Development Review Committee
Live stream not working in Chrome or Edge?
Troubleshooting steps
In your browser: open Menu (three dots) → Settings → System → turn off “Use graphics acceleration when available.” Then restart the browser.
Transcript
| I can have. | 00:00:00 | |
| Anthony, are you able to hop on? | 00:00:05 | |
| Thank you. | 00:00:09 | |
| All right, I'd like to call the order of the. | 00:00:31 | |
| DRC meeting is October 16th. | 00:00:34 | |
| And it is 9:11 AM. | 00:00:37 | |
| Move to our consent items. We have a 2.1 approval of the September 18, 2025 DRC meeting minutes. Can I get in a? | 00:00:41 | |
| Yeah. | 00:00:52 | |
| Aye, Motion to approve the. | 00:00:57 | |
| DRC maintenance of September 18th. | 00:00:59 | |
| 2025. | 00:01:01 | |
| First N. | 00:01:03 | |
| 2nd. | 00:01:05 | |
| Second by Eric, All in favor. | 00:01:06 | |
| Aye, any opposed? | 00:01:08 | |
| That moves us to our. | 00:01:12 | |
| Work session. | 00:01:13 | |
| 4.1 An update to the Vineyard City development standards and design specifications. | 00:01:15 | |
| And they believe Patrick is going to present this? | 00:01:20 | |
| Yeah, let me get. | 00:01:25 | |
| Get up on the screen. | 00:01:26 | |
| OK. | 00:01:48 | |
| So we have been. | 00:01:53 | |
| Consulting with. | 00:01:55 | |
| Chris Thompson. | 00:01:57 | |
| Who is now with? | 00:01:58 | |
| Hence now and in loose. | 00:01:59 | |
| To revise our. | 00:02:02 | |
| Construction standard drawings and and specifications. | 00:02:04 | |
| And we are. | 00:02:09 | |
| At completion or. | 00:02:10 | |
| Very near completion on those now. | 00:02:12 | |
| The reason the purpose for this is. | 00:02:16 | |
| I guess there's a couple reasons that we've been doing this. | 00:02:19 | |
| First of all. | 00:02:22 | |
| It's been quite a while since. | 00:02:23 | |
| The standard drawings and specifications were updated. | 00:02:25 | |
| I believe the last. | 00:02:29 | |
| The last round of. | 00:02:30 | |
| Updates for the drawings were was 2016 I believe. | 00:02:31 | |
| So it's been quite a while. | 00:02:36 | |
| Some of the specifications even go back to 2007. | 00:02:39 | |
| So it was. It was. | 00:02:43 | |
| Quite needed. | 00:02:45 | |
| For an update. | 00:02:46 | |
| Another reason for the update is. | 00:02:48 | |
| Apwa. | 00:02:53 | |
| Updated their specifications in standard drawings. | 00:02:55 | |
| And with that. | 00:02:58 | |
| So they have this 2025 edition. | 00:03:00 | |
| Now. And with that, we wanted to. | 00:03:03 | |
| Kind of. | 00:03:06 | |
| Adopt more apwa. | 00:03:07 | |
| Come in more alignment with other cities. | 00:03:10 | |
| Across Utah. | 00:03:13 | |
| And these? | 00:03:15 | |
| Specifications and drawings from. | 00:03:16 | |
| From APW. | 00:03:18 | |
| Apwa are are. | 00:03:19 | |
| Quite extensive and pretty good. | 00:03:21 | |
| And so it's it just makes sense to adopt A lot of a lot of that. | 00:03:24 | |
| And. | 00:03:30 | |
| Just kind of. | 00:03:31 | |
| Make. | 00:03:33 | |
| Things more simple for for construction specifications on that front. | 00:03:33 | |
| APWA also. | 00:03:39 | |
| Made. I'll just show you like real quick. | 00:03:42 | |
| So these. | 00:03:45 | |
| So their plans and and specifications are. | 00:03:46 | |
| Our online. | 00:03:49 | |
| Free to use SO. | 00:03:52 | |
| All cities, all contractors, all. | 00:03:55 | |
| Design engineers can easily get on there and find these. | 00:03:57 | |
| Now which? | 00:04:02 | |
| As I was previously a design engineer, so I. | 00:04:03 | |
| Very much appreciate that. | 00:04:08 | |
| Let me input that. | 00:04:12 | |
| Dinner, but you're still a design engineer. | 00:04:13 | |
| Yeah, yeah. | 00:04:15 | |
| I guess so. | 00:04:16 | |
| In a way sometimes. | 00:04:18 | |
| So just to go through some changes in our specifications, probably the biggest change. | 00:04:22 | |
| That we did was we we completely reformatted the specifications. | 00:04:29 | |
| We changed around the sections and the. | 00:04:35 | |
| And the titles headings. | 00:04:39 | |
| Just to try to make it more clear. | 00:04:41 | |
| And so. | 00:04:44 | |
| And then? | 00:04:45 | |
| We're also. | 00:04:46 | |
| Putting that on to Municode. | 00:04:48 | |
| So and everything has links. | 00:04:51 | |
| So contractors or engineers can go in there and. | 00:04:54 | |
| Click on links and it'll take it right to. | 00:04:57 | |
| Specific sections or other parts of our code which will be really nice. | 00:05:01 | |
| So that's really. | 00:05:07 | |
| You know the bulk of it. | 00:05:09 | |
| But our specifications is to reiterate a little bit, our specifications are. | 00:05:11 | |
| Are more like a supplemental specification set. | 00:05:16 | |
| Supplemental to the APWA specifications. | 00:05:20 | |
| We also had a design criteria. | 00:05:27 | |
| Document. | 00:05:31 | |
| That, uh. | 00:05:32 | |
| That you can see the date down here for that was 2016. | 00:05:33 | |
| So needed. | 00:05:37 | |
| A little updating. | 00:05:38 | |
| And this design document for up until now it was a stand alone document. | 00:05:41 | |
| But we decided to integrate this document into our specifications. | 00:05:47 | |
| So now this is all. | 00:05:52 | |
| In our specifications. | 00:05:54 | |
| We also went through the Transportation Master Plan update. | 00:05:59 | |
| A lot of our cross section, Rd. cross section has changed things like that. | 00:06:04 | |
| And so now our specifications. | 00:06:08 | |
| Refer to the new Transportation Master plan and reflect the updated. | 00:06:11 | |
| Cross sections and things that are found in the master plan. | 00:06:17 | |
| I guess I could just actually do a slideshow. | 00:06:25 | |
| So to give you an example of. | 00:06:29 | |
| Of some of those so these are in the new cross sections that. | 00:06:31 | |
| That were shown. | 00:06:35 | |
| That are shown in our. | 00:06:36 | |
| Transportation master plan. | 00:06:38 | |
| Just giving some updates on. | 00:06:41 | |
| On what our standard St. | 00:06:44 | |
| Section will look like. | 00:06:46 | |
| So as I mentioned before. | 00:06:56 | |
| This will all be This will be a book. Now our. | 00:06:59 | |
| Specifications and drawings will be. | 00:07:02 | |
| A book in Municode now. | 00:07:05 | |
| And so it'll be. | 00:07:07 | |
| Right there along our other code. | 00:07:08 | |
| And so people can easily. | 00:07:11 | |
| Find it. | 00:07:13 | |
| And cross reference. | 00:07:14 | |
| Other codes. | 00:07:16 | |
| So that'll be really nice. | 00:07:17 | |
| We have several links in the specifications that will link you directly to. | 00:07:22 | |
| Codes or ordinances, specifically storm water. | 00:07:28 | |
| Criteria. Things like that. | 00:07:32 | |
| Here. | 00:07:37 | |
| Like a few notable. | 00:07:38 | |
| Changes. | 00:07:39 | |
| That were made. | 00:07:41 | |
| We added a requirement for contractors to submit. | 00:07:43 | |
| Time dated video footage. | 00:07:47 | |
| Of the construction site. | 00:07:49 | |
| Before they start construction that way. | 00:07:51 | |
| If there's any disputes. | 00:07:54 | |
| We can go back and reference that video. | 00:07:55 | |
| And see what was damaged during construction. | 00:07:58 | |
| To protect the city and. | 00:08:03 | |
| Just keep. | 00:08:07 | |
| Keep things up to date there. | 00:08:07 | |
| Another big change was all curbing gutter. We decided to change to 30 inch. | 00:08:10 | |
| Curb and gutter We're currently at 24 inch. | 00:08:16 | |
| That reduces the amount of pavement. | 00:08:20 | |
| That is, is that in the road? | 00:08:23 | |
| Reduces maintenance costs and deterioration. | 00:08:25 | |
| Concrete holds up a lot better. | 00:08:29 | |
| There are also benefits with stormwater. | 00:08:31 | |
| A 30 inch curb and gutter can hold. | 00:08:35 | |
| Hold more storm water. | 00:08:38 | |
| Has more capacity there. | 00:08:40 | |
| We understand that. | 00:08:43 | |
| Since we have been using 24 inch with carbon gutter for. | 00:08:46 | |
| A long time. | 00:08:50 | |
| Most of our city has 24 inch curb and gutter. | 00:08:51 | |
| So. | 00:08:55 | |
| We we will analyze. | 00:08:55 | |
| Each location as new developments come in, we don't want. | 00:08:58 | |
| You know, weird mismatch of curbing gutters so. | 00:09:02 | |
| Will allow developers to still use the 24 inch in situations where it matches up to the existing. | 00:09:05 | |
| I envision this as mostly. | 00:09:13 | |
| This will be mostly applied in the. | 00:09:15 | |
| East Geneva area. | 00:09:19 | |
| When that gets developed. | 00:09:21 | |
| Another reason for this is UDOT uses a 30 inch curb and gutter. So wherever our curb and gutter. | 00:09:24 | |
| Matches up with Udots. | 00:09:31 | |
| It it will make for a more seamless transition. | 00:09:33 | |
| Going from a 30 inch to a 24. | 00:09:38 | |
| Causes some weird. | 00:09:41 | |
| Weird issues. | 00:09:42 | |
| And so that will help with that. | 00:09:44 | |
| So within 250 feet of railroad crossings, no St. intersections, and a diagnostic required for accesses. | 00:09:48 | |
| This is something we that have that's come up a few times. | 00:09:57 | |
| Fairly recently. | 00:10:02 | |
| Any development near our railroad crossing needs a diagnostic review by. | 00:10:03 | |
| By the railroad and UDOT. | 00:10:10 | |
| And so that. | 00:10:12 | |
| That just. | 00:10:13 | |
| Puts it in the in the specification so that. | 00:10:14 | |
| Where that gets caught? | 00:10:17 | |
| It's not a good thing to start. | 00:10:19 | |
| Construction and then go back and. | 00:10:22 | |
| Do a diagnostic later and kind of ask for forgiveness. | 00:10:25 | |
| And so this this will put it up front. | 00:10:28 | |
| Full, yeah. | 00:10:32 | |
| Does it need to be stated? | 00:10:34 | |
| At grade. | 00:10:36 | |
| Is that just inferred? | 00:10:37 | |
| That is a good question, I'll. | 00:10:40 | |
| I'll check and see if. | 00:10:41 | |
| If we need to put at grade in there. | 00:10:45 | |
| I don't think it mentions at. | 00:10:50 | |
| Presumably it wouldn't. | 00:10:54 | |
| Apply within. | 00:10:56 | |
| Overpass. | 00:10:57 | |
| Because it wouldn't. | 00:11:00 | |
| There would really be no conflict with. | 00:11:01 | |
| Lining up cars. | 00:11:04 | |
| Associated with a railroad, which is what I assume that that. | 00:11:05 | |
| Consideration is for. | 00:11:09 | |
| Yeah. | 00:11:11 | |
| Yeah, I think it would just I think it's common for it and in the engineering world, when you say crossing. | 00:11:12 | |
| Crosses through and. | 00:11:17 | |
| You know, we use overpass or underpass quite often, but. | 00:11:19 | |
| Maybe just to make sure that it's written properly for the? | 00:11:22 | |
| Layperson. | 00:11:25 | |
| But typically like even. | 00:11:34 | |
| It doesn't really specify it. | 00:11:39 | |
| Necessarily, but. | 00:11:41 | |
| We'll get, we'll have that clarified. We can even put down as, as, as required or as needed. So therefore things change in the | 00:11:42 | |
| future we can. | 00:11:46 | |
| Ensure that Union Pacific or. | 00:11:49 | |
| Or the railroad authority. | 00:11:52 | |
| Gets coordinated communication with. | 00:11:54 | |
| OK, that's a good point. | 00:12:02 | |
| We added a specification there that. | 00:12:08 | |
| During developments at the full. | 00:12:12 | |
| When they come up to an intersection as a road intersection and there's a phase line that. | 00:12:14 | |
| Full intersection must be constructed. | 00:12:19 | |
| I don't know if we've necessarily had issues with that in the past, but. | 00:12:22 | |
| That's just a good thing to put in there so we don't end up having. | 00:12:25 | |
| Half's intersections. | 00:12:30 | |
| This awkward. | 00:12:32 | |
| Traffic flows. | 00:12:34 | |
| Buildings or pavements not allowed over landfill. | 00:12:37 | |
| Areas, uh. | 00:12:40 | |
| So this one we put we. | 00:12:42 | |
| We put a clause in there because we we will have a lot of. | 00:12:44 | |
| A lot of construction over. | 00:12:48 | |
| Garbage. Not really garbage, but. | 00:12:52 | |
| Construction debris, debris from Geneva, things like that. When, when? | 00:12:55 | |
| Development happens in that area. | 00:13:00 | |
| So there is a clause that. | 00:13:03 | |
| That. | 00:13:04 | |
| We'll have. We'll have that. | 00:13:06 | |
| Reviewed and. | 00:13:08 | |
| We can allow it in certain circumstances. | 00:13:09 | |
| But that's this is kind of protects. | 00:13:14 | |
| Protects us from. | 00:13:17 | |
| From developers just building over. | 00:13:18 | |
| Places they should not be building. | 00:13:21 | |
| For the standard drawing some changes. | 00:13:25 | |
| We added a fire hydrant apron. | 00:13:29 | |
| And I can show you that. | 00:13:33 | |
| A little bit later. | 00:13:34 | |
| New large meter assembly drawing. This has come up a lot lately. | 00:13:37 | |
| Because of the downtown area. | 00:13:41 | |
| Up until. | 00:13:45 | |
| Up until. | 00:13:46 | |
| All the development before the downtown area. | 00:13:47 | |
| We've we've only gone up to like a 2 inch meter. | 00:13:49 | |
| In our standard drawing went up to A2 inch meter. | 00:13:52 | |
| We had a drawing in there that. | 00:13:56 | |
| That had. | 00:13:58 | |
| A larger meter. | 00:14:00 | |
| Vault, but it was very confusing it. | 00:14:01 | |
| Seemed like it was pulled from something else and didn't really. | 00:14:04 | |
| Wasn't really applicable to our needs. | 00:14:07 | |
| And so we created a three inch. | 00:14:09 | |
| Meter Vault. | 00:14:11 | |
| Or three inch or larger meter vault detail. | 00:14:12 | |
| Which is. | 00:14:16 | |
| The new standard for. | 00:14:17 | |
| Pretty much all or. | 00:14:19 | |
| I would say all but. | 00:14:20 | |
| Most of the meters that are being installed in the downtown area. | 00:14:22 | |
| So that was that was very much needed. | 00:14:25 | |
| We added a sewer clean out at back of sidewalk. That's a requirement. | 00:14:29 | |
| By the state now. | 00:14:34 | |
| Parking lot layout drawing. This is another big one. | 00:14:36 | |
| We had parking lot. | 00:14:40 | |
| Dimensions or parking space dimensions in our code. | 00:14:43 | |
| But it got missed frequently and. | 00:14:47 | |
| It wasn't very clear, so we added a full sheet in our details showing parking lot dimensions or parking dimensions. | 00:14:51 | |
| And that will be a focus or. | 00:14:59 | |
| Has been really a focus of. | 00:15:01 | |
| Our engineering reviews. | 00:15:03 | |
| And then we're removing the requirement for survey monuments and roads. That's just kind of with today's technology, that's not | 00:15:06 | |
| really a. | 00:15:10 | |
| A requirement that. | 00:15:15 | |
| That we need. | 00:15:17 | |
| And it. | 00:15:18 | |
| Creates issues. | 00:15:19 | |
| It just puts puts more stuff in the road that can have issues. | 00:15:20 | |
| Questions. | 00:15:25 | |
| Yeah, on. | 00:15:26 | |
| 10890. | 00:15:29 | |
| Do you have a? | 00:15:31 | |
| Definition of landfilled areas somewhere. | 00:15:32 | |
