Live stream not working in Chrome or Edge? Click Here
Start Position | |
Bookmark0 | |
Chair Fullmer called for a motion. | |
Motion: BOARDMEMBER FLAKE MOVED TO APPROVE THE CONSENT ITEM AS PRESENTED. BOARDMEMBER RASMUSSEN SECONDED THE MOTION. CHAIR FULLMER, BOARDMEMBERS FLAKE, RASMUSSEN, SIFUENTES, AND WELSH VOTED YES. THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 3. BUSINESS ITEMS 3.1 Public hearing – Amending the Vineyard RDA Fiscal Year 2022 – 2023 Budget Amendment #2 (Resolution U2023-04) Finance Director David Mortensen will present amendments to the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 RDA budget. The RDA Board will act to adopt (or deny) this request by resolution. | |
Chair Fullmer called for a motion to open the public hearing. | |
Motion: BOARDMEMBER FLAKE MOVED TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 7:27 PM. BOARDMEMBER RASMUSSEN SECONDED THE MOTION. CHAIR FULLMER, BOARDMEMBERS FLAKE, RASMUSSEN, SIFUENTES, AND WELSH VOTED YES. THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. | |
Chair Fullmer turned the time over to Finance Director David Mortensen. | |
Mr. Mortensen explained that this amendment was due to a change order item for the Water Master Plan. | |
Chair Fullmer called for public comments. Hearing none, she called for a motion to close the public hearing. | |
Motion: BOARDMEMBER FLAKE MOVED TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 7:28 PM. BOARDMEMBER RASMUSSEN SECONDED THE MOTION. CHAIR FULLMER, BOARDMEMBERS FLAKE, RASMUSSEN, SIFUENTES, AND WELSH VOTED YES. THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. | |
Chair Fullmer called for comments from the board. | |
Boardmember Sifuentes asked for clarification on the change order. Mr. Ghandour explained that the reason for the change was to incorporate the changes for the Housing and Transit Reinvestment Zone. | |
Chair Fullmer called for further comments from the board. Hearing none, she called for a motion. | |
Motion: BOARDMEMBER FLAKE MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION U2023-04 THE VINEYARD RDA FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023 BUDGET AMENDMENT #2 AS PRESENTED BY STAFF. BOARDMEMBER RASMUSSEN SECONDED THE MOTION. ROLL CALL WENT AS FOLLOWS: CHAIR FULLMER, BOARDMEMBERS FLAKE, RASMUSSEN, SIFUENTES, AND WELSH VOTED YES. THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 3.2 DISCUSSION and Action – Final Fiscal Year 2023-2024 RDA Budget (Resolution U2023-05)Finance Director David Mortensen will present the Final Fiscal Year 2023-2024 RDA budget. The RDA Board will act to adopt (or deny) this request by resolution. (A public hearing was held on the tentative budget during the June 14, 2023 RDA meeting.) | |
Chair Fullmer turned the time over to Finance Director David Mortensen. | |
Mr. Mortensen reviewed the final budget. He gave an overview of the capital projects being contributed by the RDA. | |
Chair Fullmer asked for an overview of the Mill Road design. Mr. Ghandour explained that these were for the pedestrian enhancement designs for Mill Road. A discussion ensued. Mr. Nair recommended to change it to say $75,000 for roadway design improvements. The discussion continued. | |
Boardmember Welsh asked about the light at 400 North and Mill Road. Mr. Ghandour explained it would be part of the Transportation Master Plan. A discussion ensued. | |
Chair Fullmer called for further questions. Hearing none, she called for a motion. | |
Motion: BOARDMEMBER FLAKE MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION U2023-05 THE VINEYARD RDA FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024 BUDGET AS PRESENTED BY STAFF WITH THE CHANGES AS NOTED ABOUT SPECIFICALLY THE FUNDING FOR MILL ROAD CROSSING (DESIGN), THE BOARD DIRECTED ENHANCEMENT DESIGN CHANGE. BOARDMEMBER SIFUENTES SECONDED THE MOTION. ROLL CALL WENT AS FOLLOWS: CHAIR FULLMER, BOARDMEMBERS FLAKE, RASMUSSEN, SIFUENTES, AND WELSH VOTED YES. THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4. ADJOURNMENT | |
Chair Fullmer called for a motion to adjourn the meeting. | |
Motion: BOARDMEMBER FLAKE MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 7:40 PM.BOARDMEMBER SIFUENTES SECONDED THE MOTION. CHAIR FULLMER, BOARDMEMBERS FLAKE, RASMUSSEN, SIFUENTES, AND WELSH VOTED YES. THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. MINUTES APPROVED ON : October 11, 2023 CERTIFIEDCORRECTBY: /s/Pamela Spencer pamela spencer, city RECORDER |
