | 00:41:08 | |
| the parking to make sure it's compliant with, with state code on this. But essentially we're saying that. | 00:41:13 | |
| You have to be able to every on-site parking space. | 00:41:18 | |
| That you have has to be available for the tenants. We'll see some instances where somebody will. | 00:41:21 | |
| Rent out a house, but they won't let their tenants park in the garage. So now their tenants are parking on the street or in the | 00:41:25 | |
| driveway. So now we're saying if you have parking spaces on site, they need to be available to the tenants to use. | 00:41:30 | |
| We are also requesting put in the the language that. | 00:41:36 | |
| Every occupant who has a vehicle must have an off site parking space essentially. | 00:41:40 | |
| So it does require that if I'm a landlord and I have a condo, say in the lakefront community where you're parking in the driveway, | 00:41:45 | |
| in the garage and then you have a parking pass. | 00:41:49 | |
| You can then rent up to three people. | 00:41:53 | |
| Because that's the parking you're providing and you're no longer putting that burden on the the city or or other communities, | 00:41:54 | |
| other neighborhoods to provide for those those landlords. | 00:41:59 | |
| So for like a house. | 00:42:03 | |
| Let's just say house and. | 00:42:06 | |
| If they have four people living there, would you would this program? | 00:42:09 | |
| Actually allow I guess. | 00:42:14 | |
| Could we be allowed to require them to utilize the garage on the driveway for those four people or would? | 00:42:17 | |
| Since it's a public Rd. Yeah, because we don't have a parking permit, we couldn't say you have. | 00:42:22 | |
| To park on site, we have to say. | 00:42:26 | |
| Provide the parking available so that's something we could check when we do our inspection and say we look at the garage and the | 00:42:27 | |
| garage is jam packed as a storaging or whatever. | 00:42:31 | |
| We can say we are not. | 00:42:36 | |
| Permitting this or we're not going to pass this inspection because you are not providing the adequate parking for this, this need | 00:42:37 | |
| or this use. | 00:42:40 | |
| All right. That's a good question, Marty, because. | 00:42:44 | |
| Otherwise it might conflict with ad use even though we're viewing them separately. | 00:42:47 | |
| The state law is kind of the right. Yeah. No, we don't do parking. I like that this is separate from Adus, because you're right. | 00:42:51 | |
| Yeah, the. | 00:42:55 | |
| We can't require the additional parking spot for you, right? Right. We just have to require 4 spots and that's it. But it might | 00:42:59 | |
| conflict even either way. So yeah, even if we are doing. | 00:43:03 | |
| OK. | 00:43:08 | |
| My question is about the 50%. | 00:43:11 | |
| Don't choose to. | 00:43:14 | |
| Get a license. | 00:43:15 | |
| Because my guess is. | 00:43:18 | |
| That house in La Chaminade that's got eight guys living in it. | 00:43:20 | |
| With seven cars. | 00:43:25 | |
| Or 9 cars. | 00:43:28 | |
| That their landlord is. | 00:43:32 | |
| Going to choose not to do that and. | 00:43:34 | |
| I mean, Marty and I are probably talking about the same house. | 00:43:35 | |
| But. | 00:43:41 | |
| That landlords. | 00:43:42 | |
| You know, just brush you off and say now I don't need that. | 00:43:44 | |
| Like so in that case we do have enforcement mechanisms within this code as well as I. | 00:43:47 | |
| I'm sure we could also look at enforcing our doing business without a license violations as well. So we do have some ways that we | 00:43:51 | |
| could. | 00:43:54 | |
| Essentially get them to come into compliance as we get those reports because essentially the other 50% that aren't necessarily | 00:43:57 | |
| complying with the code. | 00:44:00 | |
| Hopefully they're. | 00:44:03 | |
| Just being good landlords and they're. | 00:44:04 | |
| Tenants aren't causing a problem in the neighborhood. | 00:44:06 | |
| For the second week, catch wind of a rental. | 00:44:08 | |
| Causing a problem, we can go straight to the landlord. | 00:44:11 | |
| Say, hey, we know you're operating this rental, you need to get a license. This is a new and you know what, we'll have some grace | 00:44:14 | |
| is this is a new program we're rolling out, but you know, we're going to say you need to obtain a license. Here's how you're going | 00:44:18 | |
| to do that You have. | 00:44:22 | |
| X amount of days to come into compliance. If not, you're going to face a daily fee of X amount. | 00:44:26 | |
| What are the improvements that allow you to do that enforcement? | 00:44:30 | |
| What are the improvements? | 00:44:34 | |
| Yeah, in this code. What is this code offer separately from what we do now that's suddenly going to allow us to have? | 00:44:35 | |
| So just right now we don't require a rental to or a landlord to have a business license. | 00:44:42 | |
| But now we will. | 00:44:47 | |
| So we're essentially now saying you are now essentially doing business in the city of Vineyard without a license. | 00:44:48 | |
| OK, I have a. | 00:44:52 | |
| I have an example. | 00:44:54 | |
| There is a house right now that has a lot of people living in it, but they're actually running a car dealership. | 00:44:55 | |
| We hopefully took a care of that. | 00:45:01 | |
| I need to take care of that. That one is actually dealt with as of now because I was going to say it's been reported. People want, | 00:45:03 | |
| yeah, I got a report of it and it was taken care of within the time frame that it needed to be. So they were actually very quick | 00:45:08 | |
| to comply. | 00:45:12 | |
| OK. Yeah, OK. | 00:45:17 | |
| Doesn't matter anymore. No, you're good. I dealt with that one. | 00:45:18 | |
| I'm guessing. Any other questions? I'm guessing this doesn't change anything with Airbnbs. | 00:45:23 | |
| No, so as of now Airbnbs are not permitted um. | 00:45:27 | |
| And that is based on complaint basis as well. I have been handling those as they've come in when they don't have a license. How | 00:45:30 | |
| are you solving that just? | 00:45:34 | |
| Because our code does. | 00:45:38 | |
| Explicitly state that they don't are not permitted, so we can still enforce it on that end. | 00:45:39 | |
| Well, just to clarify, Sorry, sorry, Maria. Maria. | 00:45:44 | |
| Pretty much right? | 00:45:47 | |
| Short term rentals are allowed under a special project. So if you develop a commercial project in a commercial district that is | 00:45:49 | |
| developed for short term rentals, kind of it's kind of like a hotel use. | 00:45:55 | |
| But developed for that, we do have a code provision that allows that just. There's also a plethora of state codes that. | 00:46:00 | |
| Kind of. | 00:46:07 | |
| Bind cities hands for how they're able to do enforcement. | 00:46:08 | |
| Yeah, there's an interest on torture rentals. Yeah, there was an update to the code this last legislative season that has made it | 00:46:12 | |
| easier. | 00:46:15 | |
| And so there are there were a couple of problem Airbnbs that have been dealt with since that. | 00:46:19 | |
| Has passed. | 00:46:24 | |
| OK, I know that we have a few that have been grandfathered in. I guess I'm wondering how many? | 00:46:25 | |
| As of now, I have a list of three. | 00:46:30 | |
| All right, Sophie. | 00:46:33 | |
| A couple more, but they've been sold, so that does not roll over to the new owners. | 00:46:35 | |
| Awesome. Any other questions from the Council at this time? | 00:46:40 | |
| If you have any other thoughts, please send them to Maria and Cash as they work through this to bring it back to yeah, We'd love | 00:46:43 | |
| to hear anybody's feedback on this. | 00:46:46 | |
| As we move forward with it. | 00:46:50 | |
| I just want to say well done. | 00:46:51 | |
| Thanks, Sir. You've been great at helping encourage us to get this moving, so I appreciate that. Yeah, well, a year ago, right, we | 00:46:52 | |
| had a parking meeting and that was one of the main concerns. | 00:46:57 | |
| Was. | 00:47:02 | |
| Over occupancy. So sure that that's for sure the one thing I do get on a. | 00:47:03 | |
| Like a day-to-day basis is just, hey, there's so many people in this home. And so that was definitely something I was looking into | 00:47:07 | |
| anyways, just because it it is an issue that we have to deal with at some point. Yeah, it makes sense for our community. So thank | 00:47:12 | |
| you. Yeah. Yeah. Well done. Definitely. Thank you. | 00:47:17 | |
| Thank you. | 00:47:22 | |
| All right, Eric, you are going to be discussing the fuel card policy and agreement. | 00:47:24 | |
| Yeah. Thank you. | 00:47:30 | |
| OK, so the Vineyard city? | 00:47:33 | |
| Fuel card policy is. | 00:47:35 | |
| One deliverable from the audit that we've been working through. | 00:47:37 | |
| To have a written. | 00:47:41 | |
| Policy on this that increases accountability. It makes it easier for us to track. | 00:47:43 | |
| Fuel usage. | 00:47:48 | |
| And it also reduces any risk of. | 00:47:50 | |
| Fraud, waste or abuse. | 00:47:52 | |
| So kind of in summary and you have these before you that you can review, but. | 00:47:54 | |
| The fuel fuel cars will be issued to specific vehicles. | 00:47:59 | |
| The fuel card pins may be used. | 00:48:03 | |
| Only for purchasing fuel for city vehicles and equipment. | 00:48:06 | |
| Employees will enter accurate odometer readings, which again helps with tracking of this. | 00:48:09 | |
| And vehicle identification information when prompted at the time of purchase. | 00:48:15 | |
| The purchase of fuel or items for personal vehicles or non city purposes is prohibited. | 00:48:23 | |
| As is splitting transactions to. | 00:48:29 | |
| Bypass purchase limits. | 00:48:32 | |
| As is misrepresentation of mileage, vehicle number. | 00:48:34 | |
| Or other information. | 00:48:38 | |
| From a monitoring standpoint, the fuel card activity shall be regularly reviewed to ensure comple. | 00:48:40 | |
| Clients on this policy. | 00:48:46 | |
| And it will be the supervisors who are responsible for monitoring card usage and ensuring that employees under their supervision | 00:48:48 | |
| comply with the policy. | 00:48:53 | |
| That's kind of a summary of that. | 00:48:57 | |
| Did you have anything to add, Brett? | 00:49:00 | |
| Excuse me? | 00:49:04 | |
| Nothing to add, I do have questions but I'll hold off. | 00:49:04 | |
| That Nope. It is now time for questions. | 00:49:07 | |
| The the question I had and I this is as much so that we get an answer on record for everybody in case they're reviewing this. | 00:49:10 | |
| The way the proposal reads. | 00:49:21 | |
| If cards are issued to a vehicle and then you have a PIN and then there's. | 00:49:25 | |
| Language about turning in cards and things like that. | 00:49:30 | |
| Can you explain the relationship between? | 00:49:33 | |
| The. | 00:49:37 | |
| Card the vehicle and the person. | 00:49:38 | |
| There's two, I guess you would. | 00:49:42 | |
| Say there's two different types of relationships. | 00:49:44 | |
| There are. | 00:49:46 | |
| Vehicles that are assigned to individuals and so those ones would have. | 00:49:47 | |
| Single pin for that driver. | 00:49:51 | |
| And that driver is expected to always use that same card for that same vehicle. | 00:49:54 | |
| Then there are shared vehicles in the city. | 00:49:59 | |
| And with the shared vehicles? | 00:50:02 | |
| The card will stay with the vehicle. | 00:50:05 | |
| And anyone that's using that card will have to again use the same protocol so they enter the odometer. | 00:50:07 | |
| And and that way over time you can kind of track. | 00:50:14 | |
| The mileage used with the. | 00:50:18 | |
| With the fuel used and from an audit standpoint, that's what they're kind of looking for is. | 00:50:20 | |
| Is. | 00:50:26 | |
| Variations. Kind of. | 00:50:27 | |
| That extend beyond the expected for that amount of mileage. | 00:50:28 | |
| And that vehicle, so that's that's how those two different types would work. And Christy has a thought too. | 00:50:33 | |
| Just the pins for each employee will be different. So that's how we will know which employee put gas in that vehicle. That was | 00:50:39 | |
| going to be my next question, so. | 00:50:44 | |
| Excellent. | 00:50:50 | |
| Any other questions? | 00:50:53 | |
| No, I'd just say well done like. | 00:50:58 | |
| Without this information, you're not able to track and understand or even investigate. And now with this ability, you'll be able | 00:51:00 | |
| to. | 00:51:03 | |
| Ascertain where issues are or arise if they come in. So good job, Brett. | 00:51:07 | |
| Team and everyone. So yeah. | 00:51:12 | |
| Thank you, Eric and Christy. | 00:51:13 | |
| We'll move on to our transportation utility fee. | 00:51:16 | |
| And we have a few people coming up. | 00:51:21 | |
| Cody and Hales. | 00:51:24 | |
| Cody Dieter with EFG Consulting and Hales Engineering is here. Naseem is anybody from our team? | 00:51:27 | |
| Working on this as well. | 00:51:33 | |
| I just want to make sure I. | 00:51:35 | |
| State everybody's name who's presenting. | 00:51:36 | |
| Just those two that you mentioned. | 00:51:51 | |
| OK, mostly just me. I think so. OK. | 00:51:52 | |
| While this is coming up, I just want to express appreciation to staff. | 00:51:57 | |
| For their assistance with this project, they've been professional and very helpful. | 00:52:01 | |
| As we've gone through this. | 00:52:07 | |
| You've got a great staff. | 00:52:10 | |
| So you should be. | 00:52:11 | |
| Grateful for their work. | 00:52:13 | |
| Thank you. | 00:52:14 | |
| All right, do I just push the thing? Is that what I do? | 00:52:22 | |
| There we go. OK, I got it. | 00:52:28 | |
| I think so. | 00:52:31 | |
| It was scared of you, so just take a second. | 00:52:35 | |
| All right, so the first thing to share about the transportation utility fee is. | 00:52:39 | |
| The statute currently does not exist. This explicitly allows the city to charge a transportation utility fee. In 2016, I assisted | 00:52:43 | |
| Pleasant Grove City. | 00:52:48 | |
| With the implement implementation of their transportation utility fee, the first in the state. | 00:52:53 | |
| It was taken to the Supreme Court. So this ruling. | 00:52:58 | |
| Now provides. | 00:53:02 | |
| The only legal pathway currently. | 00:53:03 | |
| For a city to charge a transportation utility fee, there was a proposed legislation last year that did not pass. | 00:53:06 | |
| And it's likely that that will come back in the future and it will follow, we think if it follows the statute that was proposed | 00:53:13 | |
| last year, it'll be similar to this. | 00:53:18 | |
| So So what the the reason you have the authority to? | 00:53:23 | |
| Levy a transportation utility fee or charge a transportation utility fee is under 10884 just the. | 00:53:26 | |
| The general welfare of the city and your ability to. | 00:53:34 | |
| Promote the things that are involved with running a city. | 00:53:38 | |
| Specifically. | 00:53:42 | |
| This ruling said you need to have a clear link between the demand for service. | 00:53:43 | |
| That you're providing and what you charge. | 00:53:49 | |
| So it's a very reasonable and sensible. | 00:53:51 | |
| Link that needs to be created. The second is that you need to have a utility fee fund which you already have. | 00:53:56 | |
| So that all of those expenses fall into this fund, It's easy to track. | 00:54:02 | |
| For those residents of your city. | 00:54:07 | |
| So we have followed that. | 00:54:09 | |
| Methodology. | 00:54:11 | |
| I had a quick question. Go ahead. | 00:54:13 | |
| Just to make sure I understood you properly. | 00:54:15 | |
| You said. | 00:54:18 | |
| Legislation has come forward and it did not pass, but it might come back this legislative session. And your what you said was. | 00:54:19 | |
| But you still feel like what you're presenting before us. | 00:54:27 | |
| Will meet those changes, yes. | 00:54:30 | |
| So it won't. | 00:54:32 | |
| Suddenly come back because. | 00:54:34 | |
| We had this. | 00:54:35 | |
| Be and then we paused it. | 00:54:37 | |
| And that's why we have some of this and now we would be resuming it because we waited for the Supreme Court ruling to go through. | 00:54:39 | |
| That's correct. Yes. All right. So we're following that legislation, even if it didn't pass, we're following the same guidelines | 00:54:43 | |
| that are provided therein and they. | 00:54:48 | |
| Really, there's a little bit of nuance here, Mayor at the. | 00:54:53 | |
| Pleasant Grove City was. | 00:54:56 | |
| I'll say the bleeding edge. | 00:54:58 | |
| Of. | 00:54:59 | |
| Implementing this. | 00:55:00 | |
| Where they implemented it, it was challenged. As he mentioned, it went to the Supreme Court. | 00:55:01 | |
| Supreme Court decided. | 00:55:06 | |
| The question before the Supreme Court was. | 00:55:08 | |
| Is there transportation utility fee, a fee or a tax and there's a different process for? | 00:55:11 | |
| Implementing. | 00:55:15 | |
| Each thing and for transportation taxes there are specific sections and state code that limit. | 00:55:16 | |
| Who can and under what circumstance they can implement those taxes? | 00:55:22 | |
| The Supreme Court. | 00:55:26 | |
| Said it's a fee, not a tax. | 00:55:28 | |
| And then remanded it back down to the District Court for. | 00:55:30 | |
| Pleasant Grove City to implement. | 00:55:34 | |
| The fee. | 00:55:36 | |
| And basically wait and see is that going to be challenged? | 00:55:37 | |
| My understanding, and you'll probably have better information than I do on this, is that Pleasant Grove has now done that. | 00:55:41 | |
| And. | 00:55:47 | |
| That. | 00:55:48 | |
| They don't believe it has been challenged, and my understanding with the legislature is they're basically in the holding pattern | 00:55:49 | |
| to see how that shakes out. | 00:55:52 | |
| And then? | 00:55:56 | |
| What they'll try to do is implement legislation that will mirror. | 00:55:57 | |
| What Pleasant Grove City and what other cities are doing. | 00:56:02 | |
| To implement this so that that is kind of where we're at right now. | 00:56:05 | |
| Is trying. | 00:56:09 | |
| Replicate what Pleasant Grove City has done. | 00:56:10 | |
| And have that in place and our expectation. I think my understanding of what the Legislature said fits pretty well with how you | 00:56:13 | |
| described it. | 00:56:17 | |
| OK. Thank you. You're welcome. | 00:56:22 | |
| This slide is a. | 00:56:25 | |
| Helpful exhibit. | 00:56:27 | |
| To talk about. | 00:56:29 | |