| It's a little bit more detailed in the in the specifications. | 00:15:36 | |
| Typically we just follow with the state and state where estate definition is when it comes to landfills. | 00:15:40 | |
| On that like for example if it's a. | 00:15:46 | |
| Now if it's a, it was a designated landfill like it was permitted landfills and there was unpermitted landfills sometimes. | 00:15:48 | |
| Now I've ran into this quite a bit. | 00:15:54 | |
| Myself were. | 00:15:57 | |
| During the. | 00:16:00 | |
| Specifically back I think prior to the 1970s, there was quite a bit of. | 00:16:05 | |
| You know, now they call them illegal landfills. | 00:16:09 | |
| People just dumping places there for but since it was a large enough. | 00:16:12 | |
| Of a area for dumping. | 00:16:16 | |
| The state classes cloth. | 00:16:18 | |
| Classifieds them as a landfill. | 00:16:20 | |
| Even though they're not technically supposed to show been one or to be 1. | 00:16:22 | |
| On that. | 00:16:25 | |
| So that would be that would. | 00:16:26 | |
| So we would fall underneath the state definition of what a landfill would be. | 00:16:28 | |
| Obviously with. | 00:16:32 | |
| I mean during our state. | 00:16:33 | |
| Regulations and laws prohibiting. | 00:16:36 | |
| Contractors from Baron Trash. | 00:16:38 | |
| On site as well, so I mean. | 00:16:40 | |
| That. | 00:16:42 | |
| In itself would be a violation to state to state law that they wouldn't be able to severity trash and then build on top of it. | 00:16:43 | |
| But if? | 00:16:50 | |
| As an example, I'll just use this as a. | 00:16:52 | |
| And correct me if I'm wrong, Patrick. | 00:16:54 | |
| For sure, but. | 00:16:56 | |
| A very site developer. | 00:16:57 | |
| Purchases a piece of parcel. | 00:16:58 | |
| The person's piece of parcel decides to what they want to build something. | 00:17:00 | |
| Goes through the site planning and so forth and during the geotechnical. | 00:17:04 | |
| They discovered there was like an old landfill. | 00:17:08 | |
| That was on the site they purchased. | 00:17:11 | |
| They would not be allowed to. | 00:17:14 | |
| Build on it. They would have to. | 00:17:15 | |
| Eat they're physically remove it. | 00:17:16 | |
| Or resubmit a new site plan in order to avoid itself. | 00:17:18 | |
| I mean, it would just be based on state, state laws and regulations. | 00:17:23 | |
| Yeah, I mean. | 00:17:27 | |
| Buy to. I mean, we had one my little city. | 00:17:28 | |
| Where the landfill was actually done by the city, it was illegally done by the city, apparently. | 00:17:31 | |
| The four permitting permits were had existed and. | 00:17:35 | |
| The city wanted to build a skate park on top of it. | 00:17:38 | |
| And we? | 00:17:41 | |
| Me, we had to tell, we had to ourselves that we weren't allowed to build a skate park on top of the landfill. | 00:17:43 | |
| I guess I just would. | 00:17:48 | |
| I think it might be helpful to have a definition. | 00:17:49 | |
| Attached to that. | 00:17:52 | |
| I know that the East Geneva site. | 00:17:54 | |
| Has. | 00:17:56 | |
| A lot of. | 00:17:58 | |
| Materials. | 00:18:00 | |
| That will ultimately be. | 00:18:01 | |
| Buried and I. | 00:18:04 | |
| I wouldn't want to prevent them from. | 00:18:05 | |
| Having concrete debris, for example, that's. | 00:18:08 | |
| Geotechnically sound. | 00:18:12 | |
| Preventing them from putting something on top of it. | 00:18:14 | |
| And and so. | 00:18:17 | |
| A definition would be good so that it's if the intent is no garbage landfill. | 00:18:20 | |
| Yeah, you know. | 00:18:25 | |
| Surface build. | 00:18:26 | |
| Let's be clear about that because there are definitely going to be areas that have. | 00:18:28 | |
| Debris fields. | 00:18:33 | |
| Yeah, and that's why. | 00:18:35 | |
| I thought the same thing. When when? | 00:18:38 | |
| This was added and this is how it reads. | 00:18:40 | |
| Landfill construction debris or garbage Any workaround and related to landfills or areas with buried debris, waste or garbage will | 00:18:44 | |
| require a Phase one environmental report. | 00:18:48 | |
| With recommendations for additional study. No buildings, paved parking lots, paved roads, curb, gutter, sidewalks are allowed to | 00:18:54 | |
| be located over landfills, construction debris or garbage. | 00:18:58 | |
| And then we added this part. | 00:19:03 | |
| Unless otherwise approved by the appropriate federal, state, and or city agency having jurisdiction. | 00:19:05 | |
| Because I. | 00:19:12 | |
| I understood that there will be areas in over in that area that will have a lot of debris. Yeah. And kind of slicing like cutting | 00:19:13 | |
| here is a little bit. | 00:19:17 | |
| Oh yeah. But yeah, the kind of hair has answered things. | 00:19:23 | |
| Like a previous structure, like foundation of our previous structure is not technically considered landfill. | 00:19:26 | |
| Or the way it's kind of, it's kind of it's considered. | 00:19:31 | |
| Though that would be classified as abandoned. | 00:19:34 | |
| Abandoned structure. | 00:19:37 | |
| So this being noted as a balance structure on top of it, it wouldn't be considered ninefold. There's certain things that. | 00:19:39 | |
| Would require state, probably like mitigations. | 00:19:45 | |
| Like a. | 00:19:49 | |
| Asphalt. | 00:19:50 | |
| If those ******* was buried underneath there, then the state. | 00:19:51 | |
| Actually has regulations that. | 00:19:55 | |
| They would not. That would not be a permissible use, but. | 00:19:57 | |
| Usually old legacy things. | 00:20:00 | |
| If it was done for a purpose like. | 00:20:03 | |
| Foundations. | 00:20:04 | |
| It's not, it's not considered the construction debris or. | 00:20:05 | |
| Or so forth. The biggest. | 00:20:09 | |
| Concern on this is really just again, it's mostly to help about on the building. | 00:20:11 | |
| Is to ensure that the structural stability of the foundations that was being built on top of that is being assured. | 00:20:16 | |
| Yeah, I. | 00:20:22 | |
| The geotechnical. | 00:20:23 | |
| Stipulation. | 00:20:26 | |
| Because we do know that the. | 00:20:28 | |
| The remaining mountain. | 00:20:29 | |
| In the East Geneva site. | 00:20:31 | |
| Yeah, the intent is not to fully eliminate that. The intent is to bring it down to a. | 00:20:33 | |
| A certain height that's. | 00:20:38 | |
| Comparable to the Camus. | 00:20:40 | |
| Right. Yeah. | 00:20:41 | |
| And then? | 00:20:42 | |
| Finish conducting their geotechnical on it and do something on top of it. So. | 00:20:43 | |
| Yeah, I. | 00:20:48 | |
| Shoot that one in the foot right off the bat. | 00:20:50 | |
| Right. And and this, this kind of acts as a catch. | 00:20:51 | |
| In a way so we can require additional studies or like the environmental reports and whatnot on it. | 00:20:56 | |
| May not have been an issue regardless, but I think it's a good thing to have still. | 00:21:04 | |
| If there's soil tests. | 00:21:10 | |
| That are included in those geotechnical. | 00:21:12 | |
| That kind of stuff, yeah. Is there anything particular that you're thinking about on those? | 00:21:15 | |
| Just in our responses out there, there was plenty of. | 00:21:21 | |
| Sporadic dump sites where they just put their chemicals like. | 00:21:25 | |
| That they they had out there and. | 00:21:30 | |
| Just thinking about. | 00:21:33 | |
| Isn't that, yeah, isn't that usually required on like a phase two environmental? | 00:21:35 | |
| I'm not as familiar with environment, Yeah, I mean. | 00:21:39 | |
| So I mean, I might. | 00:21:43 | |
| Don't quote me on this. I mean, it's kind of on record, but. | 00:21:45 | |
| On the phase so. | 00:21:48 | |
| Your typical phase one environmental just kind of like the side survey. See again then historical. | 00:21:50 | |
| Use like, well, what's what's what has it been used for and what's been found. | 00:21:54 | |
| And then that would trigger your like you know your requirements for a phase two. The Phase 2 is when you go into your soil | 00:21:59 | |
| testing. | 00:22:02 | |
| And more of like, OK, what's the actual is? | 00:22:05 | |
| Air quotes contamination in the ground and what would have to be done based on the use of. | 00:22:09 | |
| Was being proposed. | 00:22:14 | |
| And that all happens before anything can be built that that would happen like I mean. | 00:22:16 | |
| As part of SO yesterday we went out and toured that site. | 00:22:20 | |
| And sat down and kind of went through the. | 00:22:24 | |
| Regulatory side of it. | 00:22:28 | |
| And they have. | 00:22:30 | |
| Rick Rah and then a number of other. | 00:22:31 | |
| Kind of oversight. | 00:22:35 | |
| Plans and. | 00:22:37 | |
| Jurisdiction through Department of Environmental quality. | 00:22:40 | |
| That are managing that environmental cleanup site and. | 00:22:43 | |
| And that includes. | 00:22:47 | |
| Intense monitoring of soils. | 00:22:48 | |
| All the way down to groundwater. | 00:22:51 | |
| And how they're how they're laying the material back out and spreading it and what materials they're spreading and where they can | 00:22:55 | |
| spread it and what that will. | 00:22:59 | |
| That will dictate future potential development and so. | 00:23:03 | |
| The Department of Environmental quality issues different levels of. | 00:23:07 | |
| Of development. | 00:23:12 | |
| Opportunity. | 00:23:13 | |
| Once those plans are complete. | 00:23:15 | |
| They'll issue. | 00:23:18 | |
| Essentially either a. | 00:23:20 | |
| No further action. No further action needed or they'll issue different levels of. | 00:23:21 | |
| This could be commercial, but only commercial. | 00:23:27 | |
| This could be. | 00:23:29 | |
| Residential or you know, there's no further action as you can do anything you want there. | 00:23:31 | |
| But that there's other tiers and so. | 00:23:35 | |
| Before they can develop. | 00:23:37 | |
| They it won't just be a soil test, it will be. | 00:23:39 | |
| You know, years of soil testing. | 00:23:42 | |
| All documented. | 00:23:45 | |
| With a final report that. | 00:23:47 | |
| Dictates what can then go there, and then it'll. Just after that it'll be. | 00:23:49 | |
| Whatever. | 00:23:53 | |
| The. | 00:23:54 | |
| Land use and zoning. | 00:23:56 | |
| Would allow for. | 00:23:58 | |
| Great. Exactly. | 00:23:59 | |
| Yeah. | 00:24:02 | |
| Moving on, there's. | 00:24:07 | |
| So. | 00:24:09 | |
| We're showing the. | 00:24:10 | |
| The uh. | 00:24:12 | |
| Right away cross sections, the the right away cross section they showed earlier were the ones that were in the transportation | 00:24:13 | |
| master plan. | 00:24:16 | |
| So. | 00:24:19 | |
| Kind of recreated in our in our drawings. | 00:24:21 | |
| But then. | 00:24:24 | |
| In the standard drawings, it also shows placement of. | 00:24:25 | |
| Utilities. | 00:24:29 | |
| You probably can't see this. | 00:24:30 | |
| Real well, but. | 00:24:32 | |
| It shows kind of the general layout of how utilities should be installed under the roads. | 00:24:34 | |
| Land drain, Sewer. | 00:24:41 | |
| Water and storm drain. | 00:24:42 | |
| And I really liked this update because. | 00:24:47 | |
| It is a requirement by the state that. | 00:24:50 | |
| Sewer and water are. | 00:24:52 | |
| Our place 10 feet apart. | 00:24:54 | |
| Minimum. | 00:24:56 | |
| And. | 00:24:58 | |
| Before we were showing center to center, which is not really how the. | 00:24:59 | |
| How the state? | 00:25:03 | |
| Reads. So we're clarifying that here that it's edge piped edge pipe. | 00:25:04 | |
| So I feel like that was a big win. | 00:25:10 | |
| Or that's a good one for us. | 00:25:12 | |
| So these are just the updates. | 00:25:18 | |
| I guess I should clarify what's on the left is our new and what's on the right is the old. | 00:25:21 | |
| And so. | 00:25:28 | |
| With the transportation master plan we changed our Rd. | 00:25:29 | |
| Our. | 00:25:33 | |
| Descriptions to. | 00:25:34 | |
| Arterial Collector. | 00:25:37 | |
| And local roads. | 00:25:39 | |
| Before. | 00:25:42 | |
| They were Parkway Blvd. and local I believe. | 00:25:43 | |
| And so we're updating that. | 00:25:47 | |
| That description as well. | 00:25:50 | |
| We have a lot of drawings that we just kind of are getting rid of as well, so. | 00:25:54 | |
| To again the left is the new. | 00:26:00 | |
| The oldest. | 00:26:03 | |
| On the right. | 00:26:04 | |
| A lot of our curb details we're just getting rid of because we're referencing APWA. | 00:26:06 | |
| This cross gutter 1. | 00:26:14 | |
| Was particularly not. | 00:26:16 | |
| Not really great. | 00:26:18 | |
| So there's a much better one in APWA. So we're just. | 00:26:20 | |
| A lot of these details were just adopting what's in a PWA. | 00:26:22 | |
| So we're just kind of cleaning that up there's. | 00:26:27 | |
| Another example, we're just getting rid of this whole sheet. | 00:26:31 | |
| Because this is. | 00:26:34 | |
| Outlined in a PWA. | 00:26:35 | |
| I believe it's. | 00:26:39 | |
| Easier and better to. | 00:26:41 | |
| To be uniform with other cities in Utah and just use the same curb and gutter. | 00:26:43 | |
| And you'll just link. | 00:26:49 | |
| Patrick to the. | 00:26:50 | |
| Specific section of APWA so that it's not. | 00:26:52 | |
| Potentially lost in. | 00:26:55 | |
| In a large. | 00:26:58 | |
| Manual umm. | 00:26:59 | |
| I guess I'll have to check and see if we. | 00:27:01 | |
| If we specifically go linked to that section. | 00:27:03 | |
| At the very start of our specifications, it. | 00:27:08 | |
| We we have a link. | 00:27:10 | |
| That will just go to a PWA. | 00:27:11 | |
| Yeah, it's not common that we actually. | 00:27:15 | |
| Link to this specific section in case APWA. | 00:27:17 | |
| Changes their formatting. | 00:27:20 | |
| And so forth. We'll just reference APA. | 00:27:21 | |
| Itself. | 00:27:24 | |
| As. | 00:27:28 | |
| With the design engineers, they're. | 00:27:29 | |
| They get to the point though with APWA, they're using it. | 00:27:31 | |
| Constantly for for every project. Like I got to the point where I had certain drawing numbers memorized so I would just put in. | 00:27:35 | |
| So. | 00:27:43 | |
| It's yeah. | 00:27:46 | |
| What? What we do? | 00:27:47 | |
| Though is. | 00:27:49 | |
| There are lots of different curb. | 00:27:52 | |
| Curb and gutter designs in Apwa. | 00:27:55 | |
| And we will reference what type of gutter we want. | 00:27:58 | |
| And so. | 00:28:03 | |
| For example, I think this curb and gutter and apwa is a type P or something. | 00:28:05 | |
| But there's different types and APW. | 00:28:12 | |
| APWA also shows the. | 00:28:15 | |
| 30 inch and 24 inch. | 00:28:17 | |
| Those are the 2 common sizes. | 00:28:19 | |
| So. | 00:28:21 | |
| That's another nice thing. If we do want to use 24 inch curb and gutter to match up with existing curb and gutter, we can we can | 00:28:23 | |
| tell them just use the APWA 24 inch and. | 00:28:29 | |
| It's there so we don't have to have a bunch. | 00:28:35 | |
| Different curb and gutter. | 00:28:38 | |
| Details. | 00:28:39 | |
| There's just a lot of general little cleanup. | 00:28:44 | |