726, we're going to start the Redevelopment Agency board meeting. | 00:00:00 | |
Still the 28th Wednesday, 2023. | 00:00:05 | |
And yeah, I said 726. | 00:00:09 | |
727, just in case I don't see the time. All right, let's go ahead. And I need a motion for this consent agenda. | 00:00:12 | |
Mayor, I move that we approve the consent items as presented. Thank you, Ties. I need a second. Second. Second by Amber. All in | 00:00:22 | |
favor. Aye. All right, that carried. We'll move on to our business items. We're going to go ahead and go into a public hearing. | 00:00:30 | |
This is the Amending The Vineyard RDA fiscal year 2022-2023, Budget amendment #2, resolution U2023-04. | 00:00:38 | |
All right. | 00:00:47 | |
Mostly to go into a public hearing by ties, a second by Amber. All in favor? Aye. All right, David, thank you. So this will be | 00:00:49 | |
very quick. We have just one item that we're recommending be added to the budget and it is for a change order for our water master | 00:00:56 | |
plan with Hanson Allen and Loose of $30,000. | 00:01:03 | |
Hey, any questions? | 00:01:14 | |
Not by the public, they. | 00:01:16 | |
All right. So let's go out of Republic hearing. Thank you, Tice in a second. | 00:01:21 | |
I need, did you guys say aye, I wanted it to say all right, it's great that carried. So we are ready for the board to speak. What | 00:01:29 | |
do you guys have to say about this? What does the change order entail? | 00:01:35 | |
Yeah. | 00:01:44 | |
For that, excuse me for the fact that when we do our water master plan, we had to revise our revise our draft final water match | 00:01:55 | |
plan to incorporate. | 00:02:00 | |
The changes for the HRTZ, There we go. | 00:02:06 | |
HTRTHT yeah if it says. | 00:02:11 | |
So that's how, you know, I always stayed in my head first, yes. Yeah, in order to address. | 00:02:15 | |
The change in that, so for us to be able to go back and account for the change of ERU types which we're still working with with | 00:02:22 | |
the developer as well As for our secondary corporate, secondary water into our water master plan which will allow us to be able | 00:02:28 | |
to. | 00:02:33 | |
Utilize allocate less culinary water per year, which would have a positive effect for the residents and developers down the road | 00:02:41 | |
as well. | 00:02:44 | |
Any other questions on that? No if that satisfies me, all right. | 00:02:51 | |
If there are no further questions, no further comments, we just need a motion. | 00:02:55 | |
Mayor, I move that we adopt the resolution. View 2/20/23 Dash 4, The Vineyard RDA Physical Year 2022 Dash 2023 Budget Amendment #2 | 00:03:00 | |
as presented by Senate. Thank you Tice. Can I get a second, Second, Second by Amber. This is the Bible call. | 00:03:11 | |
Amber, Aye, aye. Marty, aye. Christy. | 00:03:22 | |
OK, we'll go on to 3.2. This is the discussion and action of the final fiscal year 2023-2024 RDA budget resolution U2023-05. | 00:03:26 | |
After David. Thank you very much. | 00:03:38 | |
Yeah. So no changes from what's been presented in the last meeting with end of the budget. I just wanted to give another overview | 00:03:41 | |
of the capital projects that are being paid for or contributed from the RDA. Those include the Vineyard, Beach Improvement, Center | 00:03:47 | |
St. Overpass Landscaping, Vineyard Connector, Promenade, Overpass Mill Rd. pedestrian enhancements, design 400 N expansion and | 00:03:53 | |
redevelopment Design, Main St. pedestrian enhancements. | 00:03:59 | |
Mill Rd. Water Line Loop Parking Master plan, Economic development, Strategic plan, Rail spill removal and Anderson East and West | 00:04:06 | |
Side projects and the other portion of the fire Station project that the Capital Projects Fund is not covering. | 00:04:13 | |
Thank you, David. Could you just go over the mill Rd. design for me? | 00:04:20 | |
The costs and everything. | 00:04:24 | |
I mean, anybody who wants to go over it can, but the cost. | 00:04:26 | |
Ma'am, you're speaking to this degree about the Melrose Enhancements design. OK, so the Melrose Enhancement design is specifically | 00:04:33 | |
for. | 00:04:37 | |
The projects for pedestrian crossings going east and West along the road, specifically along where the yard, excuse me, Mill Road | 00:04:43 | |
and 400 N would be being on the where they are then? | 00:04:50 | |