| That good roads cost less. | 00:56:31 | |
| So the concept is you do receive money. | 00:56:33 | |
| Right now from your general fund and from Class C Rd. funds and the sales tax. | 00:56:35 | |
| But it is not currently sufficient. | 00:56:42 | |
| To invest in your roadway so you can see that this. | 00:56:44 | |
| Line here that starts off with $1,000,000 road and it goes down overtime the value of that road. Meaning if you got to year 10 you | 00:56:48 | |
| would need to inject 300,000. | 00:56:54 | |
| To get it back to where it was before and it has a very steep slope. So good roads cost less. If if we come in and and inject, you | 00:56:59 | |
| know, 50,000 every five years in a good pavement management system, that is significantly cheaper than waiting for it to go all | 00:57:06 | |
| the way down to a complete rebuild in year 20 to 25 and people are happier. | 00:57:12 | |
| They don't have potholes in front of their house in year 10 or forward. | 00:57:20 | |
| So that's just a good context about YFE is being considered by you and many other cities in the state right now. | 00:57:25 | |
| Here's an overview of the methodology that we utilized. | 00:57:32 | |
| So we first looked at all of your operating costs. | 00:57:36 | |
| That go into the street department. | 00:57:38 | |
| And extrapolate those forward for you know 1015 year period, we looked at all the capital projects so. | 00:57:40 | |
| Josh with Hell's Engineering recently completed a master plan, transportation master plan that looks at all of your roadways, the | 00:57:47 | |
| capacity, what's going to be needed over the next 10 or 15 years, including what's needed for. | 00:57:53 | |
| Annual pavement management. | 00:58:00 | |
| That's just generally needed across the city. | 00:58:02 | |
| We then looked at the need for debt, if that would be needed to fund some of these. | 00:58:05 | |
| These larger projects that have. | 00:58:09 | |
| You know, 20 year lifespan and covering those rather than saving money. | 00:58:12 | |
| To fund those up front. | 00:58:17 | |
| Then applied financial metrics like how much money should you have in the rainy day fund in case there's a major emergency that | 00:58:20 | |
| occurs? And also if you know when should debt be considered and how should that be looked at? | 00:58:26 | |
| Then ultimately that landed with a revenue requirement. What is the annual revenue needed every year to ensure that you can | 00:58:32 | |
| implement this system? | 00:58:36 | |
| And then the final piece is then how do you go about collecting that revenue from users of your system in a fair and equitable | 00:58:40 | |
| way? | 00:58:44 | |
| So let's talk about a few of those things. We have developed a financial forecast. | 00:58:48 | |
| And I could put the spreadsheet up there, I can provide it to you. | 00:58:54 | |
| It has a tendency to put people to sleep, so this picture hopefully is more intuitive than a spreadsheet. | 00:58:57 | |
| So this is a look at the expenditures. | 00:59:04 | |
| Both historically for the last two years and what we project. | 00:59:06 | |
| For the next. | 00:59:09 | |
| 10 years. | 00:59:10 | |
| As you can see the green on the top. | 00:59:11 | |
| Is your capital projects. | 00:59:14 | |
| It's a meaningful amount of money. | 00:59:16 | |
| That includes both new. | 00:59:18 | |
| Development and. | 00:59:19 | |
| Primarily. | 00:59:21 | |
| Pavement Management. | 00:59:21 | |
| The orange is another large piece on the bottom that is personnel. | 00:59:23 | |
| And then the blue. | 00:59:28 | |
| Piece in the middle. | 00:59:31 | |
| Would be. | 00:59:32 | |
| Using debt to pay for. | 00:59:33 | |
| Large projects here. | 00:59:36 | |
| That assumption is that. | 00:59:38 | |
| That debt would be issued. | 00:59:41 | |
| Secured by this transportation utility fee, it would not be a general obligation bond. | 00:59:43 | |
| Excise tax or sales tax bond? It would be solely. | 00:59:48 | |
| Dependent upon the utility fee itself. | 00:59:52 | |
| So that would be. | 00:59:55 | |
| Something that would be a proactive way to help. | 00:59:57 | |
| Pay for those costs over the life of those assets by those who are being charged the fee upfront. | 00:59:59 | |
| Here's another look at the capital projects. It's approximately $41 million. | 01:00:07 | |
| Over the next 10 years. | 01:00:13 | |
| The projects are listed there. | 01:00:16 | |
| On the right, so the biggest is 28 million. | 01:00:18 | |
| Almost 29 million of. | 01:00:21 | |
| Of costs for pavement preservation. | 01:00:23 | |
| And that is, you know, the annual amount that you're implementing. | 01:00:26 | |
| We've also included the streetlights in this, so it's both a transportation and a streetlight fee. | 01:00:30 | |
| So it would be updating your annual streetlight maintenance and then these. | 01:00:36 | |
| Other projects. | 01:00:40 | |
| You know 7-8 projects there are. | 01:00:42 | |
| New capital projects that will be needed to be funded. | 01:00:45 | |
| If you have any questions about any of those capital projects, I am not the person to ask, but Josh is here and it seems here as | 01:00:48 | |
| well to answer any of those questions that you might have. | 01:00:52 | |
| So I'll pause in case you have questions about any of those. | 01:00:57 | |
| Capital projects. | 01:01:00 | |
| Looking at your revenue structure. | 01:01:06 | |
| The dark green at the bottom. | 01:01:08 | |
| Is classy Rd. funds? | 01:01:11 | |
| As you know, those come from. | 01:01:13 | |
| The state gas tax. | 01:01:14 | |
| That you pay at the pump. | 01:01:17 | |
| The lighter green is the transportation tax, which is a portion of the sales tax. | 01:01:19 | |
| We are considering implementing an impact fee. | 01:01:24 | |
| And with. | 01:01:27 | |
| Meaningful growth you have in the community that does have a large impact. | 01:01:28 | |
| But as I mean it's obvious here the. | 01:01:33 | |
| The rate revenue from. | 01:01:35 | |
| This fee would be. | 01:01:37 | |
| By and large, the largest portion of. | 01:01:38 | |
| Of the revenue stream. | 01:01:41 | |
| That we would be considering. | 01:01:43 | |
| And just a note here that. | 01:01:46 | |
| That we still have obligations. | 01:01:47 | |
| To use those funds both. | 01:01:49 | |
| The fee funds and the classy Rd. funds and others. | 01:01:52 | |
| There's specific restrictions on how those funds would be used, so we're assuming that all those would be used. | 01:01:55 | |
| Appropriately. | 01:02:00 | |
| A couple of financial metrics to look at cash reserves. | 01:02:04 | |
| It's important to. | 01:02:07 | |
| Have a healthy fund balance. This will be an enterprise fund, meaning it needs to be self supporting. | 01:02:09 | |
| So having a healthy cash balance is important. | 01:02:14 | |
| The industry standard for cash balance is one year's worth of operating expenditures. | 01:02:18 | |
| That's the same for your water and sewer utilities. That's probably how your rates were developed there. | 01:02:23 | |
| So this shows that throughout that period you generally are above or below. | 01:02:28 | |
| You know, here in 2033 you have a large capital project. As we get to that point, we may choose to. | 01:02:32 | |
| To issue data if it helps with this issue but. | 01:02:38 | |
| That far out? | 01:02:41 | |
| It's not a huge problem to have a little bit below. | 01:02:42 | |
| So it shows that this projection that we're meeting a healthy cash reserve overtime. | 01:02:46 | |
| This slide. | 01:02:52 | |
| Coverage. | 01:02:53 | |
| What it means Debt service coverage. | 01:02:54 | |
| And what that means is when you issue debt. | 01:02:57 | |
| Lenders want to know or investors want to know that you have. | 01:03:00 | |
| Healthy fund that covers operations first. | 01:03:03 | |
| So this would be called a debt service coverage ratio, a net debt service pledge, meaning after you fund all of your operation and | 01:03:08 | |
| maintenance and then you pay debt. | 01:03:13 | |
| This blue line would mean you'd have a dollar and a quarter worth of. | 01:03:18 | |
| Of revenue leftover to pay for every dollar worth of debt. | 01:03:22 | |
| And you can see the orange line, you have a very healthy. | 01:03:26 | |
| Coverage ratio, meaning you have the ability, if you chose to do so, to issue more debt in the future. | 01:03:31 | |
| To help pay for these projects moving forward. | 01:03:37 | |
| It's a very healthy. | 01:03:39 | |
| Metric. | 01:03:40 | |
| There's a lot going on here on this slide, but this represents. | 01:03:42 | |
| Though both the growth rate. | 01:03:45 | |
| In your community. | 01:03:47 | |
| Measured on the right. | 01:03:48 | |
| And. | 01:03:50 | |
| The. | 01:03:51 | |
| Likely or the. | 01:03:52 | |
| The projected annual increase in rates measured on the right as well in these two orange lines. | 01:03:54 | |
| So this orange line shows. | 01:04:00 | |
| The annual rate increase would be around 3%. | 01:04:02 | |
| And this. | 01:04:06 | |
| Lighter orange shows that you're growing at about 9%, which isn't a surprise to you have a very. | 01:04:08 | |
| Quick growing community. | 01:04:14 | |
| The line that you care most about is what is the rate? | 01:04:16 | |
| Per month. | 01:04:19 | |
| Per equivalent residential unit. So for a resident or for. | 01:04:20 | |
| An equivalent residential unit. | 01:04:24 | |
| We're starting off at $5. | 01:04:26 | |
| Moving up to around 7:00 and then by year 3. | 01:04:29 | |
| $9 and then growing at 3% thereafter. | 01:04:33 | |
| So looking at that more granularly so you can see it, it's this $5 number right here. | 01:04:37 | |
| Would be the cost. | 01:04:42 | |
| Dwelling Unit. | 01:04:44 | |
| So let's just talk a little bit here on this rate structure. | 01:04:47 | |
| We it's titled adjusted for axle. | 01:04:51 | |
| So the equitable way to determine how you should allocate this fee is by. | 01:04:55 | |
| Both. How many trips? | 01:05:00 | |
| Each type of. | 01:05:02 | |
| Zone generates. | 01:05:04 | |
| So a residential unit is the base. | 01:05:07 | |
| They have about what is it 7 or 8? | 01:05:09 | |
| Trips. | 01:05:11 | |
| 7 or 8 trips per day. | 01:05:12 | |
| So that's like the. | 01:05:14 | |
| You know, just one trip. | 01:05:16 | |
| That how does that equate to if you have an office or retail or commercial or industrial? | 01:05:17 | |
| They have an equivalent adjustment. | 01:05:22 | |
| But we're also adjusting for the fact that. | 01:05:25 | |
| One small car is not the same as a semi truck. | 01:05:28 | |
| So they have very different impacts on your Rd. system. | 01:05:32 | |
| So the structure that we're suggesting to you is weighted by both trips and by axle weight. | 01:05:35 | |
| So if we look at this column here. | 01:05:41 | |
| The. | 01:05:44 | |
| By type. | 01:05:45 | |
| What we're suggesting to you is an office. | 01:05:47 | |
| 1000 square feet of office. | 01:05:50 | |
| Has four times the impact. | 01:05:52 | |
| That one residential unit has. | 01:05:55 | |
| And retail and commercial has seven. | 01:05:57 | |
| Almost 8 times. | 01:05:59 | |
| The impact an industrial has almost. | 01:06:00 | |
| 9 1/2 times the impact of one residential unit. Those are all per 1000 square feet. | 01:06:03 | |
| So we're suggesting that you should. | 01:06:09 | |
| Weight more heavily the fee. | 01:06:12 | |
| Because their impact is more. | 01:06:14 | |
| Than a standard residential unit. | 01:06:18 | |
| So the outcome here is if we have $5 is the residential rate. | 01:06:21 | |
| Per unit. | 01:06:26 | |
| The office would be $36. | 01:06:27 | |
| Per 1000 square feet. | 01:06:30 | |
| Retail commercial 70 and $0.50 per thousand. | 01:06:32 | |
| And industrial $91.75 per thousand. | 01:06:36 | |
| Is this a month? | 01:06:39 | |
| Per month. | 01:06:41 | |
| To the to the owner of the home. | 01:06:45 | |
| So yeah, to the owner of the home, it would be $5. | 01:06:47 | |
| Per month put on their utility fee. | 01:06:51 | |
| Put on their utility be. | 01:06:53 | |
| Garbage. | 01:06:54 | |
| Water. Sewer. | 01:06:55 | |
| Transportation utility fee. | 01:06:56 | |
| That's right. | 01:06:58 | |
| And so then a. | 01:07:04 | |
| An office that's 2000 square feet of office would have. | 01:07:07 | |
| $72 and. | 01:07:10 | |
| $0.04. | 01:07:11 | |
| Yes, per month, every month. That's correct. | 01:07:12 | |
| And for illustration purposes, these are. This is the amount of. | 01:07:18 | |
| Square footage that you have. | 01:07:21 | |
| In each of those types. | 01:07:23 | |
| In your community right now. | 01:07:26 | |
| So you have. | 01:07:27 | |
| 278. | 01:07:29 | |
| 1000 square feet of office. | 01:07:31 | |
| That's commercial and that's industrial. | 01:07:33 | |
| We're also suggesting a specific. | 01:07:39 | |
| Unique fee. | 01:07:41 | |
| For just those businesses along 1750 N. | 01:07:42 | |
| That road is in need of reconstruction. | 01:07:46 | |
| So for a five year period there would be an additional. | 01:07:49 | |
| $7.55. | 01:07:53 | |
| Added to. | 01:07:56 | |
| Their rate in that area specifically. | 01:07:57 | |
| So that they could recoup that over a five year period. | 01:08:02 | |
| Again, just a sample size. | 01:08:07 | |
| Like you're you're talking about. | 01:08:09 | |
| Councilman Clawson here's If it was 5000 square feet, this would what the fee would be per month. | 01:08:11 | |
| For each of those users. | 01:08:16 | |
| In terms of comparables these it's kind of small, but you can see there. | 01:08:23 | |
| There are other communities that provide. | 01:08:26 | |
| Charge this fee the most. | 01:08:29 | |
| Comparable right now would be the city of South Salt Lake that's just recently adopted. | 01:08:31 | |
| Their fee? | 01:08:35 | |
| Using Axel 8. | 01:08:37 | |
| Same structure. | 01:08:38 | |
| They have chosen not to implement the residential fee. They will cover that through a general fund subsidy. | 01:08:40 | |
| Because of the. | 01:08:45 | |
| Council council's choice to do that. | 01:08:47 | |
| Pleasant Grove you can see here. | 01:08:50 | |
| This is a similar fee structure. You know they based on trips, not on axle load. | 01:08:52 | |
| Same with provoke. | 01:08:57 | |
| Kaysville and South Ogden. South Ogden has. | 01:08:59 | |
| An enormous list. I think they have like. | 01:09:02 | |
| 15 or 20 different categories. | 01:09:06 | |
| So you can. | 01:09:08 | |
| It's much more detailed. | 01:09:09 | |
| So you're generally in line with how those others work. There are other communities on this slide that are less detailed. They | 01:09:11 | |
| just charge a fee, a flat fee. | 01:09:15 | |
| So. | 01:09:19 | |
| Highland, Mapleton. Pleasant. | 01:09:20 | |
| View South Weber. | 01:09:21 | |
| Fruit Heights, Farmington. They're just a very. | 01:09:24 | |
| Simple flat fee. These have been in place for a while. | 01:09:26 | |
| So that's what I have to share today. I'm happy to answer any questions that you might have. | 01:09:28 | |
| Great counsel, do you have any questions right now? If not, you can. | 01:09:35 | |
| Schedule a meeting or. | 01:09:39 | |
| Have a sit down. | 01:09:40 | |
| Send an e-mail. | 01:09:42 | |
| When is this being considered to be brought back to vote on? | 01:09:45 | |
| I believe it's the 10th, is that right? | 01:09:48 | |
| Yeah, of December 10th. | 01:09:50 | |
| Yeah. | 01:09:51 | |
| Any other questions? | 01:09:55 | |
| Thank you. I do I. | 01:09:59 | |
| I think it would be interesting to see some different models where the residential side is less. | 01:10:02 | |
| And what that what kind of impact that might have on? | 01:10:07 | |
| Businesses if. | 01:10:11 | |
| So less than $5 changed some of those numbers. | 01:10:13 | |
| OK. So I want to say the number that's been on our fee schedule, you know I'm looking over across there to. | 01:10:16 | |
| Make sure I get right. It's 3:50. | 01:10:23 | |
| Is what was on the. | 01:10:25 | |
| The the the the old one. | 01:10:26 | |
| Was 350, it was 350 and we just haven't been collecting it five years ago. And so this this number is kind of the inflation | 01:10:28 | |
| adjusted version of that. | 01:10:32 | |
| Sorry, but I would be curious what it would look like if. | 01:10:38 | |
| For example, we just left it at the 3:50 in. | 01:10:42 | |
| Then change some of those ratios. | 01:10:45 | |
| If we're allowed to do that. | 01:10:48 | |
| I can't. I don't understand why we wouldn't be allowed to do it, but we can do anything. | 01:10:51 | |
| As long as it's fair, every long as everyone is treated fairly. | 01:10:55 | |
| Within their category. | 01:10:57 | |
| Yeah, I'm very concerned about this. | 01:11:03 | |
| Because a year ago I talked about the failure of the RDA to bring in businesses to be able to. | 01:11:05 | |
| Bring a tax structure. | 01:11:11 | |
| Strong enough? | 01:11:14 | |
| To be able to fund the city. | 01:11:15 | |
| And this actually proves this, that we don't have a tax base here. | 01:11:17 | |
| And this is finding another way to be able to. | 01:11:22 | |
| To provide for our roads. | 01:11:24 | |
| And I think having an open conversation, not attacking anyone. | 01:11:26 | |
| But just being an open, honest. | 01:11:30 | |
| Conversation of. | 01:11:32 | |
| We are 15. | 01:11:33 | |
| Or 2006. | 01:11:35 | |
| 19 years into the RDA. | 01:11:38 | |
| And big businesses haven't come. | 01:11:40 | |
| In and that's scary. | 01:11:42 | |
| Because. | 01:11:45 | |
| You have to turn to structures and I remember when Pleasant Grove. | 01:11:47 | |
| Put this in and it was extremely controversial. | 01:11:52 | |
| And anyone hearing this today? | 01:11:55 | |
| Going January or December 10th is going to go. | 01:11:57 | |
| Wow, that's a That's a huge. | 01:12:00 | |
| You know, tax, it's a fee. | 01:12:02 | |
| So it's not a tax. | 01:12:05 | |
| And I remember the fight. | 01:12:07 | |
| Fighting over. | 01:12:08 | |
| Taxes and fees and. | 01:12:09 | |
| And all of that. But thanks for the presentation. It's helpful. | 01:12:11 | |
| You have to fund. | 01:12:16 | |
| A government. | 01:12:18 | |
| Right, but it just tells us how. | 01:12:19 | |
| Essential. | 01:12:21 | |
| The success and failure of our RDA is. | 01:12:23 | |
| Well, I don't know. | 01:12:29 | |
| Where there's so many cities that charge this, I don't know that you can say that specifically for the RDA. The RDA is in. | 01:12:30 | |
| Progress. | 01:12:36 | |
| And will be happening for the next. | 01:12:38 | |
| 25 to 50 years. | 01:12:40 | |
| So 25 years from now, maybe. | 01:12:42 | |