| Changing the. | 00:28:47 | |
| The curb and gutter width. | 00:28:49 | |
| It's kind of a big one. We took out the. | 00:28:51 | |
| C curb. C curb details. | 00:28:53 | |
| Just general cleanup there. | 00:28:57 | |
| This is the fire hydrant apron that we're adding. | 00:29:00 | |
| Basically just. | 00:29:03 | |
| Slab of concrete. | 00:29:06 | |
| That will be that will go around the hydrant. | 00:29:07 | |
| To give a nicer. | 00:29:10 | |
| Place to. | 00:29:12 | |
| To work. | 00:29:13 | |
| When you're hooking up to the hydrant. | 00:29:14 | |
| Sorry, you probably can't see that really well. I can go the actual detail, maybe that'll. | 00:29:18 | |
| Let me just go to the. | 00:29:24 | |
| Detail. | 00:29:27 | |
| And these are the ones that are specific to us. | 00:29:28 | |
| Yeah, these these are specific. | 00:29:31 | |
| For bigger city. | 00:29:33 | |
| So we do the VA from the AP. | 00:29:34 | |
| APWA and certainly not instances. | 00:29:37 | |
| Hey, Patrick, I need to go back to the fireman. | 00:29:52 | |
| OK, so it shows. It shows that. | 00:29:54 | |
| Can you zoom in on the height of the base of the fire hydrant to be from from the ground? | 00:29:56 | |
| So it says. | 00:30:02 | |
| Two inches to the bolts. | 00:30:03 | |
| Or to the joint. | 00:30:05 | |
| From the finished grade. | 00:30:07 | |
| But then I thought we had. | 00:30:09 | |
| That's assuming the fire hydrant itself is a standard height. | 00:30:11 | |
| There's no short hydrants, right? | 00:30:14 | |
| You know, I thought we had a. | 00:30:17 | |
| Dimension to the nozzle. | 00:30:18 | |
| We did have that dimension. Maybe it got. | 00:30:32 | |
| Maybe it's somewhere else, but you're talking about to the nozzle, right? Yeah, he's talking about. | 00:30:35 | |
| Yeah, just so. | 00:30:41 | |
| When the firefighters are responding that they have enough room for. | 00:30:43 | |
| Clearance for their tools to spin around. | 00:30:48 | |
| Yeah. | 00:30:51 | |
| Yeah, good, good catch. | 00:30:54 | |
| I thought we had that in there. I I know we've. | 00:30:55 | |
| We've had that. | 00:30:59 | |
| But that's good to show there. | 00:31:00 | |
| Another change we made on this was. | 00:31:03 | |
| I'll go to our old detail real fast. | 00:31:07 | |
| We had the tracer wire. | 00:31:10 | |
| The tracer wire would come up the hydrant. | 00:31:13 | |
| And then peak out. | 00:31:15 | |
| And then they would just. | 00:31:17 | |
| Tied onto the chain on the hydrant or something, it just kind of. | 00:31:18 | |
| Was ugly. Just got it, got in the way. | 00:31:22 | |
| But now we have the tracer wire come up into a. | 00:31:25 | |
| A little. | 00:31:29 | |
| Pipe that's that will be embedded in the concrete with a with a cap. | 00:31:30 | |
| So it'll be nice and clean. You won't see a wire sticking up, you know, next to the hydrant anymore. | 00:31:34 | |
| So that was one thing I really liked. | 00:31:41 | |
| And part of the other reason I. | 00:31:46 | |
| I mentioned the the apron is. | 00:31:48 | |
| So people can. | 00:31:51 | |
| Work nicely around this, but another reason is when you blow off the hydrant, you're not. | 00:31:52 | |
| You can blow it off and not destroy the landscaping around it, you know. | 00:31:57 | |
| This is the. | 00:32:09 | |
| What I was? | 00:32:10 | |
| Talking about with our. | 00:32:13 | |
| The Vault This is the old vault detail and it just didn't make. | 00:32:16 | |
| Sense for what we used in the city, so we got rid of that one. | 00:32:20 | |
| I guess we didn't put. | 00:32:25 | |
| The new one is a lot cleaner. | 00:32:29 | |
| So this is the new one. | 00:32:33 | |
| So this is the new vault that we're. | 00:32:36 | |
| We're putting downtown for all the three inch meters. | 00:32:39 | |
| So it's a lot nicer. | 00:32:44 | |
| This one shows the clean out at the property line like I mentioned before. | 00:32:50 | |
| And then changing. | 00:32:56 | |
| Changing. | 00:32:58 | |
| The amount of clean out so. | 00:33:00 | |
| Before we just required a clean out every 100 feet no matter the. | 00:33:02 | |
| Size of the pipe. | 00:33:07 | |
| But now we're changing it to. | 00:33:09 | |
| With a four inch pipe you need to put clean outs every 50 feet. | 00:33:11 | |
| And as mentioned earlier, this is our sheet for parking spaces, parking dimensions. | 00:33:17 | |
| So this will be. | 00:33:23 | |
| Really good to have. | 00:33:25 | |
| A lot, a lot more straightforward. | 00:33:27 | |
| Before in our code, it just kind of had a generic. | 00:33:30 | |
| It just basically said parking stalls should be 9 foot wide and. | 00:33:34 | |
| 18 feet long or something it was. | 00:33:38 | |
| Not very detailed. | 00:33:41 | |
| But this this is a lot more detailed. | 00:33:42 | |
| Patrick, when you're talking about parking, is is this parking within the public right of way? | 00:33:46 | |
| So because our, our zoning has has. | 00:33:52 | |
| Our parking requirements and so we would want to make sure there's not a conflict between those two. | 00:33:54 | |
| I'm sorry, I believe we. | 00:34:00 | |
| I mean this would align to the parking along. | 00:34:01 | |
| That. | 00:34:05 | |
| And correct me if I'm wrong, Patrick, but I mean really what this does is provides a little bit more clarification in terms of. | 00:34:08 | |
| The parking. | 00:34:15 | |
| More on this space like I believe the zoning. | 00:34:17 | |
| Requirements provides. | 00:34:20 | |
| Like a parking stall should be X amount of feet wide and that deep. | 00:34:22 | |
| Yeah. And this kind of goes a little bit into more detail to say. | 00:34:26 | |
| The because I'm sorry. | 00:34:31 | |
| The the zoning. | 00:34:33 | |
| One puts down the usable parking stall space. | 00:34:35 | |
| Where this kind of goes and say it goes in more detail to say when you do angle parking. | 00:34:38 | |
| Your lines aren't going to be, let's just say, 18 feet. | 00:34:43 | |
| Deep in order to. | 00:34:47 | |
| Because that 18 feet. | 00:34:49 | |
| Deep line does not translate into an 18 foot length usable. | 00:34:51 | |
| It actually translates translates less than that. | 00:34:55 | |
| So this says. | 00:34:58 | |
| In order to do an angle parking. | 00:34:59 | |
| Parking stall line. | 00:35:02 | |
| The length of your Parkinson's line should be like, more like like. | 00:35:04 | |
| Closer to almost 20 ish I don't know. | 00:35:06 | |
| Something like that, Patrick, right? Yeah, we don't. | 00:35:09 | |
| And then? | 00:35:11 | |
| This one shows 34A for that line well, but it then goes and says then this outlines like. | 00:35:12 | |
| In order to get. | 00:35:18 | |
| To make the usable parking stall length and width. | 00:35:20 | |
| This is what the this is what the dimensions should should be out. | 00:35:25 | |
| I guess my point is. | 00:35:30 | |
| Do I understand wanting to capture kind of your public requirements, like your right of way requirements for parking within this | 00:35:32 | |
| document? | 00:35:36 | |
| But where we have things that are land use that are. | 00:35:41 | |
| Like covered in zoning is a better to move some of that to zoning? | 00:35:44 | |
| And keep and keeping right of way. Right of way. | 00:35:49 | |
| As opposed to having like like the the property stuff that's covered in zoning covered here. Well, technically this is | 00:35:52 | |
| specifically just for public infrastructure. So for for the public stuff. | 00:35:57 | |
| When going to the private, private. | 00:36:02 | |
| If they do a Parkinson's, like if they want to do a parking, an angle parking stall. | 00:36:06 | |
| That's not deep enough. | 00:36:10 | |
| I'll say that I want to say not deep enough like if they say. | 00:36:12 | |
| Well, you know. | 00:36:15 | |
| We only need 18 feet depth. | 00:36:16 | |
| So they do their, they do an angle line and they do 18 feet. | 00:36:19 | |
| Then what they'll end up doing is they'll have. | 00:36:22 | |
| Cars like the back of their cars. | 00:36:24 | |
| Kind of sticking out and so forth and. | 00:36:27 | |
| It's kind of like more on the then that kind of falls on the. | 00:36:29 | |
| The ACT ownership. | 00:36:34 | |
| The liability of the actual property owner. So I'm not concerned with like the dimensions and what the standard is. It's more of | 00:36:35 | |
| or do we have conflicts between the zoning if I'm an architect and I'm laying out a conceptual plan for a client? | 00:36:42 | |
| Am I looking at the zoning ordinance and then knowing I should actually be going to this? | 00:36:49 | |
| So there's. | 00:36:55 | |
| Because I I know you're saying this. Oh yeah, I got what you said, but I think it should all be consistent. Like what are our? | 00:36:55 | |
| Private requirements on private property. | 00:37:02 | |
| Versus property we own or public right of way, we should have some consistency and I'm OK. | 00:37:04 | |
| If this is the standard, but we need to make sure we have those those connections between the zoning and this document. So yeah, | 00:37:09 | |
| the way I looked at it was if you have. | 00:37:13 | |
| A special like zoning district like we have special. | 00:37:18 | |
| Parking drawings for the downtown area. | 00:37:21 | |
| So that would kind of supersede. | 00:37:25 | |
| This general 1 I feel like. | 00:37:29 | |
| Anthony pulled up. | 00:37:33 | |
| What our current zoning code? | 00:37:34 | |
| Has for parking. | 00:37:36 | |
| It basically just has a table. | 00:37:38 | |
| Where it just says standard parking with 9 feet 20 foot length, parallel 8 feet 24 foot length. | 00:37:40 | |
| And so just kind of and then parking aisle dimensions as a little table for parking aisle dimensions. | 00:37:49 | |
| If so, I guess my question is, Anthony, have you reviewed this? Does this meet what we what, what we could use? | 00:37:55 | |
| Because I I guess what I don't want is like 2 policies. | 00:38:02 | |
| That maybe they kind of address different things, but really our city, like I think we should have one. | 00:38:05 | |
| At least dimensionally one parking standard and then like we have that and we just. | 00:38:11 | |
| If it's in our parking, if our parking codes more of. | 00:38:16 | |
| Like if you're a bank, you need X number of stalls per 1000 square feet. Like like like. | 00:38:19 | |
| The numbers. | 00:38:26 | |
| Are OK in our code, but if we already have this, that's the same dimensionally, this is what you need to have and then for aisles. | 00:38:27 | |
| Why don't we just keep that one spot and then we reference like the the dimension stuff? | 00:38:34 | |
| I don't know. Have you looked at that, Anthony? | 00:38:38 | |
| OK, well that's probably something we need to do pretty quickly then to. | 00:38:41 | |
| Yeah, I I just don't want 2 conflicting documents. Even if ours is really general and yours more specific. I'd rather just. | 00:38:45 | |
| Rather just like. | 00:38:53 | |
| Like sent everyone to 1 document. Yeah, no, that's a good point. Yeah, just just reference the one. Yeah, so. | 00:38:54 | |
| Yeah, we can talk about it out. Yeah, that's a good point. We need to consolidate it. | 00:39:03 | |
| Thank you. | 00:39:07 | |
| This is just getting rid of the survey monuments. | 00:39:14 | |
| And that is? | 00:39:17 | |
| It. | 00:39:19 | |
| Sorry, it's been a long time on that. | 00:39:22 | |
| Is there any other questions? There's there's a lot of detail and. | 00:39:24 | |
| In all this but. | 00:39:28 | |
| I don't want to. | 00:39:30 | |
| We would spend all day if we went through. | 00:39:32 | |
| Everything but. | 00:39:34 | |
| Are there any questions? | 00:39:35 | |
| Patty, do you want to bring up your concerns? | 00:39:42 | |
| Some comments. | 00:39:44 | |
| Yeah, I do have. | 00:39:45 | |
| So I didn't really. | 00:39:50 | |
| Area of expertise. | 00:39:55 | |
| But I did go over. | 00:39:56 | |
| In it and I do have just. | 00:40:00 | |
| Just to make sure that. | 00:40:05 | |
| Sort of on the same thing that. | 00:40:06 | |
| I was talking about consistency. | 00:40:08 | |
| So, umm. | 00:40:10 | |
| In section one of four. | 00:40:12 | |
| 1.04.020, page 4. | 00:40:15 | |
| Section. | 00:40:18 | |
| Four. Section F4 under permits. | 00:40:20 | |
| It says the contractor is responsible to obtain all required business licenses and building. | 00:40:25 | |
| Permits applicable to this project. | 00:40:30 | |
| I think that should be engineering permits. | 00:40:32 | |
| Because we're talking about. | 00:40:36 | |
| Like specifically, this section is talking about the requirements for. | 00:40:39 | |
| Pre construction. | 00:40:45 | |
| I think the intent of this was to. | 00:40:49 | |
| To basically make sure that. | 00:40:52 | |
| They get all. | 00:40:54 | |
| Permits that are required so that not so that. | 00:40:56 | |
| We're not saying. | 00:40:59 | |
| Or you can't just go out and start construction. | 00:41:00 | |
| With some permits, but not. | 00:41:05 | |
| All. Yeah, we can change that. No, we can change that to be all applicable permits by the. | 00:41:07 | |
| Through. | 00:41:14 | |
| Through the respective agencies. | 00:41:15 | |
| Yeah, through their respective agencies. | 00:41:18 | |
| Yeah, we can just say applicable permits. | 00:41:20 | |
| More broader language is better. | 00:41:22 | |
| To just sort of like capture that anything. | 00:41:24 | |
| Could be required. | 00:41:27 | |
| Page 5 under section. | 00:41:29 | |
| Under Bonds, Section C. | 00:41:33 | |
| It notes. | 00:41:36 | |
| Bond is required. | 00:41:39 | |
| And that can be. | 00:41:42 | |
| A letter from a bank. | 00:41:44 | |
| Survey. | 00:41:46 | |
| Surety company or cash bond? | 00:41:47 | |
| So just. | 00:41:49 | |
| To make consistently uh. | 00:41:50 | |
| As of may, finance departments ask that we no longer do cash bonds because of the state code interest rate requirements for state | 00:41:52 | |
| code 10-98-604. | 00:41:57 | |
| .53 B. | 00:42:02 | |
| So we probably would just want to take cash bond. | 00:42:06 | |
| Out of that. | 00:42:09 | |
| And we took it out of the. | 00:42:11 | |
| Different section further down. | 00:42:12 | |
| For bonds. | 00:42:13 | |
| So we probably just want to remove it from. | 00:42:15 | |
| This section as well to just to be. | 00:42:17 | |
| Consistent. Yeah, I think. | 00:42:19 | |
| And we don't think we were keeping and I'll talk, we'll talk to the finance. I think we were keeping on. | 00:42:22 | |
| Cash bonds for the fact that. | 00:42:27 | |
| There may be, because we do have encroachment balance. | 00:42:28 | |
| Like there's that would be small. | 00:42:32 | |
| And. | 00:42:34 | |
| Taking. | 00:42:36 | |
| Encroachment bonds are typically done through surety bonds. | 00:42:37 | |
| Typically, but not typically those up. | 00:42:41 | |
| Yeah. It was specifically requested that we not do cash bonds anymore because of the interest rate bearing requirements. | 00:42:43 | |
| That you have to put him in interest rate. | 00:42:51 | |
| Interest rate. | 00:42:53 | |
| Burying accounts. | 00:42:54 | |
| Separate for each one. | 00:42:55 | |