At Watertown, homes are as well as along the corridor as well. So for example, what's the dollar amount on it? | 00:04:58 | |
And this was discussed during the town hall that we have. Yeah, I remember that. | 00:05:11 | |
And there's been meetings and task forces and people working on it. I just kind of want to understand the costs a little bit | 00:05:16 | |
better publicly. Dave is pulling that one up specifically. | 00:05:21 | |
Hmm. | 00:05:27 | |
As we're beating 75,000 is what we have in the budget. | 00:05:30 | |
So I don't know that if that item is something we've ever talked about as a council. | 00:05:33 | |
Yeah, I think it 1 experience I have with it is. | 00:05:38 | |
Understanding from like. | 00:05:42 | |
Commission's perspective, I hear from them. It's like and Planning Commission. | 00:05:45 | |
An area they always talk about how we want to change Mill Rd. Mill Rd. needs it's and I agree if you're a pedestrian or a or | 00:05:50 | |
you're bicycling along Mill Rd. I mean nobody's doing that and and it's a what size lanes to cross it so if you if you live on the | 00:05:56 | |
other street. | 00:06:01 | |
You. | 00:06:07 | |
West. | 00:06:09 | |
Of top go. | 00:06:10 | |
Just across that road, like people are not going to walk across that to go to top off if they're still going to get their car and | 00:06:12 | |
drive. | 00:06:15 | |
Because of the way that Rose is designed. And so is this in our ATP plan or is it more than that? So yes, So that crossing was an | 00:06:18 | |
ATP plan and it was prioritized somewhere in the top. | 00:06:24 | |
Five or ten, Yeah. Something it was. It was in there and. | 00:06:32 | |
The only time I guess we discussed it was in the ATP plan and the priorities. | 00:06:38 | |
Why? | 00:06:43 | |
I. | 00:06:47 | |
I've never discussed having that in here, and this is the first time. This is the first time we're discussing it, so. | 00:06:49 | |
That's all I know. I'm not saying this to advocate for it. I'm just thinking about it as you brought it up. Could we do something | 00:06:54 | |
where if we do approve this, that we just hold this for? | 00:06:58 | |
Spending on that project until we approve anything, I mean, we are going to have to approve it anyway, right? I just don't want it | 00:07:03 | |
to allocate funds for it necessarily unless we go through some kind of process where I might have like right now I feel like I'm | 00:07:08 | |
prioritizing it. | 00:07:13 | |
And it's my bad that I didn't catch it earlier, but I'm touching it now and I'm thinking I want to take time to just prioritize it | 00:07:19 | |
really quick and make sure I'm. | 00:07:24 | |
Really have my head wrapped around it. | 00:07:30 | |
How would we do that? | 00:07:33 | |
I mean, because we're going to have to go through it anyway, right? That's the process. It's just setting the money aside right | 00:07:34 | |
now and prioritizing it over the other things that we could be doing with it, right? | 00:07:39 | |
The kind of the idea was that we. | 00:07:45 | |
Do that as we design the 400 N as well, because the two really are. | 00:07:47 | |
Ventricle. | 00:07:54 | |
Mm-hmm. | 00:07:58 | |
That girl, That's what I'm trying to say, Yeah. So I mean, and we we we might be able to get a kind of a. | 00:07:59 | |
It's cheaper by having the two pull together. | 00:08:07 | |
And that's that's something that we we could look at if we have the same consultant do both projects. I wonder if just the next | 00:08:11 | |
meeting that we have if we could pull this on to. | 00:08:17 | |
Our agenda and have a broader discussion about it for me and then say. | 00:08:23 | |
Tentatively were like, I mean we're putting it here, but obviously it's not like we have to spend it or approve it, right. Yeah, | 00:08:29 | |
what you could do is if you wanted to just designate that 75,000 for roadway design improvements. | 00:08:36 | |
Then that just gives the broad. | 00:08:43 | |
If as things come up, this one might be a good opportunity if we pair it with the signal design as well, but if you just made the | 00:08:45 | |
category more broad, then it would give us the opportunity to. | 00:08:52 | |
Come to you guys when there's an opportunity to pair two different studies together or something like that. OK. The last time you | 00:08:59 | |
did, sorry, do you mind if I say something the last time you guys suggested when we wanted to hold on a project that we put it in | 00:09:03 | |