| But it's it's going to take time. | 01:12:44 | |
| I don't have, I don't have a problem with the residential. I mean I spent an extra $4.00 for an extra garbage can, so. | 01:12:47 | |
| So that one doesn't. | 01:12:53 | |
| Bother me but the industrial seems so high. | 01:12:55 | |
| Right. So it's like. | 01:12:58 | |
| As a business owner. | 01:13:00 | |
| You know, I'm thinking of the little businesses in the yard. | 01:13:02 | |
| You know that it? | 01:13:05 | |
| Feels like. | 01:13:06 | |
| A big expense. | 01:13:07 | |
| You know, but I could be wrong. | 01:13:09 | |
| Well, So what I wonder is if. | 01:13:11 | |
| Is if you could. | 01:13:13 | |
| Somehow. | 01:13:15 | |
| If if the businesses could show that they're creating a certain amount of. | 01:13:16 | |
| Tax benefit. | 01:13:20 | |
| To the city, if that. | 01:13:22 | |
| If they could get a credit. | 01:13:23 | |
| I don't know just well, I mean, I look at because I'm a business owner like we have a FedEx warehouse and vineyard. | 01:13:26 | |
| And the wear and tear they put on the roads. | 01:13:32 | |
| Versus. | 01:13:35 | |
| What I put on the roads. So I mean, I see. | 01:13:37 | |
| But not every. | 01:13:39 | |
| Business and. | 01:13:40 | |
| And Vineyard. | 01:13:42 | |
| Not every industrial business has the same type of traffic as the FedEx warehouse, but. | 01:13:44 | |
| I definitely see the value in this structure. | 01:13:48 | |
| I think that tying it to the RDA. | 01:13:52 | |
| Is kind of just like a. | 01:13:56 | |
| We can analyze it and criticize it and dig into it all day long, but I think what you have to decide is. | 01:13:58 | |
| How are you going to move in the future to pay for your roads? | 01:14:05 | |
| So that's a, that's a good question. I wonder is there anything? | 01:14:09 | |
| Because when we talk about businesses coming in. | 01:14:14 | |
| And the rate of businesses and the RDA has been providing the backbone infrastructure and roads. | 01:14:16 | |
| And we're really lucky. | 01:14:22 | |
| To have that. | 01:14:23 | |
| We've increased our businesses by like 50% over the last few years. | 01:14:25 | |
| But to. | 01:14:30 | |
| Point we do have to offset that, so if there was. | 01:14:31 | |
| Do in your comparables. | 01:14:36 | |
| Do are we looking at the economic? | 01:14:39 | |
| Balance between. | 01:14:41 | |
| The different cities and how much they're paying and how big of a. | 01:14:43 | |
| Economic base they have. | 01:14:47 | |
| Have have we been able to do that? I don't even know if that's something that you examine when looking at Rd. base and stuff. But | 01:14:49 | |
| maybe together as a team we can take your study and then we can do those comparables ourselves and then as your take away, I | 01:14:54 | |
| guess. | 01:14:58 | |
| For what the Council is asking for. | 01:15:03 | |
| Its models going back to our 350. | 01:15:05 | |
| Is that something that we can look into and say, what does that look like? I mean, I think I saw Farmington was 350. Maybe we can | 01:15:08 | |
| just compare those two. | 01:15:12 | |
| So here's the first one where they have a detailed schedule. | 01:15:18 | |
| So just look at that and then let me know when you want to look at the other. | 01:15:21 | |
| Yeah, and then council, maybe what we could do is. | 01:15:27 | |
| Take the time to sit down and meet with these guys and you can look at the different comparables. You can look at the ones that | 01:15:30 | |
| are subsidizing. | 01:15:34 | |
| You can look at the ones that have a lower model, like I think it was Farmington, and then maybe between our team and your team we | 01:15:38 | |
| can look at. | 01:15:42 | |
| What the business? | 01:15:46 | |
| You know what their business base is there and what they're providing and then how they're offsetting it with. | 01:15:48 | |
| Transportation fees. I do like how Pleasant Grove has a Tier 1 and Tier 2 commercial that would be interesting to. | 01:15:53 | |
| See how that could be reflected in ours. | 01:16:00 | |
| 'Cause I mean. | 01:16:03 | |
| No, nothing against FedEx, but I definitely feel like they should be paying more than. | 01:16:06 | |
| A different warehouse if I could ask them and that that would be something good to look at because we have industrial your your | 01:16:11 | |
| trucks are a lot heavier you're, you know like there's. | 01:16:15 | |
| Just the weight of the vehicles is going to have a much bigger impact, so there might be some. | 01:16:20 | |
| Usefulness in looking at. | 01:16:25 | |
| OK, so I feel like everybody has their tasks. | 01:16:28 | |
| Council, you're going to go sit down and look at these comparables that already came through. We're going to look at the business | 01:16:31 | |
| base of all these comparables and then you guys are going to model the Farmington 350 kind of lower thing. | 01:16:35 | |
| OK awesome, this is so helpful. | 01:16:41 | |
| Any something to add, Eric? Just one quick clarification based on. | 01:16:43 | |
| Question and. | 01:16:47 | |
| It kind of teetered on two different categories. | 01:16:48 | |
| Home based businesses will be treated as residential. | 01:16:51 | |
| There won't be an added fee because you have a. | 01:16:54 | |
| Whatever the home based business is. So it'll be $5 for those. | 01:16:57 | |
| It's only when it goes to actual commercial that you'll see that adjustment to. | 01:17:01 | |
| Commercial categories. | 01:17:06 | |
| OK, awesome. | 01:17:09 | |
| Thank you, Council. | 01:17:11 | |
| All right, Jamie, this brings us to 3.4. This is the Vineyard Municipal Code amendment for Title 2. | 01:17:14 | |
| Administration and Jamie's going to present. | 01:17:21 | |
| Some of these changes. | 01:17:25 | |
| Thank you, Mayor. | 01:18:06 | |
| I have just a few slides to introduce this. | 01:18:08 | |
| As you all know. | 01:18:11 | |
| Last November. | 01:18:14 | |
| Citizens elected or voted to. | 01:18:15 | |
| Move from A5 to A6 member council form of government. | 01:18:18 | |
| The election this fall reflected that, and so elected to the Council were. | 01:18:22 | |
| Enough council members to form. | 01:18:26 | |
| 6 member. | 01:18:28 | |
| Council form of government. | 01:18:29 | |
| What that means is 5 council members and a non voting mayor. | 01:18:31 | |
| On most issues. | 01:18:35 | |
| With this change. | 01:18:37 | |
| The city has to update its municipal code to reflect that. | 01:18:38 | |
| Change. There are a few simple changes that will. | 01:18:42 | |
| Need to be made. | 01:18:46 | |
| Again. | 01:18:47 | |
| The the ordinance that's been. | 01:18:48 | |
| Presented. What we've attempted to do is clarify how that authority administratively and executively and among the Council. | 01:18:50 | |
| Will function under the new form of. | 01:18:59 | |
| Government. | 01:19:01 | |
| The Council, of course, has statutory authority to establish policy and legislation in the city. | 01:19:01 | |
| The mayor provides leadership and representation. | 01:19:08 | |
| For the city and the city manager. | 01:19:13 | |
| Handles the administration side, the daily operations side. | 01:19:16 | |
| Of city government. | 01:19:20 | |
| The state code references 103B306 that relates to 6 member council form of government and again to restate a little bit. | 01:19:22 | |
| The council's legislative body returns all those powers. The mayor's the chief executive. | 01:19:30 | |
| And then perform certain statutory functions and then the council by ordinance. | 01:19:36 | |
| Is allowed to delegate executive or administrative duties to a city manager. | 01:19:41 | |
| And they, you know. | 01:19:45 | |
| Maintain flexibility overtime to remove or reinstate those duties as needed. | 01:19:46 | |
| The. | 01:19:51 | |
| These are the mayor's statutory powers, and they're reflected in. | 01:19:52 | |
| The proposed ordinance. | 01:19:56 | |
| The policy goals of the proposed ordinance are to protect the mayor's leadership and ceremonial roles. | 01:19:59 | |
| Maintain the current delegation of day-to-day operations to a professional city manager so the code doesn't. | 01:20:05 | |
| Upset anything that's occurring right now, but carries out forward to the new form of government. | 01:20:12 | |
| Ensures that the city manager is accountable to the council as a body, not to individual members of the council. | 01:20:18 | |
| And then maintains the rules applicable to transparency efficiency. | 01:20:24 | |
| And good governance. | 01:20:28 | |
| There are. | 01:20:30 | |
| Some proposed code updates that include four different sections in Title 2, Chapter 4. | 01:20:31 | |
| They relate to the mayor's duty. | 01:20:38 | |
| The delegation of executive and administrative duties among the. | 01:20:40 | |
| City manager and the mayor. | 01:20:44 | |
| The definition of the city manager and the city manager's role. | 01:20:47 | |
| And how the city manager functions visa via the mayor and the City Council. | 01:20:52 | |
| And then sections on administrative route. | 01:20:56 | |
| Relations among in between. | 01:20:59 | |
| The Council. | 01:21:02 | |
| And the mayor. And the city manager. | 01:21:03 | |
| There also is a section that we needed to make a few adjustments to to make sure the two code sections interrelate and these are | 01:21:05 | |
| the. | 01:21:08 | |
| Provisions in 2.08 point 010. | 01:21:12 | |
| That established the office of the city manager. How the city manager is appointed. | 01:21:16 | |
| What the bonding, salary, term removal process, those kinds of things are? | 01:21:20 | |
| And then making sure that if there are any conflicts between the two sections which which section controls. | 01:21:25 | |
| I won't belabor the points, this is just a summary of. | 01:21:33 | |
| What's in the document? But again, the goal was to clarify rather than change. | 01:21:36 | |
| The existing practice make sure the code is aligned with. | 01:21:41 | |
| The state. | 01:21:44 | |
| Code sections that relate to A6 member framework. | 01:21:46 | |
| Strengthen the partnership between elected leadership and professional administration and allow Vineyard to continue. | 01:21:50 | |
| Operating as it has. | 01:21:56 | |
| So. | 01:21:58 | |
| In terms of next steps, this is being presented tonight for discussion and feedback from the Council. | 01:21:59 | |
| In a work session at the next meeting, it will be brought forward with the formal ordinance for adoption. | 01:22:04 | |
| We need to make sure it's adopted before the end of the year so that when the new. | 01:22:11 | |
| Council is seated in. The new mayor is sworn in. | 01:22:15 | |
| That this will be in place. | 01:22:18 | |
| For them to function under that structure. | 01:22:20 | |
| All right. Any questions or comments from the City Council? | 01:22:23 | |
| With the vote, the new council can adjust. | 01:22:32 | |
| Things as necessary, right to their liking. | 01:22:35 | |
| There are certain statutory. | 01:22:38 | |
| Duties and obligations that of course they can't change, but they have flexibility to. | 01:22:40 | |
| Change order. Assign the delegation of. | 01:22:45 | |
| What things the mayor does, what things the city manager does. | 01:22:48 | |
| Yeah, on the administrative. | 01:22:51 | |
| Side of that and we have the full thing to now yeah you have the. | 01:22:54 | |
| Text. It's in the packet. | 01:22:57 | |
| And you're welcome to look at that if you have things that you would like. | 01:22:59 | |
| To discuss or talk through or change between now and the next meeting. | 01:23:03 | |
| Ping me and we can. | 01:23:07 | |
| And work on that. | 01:23:09 | |
| OK. Any other questions or comments? | 01:23:11 | |
| Thank you so much. I would just say inviting all citizens and to do a social media post about. | 01:23:14 | |
| The ordinances and changes and post the. | 01:23:20 | |
| The uh. | 01:23:23 | |
| The detailed stuff online so that they can give us feedback before the next meeting because it is a big. | 01:23:24 | |
| It's a happy thing, you know, that we all worked on on the change of government and. | 01:23:29 | |
| Getting feedback before the next meeting would be cool. | 01:23:34 | |
| OK. | 01:23:36 | |
| Eric is on that. | 01:23:39 | |
| 3.5 is going to be continued. | 01:23:41 | |
| Do we need a motion to continue this item or can I? | 01:23:44 | |
| Assign it to a different agenda. | 01:23:47 | |
| Do we need to make a motion? No. You. | 01:23:54 | |
| You don't need to make a motion. You can simply continue it. I think the reason for the continuance is it's notice for a hearing | 01:23:56 | |
| before the Planning Commission and OK. | 01:24:00 | |
| My recommendation is to allow the Planning Commission. | 01:24:04 | |
| For the hearing and for them to. | 01:24:07 | |
| Fulfill their. | 01:24:09 | |
| Obligations. | 01:24:11 | |
| Before it come to the Council for decision. OK, perfect. Thank you so much. | 01:24:12 | |
| Brian, I believe you are up with 3.6 for the mountain bike park location. | 01:24:16 | |
| Discussion. | 01:24:22 | |
| Real quick. | 01:24:24 | |
| Why the why the push of all the way fields just not ready. Oh that is the one we were just talking about with the notice of the | 01:24:25 | |
| hearing that went to the Planning Commission and so we're gonna have it go to the Planning Commission and then it'll go to the | 01:24:30 | |
| council. OK the amendments at the request of the developer, but the. | 01:24:35 | |
| The development agreement contains administrative and legislative. | 01:24:41 | |
| I think aspects, so it requires a public hearing and it's I just think the preferred way to do it is. | 01:24:45 | |
| Allow the hearing to occur at the Planning Commission where it really needs to before. | 01:24:51 | |
| It comes to the council. If it comes to the council first, then they're. | 01:24:55 | |
| Or questions of. | 01:24:58 | |
| You know, did we predetermine what would occur? | 01:24:59 | |
| In that hearing and how the Planning Commission would make its recommendation. | 01:25:01 | |
| Any other questions on that one? | 01:25:07 | |
| OK. Go ahead, Brian. | 01:25:10 | |
| OK, Good evening, Brian Vaudrey, Vineyard Parks and Rec Director. | 01:25:12 | |
| I wanted to show you the central corridor plan, just briefly. | 01:25:16 | |
| To propose potential amendment. | 01:25:21 | |
| Of the location of the dirt pump track. | 01:25:24 | |
| So on the. | 01:25:27 | |
| Senator Corridor plan has. | 01:25:28 | |
| The Dirt Pump track across the street from Gammon Park. | 01:25:30 | |
| I'm proposing that we move it. | 01:25:36 | |
| To the City Hall. | 01:25:39 | |
| Location. | 01:25:40 | |
| For three reasons in particular. | 01:25:43 | |
| The first reason it would be. | 01:25:45 | |
| Super close to parking. | 01:25:48 | |
| Whereas over here. | 01:25:50 | |
| You have to cross a street. | 01:25:51 | |
| That is a busy center St. | 01:25:54 | |
| This would also. | 01:25:58 | |
| Be already Vineyard city owned land. | 01:26:00 | |
| Whereas this current portion is not. | 01:26:04 | |
| And then at the City Hall, it would also allow us to have a stronger application for. | 01:26:07 | |
| Our skate park. | 01:26:14 | |
| Grant. | 01:26:16 | |
| Application that we'll be putting out in January. | 01:26:17 | |
| And so I just wanted to. | 01:26:21 | |
| See if. | 01:26:25 | |
| There's any concerns with us? | 01:26:26 | |
| Pursuing that potential option. | 01:26:29 | |
| Who owns the wind property that was out? | 01:26:31 | |
| Oh yeah, sorry, let me show you the. | 01:26:34 | |
| Picture. | 01:26:36 | |
| I don't know what you call that. OK, so essentially this is what is being. | 01:26:37 | |
| Proposed. | 01:26:41 | |
| The green area is where the. | 01:26:42 | |
| Potential skate park would go. | 01:26:45 | |
| The red area. | 01:26:48 | |
| Would be a potential asphalt or modular pump track. | 01:26:49 | |
| And then the yellow area would. | 01:26:54 | |
| Be the potential area for the. | 01:26:57 | |
| Dirt pump track and potential jump lines and skill area. | 01:26:59 | |
| OK. Because we had this discussion with the central corridor plan, I think it would be really helpful to send out a message to | 01:27:04 | |
| that area that had it before and let them know that due to the additional parking that would be required for that area, this is | 01:27:11 | |
| the new location. So that when this comes back or that change occurs that the. | 01:27:17 | |
| They can make comment. | 01:27:23 | |
| Great. | 01:27:25 | |
| Mayor, if I can just add one thing too, and I don't know if you touched on this or not, but. | 01:27:27 | |
| Yes. So you did mention like Center St. being really busy, but having a bathroom and so like having so the kids don't have to run | 01:27:31 | |
| across a busy Rd. just to use a bathroom and then come back across again. So yeah, that would be really good to add. | 01:27:37 | |
| OK. | 01:27:44 | |
| How in terms of space, how does this? | 01:27:47 | |
| Space in terms of size. | 01:27:50 | |
| Compare with the. | 01:27:52 | |
| The current central quarter plan. | 01:27:54 | |
| This is much bigger. | 01:27:57 | |
| So, um. | 01:27:59 | |
| I guess as far as size wise. | 01:28:02 | |
| I'm sorry, I don't know the number completely off the top of my head. I could measure it in like a minute and get back to you. | 01:28:05 | |
| OK. But it's, but this is, yeah, this is much bigger. | 01:28:11 | |
| OK. So I would also expect that. | 01:28:15 | |
| Bigger means more expensive. | 01:28:17 | |
| We may not have those numbers. | 01:28:21 | |
| Yes. So in terms of a grant application, we're now talking about trying to get something. | 01:28:23 | |
| More. | 01:28:28 | |
| Yes, so. | 01:28:29 | |
| With the central corridor, planet just had this little smaller area. | 01:28:31 | |
| The initial plan was to actually have it go up further. | 01:28:35 | |
| Just pending the neighbors approval. | 01:28:40 | |
| Of being fine with that. So essentially if we did that option, neighbors were fine with it, it'd be about the same size there as | 01:28:42 | |
| it would be. | 01:28:46 | |
| Coming here to the City Hall. | 01:28:49 | |
| OK, Do you mind if we? | 01:28:53 | |
| Go through a few of your items. | 01:28:56 | |
| There's no other questions on this one. | 01:28:58 | |
| For comments. | 01:29:02 | |
| How did flagship? | 01:29:09 | |
| Like we had the pump track park and that used to be. | 01:29:12 | |
| Delineated wetlands. How is it not anymore? | 01:29:15 | |
| On the side where the contract was. | 01:29:18 | |
| I see value. | 01:29:22 | |
| Now partial. | 01:29:24 | |