| And then pay that out. So like that we would have to calculate the interest rate for how long we're keeping those bonds. | 00:42:57 | |
| Yeah, we understand. Well, we'll confirm with the. | 00:43:06 | |
| With the finance department to ensure their. | 00:43:09 | |
| One item on there is. | 00:43:12 | |
| We're trying to keep it level because I know there's cities out there like they're they're removing sure, surely bonds. | 00:43:14 | |
| Out of as a requirement because they don't want to deal with charity companies, but we. | 00:43:21 | |
| We were keeping them and there are because to ensure that to allow for. | 00:43:25 | |
| Contractors to have a wide. | 00:43:30 | |
| To have their options in order to for bonds and themselves. | 00:43:33 | |
| Bars are like. We do have some instances where bonds are like 2500. | 00:43:39 | |
| $2500. | 00:43:44 | |
| Or yeah, $2500. | 00:43:45 | |
| Bonds and so forth. | 00:43:47 | |
| And we just want to make sure that we won't put any. | 00:43:49 | |
| Any undue burden on a? | 00:43:52 | |
| Contractor to go out and get a surely bond or. | 00:43:54 | |
| A layer of credit or something like that. | 00:43:58 | |
| When they would just rather this. | 00:44:00 | |
| Provided a $25 check, yes, we would have to pay them back in interest, but. | 00:44:02 | |
| I think those are usually few and few between. | 00:44:06 | |
| But we'll make sure we're the finance department that they're comfortable with. | 00:44:08 | |
| Those type of occurrences as well. | 00:44:12 | |
| I wonder if we could put. | 00:44:15 | |
| Like a a time limit on on small cash bonds 29 days. | 00:44:16 | |
| Before there is injury for yeah, there's interest or so because. | 00:44:21 | |
| Yeah, the the hard part is with encroachment permits. | 00:44:25 | |
| It's it's very quick. | 00:44:29 | |
| So they'll submit a. | 00:44:31 | |
| An encroachment permit. They'll want to start working in a couple days. | 00:44:32 | |
| And it's very difficult to get. | 00:44:36 | |
| Like we're going through this right now with. | 00:44:39 | |
| Enbridge it's very difficult to get any other type of bond from from them. | 00:44:41 | |
| I mean, I think there were other reasons for the difficulty on that, but. | 00:44:47 | |
| It's just very difficult to get. | 00:44:50 | |
| A small. | 00:44:52 | |
| Bond like a 5002 to $5000 bond. | 00:44:53 | |
| And we do have that and we do have I think one company in the past and I've seen it done before we're. | 00:44:57 | |
| A developer may choose if they have the cash for they may choose to do a escrow bond. | 00:45:02 | |
| Cash Bond. | 00:45:06 | |
| Where they put all their cash into an escrow account. | 00:45:07 | |
| And then they just. | 00:45:10 | |
| And but they they hold on to the account and. | 00:45:12 | |
| Any interest being a cure occurred on the on the on that. | 00:45:14 | |
| Stays with stays with the contract at themselves but. | 00:45:19 | |
| In essence, it's not. It's not sure any bond. It's not. | 00:45:22 | |
| Layer of credit, but it's just. | 00:45:25 | |
| Cash bond held Held with a. | 00:45:27 | |
| Developers. | 00:45:30 | |
| Attorney. | 00:45:31 | |
| Oh, that's, I mean that that would be another, correct. Yeah. Escrow bonds are something that we allow for subdivisions right now | 00:45:32 | |
| through municipal code. So that was another note I had is maybe we add escrow. | 00:45:37 | |
| To that as an option. | 00:45:43 | |
| Because it's currently not listed as an option for them to do for. | 00:45:45 | |
| We'll do that scrub on there, but it is in our municipal code. | 00:45:50 | |
| So it's a bit of a contradiction there. | 00:45:53 | |
| On page 6, second paragraph. | 00:46:01 | |
| Just where it mentions. | 00:46:03 | |
| Looks like the. | 00:46:05 | |
| Contractor deposit was added and bond was removed, but everything else in that section still refers to contractor bonds. | 00:46:07 | |
| So I just don't know. | 00:46:15 | |
| If we just want to continue that to save contractor bond instead of changing it to contractor deposit, but we didn't change | 00:46:17 | |
| anything else in that section to contractor deposit. | 00:46:21 | |
| That's good catch. | 00:46:26 | |
| This was kind of an attempt to. | 00:46:27 | |
| We were wondering if there was a way we can get away from. | 00:46:30 | |
| The bond with interest. | 00:46:34 | |
| Right. Yeah. If we stopped calling it a bond, can we do like cash deposits without it being? | 00:46:37 | |
| Yeah, so. | 00:46:44 | |
| And that's fine if we all change it to the deposit. | 00:46:47 | |
| Wording then maybe that is a way to not have to deal with the interest rate requirements for a cash bond. | 00:46:49 | |
| As you're just requiring the cash. | 00:46:56 | |
| Upfront as a deposit that you'll return back. | 00:46:58 | |
| Later to them. | 00:47:01 | |
| Yeah. | 00:47:02 | |
| Yes, if we're doing it that way, then we would just want to consistently change this section to. | 00:47:04 | |
| Continue to the word. | 00:47:09 | |
| Use the word deposit instead of bond. | 00:47:10 | |
| This particular section had a couple of times where just kept referring to contractor bond instead of contractor deposit, that's | 00:47:15 | |
| all. So there was just like some inconsistency in this section. | 00:47:20 | |
| I'll take the hit for that. I told Patrick to change the bonds from deposit. | 00:47:24 | |
| No, thanks. OK, that's good catch. | 00:47:29 | |
| And then same page but under section D. | 00:47:33 | |
| You have. | 00:47:36 | |
| The people that are required for pre construction conferences. | 00:47:37 | |
| And you've added major subcontractors? | 00:47:40 | |
| So city engineer, landowner, and contractor are all defined terms within definitions at the beginning of this section, but major | 00:47:43 | |
| subcontractors aren't. | 00:47:47 | |
| And so I'm. | 00:47:52 | |
| Just wondering if we want to add language. | 00:47:54 | |
| To provide insight to the contractor and to the applicants. | 00:47:57 | |
| Who those subconscious who? What is a major subcontractor that you are going to require to attend? | 00:48:02 | |
| So is that your excavator? Is that you're like? | 00:48:10 | |
| What? What is the definition of? | 00:48:12 | |
| A major subcontractor. | 00:48:14 | |
| Yeah, that's yeah, I think. | 00:48:19 | |
| Add some language. | 00:48:21 | |
| Yeah, the reason we put major contractor was. | 00:48:24 | |
| We basically just wanted to capture the excavator. | 00:48:27 | |
| Necessary like. | 00:48:32 | |
| We didn't want all the stuff, Yeah. So showing up. | 00:48:33 | |
| And my only thing is to like we want to delineate any confusion to applicants. | 00:48:35 | |
| In. | 00:48:40 | |
| There if someone we consider to be a major subcontractor isn't invited or. | 00:48:41 | |
| Brought to the meeting that it does not cause a delay later. | 00:48:46 | |
| Because they did not have an understanding of. | 00:48:49 | |
| What those who those people were. | 00:48:51 | |
| Yeah. Whereas like contractor and landowner are clearly defined terms in the definition. That's fine. And I think, I mean we still | 00:48:54 | |
| hold the principle that a developer is the sole. | 00:48:59 | |
| There's the sole party responsible for the project, so. | 00:49:05 | |
| If for any reason that they choose to change out their contractor midway through project. | 00:49:08 | |
| There is no reason for us to do. | 00:49:12 | |
| Meeting with that. | 00:49:14 | |
| Major subcontractor like the excavator or so forth, that's. | 00:49:16 | |
| And if there's any issues, it just goes directly to the. | 00:49:19 | |
| To the developer itself. | 00:49:22 | |
| As they're the ones who are. | 00:49:23 | |
| Pulling the permits. | 00:49:25 | |
| But. | 00:49:27 | |
| We'll define that a little bit. | 00:49:28 | |
| We'll put a little definition in there. | 00:49:29 | |
| To ensure that, yeah. And you could even then like supplement that. | 00:49:32 | |
| Section that maybe they're not required as the responsibility still falls under the contractor. | 00:49:35 | |
| But. | 00:49:41 | |
| That the city highly recommends any major subcontractors, including excavators, to be present at the. | 00:49:42 | |
| Reconstruction Meeting. | 00:49:48 | |
| Page 8 under time limitations. | 00:49:51 | |
| There is a. | 00:49:53 | |
| Contradiction here with the time limitations for land disturbance permits. | 00:49:54 | |
| As Municipal Code section 7.08.040 G specifically also. | 00:49:58 | |
| Calls out land disturbance, permits time limitations. So we just want to make sure that those are either consistent. | 00:50:05 | |
| Or that one section is referring to the other one. That's like. | 00:50:11 | |
| The best way to do it is just. | 00:50:15 | |
| To have one section refer to the other, so you don't have to update both times and both documents every time you want to make a | 00:50:17 | |
| change. | 00:50:20 | |
| OK. Yeah, that's a good point. | 00:50:26 | |
| Yeah. And then and then on page 12. | 00:50:44 | |
| Under Section H, Notification of residence. | 00:50:46 | |
| There is you kind of worded what you wanted the. | 00:50:50 | |
| Notice to say. | 00:50:55 | |
| Did you want to have a requirement for them to add? | 00:50:57 | |
| Uh, contact for. | 00:51:01 | |
| Who that resident should reach out to if they have questions or concerns on the project, because there's nothing in here that | 00:51:04 | |
| requires any sort of notification for them to provide emergency contacts. | 00:51:09 | |
| Or, uh. | 00:51:14 | |
| Context for residents when they're concerned, but I know we've received things. | 00:51:15 | |
| From. | 00:51:20 | |
| Community members. | 00:51:21 | |
| Because they didn't know. | 00:51:23 | |
| Who to go to? | 00:51:25 | |
| When construction is happening in the right of way. | 00:51:26 | |
| So put something in for who residents can contact. | 00:51:31 | |
| Wait, are we going to require the contractor to provide a contact number? | 00:51:37 | |
| For residents to reach out to either the contractor or do we want to have them put. | 00:51:41 | |
| Generic language on. | 00:51:46 | |
| Who they reach out to with us in the city? | 00:51:47 | |
| If they have concerns on those projects, but I know we had a lot of those issues with like the Comcast ones. | 00:51:50 | |
| That were done. | 00:51:55 | |
| And. | 00:51:57 | |
| There was no information provided to the residents as to like when that. | 00:51:59 | |
| Who they should contact? | 00:52:03 | |
| Or when those projects would be happening. So I think this takes care of the win, but not necessarily The Who. | 00:52:05 | |
| OK, Yeah. | 00:52:13 | |
| I see that. | 00:52:14 | |
| We'll have them, we'll add. | 00:52:17 | |
| Yeah. I just didn't know if we want to expand that section just a little bit just to be more like. | 00:52:25 | |
| If we don't put it on as a requirement, they're not going to put it on the. | 00:52:31 | |
| Notice if that makes sense. | 00:52:34 | |
| Because they they. | 00:52:36 | |
| They aren't getting anything else by having community members reach out to them if they're upset. | 00:52:37 | |
| Yeah. | 00:52:42 | |
| OK. And then page 16. | 00:52:45 | |
| Under Electronic under Record Drawings, Section D, third paragraph where it talks about final inspection may not be scheduled | 00:52:49 | |
| until the record drawings are. | 00:52:54 | |
| And required electronic files are received. | 00:53:00 | |
| So that is a conditional statement. | 00:53:02 | |
| That they cannot do a final inspection, so this act may not. | 00:53:05 | |
| Acts the same as shall not in this case. | 00:53:08 | |
| But it's not consistent with the language that you have. | 00:53:11 | |
| In section one that. | 00:53:14 | |
| .08 dot 030, section F. | 00:53:16 | |
| That basically says that. | 00:53:20 | |
| You can require it, so I would just make that consistent with that section so that you have the option. | 00:53:22 | |
| To do a final inspection or not do a final inspection with the record drawings. | 00:53:27 | |
| Yeah, we were trying to leave the option open. What was the other section number? | 00:53:32 | |
| 1.08. | 00:53:37 | |
| .030, Section F. | 00:53:39 | |
| So I just copy that sentence and move it over because that way it's just the language in that was. | 00:53:43 | |
| You know. | 00:53:48 | |
| Gave you the. | 00:53:49 | |
| He said 108.003. | 00:53:51 | |
| 1.08.030 Section F. | 00:53:55 | |
| Zero section F. | 00:54:01 | |
| OK, yeah, 1.08.030. | 00:54:07 | |
| Section F. | 00:54:11 | |
| Sorry I'm not catching this. | 00:54:13 | |
| Like that? | 00:54:14 | |
| I'll find it. | 00:54:17 | |
| It's on page. | 00:54:19 | |
| I didn't write the page number down, I'm sorry. | 00:54:27 | |
| Page 25. | 00:54:34 | |
| Page 18 under warranty bond. | 00:54:43 | |
| You mentioned a minimum $500 contractor bond. This is not listed in the consolidated fee schedule. | 00:54:45 | |
| So you just want to be very careful. | 00:54:51 | |
| You cannot charge. | 00:54:54 | |
| Fee that isn't listed in the minimum. | 00:54:56 | |
| Like you can't charge a fee that isn't listed on the consolidated fee schedule. | 00:54:58 | |
| And so you'll probably just want to put a minimum of $500 on the fee schedule. | 00:55:02 | |
| So that you can charge. | 00:55:07 | |
| Which page is that? Because right now the fee schedule just says 10% warning. | 00:55:09 | |
| Which page is that on? | 00:55:13 | |
| Sorry, page 18. | 00:55:17 | |
| Section E. | 00:55:18 | |
| And then under under. | 00:55:35 | |
| Page 19. | 00:55:37 | |
| Under Variances section C. | 00:55:39 | |
| The last. | 00:55:41 | |
| Sentence your. | 00:55:42 | |
| Appeal processes. | 00:55:44 | |
| That's a lot of appeals. | 00:55:46 | |
| So I would probably. | 00:55:49 | |
| The Ombudsman tends to not. | 00:55:52 | |
| A lot of appeal processes. | 00:55:55 | |
| I would probably suggest. | 00:55:57 | |
| Removing at least one, I wouldn't have more than two appeal processes for people. | 00:55:59 | |
| Before they start going to the court system. | 00:56:03 | |
| My suggestion. | 00:56:06 | |
| Would probably be to take out the Planning Commission as they don't normally function as a quasi judicial board. | 00:56:08 | |
| OK. | 00:56:16 | |
| But that's, you know, that's. | 00:56:18 | |
| You know, up to discussion, but typically like having. | 00:56:20 | |
| A lot of appeal processes. | 00:56:24 | |
| Tends to be something that gets. | 00:56:25 | |
| Pretty convoluted for people. | 00:56:27 | |
| I think that was the last note I made. | 00:56:40 | |
| Yeah, that was the last note I made. Everything else goes into lake. | 00:56:42 | |
| The specifications and I don't that's your guys' area of expertise. | 00:56:46 | |
| OK. Yeah. Thanks Patty for that. | 00:56:55 | |
| Yeah, you're welcome. | 00:56:59 | |
| Or you're not welcome if you. | 00:57:01 | |
| If you didn't want me to say anything. | 00:57:03 | |
| No thanks, Betty. I wasn't expecting to be reprimanded. | 00:57:07 | |
| That's good. Anybody. | 00:57:12 | |
| Have any other concerns? | 00:57:14 | |
| OK, that. | 00:57:18 | |