the like. | 00:09:07 | |
Council project or the RDA projects that we are looking towards, towards the future, Is there anything that we could isolate the | 00:09:12 | |
fence so that it doesn't go into the broader category and we could save it for a future project design? | 00:09:18 | |
Yeah. | 00:09:26 | |
Designated here? No, there was a placeholder. That's what we're looking for, so we could then go back to it and vet it. | 00:09:28 | |
Yeah. And what would be cool about doing that is that if we saw it and we thought, OK, we don't necessarily want to prioritize | 00:09:36 | |
that, but we're going to pick something from the ATP plan to do, we could. But if we see that it's really essential and we see | 00:09:41 | |
that 400 N and we're like, yeah, this is of course. | 00:09:47 | |
Why wouldn't we do this? We could go ahead and move forward. | 00:09:52 | |
I would feel more comfortable with that. | 00:09:55 | |
So I need to say like council directed roadway enhancement, you mentioned a light there. Are we getting close to that warranting a | 00:09:58 | |
light? | 00:10:01 | |
Or is that just something we're anticipating it as well? Would we have to put RDA directed? | 00:10:05 | |
Because it's going to have to come back to the RDA budget. | 00:10:11 | |
To answer the question about the warranty and lights, so we're doing the after that excuse me, the transportation Master plan | 00:10:15 | |
which is which is reviewing all our Dr. sessions being 400 N and mill roads. We're not doing an individual traffic warrant study | 00:10:21 | |
for that. We're going to, we're corporate as part of our workout transportation master plan. | 00:10:28 | |
So the Transportation Master Plan will provide us the kind of the direction of what specific improvements would enhance that | 00:10:34 | |
particular intersection. So that plan will. | 00:10:40 | |
Is that enough? So if that plan shows that it will show if it needs it now? | 00:10:46 | |
Yes. So the so that translation Master plan will along with that there's going to be capital facilities plan which will outline | 00:10:51 | |
the projects to be done and when, when those projects should be prioritized. So that'll determine, yes, that this is needed now. | 00:10:59 | |
Or LB or may say you know this I need now but it'll be it'll be anticipated in the near future based on the development that's | 00:11:07 | |
going on. | 00:11:11 | |
Yes. So the capital facilities plan is a little outline of the 10 years throughout the 10, it will go out 10 years. | 00:11:19 | |
I don't know. It's like these are the projects that you're going to need to do within the next 10 years. Typically what we do is | 00:11:28 | |
we approve the next five years. | 00:11:31 | |
Because that's and then. | 00:11:34 | |
We it's reviewed and then so because if you're six through 10. | 00:11:38 | |
You know, can change and then we expect to review the capital facilities plan on a yearly basis to determine what's really being | 00:11:42 | |
needed, what's not being used. | 00:11:47 | |
So OK, I'm just cur. | 00:11:53 | |
Is there sense of? | 00:11:56 | |
That it's going to need to stop, like sooner or later, my spice sensor says. | 00:11:59 | |
Spice. | 00:12:06 | |
OK. | 00:12:09 | |
Great. If you do, you guys have any other questions or thoughts about it? | 00:12:12 | |
No. David, did you have anything else to add? | 00:12:15 | |
Nope, that was everything. OK, great. Then I just need a motion and I'm requesting that that little stipulation be added in. | 00:12:19 | |
Here I'll make a motion. | 00:12:28 | |
I move. We adopt Resolution 2023-05. | 00:12:30 | |
The Vineyard RDA Physical year 2023 AS 2024 budget as presented by staff with. | 00:12:34 | |
The changes. | 00:12:42 | |
About specifically the. | 00:12:44 | |
Mill Rd. crossings, yeah for the board directive enhancement design change. | 00:12:48 | |
2nd at first by ties, second by Marty, and then this is going to require a roll call from the board. | 00:12:55 | |
Tice yay Amber. Yay Marty. Yay Kristy. | 00:13:02 | |
Aye, awesome. I need a motion to adjourn. | 00:13:06 | |
So moved. That was a tie second. OK, first by tie, second by Marty. All in favor. Thank you all for coming tonight. | 00:13:09 | |
I was. | 00:13:26 |
* you need to log in to manage your favorites
* use Ctrl+F (Cmd+F on Mac) to search in document
Loading...