| Sorry, so no seem to know about the works director. | 01:29:25 | |
| In regards to the what answers hasn't officially been dealing with excuse me on that. So we we went through environmental wetlands | 01:29:28 | |
| study on that and we were able to determine where the what they call the merchant wetlands vegetation is in each of the areas so | 01:29:36 | |
| and the area behind Grove Park. | 01:29:43 | |
| We've identified the areas there. | 01:29:51 | |
| And also what they call the fish hook area, which is right to kind of. | 01:29:53 | |
| South of Gammon Park and Bio City Hall. | 01:29:57 | |
| The two areas there. | 01:30:00 | |
| And then based on the. | 01:30:03 | |
| Within survey that we had conducted. | 01:30:05 | |
| And the report that we have ready for the United States Army Corps of Engineers. | 01:30:08 | |
| That. | 01:30:13 | |
| Our consultants has. | 01:30:14 | |
| Made a. | 01:30:16 | |
| Determination that the. | 01:30:18 | |
| Area. That's the fish hook area. | 01:30:19 | |
| The the vegetation there is. | 01:30:23 | |
| Considered non jurisdictional. | 01:30:25 | |
| Would be considered non jurisdictional. | 01:30:27 | |
| Based on federal laws. | 01:30:29 | |
| Yeah, the current fellow. | 01:30:32 | |
| Federal laws. | 01:30:34 | |
| On that, since it doesn't touch but it doesn't navigate, does not navigate navigable what type of bodies of water and such. | 01:30:36 | |
| And we will. We actually have a. | 01:30:42 | |
| Excuse me application array to submit to the core engineers now that. | 01:30:49 | |
| The federal government should be open pretty soon. | 01:30:52 | |
| We'll be able to move forward on that and then the area on Grove. | 01:30:54 | |
| Park we have. We're going to be scheduling a sit down meeting with the Corps of Engineers to discuss. | 01:30:58 | |
| The some prior impacts. | 01:31:05 | |
| That was done on that area. | 01:31:08 | |
| For the wetlands and have a discussion with them to. | 01:31:11 | |
| Have a discussion with them to determine whether or not that would be considered, though that area would still have to be | 01:31:16 | |
| mitigated or not. | 01:31:19 | |
| And if and then apply for. | 01:31:22 | |
| The parameter release of jurisdictional wetlands from the core engineers. | 01:31:25 | |
| On that 1. So it's a process. | 01:31:30 | |
| It's a process to go through. | 01:31:32 | |
| The area behind Gamut Park. | 01:31:35 | |
| All right, Excuse me. Grove Park. | 01:31:37 | |
| Probably a longer process than the area. That's the fish oak area. | 01:31:39 | |
| That would be a smoother, faster process and which also makes why the relocation makes more sense. | 01:31:43 | |
| Because it's a, you know it's. | 01:31:49 | |
| Something that could be. | 01:31:51 | |
| In the more foreseeable future. | 01:31:53 | |
| Does that answer your question? | 01:31:56 | |
| Yeah. I mean, I was a kid when those were contracts were. | 01:31:58 | |
| Negotiated, but I know the. | 01:32:02 | |
| Lynn Holdaway, Robin Hold, Robbins. | 01:32:04 | |
| You know there's 5 or 6 different families that are there. | 01:32:08 | |
| That turned over those properties. | 01:32:12 | |
| Knowing or thinking that being told by the state and city that those would be. | 01:32:14 | |
| Non developable or usable wetlands. | 01:32:19 | |
| And then? | 01:32:23 | |
| When the developer was done with them, it's my understanding that they were turned over to the city, right? That's how we became | 01:32:24 | |
| the area. The area. Grove Park has not yet been turned over the city. That's part of the process to ensure that no, not talking | 01:32:29 | |
| about Grove Park. I'm talking about. | 01:32:33 | |
| The wetlands. | 01:32:38 | |
| He's talking. I think you guys are saying the same thing, Jake. He's saying it's the. | 01:32:39 | |
| Open space behind Grove Park so it's the area as a point of order for this particular item. I think it would be great if you guys | 01:32:44 | |
| if you guys want to look at the contracts for the Army Corps and talk about the wetlands and the delineation of that space or | 01:32:49 | |
| have. | 01:32:55 | |
| Kind of further conversation about the skate parks. | 01:33:01 | |
| The skate park, I think that. | 01:33:04 | |
| You guys could do that, maybe offline, I will say that delineation. | 01:33:05 | |
| If I'm echoing what you're saying happens with the Army Corps. | 01:33:11 | |
| And they determine whether something is uplands or. | 01:33:14 | |
| Wetlands. | 01:33:17 | |
| Correct. And then if there's mitigation that's done. | 01:33:18 | |
| Wetlands. Never. | 01:33:22 | |
| Are reduced, they are only replaced. | 01:33:23 | |
| And so I think. | 01:33:26 | |
| You could go and look at those agreements. | 01:33:28 | |
| To see so if he wanted to say where did those wetlands go or how if they were mitigated? | 01:33:30 | |
| Where did they go? | 01:33:35 | |
| And how were they replaced? I bet you could do that. And if you want to say how were they delineated, you could look back through | 01:33:36 | |
| the time frame. But for purposes of tonight, we're going to stay on this topic. | 01:33:41 | |
| And we are going to move on to another item, but I just want to make sure it's on the record. | 01:33:47 | |
| That entire foshark South of Gamma Park, up and around we as a city went. | 01:33:52 | |
| And met with the Army Corps of Engineer to ensure that those are no longer wetlands. | 01:33:57 | |
| We have not. I didn't say that we have. We have an application. We have an application, We have an application to submit to the | 01:34:02 | |
| core of engineers and. | 01:34:05 | |
| Again, now that the federal government should be opened, we should be able to proceed with that. | 01:34:10 | |
| Thank you. And that also means that if the Army Corps comes back and says, yeah, this is all wetlands, then those plans. | 01:34:14 | |
| Kind of go away cuz they're white ones. Not necessarily there's areas where we would have they would identify what areas are | 01:34:21 | |
| considered what lands and then of course we have buffer areas so we would ensure that we're still protecting what would be | 01:34:26 | |
| considered what lands and. | 01:34:30 | |
| The current plans that Brian has put together. | 01:34:35 | |
| Does does it does that as well, so. | 01:34:38 | |
| Technically he's. | 01:34:41 | |
| He's playing a safe route. | 01:34:42 | |
| And making sure that regardless what the determination is. | 01:34:45 | |
| That there. | 01:34:48 | |
| He's he's not having to redo his process. | 01:34:49 | |
| Awesome. | 01:34:52 | |
| All right, Brian, can you stay here for a second so we can? | 01:34:53 | |
| Close out a few. | 01:34:57 | |
| Few of your items. | 01:34:58 | |
| You had some appointments that you wanted. | 01:35:00 | |
| To discuss. | 01:35:02 | |
| Yes. So on the Arch Commission. | 01:35:03 | |
| We have Jerem Sidwell, who is our current Arch Commission Chair. | 01:35:06 | |
| And then Elizabeth Shelley, who is a former arch Commission chair. | 01:35:11 | |
| And just proposed to. | 01:35:17 | |
| Have them serve a second term. | 01:35:19 | |
| We just are in need of staggering. | 01:35:22 | |
| Are members of Arch. They are all. | 01:35:25 | |
| Like on the same. | 01:35:29 | |
| Time frame so. | 01:35:30 | |
| Hold that thought, just for one second. | 01:35:32 | |
| Cash and Morgan, would you mind just because we're on the appointments, if you could just introduce Neil Peterson and Doug. | 01:35:35 | |
| Rodnick. | 01:35:41 | |
| To I'm going to do them all at the same time. Yeah, no problem. And unfortunately Anthony's out for for a little bit, so I think | 01:35:43 | |
| he had those appointments. There's Doug Radnich. | 01:35:47 | |
| And. | 01:35:53 | |
| I'm not I'm. | 01:35:54 | |
| I I'm not familiar with it, I didn't manage the process for Miss Neil. | 01:35:55 | |
| What's the name of that? Yeah, Neil Peterson, Neil Peterson and Neil Peterson. He served on a few of our committees and task | 01:36:00 | |
| forces already. But if you if you guys don't have anything about that tonight, I can wait until December 10th for that. | 01:36:06 | |
| Because I'd like them introduced. | 01:36:13 | |
| I thought they were. | 01:36:16 | |
| Yeah, we didn't know. So would you like them to? So if it's next meeting, would you like them at the at the meeting then? | 01:36:17 | |
| You guys can introduce the process of how you guys or talk to them and interview them next time. Awesome. Sorry Anthony is not | 01:36:23 | |
| here but happy he's with his family. | 01:36:29 | |
| All right, can I get a motion from the council to approve a? | 01:36:34 | |
| Jeremiah said well and Liz Shelley to serve a second term. | 01:36:39 | |
| So moved. | 01:36:43 | |
| Thank you, Marty. Can I get a second? | 01:36:44 | |
| 2nd. | 01:36:47 | |
| Second by Brett. All in favor. | 01:36:47 | |
| Aye, aye. | 01:36:49 | |
| Any opposed? | 01:36:50 | |
| All right. | 01:36:52 | |
| Stay here still. | 01:36:54 | |
| 7.37.4 and 7.10 of the consent items, you said there were things on them that needed to be discussed that were not actually added. | 01:36:56 | |
| Before the Council saw them and they were for discussion tonight. | 01:37:05 | |
| I'm going to pull those off of the consent agenda and allow you to discuss them really quick. | 01:37:09 | |
| Great. Thank you. | 01:37:14 | |
| So the first one is regarding this 7.1. | 01:37:15 | |
| Zero option. | 01:37:21 | |
| This is pertaining to the Arch grant. | 01:37:22 | |
| Policy and procedure update. | 01:37:25 | |
| There's just a minor language change that is just shown up here in yellow. | 01:37:28 | |
| So just instead of it saying. | 01:37:34 | |
| In agreement, it specifies. | 01:37:36 | |
| A written agreement and this is 710 guys. | 01:37:38 | |
| 7.10. | 01:37:41 | |
| Correct. OK. | 01:37:42 | |
| OK. That's the only change with that one. | 01:37:45 | |
| This next one is for. | 01:37:51 | |
| The. | 01:37:53 | |
| Did anybody have any questions on 7.10? | 01:37:54 | |
| With that. | 01:37:57 | |
| Change. | 01:37:58 | |
| OK, go to the next one. | 01:38:01 | |
| Oh, go ahead. | 01:38:03 | |
| I guess I would act like. | 01:38:05 | |
| How long term are these changes? Because I know there's an appetite to look into and. | 01:38:07 | |
| Adjust Arch Commission. | 01:38:11 | |
| It's like, what? What are we agreeing to? That would be extremely long term tonight. | 01:38:14 | |
| So as far as the code, well, and you always have the ability to change it. Yeah, OK. | 01:38:18 | |
| So if you if you go through it, this is just a technical change. The short answer on this one is it. | 01:38:24 | |
| But just in order the arch committee. | 01:38:29 | |
| Issues grants and so this relates to. | 01:38:31 | |
| The grants, they can issue, the criteria they would apply, right, How we would memorialize the agreement with the grant recipient. | 01:38:34 | |
| And then certain kinds of things that are eligible and ineligible. | 01:38:41 | |
| Have received those grants. | 01:38:45 | |
| Yeah, that's good. | 01:38:47 | |
| OK, next one. | 01:38:49 | |
| OK with the pavilion and field reservation? | 01:38:50 | |
| Code. I'm sorry, I don't remember what number specifically that was, If that was 77.33. OK, thank you. | 01:38:54 | |
| So in yellow are just a few. | 01:39:02 | |
| Updates that occurred since. | 01:39:05 | |
| The packet was published. | 01:39:08 | |
| So it's really just a lot of. | 01:39:10 | |
| Just language changes I guess. | 01:39:14 | |
| Let's see. So like for example 1 was. | 01:39:18 | |
| Identifying what long term basis means for. | 01:39:22 | |
| Reservation. | 01:39:26 | |
| So we just. | 01:39:28 | |
| Change that to be. | 01:39:29 | |
| Exceeding 24 hours. | 01:39:31 | |
| And then just a few changes regarding the fees and refunds. | 01:39:36 | |
| Umm. | 01:39:41 | |
| You're welcome to read through that. | 01:39:44 | |
| One of which was the commercial use of parks. Just ensuring that if there's. | 01:39:53 | |
| Businesses wanting to use parks. | 01:39:59 | |
| Profit or business purposes? | 01:40:02 | |
| We just ensure that we have. | 01:40:05 | |
| A process in place for that to get insurance documents and a contract written up and. | 01:40:07 | |
| A fee paid. | 01:40:12 | |
| And that's to remove liability from the city. | 01:40:16 | |
| So and then the bottom half is just pertaining to. | 01:40:20 | |
| Than field reservations. So these changes are essentially the same as the top half. | 01:40:24 | |
| That was just pertaining to pavilion reservations. Any questions on 7.3? | 01:40:29 | |
| Any further clarity needed on it? | 01:40:33 | |
| OK, 7.4. | 01:40:36 | |
| OK. The last one is pertaining to concessions. | 01:40:38 | |
| Would it help you, Brian, if I talked through this change or did you want to? | 01:40:46 | |
| Take it on. Yeah, there's an addition to the concessions code that. | 01:40:50 | |
| Was. | 01:40:53 | |
| Requested in part by code enforcement, in part by the concessionaire, and then. | 01:40:55 | |
| In part by Pam, as she's dealt with some election questions this last election cycle. What ended up occurring? We have a | 01:41:00 | |
| concessionaire that pays. | 01:41:05 | |
| To operate space in the park and they sell. | 01:41:09 | |
| Ice cream, sodas, candies, those kinds of things. And we had. | 01:41:13 | |
| Some. | 01:41:17 | |
| People during the campaign season that were. | 01:41:18 | |
| Providing free treats and snacks that were of the same variety sold by the concessionaire. And so the concessionaire complained to | 01:41:21 | |
| the city saying. | 01:41:25 | |
| I'm paying to rent the space. These are the things I'm selling and folks are coming and giving it away for free. | 01:41:29 | |
| We didn't feel it appropriate to enforce or to make a change in the ordinance mid election cycle. | 01:41:35 | |
| It just becomes too difficult where you have. | 01:41:41 | |
| Competing campaigns and you want to be fair to all sides. | 01:41:44 | |
| But we did want to make a change. | 01:41:47 | |
| Going forward, so that that's known by everybody. | 01:41:50 | |
| And the reason for the change again is we have a concessionaire and a revenue stream to the city that comes from it. | 01:41:53 | |
| Pays to operate a business in that space. | 01:42:01 | |
| In that space and we didn't want to allow. | 01:42:03 | |
| Behavior in the parks that would. | 01:42:06 | |
| Compete with. | 01:42:08 | |
| That right to operate the business in that same area. | 01:42:10 | |
| All right. | 01:42:14 | |
| If there are no. | 01:42:15 | |
| Questions on that that? | 01:42:16 | |
| Felt really clear. Why don't we go ahead and approve 7.37.4? | 01:42:18 | |
| 7.5 which goes with it in seven point. | 01:42:23 | |
| Is that is that approving those or moving them because there was additional change? | 01:42:31 | |
| Nope, they're they're already. | 01:42:35 | |
| Moved, so I pulled them. | 01:42:37 | |
| So we just need to approve them. | 01:42:39 | |
| So I just want a clarification. | 01:42:41 | |
| On the concessions, are you saying that? | 01:42:43 | |
| Because I guess I'm not. | 01:42:47 | |
| It's not reading easy for me. Are you saying that people are not allowed to hand out free items if. | 01:42:48 | |
| At all or free items that are sold by those vendors. | 01:42:54 | |
| The way our process works with the concessionaire is they get a menu approved by the city. | 01:42:58 | |
| Of the things that they. | 01:43:03 | |
| Can sell and if somebody were to come to the park and. | 01:43:05 | |
| Either give away or try to sell. | 01:43:09 | |
| The same items that the concessionaire sells. | 01:43:12 | |
| Then we'd be able to. | 01:43:14 | |
| Remove them or stop them from selling that item. | 01:43:16 | |
| At the park. | 01:43:19 | |
| And if we? | 01:43:24 | |
| Don't pass this. | 01:43:24 | |
| If because when you talk about selling other items. | 01:43:26 | |
| I mean, you already have to have a permit to sell at the park. | 01:43:29 | |
| So if we didn't pass this, you could already. | 01:43:33 | |
| If someone's selling it, you could already stop them, correct? Correct. | 01:43:35 | |
| But now you're just basically saying you can't give it away for free. | 01:43:38 | |
| Which feels UN American the same items. | 01:43:45 | |
| You can give away something else. | 01:43:48 | |
| No, I I get it. | 01:43:50 | |
| I think it's because one is paying a fee to do it and then we're allowing somebody else to come in and we're not charging them a | 01:43:51 | |
| fee. | 01:43:54 | |
| Yeah, there there are times that. | 01:43:59 | |
| Cities make decisions that feel a little bit more like a private landlord than they do. | 01:44:01 | |
| A government entity. | 01:44:08 | |
| And one is when you make the choice to. | 01:44:09 | |
| Lease some of your park space to a business and give that business certain. | 01:44:12 | |
| Exclusive rights to operate in that space, and that's really what this is about. | 01:44:18 | |
| You could pivot and not. | 01:44:23 | |
| Rent that space and. | 01:44:25 | |
| Not run it in that way. | 01:44:27 | |
| If you. | 01:44:29 | |
| Didn't want to receive that revenue stream. | 01:44:29 | |
| But I. | 01:44:32 | |
| Think you're going to have a hard time holding on to the business if you allow competing behaviors? | 01:44:32 | |
| That erode their bottom line. | 01:44:37 | |
| Well, and it's not very common that someone's going to be handing out free stuff. | 01:44:39 | |
| Yeah, it seems very few and far between. | 01:44:45 | |
| I'm with Marty on that one. | 01:44:50 | |
| OK. | 01:44:52 | |
| I'm comfortable with that. I'll make a motion. | 01:44:56 | |
| To approve. | 01:44:59 | |
| 7.1. | 01:45:02 | |
| 7.3.37.4 and 7.10. | 01:45:03 | |
| And seven point. | 01:45:08 | |
| 5 and 7.5. | 01:45:08 | |
| You have a first by Marty. Can I get a second? | 01:45:11 | |
| Second Second by Sarah. | 01:45:13 | |
| I'm going to do this by roll call Jake. | 01:45:16 | |
| No, Brett. | 01:45:18 | |
| Aye, aye, Marty. Hi, Sarah. | 01:45:21 | |
| Aye, all right. | 01:45:25 | |
| Thank you. | 01:45:27 | |
| I think the. | 01:45:28 | |
| Took care of all of your items. Yes, yes. OK. | 01:45:29 | |
| Can I get a raise of hand of who would like to speak in public comment? | 01:45:33 | |
| For things that are not currently on the Agenda 123. | 01:45:38 | |
| Anybody else? | 01:45:42 | |
| All right, Tony, can you put? | 01:45:44 | |
| Minutes on the clock for each. Please come state your name at the podium and share with us. | 01:45:46 | |
| Your comments. | 01:45:52 | |
| Yep. | 01:45:59 | |