| Any staff or Commission reports? | 00:57:21 | |
| Move this to adjournment. Thank you guys. | 00:57:25 | |
| Thank you. | 00:57:28 |
Transcript
| I can have. | 00:00:00 | |
| Anthony, are you able to hop on? | 00:00:05 | |
| Thank you. | 00:00:09 | |
| All right, I'd like to call the order of the. | 00:00:31 | |
| DRC meeting is October 16th. | 00:00:34 | |
| And it is 9:11 AM. | 00:00:37 | |
| Move to our consent items. We have a 2.1 approval of the September 18, 2025 DRC meeting minutes. Can I get in a? | 00:00:41 | |
| Yeah. | 00:00:52 | |
| Aye, Motion to approve the. | 00:00:57 | |
| DRC maintenance of September 18th. | 00:00:59 | |
| 2025. | 00:01:01 | |
| First N. | 00:01:03 | |
| 2nd. | 00:01:05 | |
| Second by Eric, All in favor. | 00:01:06 | |
| Aye, any opposed? | 00:01:08 | |
| That moves us to our. | 00:01:12 | |
| Work session. | 00:01:13 | |
| 4.1 An update to the Vineyard City development standards and design specifications. | 00:01:15 | |
| And they believe Patrick is going to present this? | 00:01:20 | |
| Yeah, let me get. | 00:01:25 | |
| Get up on the screen. | 00:01:26 | |
| OK. | 00:01:48 | |
| So we have been. | 00:01:53 | |
| Consulting with. | 00:01:55 | |
| Chris Thompson. | 00:01:57 | |
| Who is now with? | 00:01:58 | |
| Hence now and in loose. | 00:01:59 | |
| To revise our. | 00:02:02 | |
| Construction standard drawings and and specifications. | 00:02:04 | |
| And we are. | 00:02:09 | |
| At completion or. | 00:02:10 | |
| Very near completion on those now. | 00:02:12 | |
| The reason the purpose for this is. | 00:02:16 | |
| I guess there's a couple reasons that we've been doing this. | 00:02:19 | |
| First of all. | 00:02:22 | |
| It's been quite a while since. | 00:02:23 | |
| The standard drawings and specifications were updated. | 00:02:25 | |
| I believe the last. | 00:02:29 | |
| The last round of. | 00:02:30 | |
| Updates for the drawings were was 2016 I believe. | 00:02:31 | |
| So it's been quite a while. | 00:02:36 | |
| Some of the specifications even go back to 2007. | 00:02:39 | |
| So it was. It was. | 00:02:43 | |
| Quite needed. | 00:02:45 | |
| For an update. | 00:02:46 | |
| Another reason for the update is. | 00:02:48 | |
| Apwa. | 00:02:53 | |
| Updated their specifications in standard drawings. | 00:02:55 | |
| And with that. | 00:02:58 | |
| So they have this 2025 edition. | 00:03:00 | |
| Now. And with that, we wanted to. | 00:03:03 | |
| Kind of. | 00:03:06 | |
| Adopt more apwa. | 00:03:07 | |
| Come in more alignment with other cities. | 00:03:10 | |
| Across Utah. | 00:03:13 | |
| And these? | 00:03:15 | |
| Specifications and drawings from. | 00:03:16 | |
| From APW. | 00:03:18 | |
| Apwa are are. | 00:03:19 | |
| Quite extensive and pretty good. | 00:03:21 | |
| And so it's it just makes sense to adopt A lot of a lot of that. | 00:03:24 | |
| And. | 00:03:30 | |
| Just kind of. | 00:03:31 | |
| Make. | 00:03:33 | |
| Things more simple for for construction specifications on that front. | 00:03:33 | |
| APWA also. | 00:03:39 | |
| Made. I'll just show you like real quick. | 00:03:42 | |
| So these. | 00:03:45 | |
| So their plans and and specifications are. | 00:03:46 | |
| Our online. | 00:03:49 | |
| Free to use SO. | 00:03:52 | |
| All cities, all contractors, all. | 00:03:55 | |
| Design engineers can easily get on there and find these. | 00:03:57 | |
| Now which? | 00:04:02 | |
| As I was previously a design engineer, so I. | 00:04:03 | |
| Very much appreciate that. | 00:04:08 | |
| Let me input that. | 00:04:12 | |
| Dinner, but you're still a design engineer. | 00:04:13 | |
| Yeah, yeah. | 00:04:15 | |
| I guess so. | 00:04:16 | |
| In a way sometimes. | 00:04:18 | |
| So just to go through some changes in our specifications, probably the biggest change. | 00:04:22 | |
| That we did was we we completely reformatted the specifications. | 00:04:29 | |
| We changed around the sections and the. | 00:04:35 | |
| And the titles headings. | 00:04:39 | |
| Just to try to make it more clear. | 00:04:41 | |
| And so. | 00:04:44 | |
| And then? | 00:04:45 | |
| We're also. | 00:04:46 | |
| Putting that on to Municode. | 00:04:48 | |
| So and everything has links. | 00:04:51 | |
| So contractors or engineers can go in there and. | 00:04:54 | |
| Click on links and it'll take it right to. | 00:04:57 | |
| Specific sections or other parts of our code which will be really nice. | 00:05:01 | |
| So that's really. | 00:05:07 | |
| You know the bulk of it. | 00:05:09 | |
| But our specifications is to reiterate a little bit, our specifications are. | 00:05:11 | |
| Are more like a supplemental specification set. | 00:05:16 | |
| Supplemental to the APWA specifications. | 00:05:20 | |
| We also had a design criteria. | 00:05:27 | |
| Document. | 00:05:31 | |
| That, uh. | 00:05:32 | |
| That you can see the date down here for that was 2016. | 00:05:33 | |
| So needed. | 00:05:37 | |
| A little updating. | 00:05:38 | |
| And this design document for up until now it was a stand alone document. | 00:05:41 | |
| But we decided to integrate this document into our specifications. | 00:05:47 | |
| So now this is all. | 00:05:52 | |
| In our specifications. | 00:05:54 | |
| We also went through the Transportation Master Plan update. | 00:05:59 | |
| A lot of our cross section, Rd. cross section has changed things like that. | 00:06:04 | |
| And so now our specifications. | 00:06:08 | |
| Refer to the new Transportation Master plan and reflect the updated. | 00:06:11 | |
| Cross sections and things that are found in the master plan. | 00:06:17 | |
| I guess I could just actually do a slideshow. | 00:06:25 | |
| So to give you an example of. | 00:06:29 | |
| Of some of those so these are in the new cross sections that. | 00:06:31 | |
| That were shown. | 00:06:35 | |
| That are shown in our. | 00:06:36 | |
| Transportation master plan. | 00:06:38 | |
| Just giving some updates on. | 00:06:41 | |
| On what our standard St. | 00:06:44 | |
| Section will look like. | 00:06:46 | |
| So as I mentioned before. | 00:06:56 | |
| This will all be This will be a book. Now our. | 00:06:59 | |
| Specifications and drawings will be. | 00:07:02 | |
| A book in Municode now. | 00:07:05 | |
| And so it'll be. | 00:07:07 | |
| Right there along our other code. | 00:07:08 | |
| And so people can easily. | 00:07:11 | |
| Find it. | 00:07:13 | |
| And cross reference. | 00:07:14 | |
| Other codes. | 00:07:16 | |
| So that'll be really nice. | 00:07:17 | |
| We have several links in the specifications that will link you directly to. | 00:07:22 | |
| Codes or ordinances, specifically storm water. | 00:07:28 | |
| Criteria. Things like that. | 00:07:32 | |
| Here. | 00:07:37 | |
| Like a few notable. | 00:07:38 | |
| Changes. | 00:07:39 | |
| That were made. | 00:07:41 | |
| We added a requirement for contractors to submit. | 00:07:43 | |
| Time dated video footage. | 00:07:47 | |
| Of the construction site. | 00:07:49 | |
| Before they start construction that way. | 00:07:51 | |
| If there's any disputes. | 00:07:54 | |
| We can go back and reference that video. | 00:07:55 | |
| And see what was damaged during construction. | 00:07:58 | |
| To protect the city and. | 00:08:03 | |
| Just keep. | 00:08:07 | |
| Keep things up to date there. | 00:08:07 | |
| Another big change was all curbing gutter. We decided to change to 30 inch. | 00:08:10 | |
| Curb and gutter We're currently at 24 inch. | 00:08:16 | |
| That reduces the amount of pavement. | 00:08:20 | |
| That is, is that in the road? | 00:08:23 | |
| Reduces maintenance costs and deterioration. | 00:08:25 | |
| Concrete holds up a lot better. | 00:08:29 | |
| There are also benefits with stormwater. | 00:08:31 | |
| A 30 inch curb and gutter can hold. | 00:08:35 | |
| Hold more storm water. | 00:08:38 | |
| Has more capacity there. | 00:08:40 | |
| We understand that. | 00:08:43 | |
| Since we have been using 24 inch with carbon gutter for. | 00:08:46 | |
| A long time. | 00:08:50 | |
| Most of our city has 24 inch curb and gutter. | 00:08:51 | |
| So. | 00:08:55 | |
| We we will analyze. | 00:08:55 | |
| Each location as new developments come in, we don't want. | 00:08:58 | |
| You know, weird mismatch of curbing gutters so. | 00:09:02 | |
| Will allow developers to still use the 24 inch in situations where it matches up to the existing. | 00:09:05 | |
| I envision this as mostly. | 00:09:13 | |
| This will be mostly applied in the. | 00:09:15 | |
| East Geneva area. | 00:09:19 | |
| When that gets developed. | 00:09:21 | |
| Another reason for this is UDOT uses a 30 inch curb and gutter. So wherever our curb and gutter. | 00:09:24 | |
| Matches up with Udots. | 00:09:31 | |
| It it will make for a more seamless transition. | 00:09:33 | |
| Going from a 30 inch to a 24. | 00:09:38 | |
| Causes some weird. | 00:09:41 | |
| Weird issues. | 00:09:42 | |
| And so that will help with that. | 00:09:44 | |
| So within 250 feet of railroad crossings, no St. intersections, and a diagnostic required for accesses. | 00:09:48 | |
| This is something we that have that's come up a few times. | 00:09:57 | |
| Fairly recently. | 00:10:02 | |
| Any development near our railroad crossing needs a diagnostic review by. | 00:10:03 | |
| By the railroad and UDOT. | 00:10:10 | |
| And so that. | 00:10:12 | |
| That just. | 00:10:13 | |
| Puts it in the in the specification so that. | 00:10:14 | |
| Where that gets caught? | 00:10:17 | |
| It's not a good thing to start. | 00:10:19 | |
| Construction and then go back and. | 00:10:22 | |
| Do a diagnostic later and kind of ask for forgiveness. | 00:10:25 | |
| And so this this will put it up front. | 00:10:28 | |
| Full, yeah. | 00:10:32 | |
| Does it need to be stated? | 00:10:34 | |
| At grade. | 00:10:36 | |
| Is that just inferred? | 00:10:37 | |
| That is a good question, I'll. | 00:10:40 | |
| I'll check and see if. | 00:10:41 | |
| If we need to put at grade in there. | 00:10:45 | |
| I don't think it mentions at. | 00:10:50 | |
| Presumably it wouldn't. | 00:10:54 | |
| Apply within. | 00:10:56 | |
| Overpass. | 00:10:57 | |
| Because it wouldn't. | 00:11:00 | |
| There would really be no conflict with. | 00:11:01 | |
| Lining up cars. | 00:11:04 | |
| Associated with a railroad, which is what I assume that that. | 00:11:05 | |
| Consideration is for. | 00:11:09 | |
| Yeah. | 00:11:11 | |
| Yeah, I think it would just I think it's common for it and in the engineering world, when you say crossing. | 00:11:12 | |
| Crosses through and. | 00:11:17 | |
| You know, we use overpass or underpass quite often, but. | 00:11:19 | |
| Maybe just to make sure that it's written properly for the? | 00:11:22 | |
| Layperson. | 00:11:25 | |
| But typically like even. | 00:11:34 | |
| It doesn't really specify it. | 00:11:39 | |
| Necessarily, but. | 00:11:41 | |
| We'll get, we'll have that clarified. We can even put down as, as, as required or as needed. So therefore things change in the | 00:11:42 | |
| future we can. | 00:11:46 | |
| Ensure that Union Pacific or. | 00:11:49 | |
| Or the railroad authority. | 00:11:52 | |
| Gets coordinated communication with. | 00:11:54 | |
| OK, that's a good point. | 00:12:02 | |
| We added a specification there that. | 00:12:08 | |
| During developments at the full. | 00:12:12 | |
| When they come up to an intersection as a road intersection and there's a phase line that. | 00:12:14 | |
| Full intersection must be constructed. | 00:12:19 | |
| I don't know if we've necessarily had issues with that in the past, but. | 00:12:22 | |
| That's just a good thing to put in there so we don't end up having. | 00:12:25 | |
| Half's intersections. | 00:12:30 | |
| This awkward. | 00:12:32 | |
| Traffic flows. | 00:12:34 | |
| Buildings or pavements not allowed over landfill. | 00:12:37 | |
| Areas, uh. | 00:12:40 | |
| So this one we put we. | 00:12:42 | |
| We put a clause in there because we we will have a lot of. | 00:12:44 | |
| A lot of construction over. | 00:12:48 | |
| Garbage. Not really garbage, but. | 00:12:52 | |
| Construction debris, debris from Geneva, things like that. When, when? | 00:12:55 | |
| Development happens in that area. | 00:13:00 | |
| So there is a clause that. | 00:13:03 | |
| That. | 00:13:04 | |
| We'll have. We'll have that. | 00:13:06 | |
| Reviewed and. | 00:13:08 | |
| We can allow it in certain circumstances. | 00:13:09 | |
| But that's this is kind of protects. | 00:13:14 | |
| Protects us from. | 00:13:17 | |
| From developers just building over. | 00:13:18 | |
| Places they should not be building. | 00:13:21 | |
| For the standard drawing some changes. | 00:13:25 | |
| We added a fire hydrant apron. | 00:13:29 | |
| And I can show you that. | 00:13:33 | |
| A little bit later. | 00:13:34 | |
| New large meter assembly drawing. This has come up a lot lately. | 00:13:37 | |
| Because of the downtown area. | 00:13:41 | |
| Up until. | 00:13:45 | |
| Up until. | 00:13:46 | |
| All the development before the downtown area. | 00:13:47 | |
| We've we've only gone up to like a 2 inch meter. | 00:13:49 | |
| In our standard drawing went up to A2 inch meter. | 00:13:52 | |
| We had a drawing in there that. | 00:13:56 | |
| That had. | 00:13:58 | |
| A larger meter. | 00:14:00 | |
| Vault, but it was very confusing it. | 00:14:01 | |
| Seemed like it was pulled from something else and didn't really. | 00:14:04 | |
| Wasn't really applicable to our needs. | 00:14:07 | |
| And so we created a three inch. | 00:14:09 | |
| Meter Vault. | 00:14:11 | |
| Or three inch or larger meter vault detail. | 00:14:12 | |
| Which is. | 00:14:16 | |
| The new standard for. | 00:14:17 | |
| Pretty much all or. | 00:14:19 | |
| I would say all but. | 00:14:20 | |
| Most of the meters that are being installed in the downtown area. | 00:14:22 | |
| So that was that was very much needed. | 00:14:25 | |
| We added a sewer clean out at back of sidewalk. That's a requirement. | 00:14:29 | |
| By the state now. | 00:14:34 | |
| Parking lot layout drawing. This is another big one. | 00:14:36 | |
| We had parking lot. | 00:14:40 | |
| Dimensions or parking space dimensions in our code. | 00:14:43 | |
| But it got missed frequently and. | 00:14:47 | |
| It wasn't very clear, so we added a full sheet in our details showing parking lot dimensions or parking dimensions. | 00:14:51 | |
| And that will be a focus or. | 00:14:59 | |
| Has been really a focus of. | 00:15:01 | |
| Our engineering reviews. | 00:15:03 | |
| And then we're removing the requirement for survey monuments and roads. That's just kind of with today's technology, that's not | 00:15:06 | |
| really a. | 00:15:10 | |
| A requirement that. | 00:15:15 | |
| That we need. | 00:15:17 | |
| And it. | 00:15:18 | |
| Creates issues. | 00:15:19 | |
| It just puts puts more stuff in the road that can have issues. | 00:15:20 | |
| Questions. | 00:15:25 | |
| Yeah, on. | 00:15:26 | |
| 10890. | 00:15:29 | |
| Do you have a? | 00:15:31 | |
| Definition of landfilled areas somewhere. | 00:15:32 | |
| It's a little bit more detailed in the in the specifications. | 00:15:36 | |
| Typically we just follow with the state and state where estate definition is when it comes to landfills. | 00:15:40 | |