Loading...
726, we're going to start the Redevelopment Agency board meeting. | 00:00:00 | |
Still the 28th Wednesday, 2023. | 00:00:05 | |
And yeah, I said 726. | 00:00:09 | |
727, just in case I don't see the time. All right, let's go ahead. And I need a motion for this consent agenda. | 00:00:12 | |
Mayor, I move that we approve the consent items as presented. Thank you, Ties. I need a second. Second. Second by Amber. All in | 00:00:22 | |
favor. Aye. All right, that carried. We'll move on to our business items. We're going to go ahead and go into a public hearing. | 00:00:30 | |
This is the Amending The Vineyard RDA fiscal year 2022-2023, Budget amendment #2, resolution U2023-04. | 00:00:38 | |
All right. | 00:00:47 | |
Mostly to go into a public hearing by ties, a second by Amber. All in favor? Aye. All right, David, thank you. So this will be | 00:00:49 | |
very quick. We have just one item that we're recommending be added to the budget and it is for a change order for our water master | 00:00:56 | |
plan with Hanson Allen and Loose of $30,000. | 00:01:03 | |
Hey, any questions? | 00:01:14 | |
Not by the public, they. | 00:01:16 | |
All right. So let's go out of Republic hearing. Thank you, Tice in a second. | 00:01:21 | |
I need, did you guys say aye, I wanted it to say all right, it's great that carried. So we are ready for the board to speak. What | 00:01:29 | |
do you guys have to say about this? What does the change order entail? | 00:01:35 | |
Yeah. | 00:01:44 | |
For that, excuse me for the fact that when we do our water master plan, we had to revise our revise our draft final water match | 00:01:55 | |
plan to incorporate. | 00:02:00 | |
The changes for the HRTZ, There we go. | 00:02:06 | |
HTRTHT yeah if it says. | 00:02:11 | |
So that's how, you know, I always stayed in my head first, yes. Yeah, in order to address. | 00:02:15 | |
The change in that, so for us to be able to go back and account for the change of ERU types which we're still working with with | 00:02:22 | |
the developer as well As for our secondary corporate, secondary water into our water master plan which will allow us to be able | 00:02:28 | |
to. | 00:02:33 | |
Utilize allocate less culinary water per year, which would have a positive effect for the residents and developers down the road | 00:02:41 | |
as well. | 00:02:44 | |
Any other questions on that? No if that satisfies me, all right. | 00:02:51 | |
If there are no further questions, no further comments, we just need a motion. | 00:02:55 | |
Mayor, I move that we adopt the resolution. View 2/20/23 Dash 4, The Vineyard RDA Physical Year 2022 Dash 2023 Budget Amendment #2 | 00:03:00 | |
as presented by Senate. Thank you Tice. Can I get a second, Second, Second by Amber. This is the Bible call. | 00:03:11 | |
Amber, Aye, aye. Marty, aye. Christy. | 00:03:22 | |
OK, we'll go on to 3.2. This is the discussion and action of the final fiscal year 2023-2024 RDA budget resolution U2023-05. | 00:03:26 | |
After David. Thank you very much. | 00:03:38 | |
Yeah. So no changes from what's been presented in the last meeting with end of the budget. I just wanted to give another overview | 00:03:41 | |
of the capital projects that are being paid for or contributed from the RDA. Those include the Vineyard, Beach Improvement, Center | 00:03:47 | |
St. Overpass Landscaping, Vineyard Connector, Promenade, Overpass Mill Rd. pedestrian enhancements, design 400 N expansion and | 00:03:53 | |
redevelopment Design, Main St. pedestrian enhancements. | 00:03:59 | |
Mill Rd. Water Line Loop Parking Master plan, Economic development, Strategic plan, Rail spill removal and Anderson East and West | 00:04:06 | |
Side projects and the other portion of the fire Station project that the Capital Projects Fund is not covering. | 00:04:13 | |
Thank you, David. Could you just go over the mill Rd. design for me? | 00:04:20 | |
The costs and everything. | 00:04:24 | |
I mean, anybody who wants to go over it can, but the cost. | 00:04:26 | |
Ma'am, you're speaking to this degree about the Melrose Enhancements design. OK, so the Melrose Enhancement design is specifically | 00:04:33 | |
for. | 00:04:37 | |
The projects for pedestrian crossings going east and West along the road, specifically along where the yard, excuse me, Mill Road | 00:04:43 | |
and 400 N would be being on the where they are then? | 00:04:50 | |