| Good evening Daria Evans, Vineyard resident. | 01:46:04 | |
| Thank you for this opportunity to speak tonight. | 01:46:08 | |
| I'd like to thank the city for honoring Don Overson. | 01:46:12 | |
| For his dedicated service to Vineyard City and residents. | 01:46:16 | |
| I enjoyed the dedicatory ceremony and seeing the inside of the water tank that was very. | 01:46:20 | |
| Cool. Very interesting. | 01:46:25 | |
| And I'm just wondering when the tank will be operational. | 01:46:27 | |
| I also would like to thank Nassim for his answering my many water questions. I had some more and he answered them this last week. | 01:46:32 | |
| So thank you Nasim. | 01:46:36 | |
| Now I have my questions. | 01:46:42 | |
| I am wondering when the crosswalks will be completed on Main Street. | 01:46:44 | |
| And also Vineyard Loop Rd. | 01:46:48 | |
| I have a question about. | 01:46:52 | |
| Is if there is an ordinance restricting overnight parking on public streets from November to March? | 01:46:54 | |
| And if so, what will happen with those vehicles on the Vineyard Loop Rd. | 01:47:01 | |
| Will the roads still be plowed? | 01:47:06 | |
| And then I have one question. | 01:47:09 | |
| Or concern. | 01:47:11 | |
| Regarding item 6.3 on the work session. | 01:47:13 | |
| Nassim said that the Army Corps of Engineers has not released that designation of wetlands. | 01:47:20 | |
| At this property here. | 01:47:27 | |
| At Planning Commission. | 01:47:29 | |
| It was said that the survey study was done in June. | 01:47:31 | |
| And I believe that the City Council should not move ahead. | 01:47:34 | |
| Until the Corps of Engineers gives the approval. | 01:47:39 | |
| Thank you very much. | 01:47:42 | |
| Tim Blackburn, Vineyard resident. | 01:47:58 | |
| I thought it was going to be discussed tonight 3.5. | 01:48:01 | |
| A little bit, but since it wasn't. | 01:48:03 | |
| I'll take just a moment and. | 01:48:05 | |
| Talk about a concern we have. I'm speaking on behalf of the Vineyard Heritage Foundation. | 01:48:06 | |
| And a couple of years ago, the mayor. | 01:48:12 | |
| And I and half dozen other people went with the developers through that area. We walked through all the. | 01:48:15 | |
| Thorny areas of of that of the property up near. | 01:48:21 | |
| The eastern portion of that plat of ground, right behind the Pioneer home. | 01:48:26 | |
| Where there are still. | 01:48:31 | |
| And there's an old barn and there's silos and all that kind of thing. And I had understood that maybe the developer was going to | 01:48:34 | |
| reverse the order in which they were going to have the city take. | 01:48:39 | |
| Ownership or. | 01:48:44 | |
| In interest in that property. | 01:48:46 | |
| And I just want to remind the city that at that time a couple of years ago. | 01:48:48 | |
| In talking with gold barrel and and other. | 01:48:54 | |
| Interested people that was going to become a Heritage Park. | 01:48:56 | |
| Of some kind. | 01:49:00 | |
| We were going to take the silos and and redo some of them. We were going to. | 01:49:02 | |
| Take the old barn and. | 01:49:07 | |
| Maybe redo it. We were going to turn some of it into a venue where we could use them for weddings and other events in the city. | 01:49:09 | |
| And I'm just hopeful that as that sequence of turning that ownership over to the city or. | 01:49:16 | |
| Or who's going to be developing? | 01:49:22 | |
| That it isn't just bulldozed down. | 01:49:24 | |
| So that it can be developed. | 01:49:27 | |
| That we truly do retain that parcel of land. | 01:49:28 | |
| Into some kind of heritage celebration, because there aren't many of those locations in Vineyard left. | 01:49:32 | |
| And right now we have that prize in our hands, so let's not destroy it. | 01:49:39 | |
| Let's keep it. | 01:49:44 | |
| Let's build upon it and turn it into something that we can all be proud of. | 01:49:45 | |
| Thank you so much. | 01:49:49 | |
| Thanks, Tim. | 01:49:50 | |
| Crystal, did you have something? | 01:49:52 | |
| Do you mind if I speak to that first? | 01:49:54 | |
| No, we're gonna finish for school. I think you are last. | 01:49:56 | |
| Well, I just wanted to say that I. | 01:50:03 | |
| The voter base that elected the new. | 01:50:06 | |
| Mayor and council are not happy about the What is it? | 01:50:08 | |
| I think you're 10 cent items 7.7. | 01:50:13 | |
| And 7.8. | 01:50:17 | |
| And I hope that you will do the ethical thing and not try to jam through. | 01:50:19 | |
| Any of your agendas? | 01:50:23 | |
| OK, Thank you. As we close, I'm going to turn a few things. I'm. | 01:50:26 | |
| We're going to answer a few questions. | 01:50:31 | |
| I'm going to close. | 01:50:33 | |
| Comment. | 01:50:35 | |
| Really quick, I believe the water tank completion is going to is pegged to be. | 01:50:37 | |
| Entirely completed in the next month. | 01:50:42 | |
| Is that right, Nasim? OK. | 01:50:44 | |
| Vineyard Loop Rd. Crosswalks. | 01:50:46 | |
| I can't speak to the timeline on that. | 01:50:49 | |
| Did you want to come to a microphone? | 01:50:52 | |
| Thanks, Chris. | 01:50:55 | |
| OK. Thanks for being here. | 01:50:59 | |
| We're going to excuse Marty. She has streets and stormwater. | 01:51:01 | |
| So you may have noticed now we're doing the the cross, the crossings for the Refuge Islands and some of the other. | 01:51:09 | |
| Pedestrian crossings. | 01:51:15 | |
| As soon as those crossings are done. | 01:51:17 | |
| The the ADA Paths report today. | 01:51:19 | |
| They'll start on the islands here soon. | 01:51:22 | |
| As soon as those islands are done. | 01:51:24 | |
| The strippers will be in here to kind of. | 01:51:26 | |
| Red delineate some of those lanes there around those islands. | 01:51:29 | |
| And they'll also hit the crosswalks before then. | 01:51:34 | |
| If it's a concern. | 01:51:36 | |
| That we want to get them out here sooner. | 01:51:38 | |
| I'm happy to have them come out and do that. | 01:51:40 | |
| We were just hoping to kind of get them all here, for one. | 01:51:44 | |
| Big striping event so. | 01:51:47 | |
| OK. Thank you. | 01:51:49 | |
| We can. | 01:51:52 | |
| Have you guys work on that and find out the best opportunity for us? Marty, did you have something to add? Yeah, I wanted to know. | 01:51:53 | |
| There was an addition on the crosswalks. | 01:52:00 | |
| We added another crosswalk on. | 01:52:02 | |
| Oh, now I'm going to free. Is it Vineyard loop Rd. and. | 01:52:06 | |
| 170 N. | 01:52:11 | |
| It's right by the Willows. | 01:52:12 | |
| Clubhouse, I think it's worth noting. | 01:52:14 | |
| That it was. | 01:52:17 | |
| A really cool. | 01:52:20 | |
| Conversation where flagship. | 01:52:21 | |
| Offered to pay for the whole project. | 01:52:23 | |
| Up to was it 18,000 or 15,000? | 01:52:26 | |
| So I think that that's. | 01:52:30 | |
| Really exciting for those communities that cross. | 01:52:31 | |
| Over to that clubhouse all summer long. Yeah. Thank you so much, Marty, for negotiating that and putting that through. | 01:52:34 | |
| I really appreciate it. Thank you. Thank you. We'll look forward. Maybe you guys can put a timeline together and we can. | 01:52:40 | |
| Kind of post it and. | 01:52:44 | |
| Recap it next. I mean I would anticipate within the next 30 days the project is going to be complete. | 01:52:46 | |
| So it would be within the next 30 days. That's wonderful. Thank you. | 01:52:50 | |
| Daria, we do have a winter ordinance that talks about parking on those roads and what it usually entails is when it snows, they | 01:52:56 | |
| move and then when they come back when it's. | 01:53:01 | |
| Cleared, the cars can return to where they are allowed to park. | 01:53:06 | |
| We could have that sent to you and we could post it. Generally we post it every time winter starts coming, so on social media. So | 01:53:10 | |
| you'll see that come up, but we can get it too earlier. | 01:53:15 | |
| Let's see as far as Tim Tim, that park remains. | 01:53:21 | |
| I don't believe that was going to change on timeline. | 01:53:25 | |
| Those agreements are still there. Go ahead Morgan, you can add to it. I don't know what they're requesting. So so they their, | 01:53:28 | |
| their request now is. | 01:53:32 | |
| To essentially flip the parks. | 01:53:36 | |
| So instead of doing. | 01:53:39 | |
| The lakeside park. | 01:53:41 | |
| 1st. | 01:53:43 | |
| They they want to do that they what we call the gateway or the. | 01:53:45 | |
| The wet. | 01:53:48 | |
| The East park first. | 01:53:50 | |
| Which is the heritage, yeah. And so and. | 01:53:51 | |
| They're they're required to install baseline improvements. And so this is something we talked with the council a few years ago. | 01:53:55 | |
| And so it would, it would be up to the City Council. | 01:53:59 | |
| So those would be costs above what the what what the developers required to put in. They're required to put in baseline | 01:54:03 | |
| improvements, which would be essentially grasp playground equipment. | 01:54:08 | |
| Restrooms. | 01:54:15 | |
| So they're supposed to put in a minimum kind of those minimum requirements and then if the city wants anything in addition. | 01:54:17 | |
| We would do that and so. | 01:54:22 | |
| That's one of those things that the city would like to budget to get, like to see if. | 01:54:24 | |
| From a engineering structural assessment standpoint. | 01:54:29 | |
| If they'll silos are good if you want to keep someone I mean that that'd be worthy of like a design charrette to. | 01:54:33 | |
| To to to kick that back up, because if. | 01:54:40 | |
| If the approval occurs as. | 01:54:43 | |
| The applicant is requesting it would push that park at the front more of the front end and that does cut down some of the timeline | 01:54:46 | |
| that we'd be able to to look at because. | 01:54:51 | |
| So because right now it's towards the end and so it provides us a lot of time. | 01:54:56 | |
| We move it up. | 01:55:00 | |
| Then we need to make some decisions quickly. It's going to be fairly expensive to. So we just got anticipate that so it looks | 01:55:01 | |
| like. | 01:55:04 | |
| The timeline switches it closer. | 01:55:08 | |
| And then? | 01:55:11 | |
| Obviously comes into a budget conversation. | 01:55:12 | |
| Yeah. So that will come forward in the future. | 01:55:14 | |
| And then? | 01:55:17 | |
| Crystal, I'm glad that you mentioned 7.8. | 01:55:18 | |
| 7:00 I'm going to confirm those numbers as I say them out loud. | 01:55:21 | |
| Yep, 7.7 and 7.8. | 01:55:26 | |
| We were able to have some conversations with our. | 01:55:28 | |
| Newly elected officials. | 01:55:32 | |
| And they talked about. | 01:55:34 | |
| Potentially bringing forward some ideas to see if those work. | 01:55:35 | |
| I recommended to the council that we allow them to bring those forward and talk in the next couple of weeks and show what we've | 01:55:39 | |
| got and so my recommendation is that we move. | 01:55:44 | |
| Those to our December 10th meeting to see. | 01:55:48 | |
| How we can come together on that? But thank you for your comment. | 01:55:51 | |
| Yep, there's there's always different opportunities. | 01:55:55 | |
| So hopefully we can come together as a, as a. | 01:55:59 | |
| As group. | 01:56:01 | |
| All right, with that in mind. | 01:56:02 | |
| Let's Oh, yeah, I'm sorry, Jake, you had something to add to the. | 01:56:05 | |
| The park. I'm glad that Tim came tonight. A lot of people don't know. | 01:56:08 | |
| The original name of Sleepy Ridge. | 01:56:12 | |
| Is brought to us by. | 01:56:16 | |
| The Timpanogos people. | 01:56:18 | |
| The Sleepy Ridge is along. | 01:56:21 | |
| It goes all the way throughout Vineyard, right? | 01:56:23 | |
| Don't want to get emotional but. | 01:56:26 | |
| Before The Pioneers got here. | 01:56:29 | |
| We didn't have Deer Creek, we didn't have Strawberry and we didn't have Jordanelle. | 01:56:33 | |
| And so every spring. | 01:56:38 | |
| The entire. | 01:56:43 | |
| Valley. | 01:56:44 | |
| In about a three or four week period would flood. | 01:56:45 | |
| And Vineyard would be a point of order. | 01:56:49 | |
| Talking about history. | 01:56:53 | |
| I know. | 01:56:54 | |
| But you can. | 01:56:55 | |
| Talk about that. | 01:56:56 | |
| Another time. | 01:56:57 | |
| We're talking about what Tim just said. | 01:56:59 | |
| Talking about it, I think that's awesome. | 01:57:01 | |
| And I think that should happen. Absolutely. OK, Jake, do you have a point? Yeah, Yeah, I have a point to this. | 01:57:04 | |
| Because of that. | 01:57:10 | |
| The specific location of where the indigenous people. | 01:57:12 | |
| And the early holdaway families. | 01:57:16 | |
| Met for a truce was on the sleepy Ridge right on right where the. | 01:57:18 | |
| Leroy Family. | 01:57:23 | |
| Farm is. | 01:57:24 | |
| 3. | 01:57:26 | |
| Profits of the LDS church and 9 apostles lived in that location and so I love that Tim is concerned about the history there. | 01:57:27 | |
| And about that Heritage Park because it's not only the Mormon settlers, but also the indigenous of the Timpanogos tribe. | 01:57:37 | |
| Of what? Of what happened and occurred at that location. So I just want to make sure that. | 01:57:46 | |
| Tim, I will go. | 01:57:51 | |
| I've spoken with the mayor elect and the council and I know I'm going to be playing a major role. | 01:57:52 | |
| In that history, and I'll go and meet with them before. | 01:57:57 | |
| Next meeting, I know the next council will be the one that. | 01:58:01 | |
| Is financing and thinking and. | 01:58:04 | |
| Building that through so I just want to make sure. | 01:58:06 | |
| I understand the history. | 01:58:08 | |
| And the importance of it. | 01:58:12 | |
| Go ahead, Sarah. | 01:58:15 | |
| So. | 01:58:16 | |
| As far as? | 01:58:18 | |
| 7.7. | 01:58:19 | |
| And the social media outrage? | 01:58:22 | |
| I just wanted to point out. | 01:58:25 | |
| To all of. | 01:58:27 | |
| The people who are opposing it. | 01:58:28 | |
| That I have a budget request from Sullivan Love a year and a half ago. | 01:58:31 | |
| Requesting a new vac truck. | 01:58:35 | |
| What is a TV van? | 01:58:37 | |
| The TV vans are used for. | 01:58:42 | |
| Sending a video camera into those lines prior to using the back truck. So you send the video camera in. | 01:58:45 | |
| You inspect the line with that. | 01:58:52 | |
| From the surface. | 01:58:55 | |
| You determine where the problems are. | 01:58:56 | |
| And then you put your vac truck in and take care of it. | 01:58:58 | |
| OK. So did we purchase that? | 01:59:01 | |
| OK, so he has a request to purchase a new vac truck. | 01:59:04 | |
| And a TV van. And that was a year and a half ago. | 01:59:07 | |
| And we have since put money aside in the budget to be able to do that. Is that correct? | 01:59:10 | |
| So for the last year and a half. | 01:59:15 | |
| We've been setting aside money to be able to afford that. | 01:59:17 | |
| So so when you get information. | 01:59:20 | |
| Online and you say that we're going to spend $700,000. That's incorrect. | 01:59:23 | |
| The amount here on fiscal impact shows 643. | 01:59:28 | |
| 643,000 with A170150 to 170. | 01:59:31 | |
| $1000 credit for the existing. | 01:59:37 | |
| Equipment that would be turned back in. | 01:59:40 | |
| So the actual amount was. | 01:59:42 | |
| Closer to what was it for? | 01:59:44 | |
| 475. | 01:59:47 | |
| So I think it's really important that we get our facts straight, especially if we're spreading them. | 01:59:48 | |
| Through the community. | 01:59:53 | |
| To make sure that Sullivan was the one that asked for this a year and a half ago. | 01:59:54 | |
| And the city supported that and put the money aside. | 01:59:58 | |
| And so. | 02:00:01 | |
| So when we spread information, let's sure that make sure that we have all our facts correct. Sarah you. | 02:00:02 | |
| Sullivan started with. | 02:00:08 | |
| Telling me that he was the one that requested it. | 02:00:09 | |
| Due to COVID funds. | 02:00:12 | |
| There were massive amount of buildings that. | 02:00:13 | |
| Bought vac trucks. | 02:00:15 | |
| The hourly rate to rent one. | 02:00:17 | |
| And the availability has changed dramatically in the last year and a half, so for him to come forward. | 02:00:19 | |
| And adjust his assessment. | 02:00:25 | |
| Is awesome. | 02:00:27 | |
| So we knew that he didn't, he didn't not share that with us because we are discussing 700,000, okay, he was off 100,000. | 02:00:29 | |
| No, the actual amounts more like 475. That's a big difference. | 02:00:37 | |
| Because we are discussing. | 02:00:42 | |
| 7.7. | 02:00:45 | |
| I know I recommended it to be continued for further discussion, but maybe we could just come and talk about some of the facts. | 02:00:47 | |
| Of the truck. | 02:00:56 | |
| It seems like you guys want to review them. | 02:01:00 | |
| I would just recognize the mayor and say thank you for working with Zach and and. | 02:01:03 | |
| Having a conversation, you know he. | 02:01:07 | |
| Obviously is the executive. He'll have an approach. He works with VAC trucks. | 02:01:10 | |
| All the time like I spent an hour learning. I don't even know. | 02:01:14 | |
| A lot about vac trucks, but about the rental of how much and and the availability of them and then also being on with. | 02:01:18 | |
| TTSD today. | 02:01:24 | |
| For like an hour and understanding that contract, it was like. | 02:01:26 | |
| Wow yeah, this is a no brainer so. | 02:01:28 | |
| I just appreciate the conversation and delaying it a couple of weeks. | 02:01:32 | |
| Yeah, OK. | 02:01:36 | |
| Thank you. | 02:01:38 | |
| For your comments. | 02:01:39 | |
| Did we want to talk about it now? Does the Council want to continue it? | 02:01:42 | |
| OK, how about we continue it? | 02:01:46 | |
| We sit down and then next time we can bring these discussions forward and we can talk about the contract with TSSD. | 02:01:48 | |
| We can talk about. | 02:01:56 | |
| The ability or. | 02:01:57 | |
| Discussion about what it costs to rent it. | 02:01:59 | |
| We can talk about our usage and our service agreements. | 02:02:02 | |
| OK, so I'm going to ask that we just put. | 02:02:05 | |
| Put 7.7 and 7.8 and we continue those. | 02:02:07 | |
| Hold for a second while I. | 02:02:12 | |
| Just say, can we approve? | 02:02:14 | |
| 7.1. | 02:02:16 | |
| 7.2. | 02:02:18 | |
| Seven point. | 02:02:20 | |
| Six and seven point. | 02:02:21 | |
| 9 and 7.11. | 02:02:24 | |
| And then we'll continue 7.7 and 7.8. | 02:02:27 | |
| I'd like to pull off 7.6. | 02:02:32 | |
| 7.6 Can we can we go ahead and talk about 7.6? | 02:02:34 | |