| On that like for example if it's a. | 00:15:46 | |
| Now if it's a, it was a designated landfill like it was permitted landfills and there was unpermitted landfills sometimes. | 00:15:48 | |
| Now I've ran into this quite a bit. | 00:15:54 | |
| Myself were. | 00:15:57 | |
| During the. | 00:16:00 | |
| Specifically back I think prior to the 1970s, there was quite a bit of. | 00:16:05 | |
| You know, now they call them illegal landfills. | 00:16:09 | |
| People just dumping places there for but since it was a large enough. | 00:16:12 | |
| Of a area for dumping. | 00:16:16 | |
| The state classes cloth. | 00:16:18 | |
| Classifieds them as a landfill. | 00:16:20 | |
| Even though they're not technically supposed to show been one or to be 1. | 00:16:22 | |
| On that. | 00:16:25 | |
| So that would be that would. | 00:16:26 | |
| So we would fall underneath the state definition of what a landfill would be. | 00:16:28 | |
| Obviously with. | 00:16:32 | |
| I mean during our state. | 00:16:33 | |
| Regulations and laws prohibiting. | 00:16:36 | |
| Contractors from Baron Trash. | 00:16:38 | |
| On site as well, so I mean. | 00:16:40 | |
| That. | 00:16:42 | |
| In itself would be a violation to state to state law that they wouldn't be able to severity trash and then build on top of it. | 00:16:43 | |
| But if? | 00:16:50 | |
| As an example, I'll just use this as a. | 00:16:52 | |
| And correct me if I'm wrong, Patrick. | 00:16:54 | |
| For sure, but. | 00:16:56 | |
| A very site developer. | 00:16:57 | |
| Purchases a piece of parcel. | 00:16:58 | |
| The person's piece of parcel decides to what they want to build something. | 00:17:00 | |
| Goes through the site planning and so forth and during the geotechnical. | 00:17:04 | |
| They discovered there was like an old landfill. | 00:17:08 | |
| That was on the site they purchased. | 00:17:11 | |
| They would not be allowed to. | 00:17:14 | |
| Build on it. They would have to. | 00:17:15 | |
| Eat they're physically remove it. | 00:17:16 | |
| Or resubmit a new site plan in order to avoid itself. | 00:17:18 | |
| I mean, it would just be based on state, state laws and regulations. | 00:17:23 | |
| Yeah, I mean. | 00:17:27 | |
| Buy to. I mean, we had one my little city. | 00:17:28 | |
| Where the landfill was actually done by the city, it was illegally done by the city, apparently. | 00:17:31 | |
| The four permitting permits were had existed and. | 00:17:35 | |
| The city wanted to build a skate park on top of it. | 00:17:38 | |
| And we? | 00:17:41 | |
| Me, we had to tell, we had to ourselves that we weren't allowed to build a skate park on top of the landfill. | 00:17:43 | |
| I guess I just would. | 00:17:48 | |
| I think it might be helpful to have a definition. | 00:17:49 | |
| Attached to that. | 00:17:52 | |
| I know that the East Geneva site. | 00:17:54 | |
| Has. | 00:17:56 | |
| A lot of. | 00:17:58 | |
| Materials. | 00:18:00 | |
| That will ultimately be. | 00:18:01 | |
| Buried and I. | 00:18:04 | |
| I wouldn't want to prevent them from. | 00:18:05 | |
| Having concrete debris, for example, that's. | 00:18:08 | |
| Geotechnically sound. | 00:18:12 | |
| Preventing them from putting something on top of it. | 00:18:14 | |
| And and so. | 00:18:17 | |
| A definition would be good so that it's if the intent is no garbage landfill. | 00:18:20 | |
| Yeah, you know. | 00:18:25 | |
| Surface build. | 00:18:26 | |
| Let's be clear about that because there are definitely going to be areas that have. | 00:18:28 | |
| Debris fields. | 00:18:33 | |
| Yeah, and that's why. | 00:18:35 | |
| I thought the same thing. When when? | 00:18:38 | |
| This was added and this is how it reads. | 00:18:40 | |
| Landfill construction debris or garbage Any workaround and related to landfills or areas with buried debris, waste or garbage will | 00:18:44 | |
| require a Phase one environmental report. | 00:18:48 | |
| With recommendations for additional study. No buildings, paved parking lots, paved roads, curb, gutter, sidewalks are allowed to | 00:18:54 | |
| be located over landfills, construction debris or garbage. | 00:18:58 | |
| And then we added this part. | 00:19:03 | |
| Unless otherwise approved by the appropriate federal, state, and or city agency having jurisdiction. | 00:19:05 | |
| Because I. | 00:19:12 | |
| I understood that there will be areas in over in that area that will have a lot of debris. Yeah. And kind of slicing like cutting | 00:19:13 | |
| here is a little bit. | 00:19:17 | |
| Oh yeah. But yeah, the kind of hair has answered things. | 00:19:23 | |
| Like a previous structure, like foundation of our previous structure is not technically considered landfill. | 00:19:26 | |
| Or the way it's kind of, it's kind of it's considered. | 00:19:31 | |
| Though that would be classified as abandoned. | 00:19:34 | |
| Abandoned structure. | 00:19:37 | |
| So this being noted as a balance structure on top of it, it wouldn't be considered ninefold. There's certain things that. | 00:19:39 | |
| Would require state, probably like mitigations. | 00:19:45 | |
| Like a. | 00:19:49 | |
| Asphalt. | 00:19:50 | |
| If those ******* was buried underneath there, then the state. | 00:19:51 | |
| Actually has regulations that. | 00:19:55 | |
| They would not. That would not be a permissible use, but. | 00:19:57 | |
| Usually old legacy things. | 00:20:00 | |
| If it was done for a purpose like. | 00:20:03 | |
| Foundations. | 00:20:04 | |
| It's not, it's not considered the construction debris or. | 00:20:05 | |
| Or so forth. The biggest. | 00:20:09 | |
| Concern on this is really just again, it's mostly to help about on the building. | 00:20:11 | |
| Is to ensure that the structural stability of the foundations that was being built on top of that is being assured. | 00:20:16 | |
| Yeah, I. | 00:20:22 | |
| The geotechnical. | 00:20:23 | |
| Stipulation. | 00:20:26 | |
| Because we do know that the. | 00:20:28 | |
| The remaining mountain. | 00:20:29 | |
| In the East Geneva site. | 00:20:31 | |
| Yeah, the intent is not to fully eliminate that. The intent is to bring it down to a. | 00:20:33 | |
| A certain height that's. | 00:20:38 | |
| Comparable to the Camus. | 00:20:40 | |
| Right. Yeah. | 00:20:41 | |
| And then? | 00:20:42 | |
| Finish conducting their geotechnical on it and do something on top of it. So. | 00:20:43 | |
| Yeah, I. | 00:20:48 | |
| Shoot that one in the foot right off the bat. | 00:20:50 | |
| Right. And and this, this kind of acts as a catch. | 00:20:51 | |
| In a way so we can require additional studies or like the environmental reports and whatnot on it. | 00:20:56 | |
| May not have been an issue regardless, but I think it's a good thing to have still. | 00:21:04 | |
| If there's soil tests. | 00:21:10 | |
| That are included in those geotechnical. | 00:21:12 | |
| That kind of stuff, yeah. Is there anything particular that you're thinking about on those? | 00:21:15 | |
| Just in our responses out there, there was plenty of. | 00:21:21 | |
| Sporadic dump sites where they just put their chemicals like. | 00:21:25 | |
| That they they had out there and. | 00:21:30 | |
| Just thinking about. | 00:21:33 | |
| Isn't that, yeah, isn't that usually required on like a phase two environmental? | 00:21:35 | |
| I'm not as familiar with environment, Yeah, I mean. | 00:21:39 | |
| So I mean, I might. | 00:21:43 | |
| Don't quote me on this. I mean, it's kind of on record, but. | 00:21:45 | |
| On the phase so. | 00:21:48 | |
| Your typical phase one environmental just kind of like the side survey. See again then historical. | 00:21:50 | |
| Use like, well, what's what's what has it been used for and what's been found. | 00:21:54 | |
| And then that would trigger your like you know your requirements for a phase two. The Phase 2 is when you go into your soil | 00:21:59 | |
| testing. | 00:22:02 | |
| And more of like, OK, what's the actual is? | 00:22:05 | |
| Air quotes contamination in the ground and what would have to be done based on the use of. | 00:22:09 | |
| Was being proposed. | 00:22:14 | |
| And that all happens before anything can be built that that would happen like I mean. | 00:22:16 | |
| As part of SO yesterday we went out and toured that site. | 00:22:20 | |
| And sat down and kind of went through the. | 00:22:24 | |
| Regulatory side of it. | 00:22:28 | |
| And they have. | 00:22:30 | |
| Rick Rah and then a number of other. | 00:22:31 | |
| Kind of oversight. | 00:22:35 | |
| Plans and. | 00:22:37 | |
| Jurisdiction through Department of Environmental quality. | 00:22:40 | |
| That are managing that environmental cleanup site and. | 00:22:43 | |
| And that includes. | 00:22:47 | |
| Intense monitoring of soils. | 00:22:48 | |
| All the way down to groundwater. | 00:22:51 | |
| And how they're how they're laying the material back out and spreading it and what materials they're spreading and where they can | 00:22:55 | |
| spread it and what that will. | 00:22:59 | |
| That will dictate future potential development and so. | 00:23:03 | |
| The Department of Environmental quality issues different levels of. | 00:23:07 | |
| Of development. | 00:23:12 | |
| Opportunity. | 00:23:13 | |
| Once those plans are complete. | 00:23:15 | |
| They'll issue. | 00:23:18 | |
| Essentially either a. | 00:23:20 | |
| No further action. No further action needed or they'll issue different levels of. | 00:23:21 | |
| This could be commercial, but only commercial. | 00:23:27 | |
| This could be. | 00:23:29 | |
| Residential or you know, there's no further action as you can do anything you want there. | 00:23:31 | |
| But that there's other tiers and so. | 00:23:35 | |
| Before they can develop. | 00:23:37 | |
| They it won't just be a soil test, it will be. | 00:23:39 | |
| You know, years of soil testing. | 00:23:42 | |
| All documented. | 00:23:45 | |
| With a final report that. | 00:23:47 | |
| Dictates what can then go there, and then it'll. Just after that it'll be. | 00:23:49 | |
| Whatever. | 00:23:53 | |
| The. | 00:23:54 | |
| Land use and zoning. | 00:23:56 | |
| Would allow for. | 00:23:58 | |
| Great. Exactly. | 00:23:59 | |
| Yeah. | 00:24:02 | |
| Moving on, there's. | 00:24:07 | |
| So. | 00:24:09 | |
| We're showing the. | 00:24:10 | |
| The uh. | 00:24:12 | |
| Right away cross sections, the the right away cross section they showed earlier were the ones that were in the transportation | 00:24:13 | |
| master plan. | 00:24:16 | |
| So. | 00:24:19 | |
| Kind of recreated in our in our drawings. | 00:24:21 | |
| But then. | 00:24:24 | |
| In the standard drawings, it also shows placement of. | 00:24:25 | |
| Utilities. | 00:24:29 | |
| You probably can't see this. | 00:24:30 | |
| Real well, but. | 00:24:32 | |
| It shows kind of the general layout of how utilities should be installed under the roads. | 00:24:34 | |
| Land drain, Sewer. | 00:24:41 | |
| Water and storm drain. | 00:24:42 | |
| And I really liked this update because. | 00:24:47 | |
| It is a requirement by the state that. | 00:24:50 | |
| Sewer and water are. | 00:24:52 | |
| Our place 10 feet apart. | 00:24:54 | |
| Minimum. | 00:24:56 | |
| And. | 00:24:58 | |
| Before we were showing center to center, which is not really how the. | 00:24:59 | |
| How the state? | 00:25:03 | |
| Reads. So we're clarifying that here that it's edge piped edge pipe. | 00:25:04 | |
| So I feel like that was a big win. | 00:25:10 | |
| Or that's a good one for us. | 00:25:12 | |
| So these are just the updates. | 00:25:18 | |
| I guess I should clarify what's on the left is our new and what's on the right is the old. | 00:25:21 | |
| And so. | 00:25:28 | |
| With the transportation master plan we changed our Rd. | 00:25:29 | |
| Our. | 00:25:33 | |
| Descriptions to. | 00:25:34 | |
| Arterial Collector. | 00:25:37 | |
| And local roads. | 00:25:39 | |
| Before. | 00:25:42 | |
| They were Parkway Blvd. and local I believe. | 00:25:43 | |
| And so we're updating that. | 00:25:47 | |
| That description as well. | 00:25:50 | |
| We have a lot of drawings that we just kind of are getting rid of as well, so. | 00:25:54 | |
| To again the left is the new. | 00:26:00 | |
| The oldest. | 00:26:03 | |
| On the right. | 00:26:04 | |
| A lot of our curb details we're just getting rid of because we're referencing APWA. | 00:26:06 | |
| This cross gutter 1. | 00:26:14 | |
| Was particularly not. | 00:26:16 | |
| Not really great. | 00:26:18 | |
| So there's a much better one in APWA. So we're just. | 00:26:20 | |
| A lot of these details were just adopting what's in a PWA. | 00:26:22 | |
| So we're just kind of cleaning that up there's. | 00:26:27 | |
| Another example, we're just getting rid of this whole sheet. | 00:26:31 | |
| Because this is. | 00:26:34 | |
| Outlined in a PWA. | 00:26:35 | |
| I believe it's. | 00:26:39 | |
| Easier and better to. | 00:26:41 | |
| To be uniform with other cities in Utah and just use the same curb and gutter. | 00:26:43 | |
| And you'll just link. | 00:26:49 | |
| Patrick to the. | 00:26:50 | |
| Specific section of APWA so that it's not. | 00:26:52 | |
| Potentially lost in. | 00:26:55 | |
| In a large. | 00:26:58 | |
| Manual umm. | 00:26:59 | |
| I guess I'll have to check and see if we. | 00:27:01 | |
| If we specifically go linked to that section. | 00:27:03 | |
| At the very start of our specifications, it. | 00:27:08 | |
| We we have a link. | 00:27:10 | |
| That will just go to a PWA. | 00:27:11 | |
| Yeah, it's not common that we actually. | 00:27:15 | |
| Link to this specific section in case APWA. | 00:27:17 | |
| Changes their formatting. | 00:27:20 | |
| And so forth. We'll just reference APA. | 00:27:21 | |
| Itself. | 00:27:24 | |
| As. | 00:27:28 | |
| With the design engineers, they're. | 00:27:29 | |
| They get to the point though with APWA, they're using it. | 00:27:31 | |
| Constantly for for every project. Like I got to the point where I had certain drawing numbers memorized so I would just put in. | 00:27:35 | |
| So. | 00:27:43 | |
| It's yeah. | 00:27:46 | |
| What? What we do? | 00:27:47 | |
| Though is. | 00:27:49 | |
| There are lots of different curb. | 00:27:52 | |
| Curb and gutter designs in Apwa. | 00:27:55 | |
| And we will reference what type of gutter we want. | 00:27:58 | |
| And so. | 00:28:03 | |
| For example, I think this curb and gutter and apwa is a type P or something. | 00:28:05 | |
| But there's different types and APW. | 00:28:12 | |
| APWA also shows the. | 00:28:15 | |
| 30 inch and 24 inch. | 00:28:17 | |
| Those are the 2 common sizes. | 00:28:19 | |
| So. | 00:28:21 | |
| That's another nice thing. If we do want to use 24 inch curb and gutter to match up with existing curb and gutter, we can we can | 00:28:23 | |
| tell them just use the APWA 24 inch and. | 00:28:29 | |
| It's there so we don't have to have a bunch. | 00:28:35 | |
| Different curb and gutter. | 00:28:38 | |
| Details. | 00:28:39 | |
| There's just a lot of general little cleanup. | 00:28:44 | |
| Changing the. | 00:28:47 | |
| The curb and gutter width. | 00:28:49 | |
| It's kind of a big one. We took out the. | 00:28:51 | |