At Watertown, homes are as well as along the corridor as well. So for example, what's the dollar amount on it? | 00:04:58 | |
And this was discussed during the town hall that we have. Yeah, I remember that. | 00:05:11 | |
And there's been meetings and task forces and people working on it. I just kind of want to understand the costs a little bit | 00:05:16 | |
better publicly. Dave is pulling that one up specifically. | 00:05:21 | |
Hmm. | 00:05:27 | |
As we're beating 75,000 is what we have in the budget. | 00:05:30 | |
So I don't know that if that item is something we've ever talked about as a council. | 00:05:33 | |
Yeah, I think it 1 experience I have with it is. | 00:05:38 | |
Understanding from like. | 00:05:42 | |
Commission's perspective, I hear from them. It's like and Planning Commission. | 00:05:45 | |
An area they always talk about how we want to change Mill Rd. Mill Rd. needs it's and I agree if you're a pedestrian or a or | 00:05:50 | |
you're bicycling along Mill Rd. I mean nobody's doing that and and it's a what size lanes to cross it so if you if you live on the | 00:05:56 | |
other street. | 00:06:01 | |
You. | 00:06:07 | |
West. | 00:06:09 | |
Of top go. | 00:06:10 | |
Just across that road, like people are not going to walk across that to go to top off if they're still going to get their car and | 00:06:12 | |
drive. | 00:06:15 | |
Because of the way that Rose is designed. And so is this in our ATP plan or is it more than that? So yes, So that crossing was an | 00:06:18 | |
ATP plan and it was prioritized somewhere in the top. | 00:06:24 | |
Five or ten, Yeah. Something it was. It was in there and. | 00:06:32 | |
The only time I guess we discussed it was in the ATP plan and the priorities. | 00:06:38 | |
Why? | 00:06:43 | |
I. | 00:06:47 | |
I've never discussed having that in here, and this is the first time. This is the first time we're discussing it, so. | 00:06:49 | |
That's all I know. I'm not saying this to advocate for it. I'm just thinking about it as you brought it up. Could we do something | 00:06:54 | |
where if we do approve this, that we just hold this for? | 00:06:58 | |
Spending on that project until we approve anything, I mean, we are going to have to approve it anyway, right? I just don't want it | 00:07:03 | |
to allocate funds for it necessarily unless we go through some kind of process where I might have like right now I feel like I'm | 00:07:08 | |
prioritizing it. | 00:07:13 | |
And it's my bad that I didn't catch it earlier, but I'm touching it now and I'm thinking I want to take time to just prioritize it | 00:07:19 | |
really quick and make sure I'm. | 00:07:24 | |
Really have my head wrapped around it. | 00:07:30 | |
How would we do that? | 00:07:33 | |
I mean, because we're going to have to go through it anyway, right? That's the process. It's just setting the money aside right | 00:07:34 | |
now and prioritizing it over the other things that we could be doing with it, right? | 00:07:39 | |
The kind of the idea was that we. | 00:07:45 | |
Do that as we design the 400 N as well, because the two really are. | 00:07:47 | |
Ventricle. | 00:07:54 | |
Mm-hmm. | 00:07:58 | |
That girl, That's what I'm trying to say, Yeah. So I mean, and we we we might be able to get a kind of a. | 00:07:59 | |
It's cheaper by having the two pull together. | 00:08:07 | |
And that's that's something that we we could look at if we have the same consultant do both projects. I wonder if just the next | 00:08:11 | |
meeting that we have if we could pull this on to. | 00:08:17 | |
Our agenda and have a broader discussion about it for me and then say. | 00:08:23 | |
Tentatively were like, I mean we're putting it here, but obviously it's not like we have to spend it or approve it, right. Yeah, | 00:08:29 | |
what you could do is if you wanted to just designate that 75,000 for roadway design improvements. | 00:08:36 | |
Then that just gives the broad. | 00:08:43 | |
If as things come up, this one might be a good opportunity if we pair it with the signal design as well, but if you just made the | 00:08:45 | |
category more broad, then it would give us the opportunity to. | 00:08:52 | |
Come to you guys when there's an opportunity to pair two different studies together or something like that. OK. The last time you | 00:08:59 | |