| Yeah. All right. | 02:02:41 | |
| Right, go ahead and start the the the the question I had and this is again, as much I know, I know we've I've already had a | 02:02:42 | |
| conversation about this, but I want to make sure everybody. | 02:02:47 | |
| Hears it. | 02:02:53 | |
| In the work session on. | 02:02:55 | |
| On that. | 02:02:59 | |
| I had asked for an evaluation of a breakpoint for Council approval. | 02:03:03 | |
| In. | 02:03:07 | |
| I'm going to point Eric. | 02:03:10 | |
| If you could walk us through the the research and evaluation that you did. | 02:03:14 | |
| And the because when I was reviewing the updated policy that's coming in here. | 02:03:19 | |
| That particular piece wasn't in there, and it was. | 02:03:24 | |
| A bit frustrating. | 02:03:26 | |
| But then we had a conversation and I want to make sure everybody hears. | 02:03:29 | |
| The research that staff have done. | 02:03:33 | |
| And why that one particular piece wasn't in there? | 02:03:36 | |
| From my recollection, there was there was 2 requests. 1 was that we would adjust the international travel that gets approved by | 02:03:42 | |
| the City Council to be scrutinized. | 02:03:46 | |
| And the other was that we looked at. | 02:03:50 | |
| Thresholds that we could utilize. | 02:03:52 | |
| On a dollar. | 02:03:55 | |
| Level rather than just. | 02:03:57 | |
| Where the location was. | 02:03:59 | |
| And so we. | 02:04:01 | |
| Did add one that was for outside Utah County that cost more than $4000. | 02:04:02 | |
| When we looked around Utah cities, there was no other Utah cities that use a dollar threshold. | 02:04:07 | |
| We did a nationwide search. | 02:04:13 | |
| And there was a couple cities in Texas that did have a dollar amount. | 02:04:15 | |
| So we utilized one of those. | 02:04:18 | |
| The $4000 one. | 02:04:22 | |
| Any travel that would that would go above that. | 02:04:25 | |
| Certainly merits. | 02:04:28 | |
| Getting additional scrutiny? | 02:04:29 | |
| And so we've added a. | 02:04:31 | |
| A requirement for that to be. | 02:04:33 | |
| I would just let. | 02:04:36 | |
| Council know that. | 02:04:37 | |
| That looking over the last couple of years, the travel. | 02:04:38 | |
| Has not been over that $4000 amount. | 02:04:43 | |
| And so anything that would go above that would definitely be something that raises a flag and needs to be looked over and | 02:04:47 | |
| carefully considered. | 02:04:51 | |
| In addition to just the budgeting of those in the 1st place at the beginning of the year. | 02:04:56 | |
| OK. Thank you. | 02:05:00 | |
| Any other comments or? | 02:05:02 | |
| Is there, you mentioned that nothing in the last couple of years has gone up that high? | 02:05:03 | |
| Do we know what the highest thing was? What was that? | 02:05:09 | |
| Dollar amount, I think the highest dollar amount was actually for City Council to attend. | 02:05:13 | |
| Our Saint George. | 02:05:20 | |
| Event and that I think the total. | 02:05:22 | |
| Total dollar amount on that was about 2800. | 02:05:24 | |
| OK. | 02:05:28 | |
| OK. Well, thank you. | 02:05:31 | |
| With that, does everybody feel comfortable approving everything and continuing everything, remaining and continuing 7.7 and 7.8? | 02:05:34 | |
| I second. | 02:05:43 | |
| Or do I make a motion? Yeah, Jake, we'll get a motion for you to do that. And I'm just going to name the numbers really quick, | 02:05:44 | |
| 7.17.27.6. | 02:05:48 | |
| 7.9 and 7. | 02:05:52 | |
| .11 to be to be approved and 7.7 and 7.8 to be continued. I make that motion. | 02:05:54 | |
| OK, can I get a second Second. | 02:06:01 | |
| Thank you. | 02:06:03 | |
| Brett for a second. | 02:06:05 | |
| And I'll do it by roll call, Jake. | 02:06:07 | |
| I Marty's excused. | 02:06:11 | |
| Hi, excellent. | 02:06:13 | |
| OK. Eric, you had a report. | 02:06:15 | |
| Did you get 7.11? | 02:06:18 | |
| That's on the next page I did. I called it 7.11. | 02:06:20 | |
| Sorry. | 02:06:24 | |
| I missed that. OK, yeah, just a just a quick we've, we've got a nice report for the council to review. | 02:06:24 | |
| Be sure to take a look at that, there's tons of cool information about what's happened over the last month. | 02:06:30 | |
| But just a couple highlights. | 02:06:35 | |
| From recreation, there were 591 registrants to the youth. | 02:06:38 | |
| Junior Jazz Basketball League. | 02:06:41 | |
| Huge, huge numbers. It's fun to see that many kids coming out for those. | 02:06:44 | |
| We hosted our buapalooza. | 02:06:47 | |
| Event this year. | 02:06:50 | |
| Just before Halloween. | 02:06:51 | |
| And had. | 02:06:53 | |
| Approximately 4000 attendees, which was huge, an increase over the years in the past. | 02:06:54 | |
| Also coordinated. | 02:07:01 | |
| With the Rojas farms. | 02:07:03 | |
| To offer pumpkins to the community on the. | 02:07:05 | |
| On the one day. | 02:07:08 | |
| And those were incredibly popular. | 02:07:10 | |
| I know that we saw pumpkins going all over the city. | 02:07:12 | |
| The their teams installed two dog stations along the trail. | 02:07:17 | |
| Near the train tracks. | 02:07:22 | |
| I bring that up as a point of. | 02:07:24 | |
| Of. | 02:07:26 | |
| Note because I know that there's oftentimes concerns about about. | 02:07:27 | |
| Not having those available and therefore. | 02:07:31 | |
| Having issues with. | 02:07:34 | |
| With dog feces found along those trails. So that's a big deal. | 02:07:35 | |
| Also. | 02:07:40 | |
| 2 memorial bench and plaques were installed. | 02:07:41 | |
| Just wanted to point out because this has come up. | 02:07:45 | |
| On social media. | 02:07:47 | |
| Those are fully funded through donations. | 02:07:48 | |
| The benches. | 02:07:53 | |
| Yes. Why were they on the budget then? | 02:07:54 | |
| Any expenses that come through the city? | 02:07:57 | |
| Have to go through our budget even if. | 02:08:00 | |
| We have to track the revenue and then we have to track the expenses. | 02:08:02 | |
| And so it shows up in our budget. | 02:08:06 | |
| But it is not something that the city is is expending its own dollars. It's just expending the could you call that out on the | 02:08:08 | |
| budget next time? Absolutely delineated. | 02:08:12 | |
| Yeah, yeah. | 02:08:16 | |
| Why were they still? | 02:08:18 | |
| $12,000 though. | 02:08:19 | |
| They were not $12,000 Twelve. | 02:08:20 | |
| Maybe in the ballpark of. | 02:08:22 | |
| 6000 total for. | 02:08:24 | |
| For how many for six benches? | 02:08:26 | |
| So 1000 bucks each. | 02:08:28 | |
| And usually when they go through the budget, they go through kind of our grants and expenses and then it shows what is coming in | 02:08:30 | |
| and what's going on. | 02:08:33 | |
| But we can be a little more clear about that next year. Yeah, that's great. | 02:08:38 | |
| Also wanted to point out we have a whole page of. | 02:08:41 | |
| Master plan updates. | 02:08:44 | |
| That includes. | 02:08:46 | |
| Mill Rd. Wayfinding station area plan. | 02:08:48 | |
| Vineyard center rental program Bluffs at Vineyard so lots of different master plans. | 02:08:51 | |
| And we try to keep you up to speed on what those are with an update each month. | 02:08:57 | |
| Let's see. | 02:09:03 | |
| I think there was one other. | 02:09:04 | |
| On our occupancy from the building, on our building report, our total units occupied in Vineyard are now at 58130. | 02:09:07 | |
| Which puts our estimated population at 22,742. | 02:09:15 | |
| From this last month we had the. | 02:09:22 | |
| Three single family dwellings were approved. | 02:09:25 | |
| 19 townhomes and three commercial units. | 02:09:28 | |
| And that's it. | 02:09:32 | |
| Awesome. Thank you so much. | 02:09:35 | |
| We're going to go ahead and do our public hearing. | 02:09:37 | |
| This is an update to the Vineyard City Development Standards and Design Specifications or. | 02:09:39 | |
| Ordinance 2025-15 can. | 02:09:44 | |
| Can I get a motion to go into a public hearing? | 02:09:47 | |
| So moved. Thank you, Brett. Can I get a second? | 02:09:50 | |
| 2nd Thank you, Sarah. | 02:09:53 | |
| We are now in a public hearing. | 02:09:55 | |
| And then? | 02:09:58 | |
| Chris Thompson, I believe our consultant. | 02:10:00 | |
| Is going to be this discussion for us. Thanks so much for being here. | 02:10:03 | |
| Yeah. Thank you. | 02:10:07 | |
| I think I need this. | 02:10:09 | |
| I don't think this will take a long time. | 02:10:18 | |
| But. | 02:10:21 | |
| Let's see. | 02:10:23 | |
| I just push the button as soon as. | 02:10:28 | |
| To run. | 02:10:58 | |
| Do I press the button on here? | 02:11:04 | |
| If you take it out and then put it back in. | 02:11:06 | |
| OK, that's what I've noticed. I have to do it twice. | 02:11:08 | |
| OK. | 02:11:13 | |
| And then it comes. | 02:11:15 | |
| Sorry that. | 02:11:17 | |
| Something came up right here so. | 02:11:22 | |
| You click it first. | 02:11:27 | |
| Didn't do that. | 02:11:32 | |
| There we go. All right, great. | 02:11:34 | |
| Sorry about that. | 02:11:36 | |
| Recently. | 02:11:46 | |
| We've been able to work with engineering staff to revise the construction and development standards. | 02:11:48 | |
| This is how your neighborhoods. | 02:11:53 | |
| Are constructed. | 02:11:55 | |
| From the curb and gutter to the sidewalks to the utilities under the ground. | 02:11:57 | |
| And. | 02:12:02 | |
| A lot of, really. | 02:12:03 | |
| Change it. Good changes that I think will help. | 02:12:06 | |
| The development community, the contractors, the inspectors, and. | 02:12:08 | |
| The engineering reviewers. | 02:12:12 | |
| One of the things. | 02:12:15 | |
| That happened at the beginning of 2025. Is a new version of the. | 02:12:17 | |
| American Poet Works Association, Utah Chapter Standards came out. | 02:12:22 | |
| These are. | 02:12:26 | |
| Are kind of like the Uniform building code, but for building. | 02:12:27 | |
| The roads and the utilities. | 02:12:31 | |
| And. | 02:12:33 | |
| There's a state committee. | 02:12:34 | |
| That meets on on. | 02:12:36 | |
| On these standards and they update them every year. | 02:12:38 | |
| And the latest update was in 2025 actually. | 02:12:41 | |
| Scene is on this committee. | 02:12:46 | |
| The state committee that. | 02:12:49 | |
| That of Daisy standards. | 02:12:50 | |
| And he's been a long standing member of the committee anyway, these standards. | 02:12:52 | |
| Have a lot of detail. | 02:12:57 | |
| That is. | 02:12:59 | |
| Up to date on like. | 02:13:00 | |
| The road base that you build underneath the asphalt. The asphalt. | 02:13:01 | |
| How it's comprised and and and concrete, the standards for concrete, it stays up with all of those so that the cities don't have | 02:13:05 | |
| to. | 02:13:09 | |
| And so. | 02:13:13 | |
| A lot of this. | 02:13:15 | |
| Update to the Vineyard Standards where? | 02:13:17 | |
| Was to adopt. | 02:13:19 | |
| The APWA specifications and then take out. | 02:13:21 | |
| Standards like. | 02:13:25 | |
| Road base? How many? | 02:13:26 | |
| You know what the graduation for your Rd. base is and and how the asphalt should be made-up to take that out so that. | 02:13:28 | |
| That you just referred to a more up-to-date standard. | 02:13:34 | |
| And the APWA specs? | 02:13:38 | |
| Anyway, that's. | 02:13:40 | |
| That's one change. | 02:13:41 | |
| The second change which? | 02:13:43 | |
| I really. | 02:13:46 | |
| Feel like is going to help. | 02:13:48 | |
| The inspectors, the. | 02:13:49 | |
| The design engineers the. | 02:13:51 | |
| The contractors is. | 02:13:53 | |
| Is kind of organizing. | 02:13:56 | |
| The standards in a way that. | 02:13:58 | |
| That if you have. | 02:14:00 | |
| A sanitary sewer or a drinking water. | 02:14:01 | |
| A standards question you can go right there and get. | 02:14:05 | |
| Get all of the answers and. | 02:14:07 | |
| And and so. | 02:14:09 | |
| Just reorganizing all the standards so that if you're a design engineer. | 02:14:12 | |
| The design requirements are in one. | 02:14:17 | |
| Section or if you're an inspector, the inspection. | 02:14:19 | |
| Requirements are on one section as well. | 02:14:23 | |
| And so this was. | 02:14:25 | |
| A pretty good change. | 02:14:27 | |
| I felt like for. | 02:14:29 | |
| The people who use these standards all the time. | 02:14:30 | |
| This is kind of. | 02:14:34 | |
| An example of. | 02:14:35 | |
| Of the previous. | 02:14:37 | |
| Standards and. | 02:14:38 | |
| To kind of see how. | 02:14:40 | |
| We took all of this and organized it into. | 02:14:42 | |
| Into a way that you you could. | 02:14:45 | |
| Just go to one place. | 02:14:47 | |
| Get all the information on on that item. | 02:14:48 | |
| The other thing is, is vineyards have been. | 02:14:52 | |
| Working on a new transportation master plan. | 02:14:55 | |
| Which has made some some great. | 02:14:57 | |
| New plans for the city's transportation system and and with that. | 02:15:02 | |
| Some different. | 02:15:07 | |
| Street cross sections. | 02:15:08 | |
| Were proposed. | 02:15:09 | |
| These were implemented into the standards so that. | 02:15:10 | |
| You now had. | 02:15:14 | |
| Your standard drawings for a street cross section match. | 02:15:15 | |
| The the master plan. | 02:15:17 | |
| And then the last kind of major. | 02:15:19 | |
| Change that I think helps is. | 02:15:22 | |
| A lot of the municip. | 02:15:24 | |
| Code is. | 02:15:25 | |
| Held in a program called Muni Code. | 02:15:28 | |
| It allows you to very quickly get to. | 02:15:31 | |
| To different codes and and standards and. | 02:15:33 | |
| Ordinances and. | 02:15:39 | |
| So, uh. | 02:15:41 | |
| The last part of this once. | 02:15:42 | |
| Once it's approved, is. | 02:15:43 | |
| These construction standards will be put into muni code. | 02:15:45 | |
| So that that. | 02:15:48 | |
| Accessibility will be there for the contractors and engineers. | 02:15:49 | |
| As well. | 02:15:53 | |
| Any questions about all that before we? | 02:15:56 | |
| Maybe. | 02:15:59 | |
| Really high level changes that were proposed. | 02:16:00 | |
| Doesn't look like it. | 02:16:05 | |
| OK. All right. | 02:16:06 | |
| Kind of just took kind of. | 02:16:08 | |
| The more impactful. | 02:16:10 | |
| We call them significant. | 02:16:12 | |
| Revisions and thought we could hit those really quickly and then we'll be done. | 02:16:14 | |
| The first one is. | 02:16:18 | |
| A lot of times. | 02:16:20 | |
| When a contractor. | 02:16:21 | |
| Comes and tears up the roads and and replaces the water line or. | 02:16:23 | |
| Or does some sort of work? | 02:16:27 | |
| The engineering office gets some complaints of, well, my driveway was cracked or my sidewalk or what have you. | 02:16:30 | |
| And. | 02:16:37 | |
| You go out there as an engineer and and. | 02:16:39 | |
| The contractors saying, well, that was already there and. | 02:16:42 | |
| That homeowners saying well, it wasn't. | 02:16:44 | |
| And and so one one of the additions to the standards is that a contractor is up to the contractor to take a video footage of the | 02:16:47 | |
| area before starting work. | 02:16:52 | |
| And and if that's neglected and and that's what will be used to to solve those type of disputes. If that's not there, then. | 02:16:57 | |
| The disputes will be decided on the homeowners side, if that makes sense. So that's if the contractor wants to be able to. | 02:17:06 | |
| Claim something is already. | 02:17:15 | |
| Was already done. They have to provide that video. | 02:17:17 | |
| The next one is. | 02:17:21 | |
| Is. | 02:17:22 | |
| There is a situation. | 02:17:24 | |
| With UDOT where all the UDOT roads and there's quite a few. | 02:17:26 | |
| UDOT roads in in in Vineyard. | 02:17:28 | |
| They use a 30 inch curb and gutter. | 02:17:32 | |
| But the Citi had 24 inch curb and gutter and so. | 02:17:35 | |
| You're always kind of. | 02:17:38 | |
| If you're a contractor and you're slipping. | 02:17:40 | |
| The curb and go use these machines that just kind of lay it. | 02:17:44 | |
| They call it slip lining anyway as they slip the curb and gutter. | 02:17:48 | |
| In and then all of a sudden you go around a corner and you now have a 24 inch. | 02:17:52 | |
| Gutter There's a lot of costs in reset up of the equipment and and. | 02:17:57 | |
| That's that's fine. | 02:18:02 | |
| Except for. | 02:18:03 | |
| The 30 inch curb and gutter is much better. | 02:18:04 | |
| It holds. | 02:18:07 | |
| More of the water in during a storm and and a lot of times the edge of the road gets eroded and that's where you have a lot of St. | 02:18:08 | |
| Problems because the water actually overflows the 24 inch curb gutter and and it erodes the water. There's two things that. | 02:18:17 | |
| That hurt roads, and that's the sun. | 02:18:24 | |
| And water. | 02:18:27 | |
| And so if you have. | 02:18:28 | |
| A little bit wider. | 02:18:30 | |
| Kirby gutter temperature. | 02:18:31 | |
| If you have a little bit wider curb and gutter, it holds that water in and it protects the road. | 02:18:33 | |
| From that water. | 02:18:37 | |
| The other thing? | 02:18:39 | |
| About that is. | 02:18:41 | |
| The cost of curbing gutter, a lot of it is in that big machine. | 02:18:43 | |
| That slips it in. | 02:18:47 | |
| And so. | 02:18:48 | |
| When you add 6 inches onto it, the only real additional cost is for a little bit more concrete. | 02:18:50 | |
| And. | 02:18:56 | |
| And. | 02:18:57 | |
| When you have concrete. | 02:18:58 | |
| It doesn't really require much maintenance except for if it settles OK. | 02:19:00 | |
| Whereas asphalt. | 02:19:04 | |
| As a 20 year lifespan and you're. | 02:19:06 | |
| You're always doing maintenance to the asphalt, so. | 02:19:08 | |
| Taking out a foot of Rd. | 02:19:11 | |
| You would think isn't a big deal, but it is a big deal. | 02:19:12 | |
| Because the cost to construct the asphalt. | 02:19:15 | |
| And to maintain it is very linear. | 02:19:19 | |
| You add 1 foot and it adds exactly. | 02:19:21 | |
| That percent of the road. | 02:19:24 | |
| In in cost of maintenance and and construction so. | 02:19:26 | |
| There's a lot of reasons why a 30 inch. | 02:19:30 | |
| Kernel gutter. | 02:19:32 | |
| Makes sense and and so this adds. | 02:19:33 | |
| It basically makes the city standard for current gutter. | 02:19:36 | |
| Match the the UDOT standard. | 02:19:39 | |
| But unless of course you already have a road with 24 inch and then it would stay the same. | 02:19:43 | |
| You just match. | 02:19:47 | |
| Grandfather did. | 02:19:48 | |
| Yeah. | 02:19:50 | |
| Yeah, OK. | 02:19:50 | |