| C curb. C curb details. | 00:28:53 | |
| Just general cleanup there. | 00:28:57 | |
| This is the fire hydrant apron that we're adding. | 00:29:00 | |
| Basically just. | 00:29:03 | |
| Slab of concrete. | 00:29:06 | |
| That will be that will go around the hydrant. | 00:29:07 | |
| To give a nicer. | 00:29:10 | |
| Place to. | 00:29:12 | |
| To work. | 00:29:13 | |
| When you're hooking up to the hydrant. | 00:29:14 | |
| Sorry, you probably can't see that really well. I can go the actual detail, maybe that'll. | 00:29:18 | |
| Let me just go to the. | 00:29:24 | |
| Detail. | 00:29:27 | |
| And these are the ones that are specific to us. | 00:29:28 | |
| Yeah, these these are specific. | 00:29:31 | |
| For bigger city. | 00:29:33 | |
| So we do the VA from the AP. | 00:29:34 | |
| APWA and certainly not instances. | 00:29:37 | |
| Hey, Patrick, I need to go back to the fireman. | 00:29:52 | |
| OK, so it shows. It shows that. | 00:29:54 | |
| Can you zoom in on the height of the base of the fire hydrant to be from from the ground? | 00:29:56 | |
| So it says. | 00:30:02 | |
| Two inches to the bolts. | 00:30:03 | |
| Or to the joint. | 00:30:05 | |
| From the finished grade. | 00:30:07 | |
| But then I thought we had. | 00:30:09 | |
| That's assuming the fire hydrant itself is a standard height. | 00:30:11 | |
| There's no short hydrants, right? | 00:30:14 | |
| You know, I thought we had a. | 00:30:17 | |
| Dimension to the nozzle. | 00:30:18 | |
| We did have that dimension. Maybe it got. | 00:30:32 | |
| Maybe it's somewhere else, but you're talking about to the nozzle, right? Yeah, he's talking about. | 00:30:35 | |
| Yeah, just so. | 00:30:41 | |
| When the firefighters are responding that they have enough room for. | 00:30:43 | |
| Clearance for their tools to spin around. | 00:30:48 | |
| Yeah. | 00:30:51 | |
| Yeah, good, good catch. | 00:30:54 | |
| I thought we had that in there. I I know we've. | 00:30:55 | |
| We've had that. | 00:30:59 | |
| But that's good to show there. | 00:31:00 | |
| Another change we made on this was. | 00:31:03 | |
| I'll go to our old detail real fast. | 00:31:07 | |
| We had the tracer wire. | 00:31:10 | |
| The tracer wire would come up the hydrant. | 00:31:13 | |
| And then peak out. | 00:31:15 | |
| And then they would just. | 00:31:17 | |
| Tied onto the chain on the hydrant or something, it just kind of. | 00:31:18 | |
| Was ugly. Just got it, got in the way. | 00:31:22 | |
| But now we have the tracer wire come up into a. | 00:31:25 | |
| A little. | 00:31:29 | |
| Pipe that's that will be embedded in the concrete with a with a cap. | 00:31:30 | |
| So it'll be nice and clean. You won't see a wire sticking up, you know, next to the hydrant anymore. | 00:31:34 | |
| So that was one thing I really liked. | 00:31:41 | |
| And part of the other reason I. | 00:31:46 | |
| I mentioned the the apron is. | 00:31:48 | |
| So people can. | 00:31:51 | |
| Work nicely around this, but another reason is when you blow off the hydrant, you're not. | 00:31:52 | |
| You can blow it off and not destroy the landscaping around it, you know. | 00:31:57 | |
| This is the. | 00:32:09 | |
| What I was? | 00:32:10 | |
| Talking about with our. | 00:32:13 | |
| The Vault This is the old vault detail and it just didn't make. | 00:32:16 | |
| Sense for what we used in the city, so we got rid of that one. | 00:32:20 | |
| I guess we didn't put. | 00:32:25 | |
| The new one is a lot cleaner. | 00:32:29 | |
| So this is the new one. | 00:32:33 | |
| So this is the new vault that we're. | 00:32:36 | |
| We're putting downtown for all the three inch meters. | 00:32:39 | |
| So it's a lot nicer. | 00:32:44 | |
| This one shows the clean out at the property line like I mentioned before. | 00:32:50 | |
| And then changing. | 00:32:56 | |
| Changing. | 00:32:58 | |
| The amount of clean out so. | 00:33:00 | |
| Before we just required a clean out every 100 feet no matter the. | 00:33:02 | |
| Size of the pipe. | 00:33:07 | |
| But now we're changing it to. | 00:33:09 | |
| With a four inch pipe you need to put clean outs every 50 feet. | 00:33:11 | |
| And as mentioned earlier, this is our sheet for parking spaces, parking dimensions. | 00:33:17 | |
| So this will be. | 00:33:23 | |
| Really good to have. | 00:33:25 | |
| A lot, a lot more straightforward. | 00:33:27 | |
| Before in our code, it just kind of had a generic. | 00:33:30 | |
| It just basically said parking stalls should be 9 foot wide and. | 00:33:34 | |
| 18 feet long or something it was. | 00:33:38 | |
| Not very detailed. | 00:33:41 | |
| But this this is a lot more detailed. | 00:33:42 | |
| Patrick, when you're talking about parking, is is this parking within the public right of way? | 00:33:46 | |
| So because our, our zoning has has. | 00:33:52 | |
| Our parking requirements and so we would want to make sure there's not a conflict between those two. | 00:33:54 | |
| I'm sorry, I believe we. | 00:34:00 | |
| I mean this would align to the parking along. | 00:34:01 | |
| That. | 00:34:05 | |
| And correct me if I'm wrong, Patrick, but I mean really what this does is provides a little bit more clarification in terms of. | 00:34:08 | |
| The parking. | 00:34:15 | |
| More on this space like I believe the zoning. | 00:34:17 | |
| Requirements provides. | 00:34:20 | |
| Like a parking stall should be X amount of feet wide and that deep. | 00:34:22 | |
| Yeah. And this kind of goes a little bit into more detail to say. | 00:34:26 | |
| The because I'm sorry. | 00:34:31 | |
| The the zoning. | 00:34:33 | |
| One puts down the usable parking stall space. | 00:34:35 | |
| Where this kind of goes and say it goes in more detail to say when you do angle parking. | 00:34:38 | |
| Your lines aren't going to be, let's just say, 18 feet. | 00:34:43 | |
| Deep in order to. | 00:34:47 | |
| Because that 18 feet. | 00:34:49 | |
| Deep line does not translate into an 18 foot length usable. | 00:34:51 | |
| It actually translates translates less than that. | 00:34:55 | |
| So this says. | 00:34:58 | |
| In order to do an angle parking. | 00:34:59 | |
| Parking stall line. | 00:35:02 | |
| The length of your Parkinson's line should be like, more like like. | 00:35:04 | |
| Closer to almost 20 ish I don't know. | 00:35:06 | |
| Something like that, Patrick, right? Yeah, we don't. | 00:35:09 | |
| And then? | 00:35:11 | |
| This one shows 34A for that line well, but it then goes and says then this outlines like. | 00:35:12 | |
| In order to get. | 00:35:18 | |
| To make the usable parking stall length and width. | 00:35:20 | |
| This is what the this is what the dimensions should should be out. | 00:35:25 | |
| I guess my point is. | 00:35:30 | |
| Do I understand wanting to capture kind of your public requirements, like your right of way requirements for parking within this | 00:35:32 | |
| document? | 00:35:36 | |
| But where we have things that are land use that are. | 00:35:41 | |
| Like covered in zoning is a better to move some of that to zoning? | 00:35:44 | |
| And keep and keeping right of way. Right of way. | 00:35:49 | |
| As opposed to having like like the the property stuff that's covered in zoning covered here. Well, technically this is | 00:35:52 | |
| specifically just for public infrastructure. So for for the public stuff. | 00:35:57 | |
| When going to the private, private. | 00:36:02 | |
| If they do a Parkinson's, like if they want to do a parking, an angle parking stall. | 00:36:06 | |
| That's not deep enough. | 00:36:10 | |
| I'll say that I want to say not deep enough like if they say. | 00:36:12 | |
| Well, you know. | 00:36:15 | |
| We only need 18 feet depth. | 00:36:16 | |
| So they do their, they do an angle line and they do 18 feet. | 00:36:19 | |
| Then what they'll end up doing is they'll have. | 00:36:22 | |
| Cars like the back of their cars. | 00:36:24 | |
| Kind of sticking out and so forth and. | 00:36:27 | |
| It's kind of like more on the then that kind of falls on the. | 00:36:29 | |
| The ACT ownership. | 00:36:34 | |
| The liability of the actual property owner. So I'm not concerned with like the dimensions and what the standard is. It's more of | 00:36:35 | |
| or do we have conflicts between the zoning if I'm an architect and I'm laying out a conceptual plan for a client? | 00:36:42 | |
| Am I looking at the zoning ordinance and then knowing I should actually be going to this? | 00:36:49 | |
| So there's. | 00:36:55 | |
| Because I I know you're saying this. Oh yeah, I got what you said, but I think it should all be consistent. Like what are our? | 00:36:55 | |
| Private requirements on private property. | 00:37:02 | |
| Versus property we own or public right of way, we should have some consistency and I'm OK. | 00:37:04 | |
| If this is the standard, but we need to make sure we have those those connections between the zoning and this document. So yeah, | 00:37:09 | |
| the way I looked at it was if you have. | 00:37:13 | |
| A special like zoning district like we have special. | 00:37:18 | |
| Parking drawings for the downtown area. | 00:37:21 | |
| So that would kind of supersede. | 00:37:25 | |
| This general 1 I feel like. | 00:37:29 | |
| Anthony pulled up. | 00:37:33 | |
| What our current zoning code? | 00:37:34 | |
| Has for parking. | 00:37:36 | |
| It basically just has a table. | 00:37:38 | |
| Where it just says standard parking with 9 feet 20 foot length, parallel 8 feet 24 foot length. | 00:37:40 | |
| And so just kind of and then parking aisle dimensions as a little table for parking aisle dimensions. | 00:37:49 | |
| If so, I guess my question is, Anthony, have you reviewed this? Does this meet what we what, what we could use? | 00:37:55 | |
| Because I I guess what I don't want is like 2 policies. | 00:38:02 | |
| That maybe they kind of address different things, but really our city, like I think we should have one. | 00:38:05 | |
| At least dimensionally one parking standard and then like we have that and we just. | 00:38:11 | |
| If it's in our parking, if our parking codes more of. | 00:38:16 | |
| Like if you're a bank, you need X number of stalls per 1000 square feet. Like like like. | 00:38:19 | |
| The numbers. | 00:38:26 | |
| Are OK in our code, but if we already have this, that's the same dimensionally, this is what you need to have and then for aisles. | 00:38:27 | |
| Why don't we just keep that one spot and then we reference like the the dimension stuff? | 00:38:34 | |
| I don't know. Have you looked at that, Anthony? | 00:38:38 | |
| OK, well that's probably something we need to do pretty quickly then to. | 00:38:41 | |
| Yeah, I I just don't want 2 conflicting documents. Even if ours is really general and yours more specific. I'd rather just. | 00:38:45 | |
| Rather just like. | 00:38:53 | |
| Like sent everyone to 1 document. Yeah, no, that's a good point. Yeah, just just reference the one. Yeah, so. | 00:38:54 | |
| Yeah, we can talk about it out. Yeah, that's a good point. We need to consolidate it. | 00:39:03 | |
| Thank you. | 00:39:07 | |
| This is just getting rid of the survey monuments. | 00:39:14 | |
| And that is? | 00:39:17 | |
| It. | 00:39:19 | |
| Sorry, it's been a long time on that. | 00:39:22 | |
| Is there any other questions? There's there's a lot of detail and. | 00:39:24 | |
| In all this but. | 00:39:28 | |
| I don't want to. | 00:39:30 | |
| We would spend all day if we went through. | 00:39:32 | |
| Everything but. | 00:39:34 | |
| Are there any questions? | 00:39:35 | |
| Patty, do you want to bring up your concerns? | 00:39:42 | |
| Some comments. | 00:39:44 | |
| Yeah, I do have. | 00:39:45 | |
| So I didn't really. | 00:39:50 | |
| Area of expertise. | 00:39:55 | |
| But I did go over. | 00:39:56 | |
| In it and I do have just. | 00:40:00 | |
| Just to make sure that. | 00:40:05 | |
| Sort of on the same thing that. | 00:40:06 | |
| I was talking about consistency. | 00:40:08 | |
| So, umm. | 00:40:10 | |
| In section one of four. | 00:40:12 | |
| 1.04.020, page 4. | 00:40:15 | |
| Section. | 00:40:18 | |
| Four. Section F4 under permits. | 00:40:20 | |
| It says the contractor is responsible to obtain all required business licenses and building. | 00:40:25 | |
| Permits applicable to this project. | 00:40:30 | |
| I think that should be engineering permits. | 00:40:32 | |
| Because we're talking about. | 00:40:36 | |
| Like specifically, this section is talking about the requirements for. | 00:40:39 | |
| Pre construction. | 00:40:45 | |
| I think the intent of this was to. | 00:40:49 | |
| To basically make sure that. | 00:40:52 | |
| They get all. | 00:40:54 | |
| Permits that are required so that not so that. | 00:40:56 | |
| We're not saying. | 00:40:59 | |
| Or you can't just go out and start construction. | 00:41:00 | |
| With some permits, but not. | 00:41:05 | |
| All. Yeah, we can change that. No, we can change that to be all applicable permits by the. | 00:41:07 | |
| Through. | 00:41:14 | |
| Through the respective agencies. | 00:41:15 | |
| Yeah, through their respective agencies. | 00:41:18 | |
| Yeah, we can just say applicable permits. | 00:41:20 | |
| More broader language is better. | 00:41:22 | |
| To just sort of like capture that anything. | 00:41:24 | |
| Could be required. | 00:41:27 | |
| Page 5 under section. | 00:41:29 | |
| Under Bonds, Section C. | 00:41:33 | |
| It notes. | 00:41:36 | |
| Bond is required. | 00:41:39 | |
| And that can be. | 00:41:42 | |
| A letter from a bank. | 00:41:44 | |
| Survey. | 00:41:46 | |
| Surety company or cash bond? | 00:41:47 | |
| So just. | 00:41:49 | |
| To make consistently uh. | 00:41:50 | |
| As of may, finance departments ask that we no longer do cash bonds because of the state code interest rate requirements for state | 00:41:52 | |
| code 10-98-604. | 00:41:57 | |
| .53 B. | 00:42:02 | |
| So we probably would just want to take cash bond. | 00:42:06 | |
| Out of that. | 00:42:09 | |
| And we took it out of the. | 00:42:11 | |
| Different section further down. | 00:42:12 | |
| For bonds. | 00:42:13 | |
| So we probably just want to remove it from. | 00:42:15 | |
| This section as well to just to be. | 00:42:17 | |
| Consistent. Yeah, I think. | 00:42:19 | |
| And we don't think we were keeping and I'll talk, we'll talk to the finance. I think we were keeping on. | 00:42:22 | |
| Cash bonds for the fact that. | 00:42:27 | |
| There may be, because we do have encroachment balance. | 00:42:28 | |
| Like there's that would be small. | 00:42:32 | |
| And. | 00:42:34 | |
| Taking. | 00:42:36 | |
| Encroachment bonds are typically done through surety bonds. | 00:42:37 | |
| Typically, but not typically those up. | 00:42:41 | |
| Yeah. It was specifically requested that we not do cash bonds anymore because of the interest rate bearing requirements. | 00:42:43 | |
| That you have to put him in interest rate. | 00:42:51 | |
| Interest rate. | 00:42:53 | |
| Burying accounts. | 00:42:54 | |
| Separate for each one. | 00:42:55 | |
| And then pay that out. So like that we would have to calculate the interest rate for how long we're keeping those bonds. | 00:42:57 | |