did, sorry, do you mind if I say something the last time you guys suggested when we wanted to hold on a project that we put it in | 00:09:03 | |
the like. | 00:09:07 | |
Council project or the RDA projects that we are looking towards, towards the future, Is there anything that we could isolate the | 00:09:12 | |
fence so that it doesn't go into the broader category and we could save it for a future project design? | 00:09:18 | |
Yeah. | 00:09:26 | |
Designated here? No, there was a placeholder. That's what we're looking for, so we could then go back to it and vet it. | 00:09:28 | |
Yeah. And what would be cool about doing that is that if we saw it and we thought, OK, we don't necessarily want to prioritize | 00:09:36 | |
that, but we're going to pick something from the ATP plan to do, we could. But if we see that it's really essential and we see | 00:09:41 | |
that 400 N and we're like, yeah, this is of course. | 00:09:47 | |
Why wouldn't we do this? We could go ahead and move forward. | 00:09:52 | |
I would feel more comfortable with that. | 00:09:55 | |
So I need to say like council directed roadway enhancement, you mentioned a light there. Are we getting close to that warranting a | 00:09:58 | |
light? | 00:10:01 | |
Or is that just something we're anticipating it as well? Would we have to put RDA directed? | 00:10:05 | |
Because it's going to have to come back to the RDA budget. | 00:10:11 | |
To answer the question about the warranty and lights, so we're doing the after that excuse me, the transportation Master plan | 00:10:15 | |
which is which is reviewing all our Dr. sessions being 400 N and mill roads. We're not doing an individual traffic warrant study | 00:10:21 | |
for that. We're going to, we're corporate as part of our workout transportation master plan. | 00:10:28 | |
So the Transportation Master Plan will provide us the kind of the direction of what specific improvements would enhance that | 00:10:34 | |
particular intersection. So that plan will. | 00:10:40 | |
Is that enough? So if that plan shows that it will show if it needs it now? | 00:10:46 | |
Yes. So the so that translation Master plan will along with that there's going to be capital facilities plan which will outline | 00:10:51 | |
the projects to be done and when, when those projects should be prioritized. So that'll determine, yes, that this is needed now. | 00:10:59 | |
Or LB or may say you know this I need now but it'll be it'll be anticipated in the near future based on the development that's | 00:11:07 | |
going on. | 00:11:11 | |
Yes. So the capital facilities plan is a little outline of the 10 years throughout the 10, it will go out 10 years. | 00:11:19 | |
I don't know. It's like these are the projects that you're going to need to do within the next 10 years. Typically what we do is | 00:11:28 | |
we approve the next five years. | 00:11:31 | |
Because that's and then. | 00:11:34 | |
We it's reviewed and then so because if you're six through 10. | 00:11:38 | |
You know, can change and then we expect to review the capital facilities plan on a yearly basis to determine what's really being | 00:11:42 | |
needed, what's not being used. | 00:11:47 | |
So OK, I'm just cur. | 00:11:53 | |
Is there sense of? | 00:11:56 | |
That it's going to need to stop, like sooner or later, my spice sensor says. | 00:11:59 | |
Spice. | 00:12:06 | |
OK. | 00:12:09 | |
Great. If you do, you guys have any other questions or thoughts about it? | 00:12:12 | |
No. David, did you have anything else to add? | 00:12:15 | |
Nope, that was everything. OK, great. Then I just need a motion and I'm requesting that that little stipulation be added in. | 00:12:19 | |
Here I'll make a motion. | 00:12:28 | |
I move. We adopt Resolution 2023-05. | 00:12:30 | |
The Vineyard RDA Physical year 2023 AS 2024 budget as presented by staff with. | 00:12:34 | |
The changes. | 00:12:42 | |
About specifically the. | 00:12:44 | |
Mill Rd. crossings, yeah for the board directive enhancement design change. | 00:12:48 | |
2nd at first by ties, second by Marty, and then this is going to require a roll call from the board. | 00:12:55 | |
Tice yay Amber. Yay Marty. Yay Kristy. | 00:13:02 | |
Aye, awesome. I need a motion to adjourn. | 00:13:06 | |
So moved. That was a tie second. OK, first by tie, second by Marty. All in favor. Thank you all for coming tonight. | 00:13:09 | |
I was. | 00:13:26 |