| The next one is railroad crossings. | 02:19:53 | |
| UDOT and the railroad and Utah. | 02:19:56 | |
| Have really come into. | 02:20:00 | |
| A much higher level of regulation railroad crossings, especially in regards to having a driveway. | 02:20:05 | |
| Or another Rd. close by. | 02:20:10 | |
| Because of the hazard of it and and diagnostic. | 02:20:12 | |
| Type. | 02:20:15 | |
| Events are triggered once. | 02:20:17 | |
| You get within 200 feet of of a railroad crossing, and so this creates a standard that says you just can't have a street | 02:20:19 | |
| intersection. | 02:20:23 | |
| Within. | 02:20:28 | |
| 200 feet of railroad crossing. | 02:20:29 | |
| And and if you want. | 02:20:31 | |
| A driveway. | 02:20:33 | |
| Then the developer would have to pay for that diagnostic. | 02:20:34 | |
| That's required. | 02:20:37 | |
| There any questions on what I've said so far? | 02:20:39 | |
| Yeah, I have. I have a question on the. | 02:20:43 | |
| You can't have an intersection by the. | 02:20:47 | |
| Railroad crossing. Can you explain that one a little bit more? | 02:20:49 | |
| OK, so. | 02:20:52 | |
| St. Intersections. | 02:20:54 | |
| Yeah, explain that one. | 02:20:55 | |
| Code approaches a railroad crossing. | 02:20:58 | |
| There there's there's some hazard. | 02:21:03 | |
| In umm. | 02:21:05 | |
| Blocking. | 02:21:08 | |
| The access across that railroad and so. | 02:21:11 | |
| What what happens is a lot of times. | 02:21:14 | |
| I'm sorry. | 02:21:17 | |
| I think I understand the right of review and the hazard. | 02:21:18 | |
| I don't think I understand when you say no St. intersections. What do? | 02:21:22 | |
| What are we defining as St. intersections? | 02:21:27 | |
| Around our railroad. | 02:21:30 | |
| So if you measured from the. | 02:21:31 | |
| From the railroad. | 02:21:34 | |
| Out 250 feet down the. | 02:21:36 | |
| The road You couldn't have a new proposal. | 02:21:38 | |
| St. come in to to. | 02:21:41 | |
| To that street, so. | 02:21:43 | |
| This is railroad crossing. Here's the road. | 02:21:45 | |
| You'd have to measure 250 feet before you could propose a new road. | 02:21:47 | |
| To connect to this. | 02:21:50 | |
| This street that crosses the railroad. | 02:21:52 | |
| Does that make more sense? | 02:21:54 | |
| Yeah, it does make more sense. | 02:21:56 | |
| I'm just wondering if I like that one or not. | 02:21:58 | |
| All right, continue. | 02:22:01 | |
| Come back to that one. | 02:22:03 | |
| That's mostly a safety situation. | 02:22:04 | |
| That UDOT, UTA, Union Pacific, all of the. | 02:22:08 | |
| The railroad folks, Sorry. | 02:22:11 | |
| Saying, yeah, it's you got to keep those 250 feet or more away. | 02:22:13 | |
| When so? | 02:22:17 | |
| This just eliminates. | 02:22:19 | |
| Review. All right. | 02:22:20 | |
| Go to the next one. I'm gonna think about that. | 02:22:22 | |
| OK, OK, great. | 02:22:23 | |
| 11. | 02:22:27 | |
| Issue that you have a lot in development is if a field is is is going to be developed and has a road along. | 02:22:29 | |
| The edge of the field. | 02:22:35 | |
| A lot of cities don't require. | 02:22:38 | |
| The full Rd. | 02:22:40 | |
| To be built. | 02:22:42 | |
| In between the two fields. | 02:22:43 | |
| But they do require enough of the road so that you can get two way traffic and and get that but. | 02:22:46 | |
| It doesn't seem fair to. | 02:22:52 | |
| Require all the right away. | 02:22:53 | |
| On the one property owner. | 02:22:55 | |
| And all of the improvements and then the property owner across the street. | 02:22:57 | |
| Basically. | 02:23:01 | |
| Can develop all their property and doesn't have all that road to put in, so it's very common. | 02:23:02 | |
| Across Utah to. | 02:23:09 | |
| To make them build half the road plus 10 feet and plus a little buffer. | 02:23:10 | |
| Okay. And and vineyards the same ways have been the same way. | 02:23:14 | |
| But there's a problem that occurs when you get. | 02:23:18 | |
| To an intersection. | 02:23:21 | |
| And. | 02:23:23 | |
| Not just in that case, but. | 02:23:25 | |
| Sometimes a development will phase. | 02:23:27 | |
| They'll build 1 section. | 02:23:30 | |
| One phase of their development 1st and then the next phase, and then the next phase. | 02:23:31 | |
| And and sometimes. | 02:23:35 | |
| When they get to those. | 02:23:37 | |
| Phase lines. There's an intersection there, and. | 02:23:38 | |
| And uh. | 02:23:41 | |
| They'll try to build. | 02:23:43 | |
| Kind of half plus 10 feet of an intersection, it just doesn't work very well. And so there's require that you have to build out. | 02:23:45 | |
| The full intersection. | 02:23:52 | |
| With each phase of the development. | 02:23:53 | |
| OK, I'm going to go back to the last one. | 02:23:56 | |
| All right. | 02:23:59 | |
| A few scenarios. | 02:24:02 | |
| Is a new intersection. | 02:24:03 | |
| An at grade or. | 02:24:05 | |
| Is that also an overpass? | 02:24:07 | |
| No, it just be out crazy, OK and. | 02:24:09 | |
| Is. | 02:24:12 | |
| A new intersection. | 02:24:13 | |
| Where we're trying to get. | 02:24:16 | |
| We'll say 1200 N. | 02:24:19 | |
| Goes in before the spur line is removed due to one of our agreements. | 02:24:22 | |
| Normally it would just require flaggers, but in this code it would mean. | 02:24:29 | |
| We can have no new intersection. | 02:24:34 | |
| No or assessment would be required. | 02:24:37 | |
| Are those different? | 02:24:39 | |
| Yeah. | 02:24:42 | |
| So if you had a situation where a spur was coming out. | 02:24:44 | |
| The city engineer has. | 02:24:50 | |
| The opportunity in your in your code. | 02:24:52 | |
| To to make exception for that. | 02:24:55 | |
| Call get the diagnostics. | 02:24:57 | |
| Where you bring out UDOT, you bring out the railroad and you do the diagnostic and you review it. | 02:24:59 | |
| But it would. | 02:25:05 | |
| It would take an exception to the rule. | 02:25:07 | |
| Rather than just be allowed by the rule. | 02:25:09 | |
| Hmm. So we already have the right of review from the railroad. We already have it from you dot. | 02:25:12 | |
| But why would we create another hurdle for us to put roads and I and I get safety? I'm just thinking as a city that's bifurcated | 02:25:19 | |
| by rail. | 02:25:23 | |
| In a city that's locked in by rail. | 02:25:27 | |
| Our entire goal as a city. | 02:25:30 | |
| Has been to overcome this hurdle and create every access point availability. | 02:25:32 | |
| I mean. | 02:25:37 | |
| Right now we're so. | 02:25:38 | |
| Traffic jammed along 800 N. | 02:25:40 | |
| That any opportunity we have to open any cross section. | 02:25:43 | |
| Is what we're going to do and so. | 02:25:47 | |
| I don't know why as a city we would say. | 02:25:49 | |
| Hey, this is going to be the exception to the rule when. | 02:25:52 | |
| Our rule? | 02:25:55 | |
| In our city right now is. | 02:25:56 | |
| Cross it. | 02:25:58 | |
| You know, I mean we want to remove it. | 02:25:59 | |
| And we want to build over it, of course, for safety because we care, but we also need to get out of here. | 02:26:01 | |
| There's huge cost. There's a simple solution to that. You can just add the words. | 02:26:07 | |
| Unless otherwise authorized by the. | 02:26:12 | |
| City engineer or the post director or someone? | 02:26:15 | |
| And and and and then you still have the teeth. | 02:26:18 | |
| Of. | 02:26:21 | |
| If a developer wants to come and put one where you don't even want it. | 02:26:22 | |
| You can still prevent it if you OK, so you could organize it. | 02:26:25 | |
| That would be a pretty easy. | 02:26:29 | |
| Addition to that and I. | 02:26:31 | |
| I don't know. I'll defer to staff if they. | 02:26:33 | |
| But but. | 02:26:36 | |
| It seems like. | 02:26:39 | |
| You don't want to be caught up in a lot of diet. | 02:26:41 | |
| Diagnostic. | 02:26:43 | |
| Because another thing for me is I'm thinking I like that because it's something where you don't want to Rd. but then you think | 02:26:46 | |
| there's additional cost to getting inspections, making it harder for businesses. Sorry, I'm troublemaker. Yeah. Patrick James, | 02:26:50 | |
| assistant city engineer. | 02:26:54 | |
| I believe we already added that language unless other other. | 02:26:58 | |
| Otherwise approved by the City engineer. | 02:27:03 | |
| But I feel like there's a little bit of confusion still. So I don't think that this doesn't necessarily eliminate the possibility | 02:27:06 | |
| of a crossing. | 02:27:10 | |
| It's just it's another St. intersecting. | 02:27:14 | |
| That road that's crossing the railroad within 250 feet? | 02:27:18 | |
| Maybe. | 02:27:22 | |
| I don't know. I'm thinking there's a little bit of confusion. So you're saying that? | 02:27:23 | |
| In Mayer's example where 1200 N we have. | 02:27:28 | |
| The intention hopefully to get 1200 N to push through to Geneva Rd. | 02:27:31 | |
| As long as it's just pushing through to Geneva Rd. | 02:27:36 | |
| That would be your. | 02:27:39 | |
| Otherwise approved. | 02:27:40 | |
| You just wouldn't want to shortly thereafter at a Rd. | 02:27:42 | |
| Within 250 feet, yeah, 1200 N and the existing spur line paralleling it. | 02:27:45 | |
| Yeah. So it just keeps that distance away, so as people. | 02:27:52 | |
| So, for example, as people back up to that intersection, they're not crossing into that. | 02:27:56 | |
| Railroad, uh. | 02:28:02 | |
| Aligned. | 02:28:03 | |
| Does that make more sense? | 02:28:05 | |
| OK. And like we can't? | 02:28:07 | |
| 'Cause this problem that I'm seeing that that makes sense. | 02:28:10 | |
| OK. Thanks. Thanks, Patrick. | 02:28:13 | |
| OK, so the next one. | 02:28:16 | |
| Is. | 02:28:19 | |
| Building and pavements not allowed over landfilled. | 02:28:20 | |
| Areas. | 02:28:24 | |
| This this is a big problem. | 02:28:26 | |
| Problem where? | 02:28:29 | |
| Where you have filled. | 02:28:31 | |
| Brought in a lot of times it'll settle. | 02:28:33 | |
| A lot of times, a lot of things in there that. | 02:28:36 | |
| That maybe are contaminants or. | 02:28:38 | |
| One city. | 02:28:41 | |
| How did development go over a landfilled area and and everything went great. They followed all the. | 02:28:43 | |
| All the reports, all the. | 02:28:48 | |
| The requirements that. | 02:28:50 | |
| That the environmental documents, the geotech. | 02:28:51 | |
| Documents and. | 02:28:54 | |
| Things had it, but then the gas company came in and. | 02:28:55 | |
| Dug their trenches in it. | 02:28:57 | |
| Unearthed a lot of garbage and things. | 02:28:59 | |
| And. | 02:29:02 | |
| Ended up being in a huge. | 02:29:03 | |
| Battle over that. | 02:29:05 | |
| And had to move. | 02:29:06 | |
| All the development. | 02:29:08 | |
| Off of it just because of public opinion and so. | 02:29:09 | |
| This helps you. | 02:29:12 | |
| To avoid that it. | 02:29:13 | |
| Even if. | 02:29:17 | |
| If you come in, you get all these reports saying we'll do it. | 02:29:19 | |
| This way there's there's a lot of. | 02:29:22 | |
| Of. | 02:29:24 | |
| Public angst about building over landfill type areas and so this just. | 02:29:27 | |
| Added a. | 02:29:32 | |
| Requirement that buildings and payments. | 02:29:34 | |
| Can't be built over that type of. | 02:29:36 | |
| Of the situation. So we do have a containment. | 02:29:38 | |
| Facility in our area that. | 02:29:43 | |
| The city has always planned to allow for pavement over that facility in some way. | 02:29:45 | |
| This would stop that ability for pavement to be put on there. | 02:29:52 | |
| Yes it would. | 02:29:57 | |
| You left this in. | 02:29:58 | |
| I mean I. | 02:30:00 | |
| I understand buildings. | 02:30:02 | |
| White pavement. | 02:30:04 | |
| Especially with just impacted material. Is landfill different? | 02:30:07 | |
| Well, they measure the settlement. | 02:30:11 | |
| Yeah, then it becomes completely unusable. But if you allow some kind of. | 02:30:12 | |
| Surface. | 02:30:19 | |
| I mean from everything that I've. | 02:30:21 | |
| Learned about it, it feels like. | 02:30:24 | |
| That was the one thing that they could allow to go in. | 02:30:25 | |
| That space. | 02:30:28 | |
| Yeah, from what I've seen personally as an engineer, I've seen pavements over this. | 02:30:30 | |
| Type of material and and they don't hold up very well. | 02:30:35 | |
| And so they after. | 02:30:39 | |
| Not very much time. | 02:30:42 | |
| Then they crack. But. | 02:30:43 | |
| This definitely is is a political decision. I mean, if you. | 02:30:45 | |
| I want to remove pavements. | 02:30:50 | |
| That's easy to do, but. | 02:30:52 | |
| It's mostly. | 02:30:54 | |
| To say, look, if you're going to build. | 02:30:56 | |
| A parking lot or a building you don't want it to settle. | 02:31:00 | |
| You want. | 02:31:04 | |
| Preferred foundation, but it'd be easy to. | 02:31:05 | |
| That payments requirement out if you want. | 02:31:08 | |
| No, I just want to learn more about it because we've had so many engineers and people come and talk to us about it. And so it's so | 02:31:12 | |
| interesting to see it come forward, especially because the scene sits on that. | 02:31:17 | |
| Committee with you. | 02:31:22 | |
| So interesting. | 02:31:23 | |
| I 100% back that. | 02:31:26 | |
| I would trust you with that because you've had so much settling in Vineyard. | 02:31:28 | |
| With so many developments and we should have. | 02:31:34 | |
| Had that standard a long time ago. | 02:31:37 | |
| I've seen in situations where you want to do. | 02:31:39 | |
| Like a park or something which is a good. | 02:31:43 | |
| Actually a good way to handle that type of material is is where you do put the parking lot you. | 02:31:45 | |
| You excavate it out and. | 02:31:51 | |
| And then build it back up. | 02:31:53 | |
| But. | 02:31:55 | |
| That's this is your code. | 02:31:58 | |
| So you can do it however you want. | 02:32:00 | |
| OK. | 02:32:02 | |
| Glass is. | 02:32:07 | |
| Fire hydrants. | 02:32:09 | |
| One problem that fire department. | 02:32:12 | |
| Quite often have is. | 02:32:13 | |
| Is they come out. | 02:32:15 | |
| To a fire. They're in a hurry. | 02:32:17 | |
| And if they don't see that hydrant write off. | 02:32:18 | |
| And they have to hunt for it then. Then that's a problem. | 02:32:22 | |
| And and so. | 02:32:25 | |
| In response to this, a lot of cities are putting what's called an apron around the hydrants. | 02:32:27 | |
| Some concrete and. | 02:32:34 | |
| 2 feet in each direction and. | 02:32:35 | |
| It's really hard to plant a Bush in concrete and so. | 02:32:37 | |
| That does a good job at. | 02:32:40 | |
| It looks. | 02:32:42 | |
| Nice. | 02:32:43 | |
| And clean. | 02:32:45 | |
| And it just keeps. | 02:32:47 | |
| Keeps those hydrants. | 02:32:48 | |
| Open from having people. | 02:32:51 | |
| Put fences or. | 02:32:53 | |
| Or trees or whatever in front of them. | 02:32:55 | |
| So. | 02:32:58 | |
| Any questions about that? | 02:33:00 | |
| You don't care about the next one. | 02:33:05 | |
| I don't know if anyone does but. | 02:33:07 | |
| There's a new meter. | 02:33:09 | |
| Box assembly. | 02:33:10 | |
| Design and then. | 02:33:12 | |
| The state requires A sewer clean out at the back of the sidewalk now. | 02:33:14 | |
| And this is really nice for residents as they. | 02:33:19 | |
| Have problems with their sewer lines. They can have a clean out there and one at the house and so. | 02:33:22 | |
| That's one and then? | 02:33:26 | |
| There's now a parking lot. | 02:33:28 | |
| Drawing in the standards so. | 02:33:30 | |
| An engineer and architect can pull that out and. | 02:33:34 | |
| And quickly design a parking lot. | 02:33:36 | |
| Know the dimensions of all the. | 02:33:38 | |
| Lanes and and stalls. | 02:33:40 | |
| And then finally. | 02:33:43 | |
| Vineyard had a survey monument standard. I don't know those. | 02:33:46 | |
| Followed a lot. | 02:33:50 | |
| But Utah County. | 02:33:52 | |
| Has the county surveyor. | 02:33:54 | |
| And and the county surveyors. | 02:33:56 | |
| Response is. | 02:33:59 | |
| Is. | 02:34:01 | |
| Don't put them in. | 02:34:01 | |
| They're not going to maintain them if they do get put in. | 02:34:03 | |
| And, and the, the county with GPS is able, has been able to survey all the section corners, all the section quarter corners and, | 02:34:06 | |
| and different things. And that's all they need. They don't need monuments anymore. So that's just kind of an old. | 02:34:12 | |
| Throwback in the standards. | 02:34:18 | |
| Any more questions? | 02:34:21 | |
| Are there more slides? | 02:34:23 | |
| No, I mean there there are, but. | 02:34:25 | |
| You don't want to see them. OK, well, I want to invite the public. The public Have any questions? | 02:34:27 | |
| Not at this time. | 02:34:35 | |
| OK. I'm going to call for a motion to go out of a public hearing if you are done presenting. | 02:34:36 | |
| Yeah. | 02:34:41 | |
| OK I have a first by Sarah. Can I get a second? | 02:34:44 | |
| Thank you, Brett. All in favor. | 02:34:47 | |
| Aye. | 02:34:49 | |
| Aye, aye. | 02:34:49 | |
| All right, Council, do you have questions? | 02:34:51 | |
| Or comments. | 02:34:54 | |
| I'm not going to pretend to be an expert in any of this stuff. I mean, that's why you're here. | 02:34:57 | |
| But. | 02:35:02 | |
| In their review that I that I've done I. | 02:35:03 | |
| It is super thorough. Everything that I've seen is. | 02:35:06 | |
| In line with what we would expect and even some of the comments, I was able to go search. | 02:35:11 | |
| Just in the during the presentation and. | 02:35:15 | |
| Like that language about the? | 02:35:18 | |
| Railroad crossing it it it is in there. | 02:35:19 | |
| So yeah. | 02:35:23 | |
| Good job. | 02:35:24 | |
| I'm pretty happy. I like and I like all of the stuff that's in there. | 02:35:25 | |
| I would also back that like these standards are brought forth because of hundreds of problems. | 02:35:31 | |
| That have happened over many years. | 02:35:38 | |
| And getting the brightest of minds that are involved in that, like the compaction. | 02:35:40 | |
| And saying what should that standard be for longevity so the problems in the future don't come? | 02:35:45 | |
| And I'm grateful that an organization like that exists as a trade and there's no way I would ever question it. | 02:35:51 | |
| So yeah. | 02:35:58 | |
| 100% vote and I I wouldn't recommend. | 02:35:59 | |
| Altering it at all? | 02:36:03 | |
| Sarah, do you have anything? | 02:36:05 | |
| I actually. | 02:36:08 | |
| Disagree a little bit, because. | 02:36:10 | |
| If the land is. | 02:36:11 | |