| Yeah, we understand. Well, we'll confirm with the. | 00:43:06 | |
| With the finance department to ensure their. | 00:43:09 | |
| One item on there is. | 00:43:12 | |
| We're trying to keep it level because I know there's cities out there like they're they're removing sure, surely bonds. | 00:43:14 | |
| Out of as a requirement because they don't want to deal with charity companies, but we. | 00:43:21 | |
| We were keeping them and there are because to ensure that to allow for. | 00:43:25 | |
| Contractors to have a wide. | 00:43:30 | |
| To have their options in order to for bonds and themselves. | 00:43:33 | |
| Bars are like. We do have some instances where bonds are like 2500. | 00:43:39 | |
| $2500. | 00:43:44 | |
| Or yeah, $2500. | 00:43:45 | |
| Bonds and so forth. | 00:43:47 | |
| And we just want to make sure that we won't put any. | 00:43:49 | |
| Any undue burden on a? | 00:43:52 | |
| Contractor to go out and get a surely bond or. | 00:43:54 | |
| A layer of credit or something like that. | 00:43:58 | |
| When they would just rather this. | 00:44:00 | |
| Provided a $25 check, yes, we would have to pay them back in interest, but. | 00:44:02 | |
| I think those are usually few and few between. | 00:44:06 | |
| But we'll make sure we're the finance department that they're comfortable with. | 00:44:08 | |
| Those type of occurrences as well. | 00:44:12 | |
| I wonder if we could put. | 00:44:15 | |
| Like a a time limit on on small cash bonds 29 days. | 00:44:16 | |
| Before there is injury for yeah, there's interest or so because. | 00:44:21 | |
| Yeah, the the hard part is with encroachment permits. | 00:44:25 | |
| It's it's very quick. | 00:44:29 | |
| So they'll submit a. | 00:44:31 | |
| An encroachment permit. They'll want to start working in a couple days. | 00:44:32 | |
| And it's very difficult to get. | 00:44:36 | |
| Like we're going through this right now with. | 00:44:39 | |
| Enbridge it's very difficult to get any other type of bond from from them. | 00:44:41 | |
| I mean, I think there were other reasons for the difficulty on that, but. | 00:44:47 | |
| It's just very difficult to get. | 00:44:50 | |
| A small. | 00:44:52 | |
| Bond like a 5002 to $5000 bond. | 00:44:53 | |
| And we do have that and we do have I think one company in the past and I've seen it done before we're. | 00:44:57 | |
| A developer may choose if they have the cash for they may choose to do a escrow bond. | 00:45:02 | |
| Cash Bond. | 00:45:06 | |
| Where they put all their cash into an escrow account. | 00:45:07 | |
| And then they just. | 00:45:10 | |
| And but they they hold on to the account and. | 00:45:12 | |
| Any interest being a cure occurred on the on the on that. | 00:45:14 | |
| Stays with stays with the contract at themselves but. | 00:45:19 | |
| In essence, it's not. It's not sure any bond. It's not. | 00:45:22 | |
| Layer of credit, but it's just. | 00:45:25 | |
| Cash bond held Held with a. | 00:45:27 | |
| Developers. | 00:45:30 | |
| Attorney. | 00:45:31 | |
| Oh, that's, I mean that that would be another, correct. Yeah. Escrow bonds are something that we allow for subdivisions right now | 00:45:32 | |
| through municipal code. So that was another note I had is maybe we add escrow. | 00:45:37 | |
| To that as an option. | 00:45:43 | |
| Because it's currently not listed as an option for them to do for. | 00:45:45 | |
| We'll do that scrub on there, but it is in our municipal code. | 00:45:50 | |
| So it's a bit of a contradiction there. | 00:45:53 | |
| On page 6, second paragraph. | 00:46:01 | |
| Just where it mentions. | 00:46:03 | |
| Looks like the. | 00:46:05 | |
| Contractor deposit was added and bond was removed, but everything else in that section still refers to contractor bonds. | 00:46:07 | |
| So I just don't know. | 00:46:15 | |
| If we just want to continue that to save contractor bond instead of changing it to contractor deposit, but we didn't change | 00:46:17 | |
| anything else in that section to contractor deposit. | 00:46:21 | |
| That's good catch. | 00:46:26 | |
| This was kind of an attempt to. | 00:46:27 | |
| We were wondering if there was a way we can get away from. | 00:46:30 | |
| The bond with interest. | 00:46:34 | |
| Right. Yeah. If we stopped calling it a bond, can we do like cash deposits without it being? | 00:46:37 | |
| Yeah, so. | 00:46:44 | |
| And that's fine if we all change it to the deposit. | 00:46:47 | |
| Wording then maybe that is a way to not have to deal with the interest rate requirements for a cash bond. | 00:46:49 | |
| As you're just requiring the cash. | 00:46:56 | |
| Upfront as a deposit that you'll return back. | 00:46:58 | |
| Later to them. | 00:47:01 | |
| Yeah. | 00:47:02 | |
| Yes, if we're doing it that way, then we would just want to consistently change this section to. | 00:47:04 | |
| Continue to the word. | 00:47:09 | |
| Use the word deposit instead of bond. | 00:47:10 | |
| This particular section had a couple of times where just kept referring to contractor bond instead of contractor deposit, that's | 00:47:15 | |
| all. So there was just like some inconsistency in this section. | 00:47:20 | |
| I'll take the hit for that. I told Patrick to change the bonds from deposit. | 00:47:24 | |
| No, thanks. OK, that's good catch. | 00:47:29 | |
| And then same page but under section D. | 00:47:33 | |
| You have. | 00:47:36 | |
| The people that are required for pre construction conferences. | 00:47:37 | |
| And you've added major subcontractors? | 00:47:40 | |
| So city engineer, landowner, and contractor are all defined terms within definitions at the beginning of this section, but major | 00:47:43 | |
| subcontractors aren't. | 00:47:47 | |
| And so I'm. | 00:47:52 | |
| Just wondering if we want to add language. | 00:47:54 | |
| To provide insight to the contractor and to the applicants. | 00:47:57 | |
| Who those subconscious who? What is a major subcontractor that you are going to require to attend? | 00:48:02 | |
| So is that your excavator? Is that you're like? | 00:48:10 | |
| What? What is the definition of? | 00:48:12 | |
| A major subcontractor. | 00:48:14 | |
| Yeah, that's yeah, I think. | 00:48:19 | |
| Add some language. | 00:48:21 | |
| Yeah, the reason we put major contractor was. | 00:48:24 | |
| We basically just wanted to capture the excavator. | 00:48:27 | |
| Necessary like. | 00:48:32 | |
| We didn't want all the stuff, Yeah. So showing up. | 00:48:33 | |
| And my only thing is to like we want to delineate any confusion to applicants. | 00:48:35 | |
| In. | 00:48:40 | |
| There if someone we consider to be a major subcontractor isn't invited or. | 00:48:41 | |
| Brought to the meeting that it does not cause a delay later. | 00:48:46 | |
| Because they did not have an understanding of. | 00:48:49 | |
| What those who those people were. | 00:48:51 | |
| Yeah. Whereas like contractor and landowner are clearly defined terms in the definition. That's fine. And I think, I mean we still | 00:48:54 | |
| hold the principle that a developer is the sole. | 00:48:59 | |
| There's the sole party responsible for the project, so. | 00:49:05 | |
| If for any reason that they choose to change out their contractor midway through project. | 00:49:08 | |
| There is no reason for us to do. | 00:49:12 | |
| Meeting with that. | 00:49:14 | |
| Major subcontractor like the excavator or so forth, that's. | 00:49:16 | |
| And if there's any issues, it just goes directly to the. | 00:49:19 | |
| To the developer itself. | 00:49:22 | |
| As they're the ones who are. | 00:49:23 | |
| Pulling the permits. | 00:49:25 | |
| But. | 00:49:27 | |
| We'll define that a little bit. | 00:49:28 | |
| We'll put a little definition in there. | 00:49:29 | |
| To ensure that, yeah. And you could even then like supplement that. | 00:49:32 | |
| Section that maybe they're not required as the responsibility still falls under the contractor. | 00:49:35 | |
| But. | 00:49:41 | |
| That the city highly recommends any major subcontractors, including excavators, to be present at the. | 00:49:42 | |
| Reconstruction Meeting. | 00:49:48 | |
| Page 8 under time limitations. | 00:49:51 | |
| There is a. | 00:49:53 | |
| Contradiction here with the time limitations for land disturbance permits. | 00:49:54 | |
| As Municipal Code section 7.08.040 G specifically also. | 00:49:58 | |
| Calls out land disturbance, permits time limitations. So we just want to make sure that those are either consistent. | 00:50:05 | |
| Or that one section is referring to the other one. That's like. | 00:50:11 | |
| The best way to do it is just. | 00:50:15 | |
| To have one section refer to the other, so you don't have to update both times and both documents every time you want to make a | 00:50:17 | |
| change. | 00:50:20 | |
| OK. Yeah, that's a good point. | 00:50:26 | |
| Yeah. And then and then on page 12. | 00:50:44 | |
| Under Section H, Notification of residence. | 00:50:46 | |
| There is you kind of worded what you wanted the. | 00:50:50 | |
| Notice to say. | 00:50:55 | |
| Did you want to have a requirement for them to add? | 00:50:57 | |
| Uh, contact for. | 00:51:01 | |
| Who that resident should reach out to if they have questions or concerns on the project, because there's nothing in here that | 00:51:04 | |
| requires any sort of notification for them to provide emergency contacts. | 00:51:09 | |
| Or, uh. | 00:51:14 | |
| Context for residents when they're concerned, but I know we've received things. | 00:51:15 | |
| From. | 00:51:20 | |
| Community members. | 00:51:21 | |
| Because they didn't know. | 00:51:23 | |
| Who to go to? | 00:51:25 | |
| When construction is happening in the right of way. | 00:51:26 | |
| So put something in for who residents can contact. | 00:51:31 | |
| Wait, are we going to require the contractor to provide a contact number? | 00:51:37 | |
| For residents to reach out to either the contractor or do we want to have them put. | 00:51:41 | |
| Generic language on. | 00:51:46 | |
| Who they reach out to with us in the city? | 00:51:47 | |
| If they have concerns on those projects, but I know we had a lot of those issues with like the Comcast ones. | 00:51:50 | |
| That were done. | 00:51:55 | |
| And. | 00:51:57 | |
| There was no information provided to the residents as to like when that. | 00:51:59 | |
| Who they should contact? | 00:52:03 | |
| Or when those projects would be happening. So I think this takes care of the win, but not necessarily The Who. | 00:52:05 | |
| OK, Yeah. | 00:52:13 | |
| I see that. | 00:52:14 | |
| We'll have them, we'll add. | 00:52:17 | |
| Yeah. I just didn't know if we want to expand that section just a little bit just to be more like. | 00:52:25 | |
| If we don't put it on as a requirement, they're not going to put it on the. | 00:52:31 | |
| Notice if that makes sense. | 00:52:34 | |
| Because they they. | 00:52:36 | |
| They aren't getting anything else by having community members reach out to them if they're upset. | 00:52:37 | |
| Yeah. | 00:52:42 | |
| OK. And then page 16. | 00:52:45 | |
| Under Electronic under Record Drawings, Section D, third paragraph where it talks about final inspection may not be scheduled | 00:52:49 | |
| until the record drawings are. | 00:52:54 | |
| And required electronic files are received. | 00:53:00 | |
| So that is a conditional statement. | 00:53:02 | |
| That they cannot do a final inspection, so this act may not. | 00:53:05 | |
| Acts the same as shall not in this case. | 00:53:08 | |
| But it's not consistent with the language that you have. | 00:53:11 | |
| In section one that. | 00:53:14 | |
| .08 dot 030, section F. | 00:53:16 | |
| That basically says that. | 00:53:20 | |
| You can require it, so I would just make that consistent with that section so that you have the option. | 00:53:22 | |
| To do a final inspection or not do a final inspection with the record drawings. | 00:53:27 | |
| Yeah, we were trying to leave the option open. What was the other section number? | 00:53:32 | |
| 1.08. | 00:53:37 | |
| .030, Section F. | 00:53:39 | |
| So I just copy that sentence and move it over because that way it's just the language in that was. | 00:53:43 | |
| You know. | 00:53:48 | |
| Gave you the. | 00:53:49 | |
| He said 108.003. | 00:53:51 | |
| 1.08.030 Section F. | 00:53:55 | |
| Zero section F. | 00:54:01 | |
| OK, yeah, 1.08.030. | 00:54:07 | |
| Section F. | 00:54:11 | |
| Sorry I'm not catching this. | 00:54:13 | |
| Like that? | 00:54:14 | |
| I'll find it. | 00:54:17 | |
| It's on page. | 00:54:19 | |
| I didn't write the page number down, I'm sorry. | 00:54:27 | |
| Page 25. | 00:54:34 | |
| Page 18 under warranty bond. | 00:54:43 | |
| You mentioned a minimum $500 contractor bond. This is not listed in the consolidated fee schedule. | 00:54:45 | |
| So you just want to be very careful. | 00:54:51 | |
| You cannot charge. | 00:54:54 | |
| Fee that isn't listed in the minimum. | 00:54:56 | |
| Like you can't charge a fee that isn't listed on the consolidated fee schedule. | 00:54:58 | |
| And so you'll probably just want to put a minimum of $500 on the fee schedule. | 00:55:02 | |
| So that you can charge. | 00:55:07 | |
| Which page is that? Because right now the fee schedule just says 10% warning. | 00:55:09 | |
| Which page is that on? | 00:55:13 | |
| Sorry, page 18. | 00:55:17 | |
| Section E. | 00:55:18 | |
| And then under under. | 00:55:35 | |
| Page 19. | 00:55:37 | |
| Under Variances section C. | 00:55:39 | |
| The last. | 00:55:41 | |
| Sentence your. | 00:55:42 | |
| Appeal processes. | 00:55:44 | |
| That's a lot of appeals. | 00:55:46 | |
| So I would probably. | 00:55:49 | |
| The Ombudsman tends to not. | 00:55:52 | |
| A lot of appeal processes. | 00:55:55 | |
| I would probably suggest. | 00:55:57 | |
| Removing at least one, I wouldn't have more than two appeal processes for people. | 00:55:59 | |
| Before they start going to the court system. | 00:56:03 | |
| My suggestion. | 00:56:06 | |
| Would probably be to take out the Planning Commission as they don't normally function as a quasi judicial board. | 00:56:08 | |
| OK. | 00:56:16 | |
| But that's, you know, that's. | 00:56:18 | |
| You know, up to discussion, but typically like having. | 00:56:20 | |
| A lot of appeal processes. | 00:56:24 | |
| Tends to be something that gets. | 00:56:25 | |
| Pretty convoluted for people. | 00:56:27 | |
| I think that was the last note I made. | 00:56:40 | |
| Yeah, that was the last note I made. Everything else goes into lake. | 00:56:42 | |
| The specifications and I don't that's your guys' area of expertise. | 00:56:46 | |
| OK. Yeah. Thanks Patty for that. | 00:56:55 | |
| Yeah, you're welcome. | 00:56:59 | |
| Or you're not welcome if you. | 00:57:01 | |
| If you didn't want me to say anything. | 00:57:03 | |
| No thanks, Betty. I wasn't expecting to be reprimanded. | 00:57:07 | |
| That's good. Anybody. | 00:57:12 | |
| Have any other concerns? | 00:57:14 | |
| OK, that. | 00:57:18 | |
| Any staff or Commission reports? | 00:57:21 | |
| Move this to adjournment. Thank you guys. | 00:57:25 | |
| Thank you. | 00:57:28 |