| Not usable. | 02:36:14 | |
| To be able to lay asphalt on it and. | 02:36:15 | |
| Repair it every five years to make it usable. | 02:36:17 | |
| That seems like a better use of. | 02:36:20 | |
| Available land. | 02:36:23 | |
| Yeah, I I wonder if we do want to. | 02:36:25 | |
| Pass it tonight if we could. | 02:36:28 | |
| I kind of want to come back to that. I want to go research it a little bit more. | 02:36:32 | |
| So if let's say you walk down that road and the developer builds a Rd. | 02:36:36 | |
| That is over a. | 02:36:41 | |
| Landfill. | 02:36:43 | |
| It would be upon the city. | 02:36:44 | |
| To pay or to fix? | 02:36:46 | |
| That particular problem and by having a standard in that's high. | 02:36:48 | |
| You're risking or taking the liability and saying. | 02:36:53 | |
| We already know based off of hundreds of hours of research that compacted land might be good and they try to do it, but at the end | 02:36:56 | |
| of the day. | 02:36:59 | |
| Whatever given reason. | 02:37:03 | |
| Compacted naturally over thousands of years is more stable and so if we give a variance on that. | 02:37:05 | |
| Then you don't know. | 02:37:12 | |
| I mean, I can't tell you how many hundreds of. | 02:37:15 | |
| Parcels around Vineyard have settled. | 02:37:17 | |
| After the fact of them saying well. | 02:37:21 | |
| They compacted it to a level and they tried and they did their best and they did all the standards but. | 02:37:24 | |
| It ended up just not. | 02:37:29 | |
| Just earth moves. | 02:37:31 | |
| So yeah, no, and I'm 100% with you like I avoiding any of that liability going through all those studies. I I think I'm just | 02:37:33 | |
| saying. | 02:37:37 | |
| I would like to go and research it and study it more and understand it a little bit better before I. | 02:37:42 | |
| Yeah, if I could make a little point of clarification too. So I. | 02:37:48 | |
| I kind of understood it a lot. Like Cal, Jake just said, it's kind of a liability issue, right? | 02:37:53 | |
| But I also understand that there's there's areas in the city like the Camus that we have planned on developing. So we added | 02:37:59 | |
| language to that section that. | 02:38:04 | |
| That basically said that it can still be developed on as long as it goes through all the. | 02:38:09 | |
| State. Federal. Local. | 02:38:14 | |
| Environmental regulations and and all those all those things. So it just kind of adds. So there's a caveat inside of are you | 02:38:16 | |
| saying the camo? | 02:38:20 | |
| We plan on developing the Cambo. Is that what you said? Yeah, that's that's that's what we're talking about here is the. | 02:38:24 | |
| If I'm if I'm correct that that the Camus the only the only use for the Camus is if you put. | 02:38:30 | |
| Some kind of payment on top? | 02:38:37 | |
| You can't have and you. | 02:38:39 | |
| In the code. | 02:38:41 | |
| Which I must have missed, you're saying? | 02:38:42 | |
| There is an availability for that if it goes through all the right processes. Yeah, as long as it goes through all the all the | 02:38:45 | |
| environmental, federal, state and local regulations and processes, then the city engineer or public works director. | 02:38:52 | |
| Maybe I have it. | 02:39:01 | |
| In print. | 02:39:04 | |
| Find this section for you. | 02:39:06 | |
| I think if those two. | 02:39:13 | |
| Things are there that say. | 02:39:15 | |
| As far as leaving rail and the caveat for developing those areas, because it's such a large swath of land and as long as it goes | 02:39:22 | |
| through all the processes to avoid liability. | 02:39:27 | |
| That was my main concern and like I said, I'm 100% with Jake wanting to avoid any liability and any problems like that, but if | 02:39:33 | |
| there is something inside of it that says hey. | 02:39:38 | |
| If. | 02:39:42 | |
| This works out and it looks right, and there's that option. | 02:39:43 | |
| That makes more sense to, I think. | 02:39:47 | |
| If if the. | 02:39:49 | |
| And this may be a question for your city attorney, but you could probably. | 02:39:50 | |
| A vote to approve it. | 02:39:55 | |
| Based on that. | 02:39:57 | |
| Being in the actual ordinance. | 02:40:00 | |
| And then? | 02:40:04 | |
| If it's already there, then it doesn't have to be changed. If it's not, it can be added. | 02:40:06 | |
| Patrick, is there urgency to adopt this today and not at the next Council meeting? | 02:40:10 | |
| Not, not a huge urgency. I mean, we, we have just been in this process for a long time. Our, our current standards and | 02:40:17 | |
| specifications are quite old, you know, dating back to. | 02:40:22 | |
| 20/16/2007 I think, where the Council has taken up. | 02:40:28 | |
| This. | 02:40:32 | |
| Ordinance. | 02:40:34 | |
| If you did have an application that came in in the next month, you could still. | 02:40:35 | |
| Weight and apply. | 02:40:39 | |
| These standards once we have them on the table, because they're on the table already. | 02:40:42 | |
| There's enough concern in this. | 02:40:47 | |
| That I. | 02:40:50 | |
| I think it would be worth the wait. | 02:40:51 | |
| I I think, yeah. | 02:40:53 | |
| Councilmember Holdaway's point is worth looking at because. | 02:40:56 | |
| We don't want the city to be left holding the. | 02:40:59 | |
| The bag, so to speak, if. | 02:41:02 | |
| A developer constructs. | 02:41:05 | |
| On top of compacted soil. | 02:41:06 | |
| And then you have settling in the city's responsible for the maintenance or upkeep of that. | 02:41:09 | |
| Because you'll have more than your routine maintenance, You're going to have to go back in, bring in fill, recompact with soil, | 02:41:15 | |
| deal with whatever utilities are underneath. | 02:41:18 | |
| I wonder if there's a way to allow. | 02:41:23 | |
| If you then have the other problem of are there certain? | 02:41:27 | |
| Properties within the city that would be undevelopable or unusable. | 02:41:30 | |
| If you didn't allow for. | 02:41:35 | |
| Paving. | 02:41:38 | |
| Over compacted soils and I think what we need to figure out is. | 02:41:39 | |
| If you allow for that type of thing, what are the circumstances where you allow it? That gets at what Patrick's talking about. | 02:41:43 | |
| But the other thing I'd like to look at is. | 02:41:50 | |
| Do you allow it only with? | 02:41:52 | |
| Some kind of protection being provided by the developer to the city, right maybe a bond, maybe an insurance product right let's | 02:41:55 | |
| figure out what that is and pair it so that if that use is allowed and we're. | 02:42:02 | |
| Permitting it based on information put forward by the developer that the developer backs it with either a warranty or some kind | 02:42:08 | |
| of. | 02:42:12 | |
| Product that the city can call on to protect itself OK yeah this is an assume I'm sorry. I was I stopped I had stopped out earlier | 02:42:16 | |
| I just had to do some of the other items. But in essence I. | 02:42:22 | |
| We're talking about pairing pavements on top of. | 02:42:29 | |
| The Karen Center, OK, those things, I mean. | 02:42:32 | |
| In essence, we can insist on in essence, what's called a performance based design. | 02:42:35 | |
| I mean in a sense like. | 02:42:42 | |
| The I mean, I'm an engineer. | 02:42:44 | |
| Yeah, I pretend to be once every once in a while, but I'm an engineer and. | 02:42:48 | |
| The the age-old we built it based on the safe standards or redesigned based on the save standards. It doesn't hold much water. | 02:42:52 | |
| On that I say that as an as because I act as an expert engineer witness. | 02:43:01 | |
| On several matters and cases. | 02:43:07 | |
| Were just because. | 02:43:09 | |
| An engineer designed to the certain standards and so forth. If it doesn't come to if it doesn't perform the way that is intended | 02:43:12 | |
| to perform. | 02:43:15 | |
| The engineer of record, the contractor and primarily the engineer records still holds liability to ensure that the performance of | 02:43:18 | |
| that. | 02:43:23 | |
| Was to. | 02:43:27 | |
| Meet the requirements of the intended purposes and they can't hide behind well, I just followed so and so standards. Therefore I'm | 02:43:28 | |
| I'm not liable. I say this having. | 02:43:34 | |
| Recently. | 02:43:41 | |
| Like 20 foot rockery failures where they followed a certain city's standard to the T but it failed within and like it failed | 02:43:45 | |
| within like less than 10 years. | 02:43:49 | |
| On that. | 02:43:54 | |
| And then of course, like building collapses and so forth. | 02:43:55 | |
| So again. | 02:43:59 | |
| On something like this I would say that the. | 02:44:01 | |
| Kind of a based on Jamie's point, I mean there is a bond, there's warranties on there, but even past that there is. | 02:44:03 | |
| I'll say that there is liability. | 02:44:08 | |
| The engineers by themselves. | 02:44:11 | |
| Do have a? | 02:44:14 | |
| Liability that they're that they had to, they have to abide to. | 02:44:15 | |
| Yeah, I like all of that. I think that's fine. So the recommendation is to continue it to the next meeting then? Yeah, that would | 02:44:18 | |
| be my recommendation. And then let's work language into the. | 02:44:23 | |
| I've into the ordinance that will protect the city. | 02:44:28 | |
| OK, I found this section in wording if you're curious to hear it now, Sure. | 02:44:31 | |
| So it's 1.08.09 specialized engineering. | 02:44:35 | |
| So, landfill construction debris or garbage. Any work around and related to landfills or areas with buried debris, waste or | 02:44:39 | |
| garbage will require phase one environmental report with recommendations for additional study. | 02:44:45 | |
| No buildings, paved parking lots, paved roads, curb, gutter, sidewalks or allowed. | 02:44:51 | |
| Are allowed. | 02:44:56 | |
| To be located over landfills, construction debris or garbage unless otherwise approved by the appropriate federal, state, and or | 02:44:57 | |
| city agency having jurisdiction. | 02:45:01 | |
| OK, that's great. | 02:45:06 | |
| So it looks like if anybody makes an application, we can already. | 02:45:07 | |
| Work within these. | 02:45:11 | |
| The processes that you've outlined before us, this was really thorough and helpful. Thank you so much. | 02:45:12 | |
| And I just need a motion to continue it to the next. | 02:45:18 | |
| Are we, are we expecting a development to come? | 02:45:22 | |
| Is under this. | 02:45:26 | |
| I don't think so. | 02:45:27 | |
| I think before the end of the year. | 02:45:28 | |
| To us, is there somebody that's like, well, it would apply to? | 02:45:30 | |
| Lot or parcel that pulls a building permit, right? | 02:45:35 | |
| What would be expected so? | 02:45:39 | |
| Maybe, but I don't know that we have. | 02:45:41 | |
| Large application pending or are we expecting the orchards before the end of the year? | 02:45:44 | |
| Not a new phase, no. | 02:45:50 | |
| Yeah, there's always, there's always continuing developments coming up. | 02:45:53 | |
| But the developers have been really good to work with us on on getting what we. | 02:45:57 | |
| What we want anyway. | 02:46:02 | |
| These these standards just kind of. | 02:46:03 | |
| Protect us so that. | 02:46:06 | |
| If we if we make an ask, we, we say this, this is in our standards, right? They they cannot dispute it. | 02:46:08 | |
| But yeah, there's no immediate development reason why we wouldn't just. | 02:46:15 | |
| Approve this and then come back and make the small changes that you're talking about because I think there's so much protection. | 02:46:18 | |
| You could do that as well. Let's just do that because there's so much protection in what he's talking about. | 02:46:24 | |
| That we could just carve out what we. | 02:46:29 | |
| Don't like? | 02:46:31 | |
| Like what you're saying? | 02:46:33 | |
| I do want to add that it's kind of our goal. | 02:46:35 | |
| Letting standards go several years without an update is not. | 02:46:39 | |
| Good practice generally. So as I read through, I was actually concerned about the liability of like so many of these things. If | 02:46:43 | |
| you let's get this in this fact, if you want to go that direction, that makes sense. | 02:46:48 | |
| What I would recommend so that you don't have to re notice a public hearing. | 02:46:53 | |
| Is that you continue not just the ordinance but also the hearing? | 02:46:58 | |
| To the next meeting and then. | 02:47:03 | |
| That way you can adopt what you have now but not have to re notice things. | 02:47:07 | |
| So how would the motion look? Let me I guess look at Naseem or should we just re notice it for the next meeting also? | 02:47:11 | |
| So we'll adopt tonight. | 02:47:19 | |
| Let me restate it. I didn't say that very clearly. | 02:47:21 | |
| To adopt an ordinance with development standards, you have to go through the land use notice and comment, right? So it goes not | 02:47:24 | |
| just the council, but to. | 02:47:29 | |
| Your Planning Commission. | 02:47:34 | |
| You have already done that, so you've. | 02:47:35 | |
| And you've held part of the public hearing today. | 02:47:39 | |
| I don't want to. | 02:47:41 | |
| Have to redo all of the. | 02:47:42 | |
| Procedure before. | 02:47:44 | |
| You make an additional change in your next meeting. | 02:47:46 | |
| So I think what you. | 02:47:50 | |
| Probably. | 02:47:53 | |
| I'm going to think out loud on this and I. | 02:47:54 | |
| Hope I'm not wrong. | 02:47:56 | |
| On it but. | 02:47:57 | |
| If you wish to adopt it today, I think you probably have to rehear it before it comes to you at your next meeting. | 02:48:00 | |
| If you wish to continue it. | 02:48:07 | |
| To your next meeting then. | 02:48:09 | |
| I don't think you have to redo the hearing because you've done that. You would just continue. | 02:48:11 | |
| And make the decision at a later point in time. There's not a perfect answer. | 02:48:16 | |
| With that procedural wrinkle. | 02:48:21 | |
| What do you guys feel comfortable with this is you guys have in the next week or two like the the things that you want changed? | 02:48:25 | |
| Like Mayor, do you? | 02:48:32 | |
| Just the compaction of dirt thing. | 02:48:35 | |
| It's that small thing. | 02:48:37 | |
| Yeah, I I mean. | 02:48:40 | |
| If you guys want to adopt it because you feel comfortable with it, I think that hits. | 02:48:41 | |
| My thing, I think you could put additional protections in for liability like Jamie was saying. | 02:48:46 | |
| Which is why you'd want to re notice it and put more things in. | 02:48:51 | |
| There is AI mean the ordinance and. | 02:48:55 | |
| I hope I'm right about this, but some of them bad levels could maybe may be may able to be addressed at the DRC level because | 02:48:58 | |
| there's a part of the ordinance that allows. | 02:49:03 | |
| For. | 02:49:08 | |
| Areas, emissions and other. | 02:49:09 | |
| Updates to meet certain statutes statutory standards to be done at the DRC, but the question the same is whether the city could | 02:49:12 | |
| apply an additional. | 02:49:16 | |
| Bond or insurance requirement for that kind of development, so I don't. | 02:49:21 | |
| I think you're right as it relates to. | 02:49:25 | |
| The engineer standing behind their work. But what that doesn't give you is a financial resource the city can turn to. | 02:49:28 | |
| If what's constructed fails. | 02:49:35 | |
| And so I. | 02:49:38 | |
| I'd like the idea of if you have. | 02:49:39 | |
| A requirement related to construction to design is that the language you used? | 02:49:43 | |
| That you would pair it with. | 02:49:48 | |
| Something that would make the city whole. | 02:49:50 | |
| If it failed within a certain period of time. | 02:49:53 | |
| On most construction you're going to have a one year warranty and maybe on. | 02:49:56 | |
| Pavement over compacted soils, you extend that. | 02:50:00 | |
| A period of time based on what's built. | 02:50:04 | |
| I am not an engineer and so I don't want to speculate as to what that would be or what it might look like. | 02:50:07 | |
| And I think we also have to look at the state law restrictions on how long you can hold those things and under what circumstances, | 02:50:14 | |
| because there are there are more moving parts and. | 02:50:18 | |
| Yeah, the structural failures I've been part of have been usually 7-8 years old. | 02:50:25 | |
| And on that portion of it, but yeah, you're right. | 02:50:30 | |
| So I don't know that I have a preference whether the city adopts. | 02:50:34 | |
| Whether the Council adopts us today or at its next meeting, just know that. | 02:50:37 | |
| If you adopt it today, we probably have to re notice it. This is what I think the new part through that process, this is what I'm | 02:50:42 | |
| thinking. If no changes really come except for additional burden on removing liability from the city, let's continue it and put it | 02:50:47 | |
| on like our consent agenda. If we add it something additional and if we don't, we'll have it on our consent agenda and we'll just | 02:50:52 | |
| pass it as it. | 02:50:57 | |
| Was resembled tonight. | 02:51:02 | |
| You know. | 02:51:03 | |
| Because to anybody's point, that says. | 02:51:04 | |
| Something could happen where somebody makes an application, not that there is an application. | 02:51:07 | |
| Jamie already said because we have these underway. | 02:51:11 | |
| You can use these standards as a guide for what we're doing so. | 02:51:15 | |
| Can I get a motion to continue it to the next meeting? | 02:51:19 | |
| I'd be happy to do so, but I comment I wanted to make first. I think there is language in there about. | 02:51:22 | |
| Bonding and accepting in. | 02:51:28 | |
| Extended warranty. | 02:51:31 | |
| I'm not sure if they're in. | 02:51:32 | |
| This exact context or not, but I'm pretty sure I saw that in there. | 02:51:33 | |
| There is a bonding section in the specifications so. | 02:51:37 | |
| Our process that whenever there's a permit comes through, we we diagnose basically what what we would need it for a bond. | 02:51:41 | |
| Based on the cost of construction or or what would happen and we. | 02:51:48 | |
| We implement or we ask for a bond. | 02:51:51 | |
| For each permit, it's kind of a permit by permit basis. OK. Would you mind continuing it? | 02:51:54 | |
| OK, so move to continue it. | 02:51:59 | |
| All right, can I get a second? | 02:52:01 | |
| Second, thanks Sarah, all in favor. | 02:52:03 | |
| Aye. | 02:52:05 | |
| All right, that brings us to the close of our meeting. | 02:52:06 | |
| Have a great night. | 02:52:08 |